Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation United States Technology

Uber Resumes Testing Self-Driving Cars Nine Months After Deadly Crash (theverge.com) 32

Nine months after an Uber self-driving car struck and killed pedestrian Elaine Herzberg in Tempe, Arizona, Uber has decided that it's time to resume testing its self-driving cars on public roads. The company received a letter from Pennsylvania's Department of Transportation authorizing it to restart its program, although it will be massively scaled back from the one it had last year. The Verge reports: For the time being, Uber's self-driving Volvo SUVs will be confined to a one-mile loop around Pittsburgh's Strip District, where the company's Advanced Technologies Group (ATG) is headquartered. Only two vehicles are being tested for now, though more will be added. The cars won't exceed the posted speed limit of 25 mph, and will have two safety drivers in them at all times -- Uber calls them "mission specialists." For now, the cars aren't picking up any passengers. A spokesperson for Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto said since Uber has "accepted established state guidelines, demonstrated transparency, and conformed to our expectations in addressing the unique conditions of a complex urban environment, the city is satisfied that self-driving testing operations by Uber will not introduce an increased level of safety risk in Pittsburgh," the spokesperson said.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Uber Resumes Testing Self-Driving Cars Nine Months After Deadly Crash

Comments Filter:
  • Wow, these "self-driving" cars will have TWO drivers in them. Thats gotta be a new record. I love AI and autonomous driving.
  • is that like having 2 collision avoidance systems, Uber's and Volvo's, and not disabling Volvo's system, instead of solely relying on Ubers beta product to not run someone over?
            https://www.autonews.com/artic... [autonews.com]

  • by Anonymous Coward

    $100 million? $150 million?

  • Well of course. They're replaced both the car and the person they killed. Damaged mitigated; it's all good now.
  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Thursday December 20, 2018 @09:13PM (#57839828)

    Chief: Max, we had a safety driver in the car and still hit a pedestrian.

    Max: Here’s an idea, Chief. How about we have TWO safety drivers? That way if one’s distracted, the other can take over!

    Chief: Max, what if they both get distracted?

    Max: (pause) Okay... how about THREE safety drivers, Chief?

    (the Chief remains unconvinced, and the discussion continues)

    .
    .
    .

    Chief (later that evening, during the test): I don’t know, Larabee. I’m worried. Maybe I should’ve went with Max’s plan.

    Larabee: What plan was that, Chief?

    Chief: The one with 99 safety drivers.

  • Now corporations own the streets and, oh, the right to conduct a homicide. Wonderful, part of making America great again!
    • by liquid_schwartz ( 530085 ) on Thursday December 20, 2018 @10:24PM (#57840024)

      Now corporations own the streets and, oh, the right to conduct a homicide. Wonderful, part of making America great again!

      Roughly 3000 people die *every month* currently. We can improve on that and should keep trying to. Learn from mistakes yes but keep trying.

      • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *

        Roughly 3000 people die *every month* currently. We can improve on that and should keep trying to.

        Next month let's go for 3500!

      • Ok but these companies should explain exactly how the improvement is going to happen because right now they are nowhere close.
  • This is textbook distributed responsibility. The likelihood of any agent acting to address a problem is inversely proportional to the number of agents who are responsible for a problem.

  • I hate to defend Uber, but I really feel like they carry a very small part of the blame in this. Sure, there was a memo about the automated cars hitting things, but isn't that exactly the problem they're trying to fix? They're putting their cars through real-world tests to improve that, with human operators present in case the automated system fails.

    Isn't this the same thing we do with airplanes? Autopilot automates much of the flight, with a couple pilots present in case the automated system fails. On thos

"The vast majority of successful major crimes against property are perpetrated by individuals abusing positions of trust." -- Lawrence Dalzell

Working...