Samsung Is Ditching Plastic Packaging In Favor of More Sustainable Materials (theverge.com) 63
In a press release, Samsung said that it will be replacing plastic packaging with "environmentally sustainable elements" beginning this year. The Verge reports: The company announced today that it will replace the plastic used in phones, tablets and wearables for molds and accessory bags made with "eco-friendly materials." The company also says that it will also change the design for its phone chargers to reduce the use of plastics, "swapping the glossy exterior with a matte finish." The company will also replace plastic bags used to protect its air conditioners, refrigerators, TVs, and washing machines with recycled materials and bioplastics that come from non-fossil fuel sources. Finally, the company will begin using paper that's been certified by "global environmental organizations" in its manuals by next year.
Gyeong-bin Jeon the head of Samsung's Global Customer Satisfaction Center, says that the company is working to address "society's environmental issues such as resource depletion and plastic wastes," and that it wants to minimize the waste that it produces. In making the shift, Samsung pledges to use 500 thousand tons of recycled plastics and to collect 7.5 tons of discarded products by 2030.
Gyeong-bin Jeon the head of Samsung's Global Customer Satisfaction Center, says that the company is working to address "society's environmental issues such as resource depletion and plastic wastes," and that it wants to minimize the waste that it produces. In making the shift, Samsung pledges to use 500 thousand tons of recycled plastics and to collect 7.5 tons of discarded products by 2030.
What about the package contents? (Score:1)
How eco-friendly is the production of integrated circuits and circuit boards? Wouldn't it be better to make products that last longer? Phones, tablets and televisions with software that can be updated? "The year of Linux on the desktop" is kind of here, but not in the form that I would have wanted. They just turned free software into proprietary building blocks.
Re: (Score:1)
lol. That's not what the end consumer sees! They see plastic in the packaging and they freak out (the kooky ones, anyways). "OMG! Why don't they use paper to deliver their product?"
Re: (Score:3)
My note four came fully packaged in paper and cardboard, with a plastic bag containing the headphones and a plastic sheet covering the each of phone and battery.
I remember being impressed at how eco friendly that was, in early 2015.
Re:What about the package contents? (Score:5, Informative)
Fun part is, the current massive uptick in fairly high end cardboard production is in large part due to this trend spinning up. You can't deliver the product packaging in old school brown cardboard, it has to be shiny, with specific texture and that can survive rigours of weeks of oceanic travel without plastic packaging over the cardboard protecting it.
I've even seen a recent news story on paper cups now starting to be made from cardboard only. For those who don't know, current paper cups have thin plastic lining inside because otherwise, seams leak when faced with hot or corrosive liquids. Apparently latest technology allows to make paper cups that can make seams that can take the temperature and even things like mild alcohol for a few hours before starting to leak.
Environmentally friendly technology is popping up in fairly surprising places nowadays, and that's a great thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Corrosive doesn't mean instant death. Things are corrosive at different levels. Did you know Cocacola used to contain phosphoric acid? Nowadays fruit juice is quite nasty. That wonderful caffeinated substance that has both bitter and sweet notes in it's flavour? Well those bitter notes are acidic and in combination with the water corrosive.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
EU actually regulated some of the materials involved in production of electronics some time ago in terms of heavy metals and some other things iirc. It resulted in quite a few changes, some of which were good (less of certain toxic materials) and some of which were bad (less durable hardware).
These are really hard things to get done right, both because of modern form of profit motive being exceedingly short term and because planned (and often enforced) obsolescence is critical for revenue in many areas of e
Re:What about the package contents? (Score:5, Interesting)
The whiskers on tin are naturally occurring I think that is why manufacturers didn't fight it any. It helped their planned obsolescence and gave them the backing they needed to say there was nothing they could do about it. Just my thoughts on it.
https://www.maximintegrated.co... [maximintegrated.com]
^^ Included article on tin whiskers. was going to load the one directly from nasa.. but the page wont respond.
Re: (Score:2)
Many companies do deal with it. Some products with electronics have to last for a few decades. But those aren't for consumers, I think consumers take the brunt of the planned obscolesence plague.
Whiskers (Score:2)
No lead in solder still means that within 3 years electronics will become less reliable due to temporary shorts (they burn out quickly) from something called tin-whiskers.
No it definitely does not provided the electronics are properly engineered. ROHS [wikipedia.org] has been in effect since 2006 and most components and assemblies these days are ROHS compliant. There were fears of tin whiskers being a big problem and they have been in select products from time to time. But in actual fact they have proven to not be a particularly significant issue for most products. Leaded solder is not the only way to control them. Coatings and plating as well as product design all can mitigate the pro
ROHS (Score:3)
EU actually regulated some of the materials involved in production of electronics some time ago in terms of heavy metals and some other things iirc. It resulted in quite a few changes, some of which were good (less of certain toxic materials) and some of which were bad (less durable hardware).
The regulations you are referring to are ROHS [wikipedia.org] and they are a good thing. It required changing some product designs but when engineered properly (which most things have been) the evidence seems to show [wikipedia.org] it does not result in less durable hardware. Tin whiskers were a concern but there appears to have been no significant increase in problems since the regulations went into effect 12 years ago. Most electronic components these days are ROHS compliant because it's easier to just go all ROHS than to try to jug
Separate discussion (Score:2)
How eco-friendly is the production of integrated circuits and circuit boards?
Not very but also not relevant. They are going to sell products and those products need packaging. It's a sunk cost [wikipedia.org] in a sense. It makes sense to make the packaging as eco-friendly as they can given they are going to be packaging something. Cleaning up the board manufacturing is an important but separate discussion. It's always irritated me how much unnecessary packaging products have these days so efforts to reduce the impact (and cost) of packaging should be applauded.
Wouldn't it be better to make products that last longer?
From Samsung's perspective the
Re: (Score:2)
Phones, tablets and televisions with software that can be updated?
They already have this.
The issue is not that the devices are technologically incapable of software updates. As sold, most phones get updates when their OEM says so, which causes issues on both fronts. For the bleeding edge crowd, the Google->OEM->carrier->end user run takes too long. In many cases, phones less than a year old end up not getting new OS updates, which bothers that crowd.
On the other hand, the "don't move my cheese" crowd isn't a fan of when those updates come because it invariably changes the procedure of
Re: (Score:2)
First thought that came to me as well when reading the headline.
Let's stop with the glued in batteries and make cell phones that can have their batteries replaced without resorting to a lab. And, allow the latest version on Android to be flashed without a lot of hurtles? Let the consumer decided if performance is at a point where the phone needs to be replaced.
Oh yeah, they want me to spend $1000 or more on a new phone every 18 months.
Re: (Score:1)
Let the consumer decided if performance is at a point where the phone needs to be replaced.
They did. Samsung sells what the consumer wants. That is why they are as big as they are. You and I might not agree but there is a reason why there isn't a huge selling Librem 6 Eco-friendly phone.
Titanium would be good (Score:1)
That stuff lasts a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Unobtainium would be better, but the damn stuff is near unobtainable.
Tell me more... (Score:3, Funny)
I mean, I might be willing to pay "Greater than iDevice prices" if they used the right packaging.
Take for example, if they made the packaging out of the tanned hides of plutocratic executives. I would pay top dollar for a phone wallet sewn from Mark Zuckerburg's pasty white skin. If I cant get it in that fashion, I would settle for Larry Ellison, or Brian Roberts, but that last one is pushing it. If you can somehow swing regulators, I would be willing to pay double for an Ajit Pai packaging.
Now, to be sure they arent pulling a fast one, I need some DNA evidence to validate the packaging's origins. We can't have them using some 3rd world country as a resource to defraud the public, after all.
Re: (Score:2)
I would pay top dollar for a phone wallet sewn from Mark Zuckerburg's pasty white skin.
They can grow skin in vats now. The technology was developed to grow skin for burns victims, but if you can get a small sample of Zuckerburg's skin, you could soon be growing enough for thousands of wallets that pass a DNA test.
Re: (Score:2)
but it wont have hair. Follicular units are fastidiously difficult things to grow in vitro.
No no, I will only settle for the company installing skin stretching balloons into the Facebook founder's fat bulbous body, to stretch it to epic proportions for skin harvesting. After all, he's already well compensated for his value to the company, and profits over all, right? Think of how much money Facebook could make by offering such a partnership!
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, I might be willing to pay "Greater than iDevice prices" if they used the right packaging.
Samsung is a huge company which also makes things like washers, dryers, and refrigerators. From what I've seen (and we've been looking at refrigerators lately), their pricing in these other product categories is already well above the median.
Like Apple, Samsung can probably afford to put money into more eco-friendly packaging options without too significantly hurting their bottom line.
Re: Tell me more... (Score:2)
When some rigidity is needed, cardboard or even wood.
I can just see it now ... your new iPhone arrives in a wooden create, along with a complimentary iCrowbar to help with the unboxing ...
Re: (Score:1)
I can just see it now ... your new iPhone arrives in a wooden create, along with a complimentary iCrowbar to help with the unboxing ...
Actually the iCrowbar will be $49.99 extra. And if you use a non-iCrowbar to open the package your warranty will be void.You'll also need a different iCrowbar for Mac, iPhone, iPad, and the Apple Watch packaging. I guess that accessories will use the same one. I'm not sure about software packaging, that may need its own iCrowbar. But one iCrowbar will only be able to open 3 packages. And of course the end of the iCrowbar will change periodically. So an iCrowbar that works on and iPhone X, may work on a XS,
Re: (Score:2)
You could build a political movement around this, one with all sorts of cool branding and stirring rallies.
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, it's kinda hard to make a political campaign around a demand-side trend for genuine executive leather from real executives. Many in wallstreet would paint it the same way they painted Occupy, and some might even suggest that there are shades of nazi-ism, what with the demand for human skin being made into leather objects.
Personally, I think it's just a good way to tell the executive culture that the 99% is tired of giving in to the demands for pounds of flesh, and wants some given back in return.
Mr. Lecter ... (Score:2)
I mean, I might be willing to pay "Greater than iDevice prices" if they used the right packaging.
Take for example, if they made the packaging out of the tanned hides of plutocratic executives. I would pay top dollar for a phone wallet sewn from Mark Zuckerburg's pasty white skin. If I cant get it in that fashion, I would settle for Larry Ellison, or Brian Roberts, but that last one is pushing it. If you can somehow swing regulators, I would be willing to pay double for an Ajit Pai packaging.
Now, to be sure they arent pulling a fast one, I need some DNA evidence to validate the packaging's origins. We can't have them using some 3rd world country as a resource to defraud the public, after all.
Oh, my. Did you forget to take your medicine again Mr. Lecter?
Re: (Score:2)
I would pay top dollar for a set of scissors not packaged in a plastic container which requires scissors to cut open.
Re: (Score:3)
They break down faster to sustain Samsung's business model of selling you another phone next year.
Re: (Score:2)
This assumes that the energy to run the AC unit comes from fossil fuels, which might not be the case.
There's an increase in talk about new nuclear deployments, and renewable power generation is a booming industry.
Re: (Score:2)
"There's an increase in talk about new nuclear deployments,"
Get ready to watch hundreds of millions of taxpayer money burned in feasibility studies which enrich the usual suspects but produce no reactors. Nuclear is economically a non-starter. Like coal, it is being killed by cost.
In other words (Score:2)
Plastic is getting expensive.
I once received a waterproof watch which was shipped in a container of water.
If Samsung could create packaging that contained canvas shopping bags, it would be good. Organic stuff like paper is just one more carbon dump I'll recycle or burn in the backyard.
Re:In other words (Score:4, Informative)
Or more like plastic is not as recyclable. It's stupidly cheap to produce (and oil prices are quite low at the moment, as well). In fact, it's so cheap that recycling plastic is uneconomical, and it lasts basically forever. And unfortunately, most tossed plastic unless landfilled tend to end up in the ocean.
Paper can be composted, recycled, or disposed of in many ways. Even if you threw it in the garbage, it'll be broken down within a year or so. And if it reaches the ocean, it'll decompose even faster.
But beside the box, would the the plastic bags inside, which is unrecyclable in most recycling programs because it jams the machines. It's so bad that many recycling centers will simply landfill plastic bags and their contents when encountered in the recycling stream.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just a matter of cost. There are basically two types of plastics - thermoplasts and thermosets.
Re: (Score:2)
I once received a waterproof watch which was shipped in a container of water
This reminds me of a guy who was sent a Thermos King thermos to do a review of. They literally brewed him some fresh coffee and sent it to him overnight for the review.
Read: (Score:1)
We found something even cheaper than plastic to house our crap, but it's also even more crappy. So we have to spin something to sell it.
Re: (Score:3)
It's going to make a difference of 7.5 tons, which is 7.5 more tons than zero.
Re: 7.5 tons (Score:2)
You're a goddamn mathemagician!
Styrofoam Peanuts (Score:2)
I used to buy loose-leaf tea online fairly regularly from a place that would use styrofoam peanuts to pack their orders. They didn't need to as it was unbreakable and they used boxes that were just about full for the order. I would write in the comments not to use the styrofoam peanuts but they continued to do so.
So I wrote to the company and asked them to stop. They replied that it was okay to use them because they were made from a "bio" source and not fossil fuels. In response I said it didn't matter what
Its devices are still explosive (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)