One Year After Trump's Foxconn Groundbreaking, There is Almost Nothing To Show For It (washingtonpost.com) 192
Josh Dzieza, reporting for The Verge: It's been exactly one year since President Trump pushed a golden shovel into a field in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, breaking ground on a planned Foxconn factory he called "the eighth wonder of the world." "This is one of the great deals, ever," he said at the ceremony. The proposed facility would employ more than 13,000 Wisconsin workers and manufacture high-resolution LCD screens. And it would be huge, he said. "Think of it: more than 20 million feet, and that's probably going to be a minimal number," he claimed. The factory, Trump said, was evidence he was bringing manufacturing back to the United States, "restoring America's industrial might."
But Foxconn's plans were already shrinking. When then-Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker wooed the company to the state with a subsidy package that came to total $4.5 billion, Foxconn had agreed to build a "Generation 10.5" facility that manufactured 75-inch LCD screens. But days before Trump's groundbreaking, the company acknowledged it would build a much smaller "Gen6" LCD factory, a type that makes smaller screens and requires far fewer workers. It would be the first of many changes. The last year has seen the factory shrink, get canceled, reappear, and undergo other shifts chronicled below. Even now, as concrete is finally being poured, it's unclear what exactly Foxconn is building in Mount Pleasant. Industry experts shown Foxconn's building plans say it does not appear to even be the scaled-down Gen6 LCD factory. If the last year is any guide, the whipsawing is far from over.
But Foxconn's plans were already shrinking. When then-Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker wooed the company to the state with a subsidy package that came to total $4.5 billion, Foxconn had agreed to build a "Generation 10.5" facility that manufactured 75-inch LCD screens. But days before Trump's groundbreaking, the company acknowledged it would build a much smaller "Gen6" LCD factory, a type that makes smaller screens and requires far fewer workers. It would be the first of many changes. The last year has seen the factory shrink, get canceled, reappear, and undergo other shifts chronicled below. Even now, as concrete is finally being poured, it's unclear what exactly Foxconn is building in Mount Pleasant. Industry experts shown Foxconn's building plans say it does not appear to even be the scaled-down Gen6 LCD factory. If the last year is any guide, the whipsawing is far from over.
Has anyone figured out what the scam is yet? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Foxconn did the same thing in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. They promised a new plant that would hire 500 local residents. The governor boasted about the deal and the company got a property tax break. The mayor was on site with company officials in 2013 for the ribbon cutting and six years later it is still an empty lot.
Foxconn does this all over the world (Brazil, India, Vietnam, Indonesia), they promise billions of dollars in new facilities, get tax breaks, and never deliver.
The boy that cried wolf.
But what does Foxconn get out of it? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Its lobbying - at a bizarre scale - but nothing more. Foxconn is stringing Trump along in hopes he doesn't take stronger trade action against China. He is so enamored with them because he believes (or his supporters believe) this over the top plan. How much is that worth? At this point most of Foxconn's business (Apple) has been exempted from new US tariffs. If that changes potentially billions of dollars of ANNUAL revenue are at risk.
So far Foxconn has probably put $100 million into the project. L
Re: (Score:1)
To add on, Foxconn doesn't care if it ever makes a dime from this project or ever gets a single tax break. Its just a balance between the cost of their minimal "investment" and the utility of having the president in love with you.
Re: (Score:2)
Foxconn is stringing Trump along in hopes he doesn't take stronger trade action against China.
If Foxconn also did this in Pennsylvania back in 2013, as well as in other countries (Brazil, India, Vietnam, Indonesia), then what evidence is there that Foxconn did this because of Trump's tariffs?
Re: (Score:2)
Scam 1: seizing land by eminent domain. Scam 2: feed the flow of lies to the drooling deporables. Scam 3: <fill in here, maybe paid public money to friends for services related to scams 1 and 2?>
Re: (Score:1)
Scam 2: feed the flow of lies to the drooling deporables
Ahh yes, there's that liberal "tolerance" that got Trump elected. Well done!
Re:Has anyone figured out what the scam is yet? (Score:5, Insightful)
Scam 2: feed the flow of lies to the drooling deporables
Ahh yes, there's that liberal "tolerance" that got Trump elected. Well done!
It has nothing to do with being a liberal. I'm a conservative, and I voted Republican my entire life until 2016. That's when "selling out conservative principles, and selling out our country while we're at it" became the all-consuming rallying cry of the Republican Party.
Trump is evil. The Republican Party is evil. At this point, anyone who is a Republican, supports Republicans, or supports Trump is a deplorable person.
Period. End of story. Sorry if it hurts your feelings, but this isn't a safe space, dickhead.
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry if it hurts your feelings, but this isn't a safe space, dickhead.
Does it make you feel like a big man to call people names? Actually it doesn't hurt my feelings at all. I didn't vote for Trump last time and I won't this time, but the "drooling deplorables" you're referring to are the good people of Wisconsin on both sides of the political aisle who got screwed out of a LOT of jobs by this shady company. How does that make them drooling deplorables?
Re: (Score:2)
Does it make you feel like a big man to call people names? Actually it doesn't hurt my feelings at all. I didn't vote for Trump last time and I won't this time, but the "drooling deplorables" you're referring to are the good people of Wisconsin on both sides of the political aisle who got screwed out of a LOT of jobs by this shady company. How does that make them drooling deplorables?
I'm really not interested in "both sides of the political aisle". There are decent political servants who are conservative, and decent political servants who are liberal. I'd take either one of those over what we have today. Hell, I'd take a pile of dog shit over what we have today.
Politicians either work for the good of the people, or they don't. I'm a conservative, which means that I think before I take action. Other people are liberal, which means that they take action and don't think. Usually, that me
Re: (Score:1)
this ignorant 30% of the country has been duped by propaganda
So what is to be done about that?
Re: Has anyone figured out what the scam is yet? (Score:1)
You are a lying sack of shit, not a former Republican. It's just as likely that you're a Russian imposter.
Re: (Score:1)
You are a lying sack of shit, not a former Republican. It's just as likely that you're a Russian imposter.
Hard to believe in a conversation like this, that neither one of us is posting as Anonymous Coward. That is such a nice change for this site; perhaps they should try it more.
However, before calling me a "lying sack of shit", maybe a little bit of Google would have saved you the embarrassment of being so obviously wrong. I've worked Republican campaigns, starting as a teenager. I have (until recently) generally voted almost straight line Republican, not because I was a blind partisan, but because I look fo
Re: (Score:1)
Hillary worked Republican campaigns as a teenager.
Re: (Score:2)
I am not what you would call a conservative, and yet I find many of your points interesting. However:
I'm a conservative, which means that I think before I take action. Other people are liberal, which means that they take action and don't think. Usually, that means that I'm right and they're wrong.
I don't see much evidence of thinking before you "took action" with this statement.
Broadly speaking, conservatives tend to resist change, and liberals tend to embrace it. That does not mean that liberals are impulsive by definition.
Re: (Score:2)
And to answer your question, no it does not make me feel like a big man to call people names.
Actually, that question was rhetorical. I put it in there simply because you called me a dickhead. My main question was "how does getting duped by a shady company make the people of Wisconsin drooling deplorables? You said a lot but I didn't actually see an answer to that.
Re: (Score:1)
Trump is evil. The Republican Party is evil. At this point, anyone who is a Republican, supports Republicans, or supports Trump is a deplorable person.
Period. End of story.
That's not how opinions work, and your level of emotional vigor is not a measure of validity.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump is evil. The Republican Party is evil. At this point, anyone who is a Republican, supports Republicans, or supports Trump is a deplorable person.
Entirely true, but that's not the point, not as long as voters believe the alternative is worse. "Trump is bad" is a statement of fact, but by itself it's not a persuasive argument.
And the Christians (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Trump is evil. The Republican Party is evil. At this point, anyone who is a Republican, supports Republicans, or supports Trump is a deplorable person.
It is good that you can identify evil sometimes. Now look around you and see if you can spot any more evil. If you can't, then you have a mental issue. Voting Democrat is not a cure to voting Republican.
Wrong article? (Score:4, Funny)
Now we're not even linking to the right article?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, which would you rather read about - the "nerdiest presidential candidate ever", or some stupid factory?
Re: (Score:2)
That's been a recurring problem lately. What's more distressing is that none of the earlier commenters seemed to notice, because reading the FA before holding forth is so old school. Yeah, I've caught myself doing that, too, because attention span and urgency to have an early word on the topic.
Correct is https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/28/18760240/foxconn-donald-trump-results-wisconsin-factory-progress-results
don't say nothing was accomplished... (Score:1)
The resulting fiasco and con was blown, and it got Scott Walker unelected.
That's progress!!
DNC 2020 is going really crush Trump on this! (Score:1)
DNC 2020 is going really crush Trump on this!
Re: (Score:2)
DNC 2020 is going really crush Trump on this!
I know, right? Just like Hillary was a shoe in, in 2016.
Your party's predictive powers are astounding!
Re: DNC 2020 is going really crush Trump on this! (Score:1)
DNC 2020 is too busy trying to finance free for all health care and college.
Who didn't see this coming? (Score:1)
Seriously? Foxconn is known for this sort of thing, and it makes the second syllable of their name all the more fitting. Before they even had a verbal agreement, you knew Foxconn was just looking to milk the state and federal governments for everything they can get. Then they'll move on to another state and pull the same scam, swearing up and down that this time things are different. Sadly, there will be plenty of people in that new state salivating at the chance to do a deal with them because of the headli
Actually, there's a LOT of road work (Score:3)
going on in the area, and we've had some spectacular, Mad Max worthy wrecks in the last couple weeks.
I live 2 miles from the Foxconn site. The tax assessor has decided that my property value went up by 10% in the last year, so naturally, my taxes will, too. Someone has to pay for the breaks that that idiot Walker and his GOP cronies gave to Foxconn.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Taxation pays for civilization.
Re: (Score:1)
Taxation pays for civilization.
Taxation also paid for the gas chambers in Germany in the late 1930s and early 1940s.
Foxconn Lied? (Score:2)
Trump wants credit not blame but deserves neither (Score:4, Insightful)
The only way to bring a significant amount of manufacturing back to the US is to make it cost competitive to do so. That means that the well paying blue collar jobs that we used to associate with manufacturing in the States won't come back even if factories do. The factories will be highly automated, will have a few high paid staff, but most of the rest will be cheap non-union labor, - until those jobs are automated away.
That's just reality. A successful manufacturing company is all about producing more while spending less. The jobs and the factories tend to go where the labor is the cheapest, - or even better, where they can eliminate most of the labor costs altogether.
There are jobs in the trades that still pay pretty well, - plumbers and electricians, so there's some money to be made in building and maintaining the factories.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump's tariffs fucked it up. It's all very well having a factory in the US, but when half the components are supplied from China and suddenly getting hit with tariffs and non-tariff overheads, it makes a lot less sense.
wtf, still no article link? (Score:3)
The actual article:
https://www.theverge.com/2019/... [theverge.com]
It is not an ALL OR NOTHING proposition. (Score:2)
Point all fingers at Foxconn (Score:3)
Why the need for such biased reporting ? Foxconn pledged to build this facility, the state of WI offered incentives, and Trump hyped it or pointed it out about jobs being created. Who cares who was president at the time - Obama would have done the same, Bush would have too, and so on. Unless the state or local gov't is causing delays, this is all on Foxconn.
Wrong link (Score:1)
New /. poll (Score:2)
Orange Man Bad?
- Yes
- Hell Yes
- Hillary is my president!
I Saw A Factory... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
More info about that "factory" you saw here: https://urbanmilwaukee.com/201... [urbanmilwaukee.com]
They're waiting for ... (Score:2)
... the outcome of the 2020 election.
Scooter is a motherfucker (Score:2)
Re: Scooter is a motherfucker (Score:1)
He wasn't all bad. He drove stakes in the hearts of some union bosses. Granted nobody can fight the machine indefinitely.
Foxconn factory is a Con. (Score:2)
Just like Trump.
Trump had to go get orders from his boss this week; did you see them joking about the election?
Jimmy Carter, bless his heart, is finally right on one thing: Trump is an Illegitimate President.
Russia stole it, using the vast number of idiots here that will believe anything.
They own an interest in the companies that make the voting machines, so there won't be any tracks to find where that changed the votes.
Get used to being a dictatorship, America. :)
/. was better before the politics (Score:2, Insightful)
/. was better before this constant emphasis on pushing left wing politics.
I wish /. would go back to reporting about stuff like Linux, programming, and sci-fi.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:/. was better before the politics (Score:4, Interesting)
I suspect /. would collapse if AC's were suddenly banned, so I expect it to remain the status quo, along with GNAA posts, swastika ascii and the APK/Superkendall appreciation society.
I beg to differ for the exact same reasons you stated. The Kendall crap was getting super old at hyperfast rates about a year ago. I don't know if whoever had a python script or what not, but browsing at anything below 1 made it near impossible to read Slashdot comments. If they banned ACs outright, I sure as heck wouldn't miss it. But that just my take, YMMV.
Re: (Score:1)
How's the weather in Volgograd today?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
How is news about tech company and technology construction not in line with /.? I've been following slashdot since 2005 and never in that time have I seen them not post articles about things like this. What, reporting relevant news stories is somehow "pushing left wing politics"
When I was a teen and discovered this site I thought the comments were interesting and informative. These days, it's like it's all comments by super narrow minded, shallow thinking folks who barely understand the surface of an issue
Re: (Score:2)
This comment is spot on.
Re:/. was better before the politics (Score:5, Insightful)
Please, I've been on Slashdot for almost 20 years and it was always political. If there's a left-wing slant now then it's a welcome change from the old right-wing juvenile libertarian idiocy.
Re:/. was better before the politics (Score:5, Informative)
it was always political
I second that, I've not known a period when this place wasn't political. If there was a point in time as such, it definitely was before I signed up.
Secondly, I'm not sure how Foxconn lagging on their delivery of manufacturing is left or right wing political? Foxconn had shitty reasons to get in US manufacturing and the dragging their feet is completely unsurprising. Clinton could be in office right now and I'm willing to bet a big fat BLT sandwich the story would be exactly the same. If you must make this some sort of hit piece to fill whatever cynical leaning you might have, let it be a smear on Scott Walker, dude is the one who pieced together the rag-tag deal that was crap when the ink was still wet on the contract.
Re: (Score:2)
I second that, I've not known a period when this place wasn't political. If there was a point in time as such, it definitely was before I signed up.
This is my second account. I have been here for a very long time. Something has been changing here. There is a LOT more social programming going on than there used to be. It is planned and orchestrated and it is foul.
Slashdot used to be random. There were lots of voices giving rise to all sorts of ideas. Now, there are still voices, but they are under the heavy pressure of social programming now, so they are virtually unheard.
Stories used to be published because they were interesting. Now, stories are publi
Re: /. was better before the politics (Score:4, Insightful)
Compared to the Trump shills, I miss the libertarians. At least they attempted to make intellectual arguments. The new right wingers are like a volunteer army for the Ministry of Truth. Trolling has become a political movement.
Re: (Score:1)
Compared to the Trump shills, I miss the libertarians.
Libertarians are just liberals or conservatives with a lack of life experience.
Eventually you reach a point in your life where you're pretty happy with the way things are and don't want anyone fucking with it, or you feel life totally didn't give you a fare shake and you want the fuckers who yanked up the ladder to pay.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Facts and truth are not partisan.
For as long as I can remember, Slashdot has been more than happy to call out politicians from any party, when they do something that runs contrary to typical tech/geek philosophies. They've just been doing a lot more of it lately, because the modern Republican party has been partying like it's 1899.
Re: (Score:1)
IDK I understood it just perfectly. I must also be a weirdo.
Re: /. was better before the politics (Score:1)
Foxconn is a Taiwanese company. They have a lot of manucacturing in China, but they are headquartered in Taiwan.
Re: (Score:1)
Nobody cares as much what neocons like Bill and Hillary think anymore.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
He definitely tried. Just not creating jobs, what he tried was giving the appearance of creating jobs. Trump is a showman, not a doer or a problem-solver.
Re:whatever (Score:5, Interesting)
Trump did the same thing when he tried to give the appearance that Apple was going to create hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs by building 3 manufacturing plants in the U.S [wsj.com].
Turns out that's not going to happen. As a matter of fact, Apple just confirmed today that they're going to be moving Mac Pro manufacturing out of the U.S. to China [wsj.com].
Re: (Score:2)
That's not even mentioning that US tax revenue is down because of the tax cuts [thebalance.com], thus meaning that the Federal deficit is climbing at an even faster rate. [fortune.com] The notion that tax cuts pay for themselves is a silly idea, you'd think we would have learned that back in Reagan.
Re: (Score:2)
And I'm sure he's still touting those same jobs as if they did materialize. A showman and a liar - and an all around 'great' guy.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, to be fair, Trump does create a war, fuzzy feeling in his followers. They are not capable of doing any actual analysis of what he does so they never notice they are being conned. Hence, he is not completely useless at least to some people. Of course, to the rest he is worse than useless.
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
The rate of job growth did slow once Trump took office (compared with the previous US President), but the numbers aren't too bad ...
https://www.statista.com/chart... [statista.com]
I suppose that, if you were looking for a stunning conclusion, you could say: "Trump did not immediately mess up the economy."
The problem with people who consume right wing propaganda is that they tend to believe the propaganda, and distrust the actual facts. You do not di
Re: (Score:3)
The propaganda however seems to be "a single person is all it takes to affect the world economy" and that idea has been pushed so many times in the past that I'm surprised that people still fall for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Most people fall for exactly the same lies time and again. And it is not even that they are not intelligent, they just chose to not use that intelligence and instead go with their fantasies.
Re:whatever (Score:5, Insightful)
Unseemly is you sycophants apologizing for Trump's fuck-ups.
Trump didn't try anything. He talked up a project because it made him look good, and had zero ownership when it fell through. A failure of leadership that shows poorly on the people that continue to cheer him on when he's clearly harmfully incompetent.
This means you.
Re: (Score:1)
Unseemly is you sycophants apologizing for Trump's fuck-ups.
Trump didn't try anything. He talked up a project because it made him look good, and had zero ownership when it fell through. A failure of leadership that shows poorly on the people that continue to cheer him on when he's clearly harmfully incompetent.
This means you.
+1
Re: (Score:1)
VOTE TRUMP!!
Re:whatever (Score:5, Informative)
8 years of 3% economic growth fixed by Trump in less than a year. Anyone who believes Trump is doing a bad job can't do math. So yeah, whatever.
GDP under Trump isn't better than it was under Obama
2010 = 2.6
2011 = 1.6
2012 = 2.2
2013 = 1.8
2014 = 2.5
2015 = 2.9
2016 = 1.6
2017 = 2.2
2018 = 2.9
https://www.statista.com/statistics/188165/annual-gdp-growth-of-the-united-states-since-1990/
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth-annual
Re: (Score:3)
1. He's replying to someone discussing "economic growth" with a series of numbers on GDP growth. I don't know what point you think you are making by informing everyone that GDP and GDP growth aren't the same thing, but he's discussing pertinent numbers.
2. You seem to have missed that Obama inherited an economy that was tanking following a global recession. *Of course* the average numbers are weaker than for Trump.
3. See #2 above. The numbers for 2008 and 2009 are largely influenced by the knock-on effects o
Re: (Score:1)
'Long ago, a storm was heading for the city of Quin'lat. Everyone took protection within the walls except one man who remained outside. Kahless went to him and asked what he was doing. "I am not afraid," the man said. "I will not hide my face behind stone and mortar. I will stand before the wind and make it respect me." Kahless honored his choice and went back inside. The next day, the storm came, and the man was killed. Kahless replied, "The wind does not respect a fool". '
Re:whatever (Score:5, Insightful)
I am altering the deal, (Score:2)
pray that I do not alter it any further.
Re:whatever (Score:4, Insightful)
What exactly did he try? I'm curious as to what you believe his effort was in this matter.
Suggesting that we should ignore failure for this one great man is taking the "Emperor's New Clothes" to a whole new level. As if the only appropriate response when it comes to Trump is to clap louder.
Re:whatever (Score:4, Funny)
At least he lied.
There, fixed that for you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:whatever (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:whatever (Score:4, Informative)
So how many people who think Trump is doing an awesome job at creating jobs also made similar excuses for Obama, Bush, and Clinton? Why is it that other presidents who don't keep their unrealistic promises are heavily criticized for it even from their own supporters, but Trump is given a free pass?
It's clear that when Trump does these publicity gigs that he just wants to keep his face out there in his 24/7/365 campaigning while not actually knowing what he's doing. For history's greatest deal maker he seems amazingly naive about accepting claims and promises from others, and this is but one example of that.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is it that other presidents who don't keep their unrealistic promises are heavily criticized for it even from their own supporters, but Trump is given a free pass?
Trump got a free pass because he *talked* about jobs, but Clinton wouldn't even acknowledge the problem. No-one thought for a minute that he actually had solutions to employment problems, but talking about them put him closer to solving the problem than Clinton could ever be.
I am not defending Trump, I'm pointing out the actual reason he gets a free pass, in the hope that Trump's competition will stop enabling him and get serious about defeating him.
Re: (Score:2)
Obama however talked lots about jobs. Of course he didn't lie and claim that coal mining jobs were going to make a huge comeback.
Still trying to polish that turd ? (Score:5, Insightful)
How much longer are apologists like you going to keep trying to polish that turd ?
Trump is a liar, a con-man, a psychopath. He's accumulated more than 1300 civils lawsuits against him in the last several decades. He destroyed countless small businesses, ruined countless lives. He has abolutely no redeeming qualities, not a single one. He has caused nothing but greef, sorrow, and pain througout his miserable disgusting life. And yet, somehow millions of americans keep defending him.
"I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and I still wouldn't lose any voters" is probably the most truthfull thing he has ever said in his entire life. It also shows clearly what he himself thinks of his own supporters.
There's not a single microgram of rationality in supporting Trump. It is pure, blind, absolute, animalistic tribalism.
Re: Still trying to polish that turd ? (Score:4, Insightful)
So is this what it boils down to ? You're so totally, completely consumed by your hatred of liberal that, just like captain Ahab, you're ready to sacrifice your future, your children's future, your country, your world, everything, just for the chance of pissing off that damn liberal white whale ?
Is that the excuse you're going to give your children and granchildren when someday they ask you to explain this incomprehensible, shamefull chapter in your country's history ?
Re: (Score:1)
I find it rather funny that you can see the truth about Trump but you give a free pass to others.
You think Bernie or Hilary or wonderful pieces of humanity that would do positive things?
I have news for you. All humans are pieces of shit. Some manage to shine despite being made of shit, but that is very rare. Most people are what they are: Pieces of shit.
You have to wonder why you have such a hard-on for Trump but none of the other pieces of shit that are all around you. I think someone made up a term for th
Re: (Score:2)
I love how the 'whataboutism' always creeps in on every negative post about Trump. But, but! Hillary! Biden! Bernie! What about them? How come you're talking about Trump but you don't mention anything about how bad Pol Pot was! Or Stalin! What about them?
Nobody mentioned them. Nobody said anything one way or the other about them. Yes there are lots of other shitty people around. They aren't president. Trump is president. Try to keep up.
Re: (Score:1)
He makes people like you go apopleptic [sic]. That is nearly enough reason alone to support [Trump].
I had suspected it, but you put it in better words than I had in my head. (Even when they're spelled correctly.)
Anyway I read GP's post and found it intelligent and reasonable, more or less the opposite of apoplectic. So the conclusion is that intelligence and reason on the other side makes people support Trump. This seems somewhat true in reality.
Re: (Score:2)
It is always good to see eminent domain abuse continues.. Politician after politician have promissed to put an end to it.
The idea that you are forced to see your property for a corporation is nonsense. This law was created to allow the government to take land for public use, not to take it and give it to coroporations. If the corporations want your property, increase their bid price and BUY IT.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the modern equivalent of a road or bridge to no where. It looks like a major industrial works project, so you can save face, but by the time they get finished framing it and you realize it's not a building, it will be too late.
You obviously don't understand what a "bridge to nowhere" is - it is an actual, honest to goodness bridge, built to full specification, that either originates, terminates, or both at places with no traffic to use the bridge.
On another note: Don't major construction projects have to be filed with the county/state/etc? Shouldn't someone be able to either FOIA, or leak this so we can know for certain what is being constructed there
The plans aren't "secret", they don't need to be "leaked", as noted in the summary above:
Industry experts shown Foxconn's building plans say it does not appear to even be the scaled-down Gen6 LCD factory.
Re: (Score:2)
So is "no traffic" literally no traffic or merely sparce traffic [wikipedia.org]? Because it appears to me that the GP understands the meaning of the phrase quite well.
$4.5 billion incent
Re: (Score:1)
The guy literally signs his posts with his name, I don't think he's a future MENSA member...
Re:The Foxconn Con, courtesy of Trump (Score:4, Informative)
What money? The state offered tax breaks, those don't actually cost the state anything if the activity that would otherwise have been taxed never happens.
For example, if the state says if a company creates more than 1,000 jobs in a certain facility/location they can save the employer portion of state income taxes on every worker over the first 1,000, but only 800 jobs are created, the "offer" cost the state nothing.
The Foxconn deal was made of many similar offers from the state, and the ones Foxconn fails to meet, cost nothing and don't benefit Foxconn.
Re: (Score:2)
What money? The state offered tax breaks, those don't actually cost the state anything if the activity that would otherwise have been taxed never happens...The Foxconn deal was made of many similar offers from the state, and the ones Foxconn fails to meet, cost nothing and don't benefit Foxconn.
This is apparently not the first time Foxconn has said they were going to build something, and then failed to deliver. They've done that many times. All over the world. According to you, all this effort that is repeated over and over again is a zero-sum game for all involved.
If that's the case, then answer one question; Why do they keep doing it?
Right or wrong, all effort in business, has justification behind it. In this case, I would question if all those tax breaks create significant financial benef
Re: (Score:2)
You are correct insofar as direct tax incentives are concerned. However, as a Wisconsin resident, I am paying for the massive upgrades to I-94 in Racine County that are part of this deal (you may be also, depending on how the highway money was allocated). Now, all things considered, those upgrades will help the state regardless of the outcome of this deal, because I-94 connects Milwaukee and Chicago, and so it's a big part of our economic infrastructure. The government also took property from residents u
Re: (Score:2)
The assertion that the giveaway was entirely tax breaks is not supported by the facts.
Walker sold Wisconsin a farce (Score:3)
Why is everyone blaming Mr. Trump -- he is just getting his mug on the tee-vee. The Foxconn deal is purely a Wisconsin matter pushed by its former governor.