Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China Education

China's New Schoolmarm Is 'Squirrel AI' (technologyreview.com) 71

Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes: MIT Technology Review's Karen Hao reports on China's grand experiment in AI education that could reshape how the world learns. "While academics have puzzled over best practices, China hasn't waited around," Hao writes. "It's the world's biggest experiment on AI in education, and no one can predict the outcome."

Profiled is Squirrel AI ("We Strive to Provide Every Student an AI Super Teacher!"), which has opened 2,000 learning centers in 200 cities and registered over a million students -- equal to New York City's entire public school system... Hao notes that the earliest efforts to "replicate" teachers date back to the 1970s, when computers first started being used in education. So, will AI-powered learning systems like Squirrel's deliver on the promise of PLATO's circa-1975 computer-assisted instruction?

From the article: Squirrel's innovation is in its granularity and scale. For every course it offers, its engineering team works with a group of master teachers to subdivide the subject into the smallest possible conceptual pieces. Middle school math, for example, is broken into over 10,000 atomic elements, or "knowledge points," such as rational numbers, the properties of a triangle, and the Pythagorean theorem. The goal is to diagnose a student's gaps in understanding as precisely as possible. By comparison, a textbook might divide the same subject into 3,000 points; ALEKS, an adaptive learning platform developed by US-based McGraw-Hill, which inspired Squirrel's, divides it into roughly 1,000.

Once the knowledge points are set, they are paired with video lectures, notes, worked examples, and practice problems. Their relationships -- how they build on each other and overlap -- are encoded in a "knowledge graph," also based on the master teachers' experience.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China's New Schoolmarm Is 'Squirrel AI'

Comments Filter:
  • so students can learn and make a world view without any real human interaction all without leaving their mom's basement. Many then they'll get riled up by similar lab rats on social media, post manifestos and shoot up malls.

    • Or they will learn in an amazingly efficient way, spend more time on the subjects that interest them, have a deeper understanding of their strengths and meet others across the globe who share their interests and build deep relationships independent of superficial niceties provided those around then who share no interest except geographic closeness and use these relationships to forge new ideas and execute an an extremely high level to solve problems like mall shootings. Or what you said.
    • The loss of human interaction in the learning process is a negative. But the loss of all the disruption and politics that bogs down educational programs could be a positive. One of the biggest issues in schools is bullying. Schools and especially high schools seem to be a breeding ground for cliques and getting ahead by denigrating others rather than building oneself up. (I'd argue this is a consequence of teachers and administrators fearing loss of their jobs if they discipline bad behaviors. Yes the
    • Yes, and we all know Eric Harris from Columbine High is living a very nice life right now, with 2 cars in the driveway, a nice house, a beautiful wife, 2 kids with a 3rd on the way, and and awesome high paying career. All because he went to high school in person instead of being a anti social mentally unbalanced basement dweller. Oh wait........
  • by jeti ( 105266 ) on Sunday August 04, 2019 @11:31AM (#59038218)
    Imagine AB testing teaching approaches and materials on a large scale. This could actually lead to a measurable improvement in teaching methodology.
  • Surely the powers that be want the Chinese citizens to master the most important skill of all . . . don't they?
  • realized that teaching the test, or just giving students the answers results in higher grades.
  • by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 ) on Sunday August 04, 2019 @01:28PM (#59038638) Journal
    Speaking as someone who had anything but a typical school experience, I have to say that, aside from so-called 'AI' (which is a misnomer) being kind of shitty overall, this approach to education will leave entire segments of Chinese children behind, since it will only cater to the average, typical child, not any with 'special needs' at either end of the Bell curve.
    When I was in school I was far ahead of the typical students in some areas, and far behind in others. If there hadn't been the small class sizes and human teachers who therefore had the time to work with me, things would not have gone so well for me. Teaching children is a very human experience and it needs a human touch to do it properly; simply programming a machine to do it isn't going to cut it.
    I think perhaps removing human teachers of children is being done on purpose, perhaps, so that they can guarantee only 'State approved' material and attitudes are ever allowed in the classroom. How else are you going to create a nice, obedient generation of citizens, who don't think for themselves or question the government? Of course it'll eventually backfire on them, when they discover that in some cases it just doesn't work, and in most cases it just creates dull-witted drone people who aren't creative and can't function without being told constantly what to do.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I think dislike the term AI in this context as much as you, but I am not as convinced this will be more destructive to atypical learners then current system. I have a daughter that has struggled with speech delay is a slow processor. She sores in the 90's in High School math if given 15 minutes extra.
      Coupled together was not until the speech was solved that the slow processing came to light because the teacher failed to see beyond the communications gap. We have poured thousands and hundreds o

  • by Anonymous Coward

    A big part of learning from a teacher is a desire to impress or at least not disappoint the teacher. This idea may help diagnose weak spots and provide better focus to self led learning, but as long as it is still transactional and not based on a bond between people, it will fall short of a real tutor.

  • China pushing AI hoping for competitive gains. Mass education consumes substantial resources so a target but for a good cause since educated people can lift a nation. Ironically Likewise with ignorance and China restricts information. Potential downside is the mass surveillance increases. Possibly Next the correlation with DNA.
  • The idea behind these types of programs is to provide more personalized learnning. I've found that when kids are learning at their level, they actually like to learn.

    I've worked with _a lot_ of these tools over the years, and the good ones always require interaction with a human teacher. They provide reports of where a student is struggling, and then the teacher will work with the student to resolve the issue, individually or in a small group with students that need similar interventions. The human ability

As you will see, I told them, in no uncertain terms, to see Figure one. -- Dave "First Strike" Pare

Working...