Juul Sued by California for Marketing E-Cigarettes To Teens (bloomberg.com) 68
Juul Labs was sued by California for allegedly targeting teenagers with ads for its e-cigarettes, after a series of lawsuits filed by schools, parents and others against the market leader as deaths and illnesses linked to vaping add up across the U.S. From a report: "Juul adopted the tobacco industry's infamous playbook, employing advertisements that had no regard for public health and searching out vulnerable targets," said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who announced the lawsuit at a news conference Monday in Los Angeles. "Today we take legal action against the deceptive practices that Juul and the e-cigarette industry employ to lure our kids into their vaping web." The San Francisco-based e-cigarette company has become a target of government regulators attempting to stem an epidemic of new nicotine users who have flocked to the sleek device even though many have never smoked cigarettes. Becerra alleges that Juul targeted young people in its advertising, failed to include required warnings, knowingly delivered tobacco products to consumers without verifying their age, kept the personal e-mails of minors who tried and failed to make a purchase, and proceeded to market Juul to them.
So I assume.. (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Except the constitution requires equal protection under the Law, so the state cannot prosecute one speeder but then let another speeder go.
Any discretion the police claim they have is actually not a thing. The state does not have discretion in enforcing the law. We have an entire branch of government set aside to be the one with discretion.
The state actually is required to prosecute a crime whenever it is seen, without discretion. The fact that they have ignored the alcohol industry for so long is a farce.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
They haven't ignored the alcohol industry for a long time, they've learned from their lesson during prohibition.
The problem is that we've not learned that lesson.
1) Free People will do what they want, regardless of what the law says.
2) We shouldn't listen to tyrannical minority view points, just because the shout louder than the masses.
3) California bans things that are inconsequential (plastic straws), while allowing for
Re: (Score:3)
Hint: if you get pulled over for speeding, that does not obligate the state to successfully catch and cite every single other person speeding anywhere.
That is... absolutely nothing like the current situation. Speeding is objective. If the speed limit is 45 mph and you're going 70 mph, you are speeding, flat out, no argument.
This is different because the lawsuit filers are making entirely subjective assumptions. "Fun flavors" == "just for kids."
It's more like suing the makers of Deadpool for peddling sex and offensive behavior to kids because "super heroes are clearly for kids," regardless of whether the movie was Rated R.
Re: (Score:2)
they do it to: "Juul adopted the tobacco industry's infamous playbook, employing advertisements that had no regard for public health and searching out vulnerable targets,"?
Re: (Score:3)
they do it to: "Juul adopted the tobacco industry's infamous playbook, employing advertisements that had no regard for public health and searching out vulnerable targets,"?
The total amount of physical harm that vaping has done to date amounts to what Big Tobacco kills before 9AM every fucking day.
I'm not here to defend any nicotine product, but looking at vaping products from a holistic point of view, and considering they're marketed as a cigarette alternative, they certainly appear to be having regard for public health.
Of course, once vaping products are banned by hysteria, and all the nicotine addicts are forced to pick up cancer sticks, we'll happily resume our regularly
Re: (Score:2)
it's the only alternative (as marketed), right?
Again, it's the only alternative?
Re: (Score:2)
it's the only alternative (as marketed), right?
Again, it's the only alternative?
Show me a guy using the nicotine patch alternative, and I'll show you a guy about ready to overdose on nicotine patches. Cigarettes appear to be a lot like sex; there's nothing like the real thing.
We both already know where the nicotine addicts created by vaping will end up; the same place the majority of cigarette smokers who tried every failed alternative.
Re: So I assume.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
it's the only alternative (as marketed), right?
It is, by far, the most effective alternative.
Patches have been around for decades, and have not put a dent in smoking. Vaping is helping WAY more people quit.
Vaping still has the social and compulsive behavior of smoking. You can do it with your friends, and it keeps your hands busy.
It also is easy to taper. Once you light a cigarette, you smoke it to the end. But you can flick on a vape device, take one puff, and then turn it off again. This makes it much easier to get only the minimum nicotine fix to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
you know psychotherapy, right?
Yes.
I also know zero people that have used it to quit smoking.
I know over a dozen that have used vaping to quit: My cousin. My neighbor. Most of the shipping and warehouse crew where I work.
Vaping works. "Talk therapy" doesn't.
Re: (Score:2)
it's the exact opposite I've seem here on Brazil ("US" != "world", you know...)
not here (where you live, maybe...)
Re: (Score:2)
Vaping IS big tobacco!!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, how did you leave wine off of that list. That's basically alcoholic fruit juice! I understand that people want that juicy first post, but c'mon man, you gotta try a little bit harder. I'm pretty sure that the Yoda doll guy put in more of an effort.
scentes candles (Score:3, Insightful)
All these candy and fruit flavored candles are targeted to kids and not 32 year old women.
Adults hate chocolate and sweets. The dessert menu at the brew pub is covered in dust because nobody ordered the giant piece of cake for themselves that you're supposed to share.
Re: (Score:2)
What planet are you from?
Re: (Score:2)
Planet Sarcasm.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm also from Planet Doesn't-spell-check-the-subject-line.
It's not just flavors (Score:3)
Give companies an inch and they take a mile. I'd say we gave them more than an inch though.
Re:And...? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm reminded of the Dazed and Confused scene where someone stands up and says he's in rehab for weed addiction, and someone stands up and says (paraphrased) "You're in here for some weed shit? I used to suck dick for coke!".
That was Half Baked, buddy.
Re: (Score:2)
That was Half Baked, buddy.
Much like the lawsuit.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm reminded of the Dazed and Confused scene where someone stands up and says he's in rehab for weed addiction, and someone stands up and says (paraphrased) "You're in here for some weed shit? I used to suck dick for coke!".
That was Half Baked, buddy.
Yeah. Boo that man. BOO!
Re: (Score:2)
Re:And...? (Score:5, Insightful)
You ever smoked? You do know that the product of cigarettes is nicotine? You ever wonder why there are so many services, programs, and prescriptions that help people to get off them(cigarettes/smokes). It's called addiction. It's just legal addiction.
Re: (Score:1)
pipe down, snowflake
people can quit smoking if they want to; or they can get mainstream safe commerical vape which provably has no issues whatsover.
Re: And...? (Score:1)
Provably?
As in, you can prove that there are no health issues associated with it?
Re: (Score:2)
zero proof of any problems. no one vaping mainstream product has problems. you can only say "but there must be some kind problem because I think there should be." that's all you have.
millions of people each year smoking have problem; 8 million of them die. probably bad
Re: And...? (Score:1)
Lol it ooks like somebody doesn't understand how science works.
Even if it was true (which it isn't) that there was no proof of a problem with vaping, that is not proof that there is no problem it just means that we haven't found any.
Now, I don't know what you would consider to be a authority in the sciences, maybe you are into all that alternative stuff like NaturalNews.com or whatever, but I am not. So here is what I consider to be the current state of things:
https://www.health.harvard.edu... [harvard.edu]
https://www.go [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
you post articles before the problem of homemade and amateur made thc mixes with vitamin e acetate (and maybe other poor choices) identified
Zero scientific evidence mainstream product vaping causes any issues, and even the numbers of harmed people from the vitamin e acetate issue are very small. More nonsmokers people get lung cancer from occupational hazards than have had any issues even from vaping bad things put together by ignorant amateurs. It's a negligible non-issue
Re: And...? (Score:1)
No, those articles clearly state that the data is from commercial vape devices.
You're like that old yellowfingered grandpa who can't let go of his rollies so he argues that there's no proof that smoking is bad.
At the end of the day, do whatever you want. They're your lungs. I couldn't give a shit.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't vape or smoke.
But you are an illiterate who can't even see the tenuous and uncertain nature of the articles you posted...."may"....."might"...."we don't know"...
You are wrong, the data gathered for those articles did not know the sources at all, was before CDC involved.
Re: And...? (Score:1)
Yea it's like how the tobacco industry pushed the line "we aren't fully sure that cigarettes are harmful" for half a century.
Let's do weird shit with our bodies just coz.
Re: (Score:2)
Yet it was known in 1940s that cigarettes did cause lung cancer...
Vaping commercial product has tens of millions of people that are fine after 15 years. If all smokers turned to vaping millions of lives would be saved, because it is much much less dangerous a thing to do.
Re:And...? (Score:5, Informative)
So you're basically saying that because you didn't "feel anything from it" when you tried smoking and vaping, the entire concept of nicotine addiction is bullshit? Nicotine addiction is a well documented, medically recognized condition and, if anything, it's not overstated enough. I smoked for 20 years and quitting was one of the hardest things I've ever done. Almost 2 years later, I've never picked up another cigarette but the urge is always there. And I tried quitting a jillion times before it finally stuck.
I know it's a Wikipedia article, but try reading the many citations linked in the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
I think I'll take the word of professionals as to what is or isn't an addiction. Your experience is an exception to the rule and a few exceptions to a rule are not sufficient grounds to disprove the rule.
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:And...? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's bullshit. It's very similar to caffeine. The reason it's so addicting is the ritual and social aspects, and the fact that it's so easy to come by. After a while the nicotine barely registers as you get used to it. I tried smoking in my youth, smoked pipe tobacco for a while, and had my brief e-cig period - don't feel anything from it, I don't get it at all.
It's also very similar to food addiction/binge eating. Is food addictive? Sure, I guess for some people overeating is an addiction of sorts, but that doesn't mean they can't just 'stop' (overeating, not eating obviously) if they decide to with no physical withdrawal symptoms.
So sure, it's addicting - lots of stuff is addicting, but the degree to which it is physically addicting is way, way overstated.
Is this supposed to be a joke? You really have no understanding of chemical addiction. Maybe the chemical pathway for nicotine addiction in your brain is broken. For most people, it is an insidious compulsion. I quit cold turkey a while ago, and it wasn't easy. I still remember the self persuasion and insane rationalizations I'd use to convince myself to go ahead and buy another pack. I've never done that with any other substance I've tried or experience I've had.
Re: (Score:2)
Shrug. Same with food. As a former fatty I used to turn off my brain and just order $25 worth of Taco Bell (basically 8 garbage bags worth, back in the day) and stuff my face. Or drive to pick up other fast food, the whole way knowing I shouldn't but just ignoring it.
Is food physically addictive? It sure kills a lot of people, and people seem unable to quit. I guess you could argue that the chemical reactions it causes in your brain are addictive. But the fact remains you don't go into dangerous withdrawal
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
"don't feel anything from it" is bullshit, nicotine gives you a high. I've used vaporizers, tobacco pipes, and cigars. The high is immediate and noticeable. I did not, however, experience anything I'd call a chemical addiction.
Re: (Score:2)
"Addiction" is far more complicated than you were brainwashed into believing in your high school/PSA experiences. Actual well designed studies have shown that chemical addiction (the kind we're told is scary) is usually a small portion of the issue. People usually become addicted to various compounds (alcohol, cigarettes, meth, oxy, etc) to escape other unpleasant factors in their lives. For example they used to show a video of rodents with a choice of two water sources, one laced with a drug and one wit
Re: (Score:1)
Now people are declaring addictions to World of Warcraft.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There isn't a lot of leeway in dosing yourself with nicotine, and the lethal dose varies widely by individual. The wikipedia article indicates that a half gram can be fatal for an adult, and 6 mg can be fatal for a child. Single dose ingestion of seemingly moderate amounts of nicotine is dangerous.
As you say, the harm of smoking is mostly from other chemicals. Inhaling high temperature gasses is also bad for you. In the dose levels from cigarettes, the leading problem from nicotine is that it keeps you comi
should be glad (Score:2)
vaping commercial product such as Juul sells is many times safer than smoking, if teens who think smoking is cool do that would have healthier lives.
Remember, vaping commercial product is provably safe, while tobacco smoking kills 8 million a year.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
two words with zero relation to commercial mainstream product. vaping is incredibly safe compared to smoking
Leave them alone! (Score:2)
Smokers suck!
Sorry if you are a conscientious smoker but there seem to be far more of you that blow their toxic shit-air around with no regard for the people around them.
E-cigs are so much more pleasant to be around. Go after the real cigarettes and let them be! Oh well if they hurt the people who CHOSE to consume them.
It's too bad that one of their symptoms isn't sterility. Maybe in a few generations we could evolve into a species that doesn't get addicted to nicotine and finally be done with this nasty,
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think it's that they have no regard (Score:2)
Smoke clings to your clothing, your skin, to everything you own. Then as you move you shake it off and spread it everywhere. Do that enough and your entire environment is smoky.
And no, smoking isn't hereditary. What's needed is education. Not "Smokin's bad, m'kay" kind of education but things like tuition free coll
Sue Juul for the vape bros and BlakeVapes (Score:2)
The "they advertised to kids" thing keeps seeming odd to me since I haven't seen any ads at all (not that I'm a kid... just haven't seen ads?). Though everyone says the ads are that the vapes are candy flavored. Honestly the kids would probably vape if it tasted like flaming shit, if everyone told them it was cool.
My wife is a teacher and it's always funny to hear about how many kids are "secretly vaping." They will lean down and vape in their backpack then zip it shut.... Over and over throughout clas
Lie! (Score:3)
>"as deaths and illnesses linked to vaping add up across the U.S."
That is just a blatant lie which is extremely misleading and it needs to stop. The substances that were causing the incredibly [proportionally] tiny and isolated number of "deaths and illnesses" were not what anyone is selling at any even moderately reputable outlets, and certainly not by Juul. It is almost 100% certain they were all back-alley mystery concoctions of marijuana extracts laced with vitamin E acetate. It seems many government entities and the media are INTENTIONALLY trying to confuse the public on this very important difference.
It probably is true that some minors are going after nicotine or non-nicotine vaping who have never used tobacco, but that is already ILLEGAL and is a totally separate issue (if it really even is a real issue, because we need to look at what underage cigarette smoking rates are and used to be, and right now they have been shrinking year after year).
Wine Industry (Score:2)
Someone should tell the wine industry [thedarkener.com] then, too.
I think it's hilarious that vaping is getting so much attention for supposedly marketing to kids when it's been going on everywhere else for forever.
The Phantom Menace (Score:2)
Aboard the Death Star, the Emperor sits back.
"Good...good. Let your hate flow through you. It was I who bought Juul. It was I who revealed the need for vaping regulation. It was I who co-opted the Truth cigarette people to spread FUD regarding vaping effects ["Fact! Nobody knows the long-term effects of vaping!")
"It was I who ordered Juul to put up big scary signs in 7-11s and proudly announce the removal of Juul products from '97,000 traditional retailers'. It was I that convinced North Carolina, a to
Just another delivery system (Score:2)
Inhalation. Not revolutionary. What you inhale, be it tobacco burning in tubes, opium and coca in pipes, THC in black market vials or even prescription inhalers used by many, it's not exactly rocket surgery. People have been doing it for millennia.
I'm not thinking it will be a successful thing for current government to control any more than others like digestion, but I'm sure that won't stop them from trying.
Advertisements still allowed??? (Score:1)