Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Open Source United States China Technology

RISC-V Foundation Moving To Switzerland Over Trade Curb Fears (reuters.com) 76

hackingbear writes: The RISC-V Foundation, which sets standards for the open-sourced CPU architecture and controls who can use the RISC-V trademark on products, will soon move to Switzerland to ensure that universities, governments and companies outside the United States can help develop its open-source technology. "From around the world, we've heard that 'If the incorporation was not in the U.S., we would be a lot more comfortable,'" its Chief Executive Calista Redmond said. Redmond said the foundation's board of directors approved the move unanimously but declined to disclose which members prompted it. More than 325 companies or other entities pay to be members, including U.S. and European chip suppliers such as Qualcomm and NXP Semiconductors, as well as China's Alibaba Group and Huawei Technologies.

The foundation's move from Delaware to Switzerland may foreshadow further technology flight because of U.S. restrictions on dealing with some Chinese technology companies, said William Reinsch, who was undersecretary of commerce for export administration in the Clinton administration. "There is a message for the government. The message is, if you clamp down on things too tightly this is what is going to happen. In a global supply chain world, companies have choices, and one choice is to go overseas," he said. The U.S. has increased tenancy to sanction foreign, especially Chinese, companies using national security as an excuse, thus conveniently evading legal due process in the U.S. justice system without providing any actual evidence.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

RISC-V Foundation Moving To Switzerland Over Trade Curb Fears

Comments Filter:
  • by BardBollocks ( 1231500 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @08:51PM (#59464664)

    ... mandated backdoors?

    • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
      Did it block the US from asking about Swiss bank accounts?
      The needed data flowed back to the USA.
      Now tech expects to be safe outside the USA in a nation that is happy to work with the USA on other issues?
    • How many fabs are in Switzerland?

      • These days, how many fabs are in the US?
        • More than there are in Switzerland?

        • Quite a few in fact:

          https://www.intel.com/content/... [intel.com]

          https://www.globalfoundries.co... [globalfoundries.com]

          TSMC has an 8" fab in Camas, WA:

          https://www.tsmc.com/english/c... [tsmc.com]

          There are likely others.

          • My point was more Intel was once the defacto leader, now that might be TSMC, and their best fabs are not in the US. Something 2 decades ago I never thought I'd see in my lifetime. Intel has fumbled their latest node. Again, I am very surprised. If they miss on the next one, Intel is done. I am crossing my fingers that get it right. As much as /. seems to champion AMD or anyone besides Intel, the loss of Intel as the preeminent CPU vendor would be a catastophic loss to the US. There was a time where IC's we
            • It will be a loss, but Intel only has themselves to blame. And let's not beat around the bush: nearly every silicon foundry business out there has either failed or taken a back seat. Globalfoundries is out of the race now, so that leaves TSMC; Samsung; and Intel. Intel may (as you say) kick the bucket in the foundry race soon if 7nm doesn't deliver for them.

              As for other countries getting into the assembly and testing business? It all comes down to costs. Intel definitely lead the charge there. Do you re

      • by gweihir ( 88907 )

        What do fabs have to do with this?

      • How many FABS are in the UK (the home of ARM)?

    • by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Thursday November 28, 2019 @07:52AM (#59465888) Journal

      ... mandated backdoors?

      National security letters couldn't mandate backdoors, at least not backdoors that reveal content. The scope of NSLs is explicitly limited by law to metadata only. There's also nothing in the law that would seem to authorize mandate of any system modification or other sort of pre-emptive access, only access to stored records. Further, the sort of information NSLs allow access to is more easily obtained from service providers than from CPUs.

      You can read the law here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/us... [cornell.edu] (it's not long, or terribly hard to read).

      I think a lot of the erroneous understanding of the scope of NSLs comes from confusion with CALEA, which does explicitly mandate that communications systems operators provide law-enforcement access, i.e. build in back doors for law enforcement use.

    • I don't see how that would be practical. At least not yet. RISC-V as standard is primarily an instruction set so far. How do you put an "backdoor for NSA" command into an instructions set for a processor?
      I guess open source RISC-V hardware designs will be highly welcome at the foundation, but even then it should be fairly obvious what is going on.

    • The standard itself will have a backdoor? Insert a paragraph in the RISC-V specification document that a backdoor must exist? That seems like a dumb thing to do because literally everyone will find out. Backdoors are put in the implementation/fabrication not the specification.

  • Over reaction (Score:5, Insightful)

    by argStyopa ( 232550 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @08:56PM (#59464680) Journal

    So drawing moral equivalency between the US and China, that's what the cool kids are doing today?

    Funny, I'd have thought if anything, ACTUAL crackdown in Hong Kong, and the increasingly lurid revelations of what's being done to Chinese Uighurs might suggest to the professional whiners in the USA what ACTUAL totalitarianism looks like, not just the poseur-declared "Trump-is-a-fascist-because-I-don't-like-him" faux criticism.

    • Re:Over reaction (Score:5, Insightful)

      by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:08PM (#59464706)
      Perhaps a fair point, but why should a foundation for an open processor architecture care about any of that? The simple truth is that an open organization (that cares nothing for patents or trade secrets) wants the least restrictive environment possible. Traditionally that has been the U.S. which has historically had a more hands off approach than other countries, but right now that's not the case.

      The rest of the world doesn't care all that much about U.S. political squabbles (outside of being able to talk about them to deflect from their own issues, but one can hardly fault them for that) and shouldn't have to suffer for them. If you have an organization whose goals include letting everyone in the world participate and join in then it hardly makes sense to stay in a place that makes those kind of things difficult.

      Maybe there's some ulterior political motives behind the move, but on the face of things it makes sense. Let's just take it for that without trying to attach anything more to it. But if you have evidence that it's just a political stunt feel free to post it and I'll gladly join in and call the people doing it shit heads from the comfort of my own computer chair.
    • Re:Over reaction (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:10PM (#59464708)

      So drawing moral equivalency between the US and China, that's what the cool kids are doing today?

      Funny, I'd have thought if anything, ACTUAL crackdown in Hong Kong, and the increasingly lurid revelations of what's being done to Chinese Uighurs might suggest to the professional whiners in the USA what ACTUAL totalitarianism looks like, not just the poseur-declared "Trump-is-a-fascist-because-I-don't-like-him" faux criticism.

      You didn't see them moving to china, did you?

      I don't think this has to do directly with the present occupant, but the fact that the USA is becoming unpredictable. To the world it is starting to appear that if you say the wrong thing, oor do not do as ordered, the USA might cut you off.

      The free world likes a bit of stability, and as the USA shifts to a Post-Communist Russian style of government, there are others who are concerned that stability is lost. Doesn't have to do with levels of whatever boogyman is pissing anyone off, but that we are changing in an unpredictable and unstable fashion. That is all.

      • Re:Over reaction (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Kernel Kurtz ( 182424 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:27PM (#59464752)

        I don't think this has to do directly with the present occupant, but the fact that the USA is becoming unpredictable.

        Actually it does, no point in tip toeing around the elephant in the room. Even America's long time western allies pretty much all consider the country not just unpredictable, but also completely untrustworthy right now, They may be polite enough not to say it, but you know they all think it, and you can't deny there is really only one rather obvious reason for that state of affairs.

        • The US has - for the bulk of its history - been considered an unstable, revolutionary state; our government has always been inconstant, prone to extremism in one direction or another, and unreliable in its promises.

          It takes a serious case of historical blindness to miss that.

          Only since 1945 has the US been seen as some sort of Old World classical-format Great Power whose role has been as a guarantor of *anything*.

          I'm not refuting the "bull in china shop" reputation of our clown-in-chief, but perhaps we're s

        • They may be polite enough not to say it

          They are polite enough not to say it?
          https://www.washingtonpost.com... [washingtonpost.com]

      • Then they would have moved to Canada. Or is that too unstable for people?

        • by chrish ( 4714 )

          Our last couple of Prime Ministers have had a habit of just rolling over and doing whatever the US asks, so it might be.

        • by dryeo ( 100693 )

          Besides the fact that Canada is more dependent on US trade then the US is dependent on Canadian trade, thus basically forcing our government to roll over. It is too easy to accidentally end up in the US. Recently a domestic plane got diverted from Vancouver to Seattle, lots of panic about people without proper documentation (passport), the possibility of being arrested for being illegally in the US (criminal records and such) and a big panic due to some passengers having substances illegal in the USA (mostl

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

      Funny, I'd have thought if anything, ACTUAL crackdown in Hong Kong, and the increasingly lurid revelations of what's being done to Chinese Uighurs might suggest to the professional whiners in the USA what ACTUAL totalitarianism looks like

      Fascism is not a boolean. It's a spectrum.

    • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
      Communists support Communism..
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      There is China the country run by the CCP, and there are the Chinese people who largely don't even know about most of the bad stuff it is doing. They are victims of the CCP too, only told that hooligans are rioting in Hong Kong and that free education and vocational training is being offered to millions of Muslim Chinese.

      Things that make life worse for most Chinese people are not going to do much to hurt the CCP. If anything they help it because it's just more evidence they can use of Western Imperialism an

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:22PM (#59464738)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Wednesday November 27, 2019 @09:36PM (#59464776)
      All the Swiss should be forced to speak Romansh, because no one can understand their German.
    • Am I the only one who has “Ads Disabled” checked, but is still seeing video ads popping up on the main slashdot page anyway? Just trying to figure out if those are being injected by my ISP or if they’re actually just a feature of today’s slashdot.

      I'm not seeing any of those... but since slashdot is HTTPS now, it should not be possible for your ISP to inject ads or otherwise muck with the content.

  • From the article

    Some Republican U.S. lawmakers said they are concerned the United States will lose influence over RISC-V chip architecture

    That is rich. The fix is easy, but the Rs are still to busy letting their "Glorious Leader" give it to them were the sun don't shine.

    Until they decide to stop watching after themselves, this could grow from a trickle to a waterfall. But in any case, next year is shaping up to be quite interesting, and I am starting to suspect the Ds convention will be quite like the 68 convention.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    As an American innovator I can't continue to support Chinese tech companies. My company is currently a member of RISC-V foundation, but I am under no obligation to select R5 for our next chip project. We have tooling for our custom ASIC that we can revive, and we can still license ARM affordably.

    RISC-V is a specification, and each vendor US and otherwise is allowed to implement it without license. Some implementations are completely open source, some are proprietary. You can license another implementation f

    • Bye bye.

      Isn't it true that arm were affected by the "entity list" nonsense, despite not being a US or US-based company? It seems to me it is evidence *for* making a move out of US, not against it.

    • And yet the country that has been caught doing this shit is the USA.

      So either the US is the only one doing it (while blaming everyone else)
      OR
      The US is incompetent (and gets caught).

      My guess is that its actually both.
      • The Chinese and the NSA are both risks that need to be mitigated.

      • Any IT the US can get it's fingers into cannot be trusted. period. We can say the same for many other countries too.

        However there's one thing that seems to be missed in the whole discussion - backdoors from a foreign country are less of a threat to my freedom than backdoors from my own country - simply because the foreign nation has little legal influence where I reside.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Hyperbole much? I think you are just a paid troll...

  • to ensure that universities, governments and companies outside the United States can help develop its open-source technology

    Yes, the governments of Russia, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and — last, yet foremost — China.

  • "Redmond said the foundation's board of directors approved the move unanimously but declined to disclose which members prompted it."

    Sounds like someone was the lucky recipient of a suitcase full of cash in a dark parking lot =)

  • No facts? Someone tells you something and then you change your policies?

    Do you think you are still a serious organization?

  • Sorry, but these guys really have a naive understanding of how the world works.

    Switzerland in particular isn't some "safe neutral haven" . The Swiss earn their neutrality by sucking on both sides of a war. They enabled the Nazi regime and also enable Russia and China through elaborate financing mechanisms.

    This might be hard to swallow (pun intended) but when it comes to real life, you will always be kissing the boot of a thug. And those thugs are the Americans, Russians, and the Chinese.

    I'll tell you this,

    • Switzerland became neutral during the XVII century before the creation of the USA. It losts it's neutrality during the invasion by the French (Napoléon) and the German (Austria) to get it back in 1815 (and becoming the legal state it is still today). Hitler is born 1889. So how can he have influenced what happened in 1647 ?
  • I'm all for it. We need a well backed, open alternative.
  • ...are making America grate again.

    What I wanna know is what are those techies gonna do in all that fresh, clean Swiss mountain air? I guess pot's legal (but you have to say it's potpourri or for medical purposes or something) & so is LSD (no excuses necessary for that one). Switzerland is also only a hop skip & jump away from Paris, Berlin, London, Amsterdam, Barcelona, Milan, Prague, etc.. I know it's hard but I'm sure they can survive surrounded by socialists with their free healthcare & publi

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...