UK To Trial Coronavirus Treatments Using Blood From Survivors (theguardian.com) 64
Health officials have prioritised two clinical trials that will be supplied with blood from recovered Covid-19 patients in the hope that transfusions can help save the lives of people hospitalised with the infection. From a report: NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) has started to collect blood from recovered patients with a view to using the antibody-rich serum to boost the immune systems of patients struggling to overcome the virus. The limited supply of convalescent plasma will be given to patients enrolled on sub-studies in the Recovery trial led by Peter Horby at the University of Oxford, and the Remap-Cap trial led by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) in London. The Recovery trial will assess whether the plasma helps patients to recover before they are admitted to intensive care, while the Remap-Cap trial will investigate whether similar transfusions help to save patients who are already in high-dependency or intensive care units. At least one trial that was designed to assess whether the plasma could protect healthy people who are in close contact with Covid-19 patients, such as NHS staff and family members, was rejected by NHSBT amid a shortage of the donated serum.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Then we're in no hurry.
Trump's Drug: Hydroxychloroquine - Deadly, Useless (Score:1, Funny)
A few weeks after Trump told people that Hydroxychloroquine "works" and to "just take it", even as sort of a preventative measure the results are in...
Hydroxychloroquine is not an effective treatment of Covid-19. Despite Trump's claims that it is totally safe, there are may reported heart related complications.
Covid-19 patients who took Trump's Hydroxychloroquine treatment, were almost twice as likely to die.
Word on the street is that Trump personally profited from Hydroxychloroquine... No surprise there..
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
"And a lot of people are saying that" This is a tired old Trump dodge. He and his minions "leak" something to some crackpot rightwing nutjobs, Fox picks up on it because they have RightWing Nut Radar. Fox promotes it, Trump picks it up as "And a lot of people are saying that". If the guy was any more transparent, he wouldn't exist.
And if people die because of it, Trump will simply claim he was only repeating "a lot of people are saying that". See, no responsibility here.
Trump works on the bigger bet syndrom
Re: (Score:3)
Places like South Korea and India have been using the hell out of it by the way. I hear France just officially approved it as a treatment.
Re: (Score:3)
Initial study at the time suggested that one needs to take the drug before symptoms manifest. Hypothesis at the time (I'm not up to date with the latest) was that it inhibited the severity of initial immune response, which is hypothesized to be play a large part in terminal outcomes of coronovirus.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Trump's Drug: Hydroxychloroquine - Deadly, Use (Score:2)
If we have to wait for trials to complete it won't be soon enough for many.
Hydroxychloroquine as a drug is well known as are its side effects which are manageable in an intensive care setting, anyone saying it's unproven has an agenda, the drug is 30 years old. Does it help with corona? Initial reports suggest that yes it does help with the symptoms, but not enough data to say it is a guaranteed cure.
It sure beats guaranteed dying.
Re: (Score:2)
If we have to wait for trials to complete it won't be soon enough for many.
Good thing we have a lockdown then.
Re: (Score:2)
This fake news about "common severe side effects" needs to stop. Here's straight from wikipedia with appropriate source:
>It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system.
https://apps.who.int/iris/hand... [who.int]
It's considered so safe, that it's prescribed for pregnant women. The RARE severe side effects are quite nasty. Do you know what medicines have rare side effects? Almost all of them. Read on what rare side effects of pa
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know why there was any need for scientific study: Trump recommended it, hence anybody could be sure is not only useless, but dangerous. Now, if he comes up with a recommendation not to take something, that would probably be the cure.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Does this count as human experimentation? I'm trying to fill in my "Pandemic" game BINGO card...
No. It is something almost as old as blood transfusion.
Some bad news in store here though - according to China and Russia which ALREADY do that less than 3% of the donor plasma is of any use - the rest is with "issues" or does not have sufficient antibody titre.
Right about what? (Score:2)
Please be specific.
Question (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You may have an erection that lasts longer than 4 hours.
...if you're the first researcher to find the Covid-19 drug that works.
Re: (Score:2)
It could do either. or neither. Don't think they know, just a shot in the dark that /might/ work people have volunteered to participate in.
Re: Question (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Likely never outside backwater third world nations that don't accept Western medicine yet.
But when it comes to novel virus causing global pandemic, normal "let's take a couple of years to research and develop countermeasures" approach is not acceptable. Threshold for risk taking is much lower, and so we'll get much more direct and much more risky attempts to address this threat.
This is one of many such attempts currently ongoing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ever hear of snake bit antivenom? This works the same way. You don't transfer immunological memory from the source, you transfer antibodies which flag the offending antigen for the patient's immune system.
That gives the patient's immune system a head start on responding. Think of it as being like your buddy slipping you a piece of papers with answers for the final exam on it. That doesn't preclude you from learning the material on the test, but it could help if you're behind on the reading.
Khaaaannn! (Score:2)
It always works in the movies (Score:2)
I mean, that is our new reality, right? Magical, last minute cures by using the blood of our protagonist?
Re: (Score:3)
What we could sure use at this point is something that falls far short of a miracle cure. A treatment which reduces the severity of the illness would keep people off ventilators and out of the hospital.
A treatment that decreases the duration of the infection could put a huge dent in the number of active cases and speed us along to herd immunity.
We probably aren't going to be able to escape difficult times ahead. But *marginal* scientific advances can have a big impact on how long and how bad those times w
Re: (Score:2)
There is validity to it... survivors of an illness develop antibodies, and so by collecting plasma from survivors, these antibodies can be put into other people (of suitable compatibility, of course) who may be able to then fight off the disease in question more quickly than they otherwise would.
Essentially, the process acts like giving the immune system a bit of a push in the right direction. Depending on the rate of progression of the disease in the recipient at the time they receive the antibodies,
Similar plasma blood drive request in US (Score:5, Insightful)
There's a similar plasma blood drive request in US. So I tried to sign up. Of course, I only know I have had it from proximity proxy to a nurse who had it and was tested.
So they asked (with Microsoft's simple chatbot) - if I had been tested positive. I said no, and the app informed me to "go to my doctor, get a test, and come back".
Well - this is the US. I'm certainly not going to go pay to go to my doctor, pay for the test, just so I can donate plasma. If you want plasma donors, enable the plasma donors to donate.
Re: (Score:2)
Your experience is hardly different than most doctor appointments I've been to. They keep typing while you're talking and only half listening and then spend 10 seconds looking at whatever problem you have. Then they write a prescription to appease you and then run out of the room. I imagine their systems look like Idiocracy with emojis for ailments. Finding a thorough competent doctor is difficult.
Re: (Score:1)
You prescribe being a cunt to someone that wants to volunteer to help with the pandemic? Giving plasma isn't an *awesome* time.
They need to provide an antibody test at the donation center. Or just take the plasma and test the batch.
I never said she was my GF.
Re: (Score:2)
So they asked you to take a test.
So he tests negative. And on the way to the donation center, someone sneezes in his face. The blood drives need to test a sample of the actual collected plasma.
Re: (Score:1)
So he tests negative. And on the way to the donation center, someone sneezes in his face. The blood drives need to test a sample of the actual collected plasma.
If he tested negative he wouldn't be on his way to the donation center.
Re:Similar plasma blood drive request in US (Score:5, Insightful)
If he tested negative he wouldn't be on his way to the donation center.
Why not? Blood banks in the USA are begging people to keep donating during the crisis. Just collect the blood and test it all. Throw out the positive tests and pull out the tests that show antibodies (survivors) for therapeutic work.
Re: (Score:2)
Well - this is the US. I'm certainly not going to go pay to go to my doctor, pay for the test
At least in my area, tests are free and don't require a doctor visit. You just call the hotline, tell them why you think you need to be tested, and if they agree you get scheduled for a test at a drive-through testing center, at no charge. Of course, this is testing for active cases, not antibodies, so if you had it but are no longer sick, you'll test negative. I don't know that you can get an antibody test right now, regardless of whether you're willing to pay for it.
Re:Trump's Drug - Hydroxycloroquine - Deadly, Usel (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, I have no idea whether Trump was trumpeting hydroxychloroquine for personal financial benefit. He was trumpeting it for personal benefit because he seems congenitally incapable of telling people shitty news like "This is going to take a year or two to work its way through, so we're kinda screwed in the short term." He'd rather deliver some faux happy news about a wonder treatment, and then his allies at Fox News can go about spreading absolute horseshit which they will very quietly retract sometime down the road when no one is looking.
This is what you get when you elect a cavalier, congenitally dishonest moron.
Re: (Score:1)
You know, trying to be optimistic and keep spirits up instead of crushing all hope and sending the nation into a spiraling depression (both senses) from which it might not recover. I see this as a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't real optimism. It's a fool's hope. There's no evidence the treatment works, but creating an environment in which a drug necessary for people who actually suffer from malaria is harder to obtain because some crazy bastard in France put out a crap study is not responsible.
Science doesn't bend to the will of even the most powerful political leader. It won't work just because Donald Trump says so, and nothing demonstrates his stupidity and arrogance more than floating this out and dangling a false ho
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, wow. "Approved as a treatment in France" ? Absolutely not. One guy in one city (Marseille) tried to make noise pretending he can cure anyone with hydroxychloroquine, and received a huge backlash by the whole community, including in France. His "treatment" was not "approved". The only thing he got might be the authorization to run experiments, which miserably failed.
So please revise your copy on France, and stop spreading false information. The "widely used in Asia" part is just as dubious ... used for
Re: (Score:2)
He'd rather deliver some faux happy news about a wonder treatment, and then his allies at Fox News can go about spreading absolute horseshit which they will very quietly retract sometime down the road when no one is looking.
Actually I believe in this cause the causality is backwards. For much of the COVID-19 debacle Trump has been nothing more than someone trying to imitate a Sulphur Crested Cockatoo sitting in front of a TV and simply repeating whatever words it hears on repeat. Though his hair looks more like a dead animal than the glorious Sulphur Crest.
- Trump didn't mention hydroxychloroquine until Fox News put their fake Stanford not doctor on their air talking about it.
- Trump didn't mention re-opening the borders until
Re: (Score:2)
What's a link to that twice as likely to die? Just curious, haven't read that yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Though it's worth noting it's not reviewed or published. Nor is the French study that didn't find increased deaths. Proper, scientifically valid, studies are being performed but in the meantime it's basically anecdote vs anecdote.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's one: https://thehill.com/policy/hea... [thehill.com]
Though it's worth noting it's not reviewed or published. Nor is the French study that didn't find increased deaths. Proper, scientifically valid, studies are being performed but in the meantime it's basically anecdote vs anecdote.
The VA study was also much larger than the original French study, which lends some (but admittedly not) weight to it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But can't there still be HIV and other STDs in the blood that are below the threshold for detection, yet still can infect the recipient?
Obviously thats true, but just like "wearing a mask is worse than not wearing one", they have a motive that, in their mind, justifies lying to you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
My understanding is that if HIV viral load (particles?) is so low that we cannot detect it, it's vastly below threshold needed to actually infect. It's also my understanding that HIV screening is routine in Western countries on donated blood.
Viral infections require a fairly significant viral payload to overwhelm initial defence mechanisms and have a reasonable chance to encounter correct cells, infect them and being the reproduction cycle.
I could be wrong in relation to HIV, since it behaves in some very e
In Poland first patient was given blood plasma (Score:3)
This week first patient in Poland was given blood plasma produced from COVID convalescents' blood.
Several hours after injection his fewer has dropped, but it's too early to say if this therapy actually works.
Transfer factor? (Score:1)
Methylene Blue is really the drug being tested! (Score:2)
Blood that comes from people who had Coronavirus has to have the viruses in it killed. This is done by adding methylene blue and exposing the blood to high intensity light.
"Inactivation of three emerging viruses – severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever virus and Nipah virus – in platelet concentrates by ultraviolet C light and in plasma by methylene blue plus visible light"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co... [wiley.com]
There are literally decades of research wit
Re: (Score:2)
The methylene blue I can handle. But if you are telling me that I have to leave my mother's basement and actually expose myself to sunlight.....
.... well, let Covid-19 take me.
Vampires (Score:2)
Has anyone looked into why vampires seem unaffected by COVID-19? May be something there .. just saying.
Re: (Score:2)
What scientific literature I've seen on the subject suggests that COVID-19 can only affect vampires under two circumstances:
1) Live virus present on a wooden stake that's being driven through the vampire's heart
2) If an infected person happens to cough in the immediate vicinity of a vampire at the moment the vampire is exposed to direct sunlight.
Blood magic (Score:2)
This is one step up from blood magic practiced by some traditional peoples.