Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Education

A.P. Exams in the Coronavirus Era: Online, and Just 15 To 45 Minutes Long (wsj.com) 53

Beginning Monday, 3.4 million high school students will sit down at desks -- and in cars, on bedroom floors and anywhere they can find some quiet -- and take Advanced Placement exams with the hopes of proving mastery of a range of academic subjects. From a report: The tests will look much different than in years past, as the coronavirus pandemic has closed high schools and sent the College Board, which runs the Advanced Placement program, scrambling to create a new format. The tests, in subjects including U.S. history, physics and macroeconomics, historically took three hours to complete. This year, the tests will cover less material and last no more than 45 minutes. To minimize the opportunity for cheating, students globally will take them at the same time, meaning overnight exams for those in Asia. "We definitely did not want to do it this way," said Trevor Packer, senior vice president of the A.P. program and instruction at the College Board. "But when we started to see that schools were closing and many would not open this academic year, we had two options: we would either cancel the exams or find a way to meet students where they are, which is in their home. We heard an overwhelming desire to proceed. We thought we had to go ahead."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A.P. Exams in the Coronavirus Era: Online, and Just 15 To 45 Minutes Long

Comments Filter:
  • Cheaters (Score:2, Insightful)

    by backslashdot ( 95548 )

    Hiow many kids with the access to resources, helicopter parents, etc. will cheat. Are these people idiots to be so naively trusting? It will reward bad behavior and demoralize and punish many hardworking students -- long term that will be bad for technology and the economy. And it'll be nearly impossible to prove. They should have postponed the exams or figured out a way to proctor the exams. It's not like there aren't a bunch of empty school buildings .. they could maintain social distancing and hold the e

    • by Nidi62 ( 1525137 )

      Hiow many kids with the access to resources, helicopter parents, etc. will cheat. Are these people idiots to be so naively trusting? It will reward bad behavior and demoralize and punish many hardworking students -- long term that will be bad for technology and the economy. And it'll be nearly impossible to prove. They should have postponed the exams or figured out a way to proctor the exams. It's not like there aren't a bunch of empty school buildings .. they could maintain social distancing and hold the exams with say 5 or 6 students per classroom. If there is a shortage of proctors, cameras could be in the exam rooms.

      I would say require the tests to be taken on a device with a camera, and that camera should be recording the entire time the test is active.

      • Better - just have the colleges test the kids when they show up.

        Have them take the final exam of whatever class they're trying to get credit for, and if they pass it, give them credit.

        Seems simpler, more fair, and more reliable than counting on some third party company's tests.

      • by vinn01 ( 178295 )

        "I would say require the tests to be taken on a device with a camera"

        The College Board can't watch the video feeds from thousands of students. Even after the fact, reviewing thousands of videos would be an enormous task.

        I've seen test-taking camera apps that claim to track eye movement. It's still a huge burden to review the footage of students flagged as potential cheaters... in an average sized class. At the scale of the AP exams, there is no way those apps would work since they require manual review

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Hiow many kids with the access to resources, helicopter parents, etc. will cheat. Are these people idiots to be so naively trusting? It will reward bad behavior and demoralize and punish many hardworking students -- long term that will be bad for technology and the economy. And it'll be nearly impossible to prove. They should have postponed the exams or figured out a way to proctor the exams. It's not like there aren't a bunch of empty school buildings .. they could maintain social distancing and hold the e

      • How would those measures work when the questions would be heard by and answered by some else? Also you naively assume that the cheater would be a complete dunce --a false assumption in most cases no doubt. Some extra help can turn a B student to an A student. An advisor could flash a card saying "use quicksort" .. hints like that .. again .. its not going to help an F student be an A student but it may help a B or C student become get an A.

  • Entrance exams are nice.

    What would be nicer is if credit-by-exam tests, such as DSST, could figure out a way to operate remotely.

    Unfortunately, those are only held at (now-closed) educational institutions, where the student can be observed (by an actual academic professional) to be not cheating.

    (I'm two of these tests away from completing a degree, and more than a bit annoyed by not being able to take the final exams for the last two distribution requirements and finish earning the diploma.)

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Seriously.

    It can't be delayed because it would be cruel to students that are at the cusp of getting a better grade. A delay would have them forget something, lowering their grade.
    It has to be at home, since some areas are still under serious quarantine.
    It has to be on computer so that there's a semblance of monitoring time, if nothing else.
    It can't use video or audio to monitor due to both privacy concerns as well as some computers just don't have the capability.
    It has to be all at the same time, to minimi

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...