Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

Germany is Banning Single-Use Plastic Straws, Cotton Buds and Food Containers (usatoday.com) 135

Germany is banning the sale of single-use plastic straws, cotton buds and food containers, bringing it in line with a European Union directive intended to reduce the amount of plastic garbage that pollutes the environment. From a report: The Cabinet agreed Wednesday to end the sale of plastics including single-use cutlery, plates, stirring sticks and balloon holders, as well as polystyrene cups and boxes by July 3, 2021. Environment Minister Svenja Schulze said the move was part of an effort to move away from "throw-away culture." Up to 20% of garbage collected in parks and other public places consists of single-use plastic, mainly polystyrene containers.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Germany is Banning Single-Use Plastic Straws, Cotton Buds and Food Containers

Comments Filter:
  • Had to look that up; British/European term for 'cotton swab'.
    Why ban those? They can be made with paper sticks.
    • Hell, they used to be! The plastic ones they make now are not as good either, bend easily and scratch some surfaces the old paper ones didn't harm.
    • Probably they just said you can't make the qtip shaft out of plastic and have to use e.g. cardboard.
      • Re:'Cotton buds'? (Score:4, Informative)

        by Richard_at_work ( 517087 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @09:09PM (#60354059)

        This. Its not about banning the item itself, its banning the single use plastic - there are already cotton buds with paper based stems available to purchase, and the UK went this way a few years back. Paper based stems are bendier and less sturdy but still get the job done.

        Dont expect it to stop here - face wipes, baby wipes etc are all in the firing line in many European countries as they are all single use where reusable products are just as usable (albeit less convenient in a modern world - who wants to wash a facecloth after a few uses these days?)

        • Re:'Cotton buds'? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @10:59PM (#60354293) Homepage

          In my whole 59 years of life, I have never seen someone use a cotton bud out in public, only at home in the bathroom. How does that rubbish sneak out of there. Hey I know something they should ban, mobile phones with fixed batteries which get broken by design when the battery swells, designed that way on purpose. How about that pollution plus the additional pollution generating revenue needed to keep buying mobile phones that are actively designed to break but Qtips they are the bigger issue, OK :/.

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            by Anonymous Coward

            I don't know exactly how they get out there, though I could guess, but as a diver I can tell you with absolute certainty that enough of them end up in the ocean that I've seen a good few during dives everywhere from the Caribbean to Asia, so this makes sense, though I think the bigger problem is that because they're small they also break down easily into micro plastics. This is just a guess, but it's possible therefore that they're seeping into the water through runoff as microplastics too.

            I don't disagree

          • Re:'Cotton buds'? (Score:5, Interesting)

            by michelcolman ( 1208008 ) on Saturday August 01, 2020 @03:41AM (#60354637)

            Many cruise and cargo ships throw trash overboard to avoid paying the fees per ton of trash offloaded in the harbour. If you want to clean up the oceans, that looks like a better place to start. Perhaps a world wide rule where ships pay for trash per passenger mile rather than per ton?

            And increase fees for littering. In Singapore, you can get a $2000 fine for a first offence. Plastic should be thrown into the trash, not into nature, why do people still find this so difficult to understand?

            But noooo, it's much easier to outlaw plastic straws and force people to use either badly tasting paper straws (yes, I've tried them) or tooth-busting corona-spreading metal straws. Never mind that producing paper straws (with the liners inside) actually pollutes more than the production of plastic straws.

            • But noooo, it's much easier to outlaw plastic straws and force people to use either badly tasting paper straws (yes, I've tried them) or tooth-busting corona-spreading metal straws. Never mind that producing paper straws (with the liners inside) actually pollutes more than the production of plastic straws.

              There are also silicone straws. They're just as corona-spreading as metal ones, which is to say negligibly, but they won't bust your teeth. I imagine hot beverages make them a bit bendy, but not so much that they won't accomplish their mission.

              • Silicone's electrostatic charge makes it IMPOSSIBLE to store kitchen utensils made from it without having them attract things like dust, dander, and cat fur. Well, unless they come out of the dishwasher & go straight into a plastic ziploc bag for storage... ;-)

                • You could store it in a case, which you'd probably want to do with other kinds of straws to keep them clean anyway. Or you could rinse before use, although I'm not thrilled with the idea of washing a straw in a public restaurant's bathroom sink either.

            • But noooo, it's much easier to outlaw plastic straws

              One regulation that can solve source problems rather than having to deal with shitty enforcement mechanisms is easier. Also it's not all about littering, it's not all about plastic in the oceans, it's not all about landfills.

              Fundamentally we humans are horrendously wasteful and horrid creatures who through millions of years of evolution with our perfectly formed mouths are suddenly too good to drink from a fucking cup. "noooo" we need to dig up decayed dinosaurs instead.

              or tooth-busting corona-spreading metal straws

              Please don't cite a very temporary pa

            • If cruise ships dumping garbage is really a problem then the other options is to require ports to accept garbage as part of the docking fee instead of per ton of garbage. Also fine anyone caught doing it and offer rewards for reporting it.

          • by 1s44c ( 552956 )

            It's not a matter of fixing the things in "bigger issue" order. It's a matter of fixing as much as possible in the shortest time. These things are bad and can be relatively easily replaced, so they should be. Your point about single use batteries is of course absolutely correct, I want to be able to change batteries on all my devices, even if that makes them slightly bigger.

          • by Pimpy ( 143938 )

            I would guess they are lumped together with other plastics, shoved on a boat somewhere, and sent on their merry way. The plastic trash is then either dumped directly into the ocean by boat owners looking to increase their margin or dumped in a country with few environmental safeguards so long as the price is right. Banning plastic qtips won't solve this problem, but it will at least ensure that less stuff is being dumped.

        • Paper based stems are bendier and less sturdy but still get the job done.

          This is the exact opposite of my experience. Paper based Q-Tips are sturdier than plastic ones.

          • Paper based stems are bendier and less sturdy but still get the job done.

            This is the exact opposite of my experience. Paper based Q-Tips are sturdier than plastic ones.

            Same here. But I do find it depends on the brand. Name brand Q-Tips are sturdy, but many off-brand cotton swabs with paper stems are worse than plastic ones. I make sure to only buy Q-Tip brand ones for that one reason alone.

        • I was horrified the first time I encountered a plastic stem q-tip. Not just because it's a stupid waste of plastic, but also because in every way it was worse, it was weaker than the paper stick, being hollow it could collect water and the edges were sharp enough that exposure to them in the ear canal could be extremely dangerous.

          I understand the plastic industry pushing the switch, but honestly, half the time we replace a traditional power object with plastic about half the time it's worse, it's only advan

        • We banned straws a few years ago, but like banning cotton buds (which we didn't) it's one thing to ban them but much harder to replace them. What replaced plastic straws was paper ones, which turn into a soggy crushed mess after a short time, essentially useless.

          I get the feeling this ban is more a shopping list of items that someone dreamed up than anything based on real research, i.e. go out there and collect roadside litter from various locations and ban the worst offenders. My guess would be plastic

        • This. Its not about banning the item itself, its banning the single use plastic - there are already cotton buds with paper based stems available to purchase, and the UK went this way a few years back. Paper based stems are bendier and less sturdy but still get the job done.

          Dont expect it to stop here - face wipes, baby wipes etc are all in the firing line in many European countries as they are all single use where reusable products are just as usable (albeit less convenient in a modern world - who wants to wash a facecloth after a few uses these days?)

          Quebec Canada also banned 1x use plastic. Paper straws are the replacement. Unfortunately, they are slightly thicker than the wax coated paper straws of old. Thicker because they have to be resist flattening when put into the same take-out bag as the rest of the food. Wax straws tend to get squashed.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Had to look that up; British/European term for 'cotton swab'.

      Why ban those? They can be made with paper sticks.

      The ones with plastic sticks are banned. The whole thing is a stunt, though.

    • by fazig ( 2909523 )
      Those with paper sticks are already widely available.

      A lot of people don't like them, because they bend too easily compared to plastic sticks. But they'll get used to it sooner or later.

      Unless we can manufacture the plastics with domestic resources, possibly from plant polymers, lowering our dependence on minerals oil is a good idea in my opinion.
      There's still a lot of nonsense going on there, like making Germany's baseline electricity generation dependent on gas straight from Putin's ass, which is lik
    • "Had to look that up; British/European term for 'cotton swab'.
      Why ban those? They can be made with paper sticks."

      It's about plastic.
      Paper stick ones aren't banned, also not paper straws or paper food containers.
      That's kind of the point.

  • Well done (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
    I'm sure the ban on plastic straws will clean up the ocean and rivers around Indonesia.......
    • Re:Well done (Score:5, Informative)

      by Pascoea ( 968200 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @11:05PM (#60354309)
      Considering the western world has a habit of dumping our shit in 3rd-world countries, seems like it would make sense to produce less shit. https://www.motherjones.com/en... [motherjones.com]
    • Some moron always says this shit.

    • I'm sure the ban on plastic straws will clean up the ocean and rivers around Indonesia.......

      Who cares about the oceans around Indonesia. I for one am excited to have less plastic littered in the bushes on the road side.

      Speaking of Indonesia, do you still export your plastic waste there for "recycling" the same way you export all your other problems to the 3rd world and then blame them for it? Or do you buy exclusively in the USA and dispose responsibly exclusively in the USA?

      • >"Who cares about the oceans around Indonesia. I for one am excited to have less plastic littered in the bushes on the road side."

        I, for one, would be more excited about not littering in the first place. It doesn't matter what the item is or is made of. Even lined paper will sit in the open for years. Plastic straws are a vanishingly tiny part of plastic waste and also litter for which there are few reasonable alternatives. What I see the most are plastic and non-plastic cups and food containers.

        >

        • I, for one, would be more excited about not littering in the first place.

          Honestly I'm more excited about a pony, but I can't get one so I'll settle for biodegradable waste.

  • Fantasic news (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @08:25PM (#60353961)
    This is fantastic news. Germany should be very proud. That's awesome. I'm looking forward to more countries doing it, as well.
    • Re:Fantasic news (Score:5, Insightful)

      by timeOday ( 582209 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @08:55PM (#60354029)
      The entire practice of making something that will be used for 5 minutes and then last for 1000 more years should be reduced as much as possible, that ratio is awful.
      • by DogDude ( 805747 )
        Absolutely. That's the crux of it. If I stop and think about it every time I throw away a piece of plastic, it's pretty overwhelming.
        • by Pascoea ( 968200 )
          Right? I love what Amazon is doing with their padded mailers. 100% paper. Even if you don't recycle it, it'll be fertilizer in a couple years. I understand that paper has its downsides as well, but it's still way better than the plastic they are replacing.
          • by 1s44c ( 552956 )

            Exactly. And they are doing is from the free enterprise angle, not the government mandated angle. It's encouraging.

      • The entire practice of making something that will be used for 5 minutes and then last for 1000 more years should be reduced as much as possible, that ratio is awful.

        . . . those cardboard condoms are going to be a "rough ride" . . .

      • Yeah, but what's with the tagging on this story?

        It's common sense, and pretty well supported in the population, but it's more tagged "nazi" and "sieghiel."

  • So when I go down to my local kebab shop and get a doner salat or my local imbis and get a currywurst and frites to go how are they going to serve it to me?
    • by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Friday July 31, 2020 @10:01PM (#60354203)
      Paper plates. Wooden utensils. Believe it or not, but humans ate take out food for many thousands of years before plastic was invented!
      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        by Mashiki ( 184564 )

        You know that businesses moved away from paper plates, wooden utensils and all the rest because it was expensive. And environmentalists cried that it was killing trees. And your definition of take out is kinda funny. Man just think of those days long past where people brought their own utensils and plates. Then again, even earthenware was considered disposable at one point.

        It reminds me of those glorious cloth bags that businesses started falling all over themselves to push people to go with. Then sudd

        • by DogDude ( 805747 )
          You know that businesses moved away from paper plates, wooden utensils and all the rest because it was expensive.

          So...? Plastic things are cheap because of the massive oil subsidies. And even if they were more expensive... so? You also buy shatter proof glass in your car's windshield. But, it's more expensive... so maybe you should replace it window single-pane window glass, then, right?

          You've got some good stories swirling around in your head about what imaginary groups of people told you. Good l
          • by Mashiki ( 184564 )

            Plastic isn't cheap because of massive oil subsidies. It's cheap because we use all of the raw and refined components in everything we make unlike even 50 years ago. Your attempt at an example is shit though, you buy a shatter proof glass windshield because the windshield is a critical component of the vehicles structure. Not having it means you die of things like the engine compartment flipping upwards in a high speed crash, or getting crushed in a rollover.

            It's a good thing it's not hard to find everyt

    • by Shinobi ( 19308 ) on Saturday August 01, 2020 @02:39AM (#60354577)

      More and more single-use food containers over here are made from paper, or from left-over starch from industrial food production(Which means they are even edible)

      • Have they changed much in the past 3 years?
        At that time at the places that used paper it was that wax covered heavy paper and then they could use a piece of aluminum foil to wrap it.
        We were told not to throw that type of paper in the paper recycling container.
        Compared to a single styrofoam container I don't see any real difference from the recycling side.
        Those edible wafer things were used with crepes and similar things at fests but have you ever seen anyone eat them? I usually just saw garbage can fil
    • The same way you'd get it at kebab shops that aren't your local brand of idiots. Paper plates and straws, and wooden utensils. Shit man if the degenerates in the Ruhrgebiet can figure this out I'm sure your local Doner can as well.

  • ...instead of plastic straws wrapped in paper.

    As if that's going to make the difference. In a few hundred years when we're all dead and buried, future generations will be scratching their heads and blaming our stupidity for our harsh lives.

    • I didn't see that anywhere in the laws. Hell I don't think I've ever been given a straw in anything. Is that a thing in America? Don't you have those straw dispensers where you push a button and you get a straw? If anything it's plastic straw wrapped in metal.

  • by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Saturday August 01, 2020 @08:22AM (#60354987)
    Or we could reduce our population. It will stop someday, that's a mathematical given. The question is: Will we reduce our population, or will mother nature do it for us? So far it looks like we've chosen mother nature to do it for us, unfortunately.
    • I'm not sure that's unfortunate. Mothernature's wrath seems to favour the intelligent as the survivors, whereas voluntarily not reproducing seems to favour the poor and stupid.

    • by noodler ( 724788 )
      Well, are you willing to give up your progeny to save the world? In fact, are you willing to terminate your life since it clearly contributes to the overall problem? Right, neither does the rest of us.
  • by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Saturday August 01, 2020 @09:55AM (#60355149)

    We already barely use those things anymore anyway. Aside from it having become quite unfashionable too.
    So banning the things is just putting the final signature under the done deal, to make it official.

    Now let's see how up in arms US commenters are ... :)

Business is a good game -- lots of competition and minimum of rules. You keep score with money. -- Nolan Bushnell, founder of Atari

Working...