Meteorite Study Suggests Earth May Have Been Wet Since It Formed 59
nickwinlund77 shares a report from Phys.Org: A new study finds that Earth's water may have come from materials that were present in the inner solar system at the time the planet formed -- instead of far-reaching comets or asteroids delivering such water. The findings published Aug. 28 in Science suggest that Earth may have always been wet.
Researchers from the Centre de Recherches Petrographiques et Geochimiques (CRPG, CNRS/Universite de Lorraine) in Nancy, France, including one who is now a postdoctoral fellow at Washington University in St. Louis, determined that a type of meteorite called an enstatite chondrite contains sufficient hydrogen to deliver at least three times the amount of water contained in the Earth's oceans, and probably much more. Enstatite chondrites are entirely composed of material from the inner solar system -- essentially the same stuff that made up the Earth originally. "Our discovery shows that the Earth's building blocks might have significantly contributed to the Earth's water," said lead author Laurette Piani, a researcher at CPRG. "Hydrogen-bearing material was present in the inner solar system at the time of the rocky planet formation, even though the temperatures were too high for water to condense."
Researchers from the Centre de Recherches Petrographiques et Geochimiques (CRPG, CNRS/Universite de Lorraine) in Nancy, France, including one who is now a postdoctoral fellow at Washington University in St. Louis, determined that a type of meteorite called an enstatite chondrite contains sufficient hydrogen to deliver at least three times the amount of water contained in the Earth's oceans, and probably much more. Enstatite chondrites are entirely composed of material from the inner solar system -- essentially the same stuff that made up the Earth originally. "Our discovery shows that the Earth's building blocks might have significantly contributed to the Earth's water," said lead author Laurette Piani, a researcher at CPRG. "Hydrogen-bearing material was present in the inner solar system at the time of the rocky planet formation, even though the temperatures were too high for water to condense."
Neon (Score:3, Interesting)
Most scientists believe that Earth lost her water during the collision with Theia [wikipedia.org], and then later gained water again from comets and asteroid impacts.
A strong piece of evidence for this is the near-total absence of Neon on Earth. Neon is common in the Universe and in the rest of the Solar System. But if the post-collision Earth was too hot to hold onto Neon (atomic weight: 20) it would have also been too hot to hold onto water (molecular weight: 18). Ergo, the water came later.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Neon (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
But apparently, Earth didn't lose its Nitrogen during the event
Maybe it did. Nitrogen is rare on Earth. We only think it is common because we are surrounded by it, but the atmosphere is just a tiny wisp when compared to the bulk of the planet. Oxygen also exists in the atmosphere, but 99.99% of it is in the oceans and lithosphere. But with nitrogen, the atmosphere is almost all there is.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Nitrogen might be quite reactive compared to Helium and Neon and other noble gases, but I don;t think you can really consider it "quite reactive" in an objective sense.
Re: (Score:2)
For industrial purposes nitrogen is frequently used as an "inert" gas. Nitrogen fixation is tricky enough biologically that plants leave it to symbiotic relationship with bacteria. Still, there are compunds that nitrogen can form naturally in an atmosphere such as ammonia and nitrous oxide. Ammonia is lighter than air though. Nitrous oxides are heavier than air, but we're still talking about gases. In any case, in the scenario we're talking about, the atmosphere and the ground can be presumed to be very hot
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
the near-total absence of Neon on Earth
Ok so explain my neighbors "Tig ol' Bitties" man-cave sign, smart guy.
Re: Neon (Score:2)
Just from the atomic and molecular weight, the conclusion seems logical, until you realize that water has entirely different properties, not being inert, being a dipole, etcetera. If water has evaporated and blown off, you can (likely) make the conclusion that neon would also have, but the other way around is not a given.
Re: (Score:2)
That is one of the theories in consideration, but if you actually read the current science (drinking from the firehose, I know) you'll find that it's a lot further from a consensus than you imply.
Theia (or something similar) does appear a lot, but the details of the collision are much more unsure. Certainly, gravitational potential energy became heat, but whe
Re: (Score:2)
Was going to post the same thing but you beat me to it.
Re: (Score:3)
Where's the turtle? My wives religion has a better story,
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is your holy book useful for goat farming? Very important factor for God books, less relevant for the physical sciences.
Wet? (Score:2)
Moist.
Re: (Score:1)
I knew it! (Score:2)
Mother Earth has been horny all along.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I knew someone would write it.
Ben Shaprio... (Score:2)
...says "No Thanks!" and boards a Falcon 9 to Mars.
well..... (Score:1)
That slut! (Score:2)
Anything will get her wet! She's been wet since she was born!