How the Ozone Layer Was 'Rescued' From a Spike in CFC (bbc.com) 85
Thelasko shared this report from the BBC:
A steady decline in the levels of ozone-harming CFC chemicals in the atmosphere has resumed, scientists say. This follows a recent, dangerous pause in that downward trajectory, which could have slowed the healing of Earth's protective ozone layer.
Atmospheric measurements published in 2018 pointed to illegal CFC production that was occurring in Eastern China. Stopping that production appears to have set the ozone layer's healing process back on track... The conclusions of a chemistry-based detective story, based on work carried out over several years by an international team of researchers, are published in two papers in the journal Nature... Further detective work in China by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) — and by environmental journalists — found that the chemical was being used in the majority of polyurethane insulation foam that was being produced by firms in the region.
The scientists stressed that the scale of this illegal production may never be revealed in full. But this combination — of chemistry, investigative journalism and enforcement of the Montreal Protocol, the researchers say, has avoided significant delays to the healing of the ozone layer.
Dr. Luke Western, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Bristol, tells the BBC that now "later this century we should see recovery of the ozone layer back to levels that we saw in 1980."
Atmospheric measurements published in 2018 pointed to illegal CFC production that was occurring in Eastern China. Stopping that production appears to have set the ozone layer's healing process back on track... The conclusions of a chemistry-based detective story, based on work carried out over several years by an international team of researchers, are published in two papers in the journal Nature... Further detective work in China by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) — and by environmental journalists — found that the chemical was being used in the majority of polyurethane insulation foam that was being produced by firms in the region.
The scientists stressed that the scale of this illegal production may never be revealed in full. But this combination — of chemistry, investigative journalism and enforcement of the Montreal Protocol, the researchers say, has avoided significant delays to the healing of the ozone layer.
Dr. Luke Western, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Bristol, tells the BBC that now "later this century we should see recovery of the ozone layer back to levels that we saw in 1980."
Time to hold dictatorships like China to account. (Score:5, Insightful)
China deny their people the vote, imprison people for speaking out and are polluting our planet to death.
And yet we trade with them, cheer them when they get to Mars, sell them all the advanced tech they want.
Time to fix the world and stop ALL trade with dictatorships.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
China deny their people the vote, imprison people for speaking out and are polluting our planet to death. And yet we trade with them, cheer them when they get to Mars, sell them all the advanced tech they want.
Time to fix the world and stop ALL trade with dictatorships.
Careful what you wish for. Americans get to vote, and almost half of them wanted Trump... What makes you so sure a Chinese Trump would be better than what they have now?
Um, it's Trump who was trying to wean us off China. And Biden is already bending over for China.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, it's Trump who was trying to wean us off China. And Biden is already bending over for China.
That's what he *said*, but what he *did* was put America in debt to China more than any other president.
Re: (Score:2)
Did you not like your Federal Taxpayer-Funded "Stimulis Check"?
Re: (Score:2)
Did you not get your Federal Taxpayer-Funded "Stimulis Check"?
It was a federal debt funded "stimulus check".
The ones who hold the debt are... China.
(well, in part).
Re: (Score:1)
China has a trade surplus, that will always translate into China owning foreign bonds.
Trump decreased US trade with China, thereby decreasing China's trade surplus thereby decreasing US indebtedness to China.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even now, he continues to get trump products, such as MAGA produced in China.
Re: (Score:1)
False choice. There are more options than dictatorship and broken democracy. Donald Trump is not a justification for dictatorship.
Your argument is essentially "death or oogabooga" https://www.ebaumsworld.com/jo... [ebaumsworld.com]
Also, why are you assuming a "Chinese Trump" is the worst that could happen or is worse than they have now? Trump is a grossly incompetent ignoramus. A Trump with even the slightest intelligence, or even basic literacy, would be far worse.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
He must have threatened the families of many senators for that backing
Nope. GOP no longer have morals.
Re: (Score:2)
False choice. There are more options than dictatorship and broken democracy. Donald Trump is not a justification for dictatorship.
Your argument is essentially "death or oogabooga" https://www.ebaumsworld.com/jo... [ebaumsworld.com]
Also, why are you assuming a "Chinese Trump" is the worst that could happen or is worse than they have now? Trump is a grossly incompetent ignoramus. A Trump with even the slightest intelligence, or even basic literacy, would be far worse.
Shallow thinkers are making it a choice of 2 extremes. Commie evil Democracy perfect. That's not at all what I said.
Do people think China will get a multiparty European style democracy? An American 2 party turd or shit sandwich? Or Russia North Korea 'democracy'? Which is more likely?
Think about the Chinese people and their sense of history and entitlement. You don't think a Make China Great Again populist leader would be a disaster, making
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Xi is already a 'Make CHina great again' leader. Ppl are either NOT reading what he is saying, or choosing to ignore it. But the whole point of BRI is to make sure that CHina's government controls all other nations, esp. the undeveloped nations.
China has used Capitalism to grow it's economy and status. Is using Capitalism to 'control other nations' as you put it. Actually to invest in the future and try to wean as many countries off $US as they can. Securing resources and markets for their products. Sounds pretty Capitalist to me.
Where is your evidence that they are still Commies? Other than the bedtime stories we tell little kids to scare them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not even 33% of American's voted for Trump.
So then 66% of them were quite willing to either vote for Trump directly or not mind if he won by choosing not to vote at all. 4 years of Trump and if he wasn't totally incompetent dealing with Covid he would have won again.
Xi puts himself first, the party second and the county third.
Trump puts himself first second and third.
Xi has to keep all* his people happy enough that they don't want to overthrow him.
Trump only has to brainwash enough of his party to do everything he says. He's openly hostile to th
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
What about something less primitive, like an illusionary democracy then? You know: When the de-facto dictators repeat the lies often enough for the people to actually believe it, and do it by themselves, so "no dictatorship is needed", as they enslave themselves and believe they actually want that and it's their own fault nothing ever gets better. Which works so well because everyone actually believes *he* cannot be manipulated and is an independent mind with a free will.
Will we stop trade with those too...
Re: (Score:2)
Unless the US has Trump as President, they we certainly would and endorse China doing the same. I wonder if China would endorse separating infants from their parents, deporting the parents and leaving the children to rot in jails. Have you not paid attention the last 4 years?
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to acco (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to ac (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As far as I know they allied against western aggression amid actual genocide by the UK and the US
WOW.
You are either from China or N. Korea. Educate yourself [wikipedia.org]
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to ac (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And no, the OP is not scaremongering. He is correctly pointing out that CHina, like imperialist Japan was, is well known for their brutality and wanting to control everything/everybody.
That is why China is invading other nations in Asia (who want little to nothing to do with CHina, but must), and now, CHina is using BRI and economic means to control other nations that are foolish.
And an old
Re: (Score:2)
Western aggression? You left out "running dogs", or is that no longer en vogue?
May I suggest "The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War" by David Halberstam?
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to ac (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
China could have easily taken over Northern Korea
China knows this, North Korea knows this, and everyone else knows this. Korea is China's annoying little brother.
China has no need to 'take over' North Korea. China benefits greatly from having DPRK as a puppet state, and a buffer - physically, administratively, culturally, and ideologically - between it and the actually democratic nation of South Korea. The idea that China would 'signal' - or, frankly, even need to 'think about' - taking over DPRK is absurd enough to be laughable.
Your red herring smells f
Re: (Score:1)
Not really. China doesn't have any interest in expanding beyond what it sees as historical China.
BRI.
Likewise, ask India, Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, S. Korea, Vietnam, even Taiwan how 'peaceful' china is.
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to acco (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We have bases in S. Korea and Philippines only to stop N. Korea/China/Russia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We don't get to count Tibet any more? Short memories guys! China was, of course, just defending themselves from the violent and ruthless invasion from Tibet! No expansionism here!
(That was sarcasm by the way)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is, they keep redefining "historical china". currently, it's the entire South China Sea.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
China doesn't have any interest in expanding beyond what it sees as historical China.
Quick, how do you say "Anschluss" in Mandarin?
Is the formerly free and independent nation of Tibet part of 'historical China', so?
we not have the war drums of liberal media banging out rumors of China's "true" intentions and hearsay of Muslim genocide from the liberals and conservatives, when they have themselves apologized for American and European ongoing Muslim genocide in the Middle East.
That's quite a lot of buzzwords there.
Are you saying that it's perfectly fine for China to continue to imprison, oppress, and work as slaves a religious and ethnic minority simply because "you guys do it, too!"?
I don't know what the equivalent idiom is in zhongwen, but in English we say that "Two wrongs don't make a right".
China is expansionist and imperialist, and trying to put
Re: (Score:2)
Likewise, while I certainly have no issue with bombing AQ, ISIS, Talibahn, etc, when we capture them, we have a responsibility to treat them correctly. WHat W did was disgusting and shows that he did not learn his history in college.
Re: Time to hold dictatorships like China to accou (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Time to hold dictatorships like China to account.
Time for you to stop complaining about dictatorships not obeying other dictatorships.
Re: (Score:2)
Likewise, they continue to claim that they will stop increasing CO2, and they keep adding more and more coal plants, with increased coal consumption and increased CO2 emissions. However, the only treaty on that, is Kyoto/paris, which are major jokes.
Re:Time to hold dictatorships like China to accoun (Score:5, Insightful)
China deny their people the vote, imprison people for speaking out and are polluting our planet to death.
And yet we trade with them, cheer them when they get to Mars, sell them all the advanced tech they want.
Time to fix the world and stop ALL trade with dictatorships.
Any proof that would be more successful than raising the standard of living in China through trade?
China is changing, ableit very slowly, and the rise of a successful middle class is a large part of that change. China today, although far from ideal, is a huge shift from the China of the 1960's and 1970's, and much of that shift has been positive. Some of us are old enough to remember the "Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution", a decades-long campaign of terror and oppression that killed millions of Chinese, and enslaved most of the rest. Lack of trade, in part, enabled that horror show.
There is still a long,long way to go, but, there is measureable progress, and much of that progress is thanks to increased trade. The reality is there are no easy answers, and any "solution" will be painful, slow and rarely linear.
Absent proof stopping ALL trade will likely yield quicker, measureable and more favourable improvements (history suggests otherwise), continuing trade, as painful as it is,remains the better option.
China is chaning in many ways (Score:3)
That China is changing is an understatement. And the high degree of change leads to instability and unpredictability.
I live pretty much the same way my father did. Engineering 9 to 5 job, although his car did not have Bluetooth, his phone was wired. But basically the same.
In my father's day, the Chinese were under Mao! They literally starved to death under the Great Leap Forward, and during the Cultural Revolution anyone with brains was purged. Then Mao finally died, Deng Xioping somehow climbed to the
Re:Time to hold dictatorships like China to accoun (Score:4, Insightful)
Wait, *how* was it rescued? (Score:5, Insightful)
TFS doesn't say anything about how those factories were stopped. Nor does it hint at the article containing that info.
Re:Wait, *how* was it rescued? (Score:5, Informative)
The absence of information is the clue - we simply don't know. Some industry, or industries, in China was violating the Montreal Protocol, using a banned CFC blowing agent to further its profits. This was detected and traced back to China and the world made a stink for the Government of China. So the GOC found out the culprits and made them cut it out. What pressures or penalties were applied may never be known. But that is OK. We just needed it stopped.
Re: (Score:2)
TFS doesn't say anything about how those factories were stopped. Nor does it hint at the article containing that info.
The EIA article has that info.
Re: Wait, *how* was it rescued? (Score:2)
Thanks. This is pecisely what I was looking for.
I really don't see the need to come to Slashdot, if I have to scan news articles for useful information anyway.
Slashdot should give me the redux edition. The essence. So I can learn more in less time, and got time to spare for other things.
Re: (Score:2)
This will soon also be done with CO2 and methane (Score:1)
Don't say "China" (Score:1)
Meanwhile, in the rest of the world... (Score:2)
Mechanics in the US are required to buy expensive CFC capture equipment to service auto A/C units but just over the border in Mexico, the let the stuff vent directly to the atmosphere. Oh, and you can still buy R-22 there.
Re: Meanwhile, in the rest of the world... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
If we can pull the same trick on climate change we may still have a chance, but it is late.
Re: (Score:2)
Fact is, when trump redid NAFTA, we really should have pushed for labor and environmental laws to be upgraded by all 3 nations. In particular, we should have brought America and Mexico up to at least Canada's level.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
One minor issue: R134a does not deplete the ozone. It does have a high global warming potential (1400x that of CO2), but nobody's dumping tons of it into the atmosphere.
Re: (Score:2)
Basically all* refrigerants are required to be captured rather than vented, not that every refrigerant tech does that.
* Technically subtances as common as water and air can be used as refrigerants, but I'm obviously not talking about them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now, lets stop their continued CO2 growth (Score:2)