Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

EPA Releases List of Top Cities With Energy Star-certified Buildings (axios.com) 22

EPA is out with its latest tally of buildings certified through the Energy Star efficiency program it runs with the Energy Department. From a report: Commercial and multifamily buildings are a big source of energy demand and carbon emissions. The chart shows the ranking of large cities, and this page has more about those, and smaller cities, too.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EPA Releases List of Top Cities With Energy Star-certified Buildings

Comments Filter:
  • What could be less relevant to readers?

    Why do you insist on such low quality posts?

    • What could be less relevant to readers?

      Why do you insist on such low quality posts?

      I don't know but this is the least interesting article I've seen here in months.

    • The only way to win is not to click on bad articles. Like publicity, there is no bad engagement. So yeah, I have failed too.
      And even if this article had some discernable nerd-appeal, the summary still fails in not giving away at least some of the top cities. Slashdot was built on useful summaries, not click-bait headlines.

  • What's better: getting more apartment buildings energy star certified, or getting more single or dual family homes certified?

    That is, on a per person basis, is a certified apartment building better than a certified single family home? I suspect so, but not sure, since apartments aren't always aiming for being most efficient vs requiring less maintenance or keeping tenants happy.

    And is "per person" the best metric?

    • Apartments have certain economies-of-scale like central heating and cooling that can be more efficient than the smaller units single-family dwellings. On the other hand, they also have common areas (hallways, stairwells, elevators, laundry rooms, etc) that must be heated and lit 24 hours a day, unlike a single-family dwelling. Also, an apartment building is only as efficient as it's worst tenant. If your neighbor leaves his windows open all winter, it undoes the efforts of everyone else in the building.

      • Also, an apartment building is only as efficient as it's worst tenant. If your neighbor leaves his windows open all winter, it undoes the efforts of everyone else in the building.

        That's one of the dumbest things I've read in a long time. Well done!

        That's not how math, physics, or reality works.

        What would posses you to come on the internet and just dump random, stupid thoughts like that here? There are a million other things you could be doing. Why this? And why here? Have you not been introduced to Twitter? That's literally the point of Twitter.

    • A Tiny-house [wikipedia.org] would be better in several ways including energy.

    • The motivation to lower energy costs applies to the person paying the energy bill.

      Single/multi-family home, the homeowner.
      Commercial building, the tenant.
      Apartment building, the tenant.

      Commercial/apartment buildings only seek LEED certification to attract tenants.

  • Would they still approve a gasoline-powered alarm clock today?

    https://gizmodo.com/a-fake-gas... [gizmodo.com]

    I keep trying to find details on the clock, IIRC it was powered by a GM LS V8.

    • by cj* ( 149112 )

      Interesting. Approved in 2008.

      A republican administration in denial about climate change, under a president that was second generation oil money (Zapata Petroleum and HRG Group), and in thrall to the petro-chemical interests of his home state Texas.

      It is almost as though they were saboteurs rather than regulators.
       

      • Wow, your Bush Derangement Syndrome is starting to flare up again.

        From your link:

        The GAO report from 2010 is pretty damning. The agency sent out twenty different products for certification under fake company names. Of those twenty outrageous products, 15 were approved, 2 were denied, and 3 didn't have a verdict by the time they issued their report.

        The 20 bogus products were sent out by the GAO in 2010, Bush left the White House in 2008, Obama was responsible for the EPA in 2010...

        But yeah, Bush, Oil, Something...

        • The GAO report from 2010 is pretty damning.

          Note that the only temporal information provided here is that the report was from 2010.

          The 20 bogus products were sent out by the GAO in 2010,

          Nowhere in TFA does it say that.

      • by bws111 ( 1216812 )

        What a moron. The Energy Star thing was a SELF-CERTIFIED program from its inception until 2011.

  • they should be ranked by the amount of co2 saved. it's that the whole point?

    chicago wins

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...