Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United Kingdom Businesses

Chinese-owned Firm Acquires UK's Largest Semiconductor Manufacturer (theguardian.com) 41

The UK's largest producer of semiconductors has been acquired by the Chinese-owned manufacturer Nexperia, prompting a senior Tory MP to call for the government to review the sale to a foreign owner during an increasingly severe global shortage of computer chips. From a report: Nexperia, a Dutch firm owned by China's Wingtech, said on Monday that it had taken full control of Newport Wafer Fab (NWF), the UK's largest producer of silicon chips, which are vital in products from TVs and mobile phones to cars and games consoles. Tom Tugendhat, the Conservative MP for Tonbridge and Malling and the chair of the foreign affairs select committee, told CNBC on Monday that he would be very surprised if the deal was not being reviewed under the National Security and Investment Act, new legislation brought in to protect key national assets from foreign takeover. "The semiconductor industry sector falls under the scope of the legislation, the very purpose of which is to protect the nation's technology companies from foreign takeovers when there is a material risk to economic and national security," he said. The business secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, has previously said that the government was monitoring the situation closely, "but does not consider it appropriate to intervene at the current time."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chinese-owned Firm Acquires UK's Largest Semiconductor Manufacturer

Comments Filter:
  • by Cryptimus ( 243846 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @01:50PM (#61556273) Homepage

    China will use this to perform supply-chain attacks. Duh.

    • From a 30 year old fab? I'd like to see them hide a supply chain attack in a discrete component because I highly doubt they manufacture anything else in there.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by sinij ( 911942 )
      Yes, supply-denial attacks. This purchase is to consolidate semiconductor manufacturing so going to proxy war with China over impending Taiwan annexation would be deemed to economically damaging.
      • Damaging to whom? Apparently not the UK, or they would have held on longer.

      • would be deemed to economically damaging

        Too late

      • There is a company C in UK.
        It's owned by a UK entity.
        It builds things in the UK, using UK workforce and it has some UK and some international suppliers and customers.

        Chinese company buys it.
        Next you know, the know how (however much it is) gets transferred to China, the production is moved to China, the local suppliers get replaced by Chinese companies.

        In the end, some money change hands but UK loses both work (workers, suppliers, ...) and the actual production capacity and must fully rely on imports.
        How lon

    • Maybe, but that is not the problem that we are facing now.

      About 20 years ago, I worked for a company that used to supply chips to AC/Delco the auto parts manufacturer

      As a result, they had bought up tens of thousands of out dated 3" silicon wafers, because that was the technology step that AC/Delco operated at since they were getting "good enough" results with that tech level and refused to spend anymore to advance to 12" tech step

      I am pretty willing to believe that AC/Delco and the rest of the auto parts ma

      • There are a lot of power semiconductor components that can be manufactured on cheap older technology equipment with small wafers, long gate lengths and imprecise control over layer thickness and diffusion or implant. It would be insane to make these components in a state of the art FAB.

    • Hahaha, for a little chicken shit $160M foundry that makes hybrid analog/digital "mixed signal" chips? Crank down the tension on your tin foil hat, this sale doesn't matter globally.

      • Hahaha, for a little chicken shit $160M foundry that makes hybrid analog/digital "mixed signal" chips? Crank down the tension on your tin foil hat, this sale doesn't matter globally.

        Hybrid analog/digital mixed signal chips are rather important in the grand scheme of things. However there are plenty of players and if you can't get you buck/boost controller from SGS, Maxim, Analog Diseases or one of the other many such companies will happily step in.

  • by tekram ( 8023518 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @01:51PM (#61556279)
    when you realized the bid is only £63 million ($87 million) for the largest UK semiconductor firm and how little that matters in the world's semiconductor business.
    • it makes "mixed signal" chips, hybrid digital/analog and the usual app would be A to D converter. North America and Asia have the bigger players than Europe anyway.

  • ARMing the enemy. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Ostracus ( 1354233 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @01:52PM (#61556289) Journal

    Tom Tugendhat, the Conservative MP for Tonbridge and Malling and the chair of the foreign affairs select committee, told CNBC on Monday that he would be very surprised if the deal was not being reviewed under the National Security and Investment Act, new legislation brought in to protect key national assets from foreign takeover. "The semiconductor industry sector falls under the scope of the legislation, the very purpose of which is to protect the nation's technology companies from foreign takeovers when there is a material risk to economic and national security," he said.

    So how's that ARM deal holding up?

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Except it isn't cutting edge technology. 0.18u was cutting edge 20 years ago and positively ancient technology now.

      Put in more current units, that's 180nm. We're pushing at 14nm and trying to get to 7nm. Basically the cutting edge processor then was the Pentium III which moved from 250nm to 180nm.

      It's unusual for China to want something that old - it's not like it can be upgraded (it's cheaper to open a new fab than upgrade fabs), it only does 200mm wafers instead of the industry standard 300mm nowadays (30

      • The Chinese company which is buying it plans to make MOSFETs on this fab. These are discrete ICs so you do not need that much wafer space for it.

  • by sinij ( 911942 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @02:00PM (#61556311)
    UK, a 5 eye country, is asleep at the wheel while China monopolizing semiconductor manufacturing.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Nah, some Tory or one if their pals is getting rich. That's far more important than some guff and silicone chips.

      • Silicon. They use silicon to make semi conductors. Silicone is used for plastic surgery.

      • Nah, some Tory or one if their pals is getting rich. That's far more important than some guff and silicone chips.

        It sad how true this is, but profiteers would not have built anything if they didnt expect to be able to do it so its better this way then not

      • Nah, some Tory or one if their pals is getting rich. That's far more important than some guff and silicone chips.

        That plastic food in the windows of Japanese restaurants probably includes silicone chips.

    • Our current government is incompetent beyond the point of a calling it a joke. In the miasma of national embarrassment upon national embarrassment, a small chip fab I'd never heard of is probably of little consequence. If chip fabs are important to the national economy and security, we need substantially larger, better and newer fabs than this. The ARM thing is worthy of far more government scrutiny, but I have less faith in our current government's competence than Dawkins has in the Bible.

      • Based on what iv seen, I bet that china is the only government that is not incompetent today. The problem is that in the western nations, the dumbest 51% make all the rules.
  • The NWF started as the Inmos factory building transputers.
    Then SGS brought Inmos and it continued, but became a more general fab after the demise of Inmos.
    I assume that's what it still is and they sold it to the Chinese.

    As fabs go, it was building the world's fastest CPUs in the 90s. No so much these days.

  • by renzhi ( 2216300 )
    A deal that's worth less than $100 millions, and it created such a brouhaha. Is it just because the acquirer has some relation with China and bashing China is an international sport now that this shit gets this kind of exposure? I don't see the so-called minister lift a finger on the ARM deal, no?
  • by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @04:58PM (#61556945)

    "prompting a senior Tory MP to call for the government to review the sale to a foreign owner "

    Really? They sold everything else, ALL the car companies, the steel factories, the drinking water, the oil, the gas, the electricity, ...the list is endless.

    • by gadb2 ( 7465360 )
      Right, but to their "just like us" fellow rentiers. 1) Corner a market. 2) Destroy quality and value. 3) Jack up the price. 4) Take little to no risk. 5) Actually create absolutely nothing of value. 5) Profit (at the expense of everyone else).
  • > which are vital in products from TVs and mobile phones to cars and games consoles

    NWF makes 180+ nm on 200mm wafers, both of which are from the mid to late 90s. We're not talking bleeding-edge technology. This explains why the whole company sold for £63 million when new individual fabs typically cost $3-4 billion to make these days.

    There's still a market for the sort of thing that NWF makes, but 180nm fabs are not as rare/expensive/exclusive as 5nm or 7nm fabs are.

  • Tory rentier "I don't like risk, I just want the money", "short termist", "sell my grandmother", "society doesn't exist", "I should become more rich because I started rich", whines about an external entity that's "not like us" who decides to buy and invest, taking risk and having a long term horizon. So, maybe it is for the purposes of espionage. The solution? Grow a spine, commit to take real financial risk and dare to dream and build and grow your own innovative humanity benefiting businesses then, you
  • they are idiots to allow this

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...