Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media Advertising

Former Employees Allege Most of Ozy's 26M Newsletter Subscribers Were Purchased, Borrowed, or Kept Against Their Will (forbes.com) 34

Eight days ago Ozy announced it was shutting down after reports that the news site bought traffic, overstated its cable deals, and at one point even had its Chief Operating Officer impersonate a YouTube executive during a phone call with investors.

Then four days ago, Ozy's CEO said he planned to relaunch the company's newsletters (while looking for new board members) to try to instead revive the company. "Ozy Media boasts that it has more than 26 million subscribers for its newsletters," reports Forbes...

"But former employees say this is another example of deceptive tactics at the embattled digital media company, with most of the email addresses on its newsletter lists either purchased, taken from other companies without their permission or added back to the lists after the recipients unsubscribed — a potentially illegal act." Three ex-employees with knowledge of Ozy's newsletter operations, who asked to remain anonymous because of non-disclosure agreements they signed, said the company on multiple occasions obtained large numbers of email addresses through marketing partnerships it formed with other companies and news outlets. Ozy would offer to send an email for the other company as part of the partnership, and some companies would then share a list of addresses for a supposed one-time message. Instead, the former employees allege, those email addresses would then be permanently added to Ozy's newsletter subscriber list. Among the companies they say Ozy collectively accumulated millions of email addresses from were the McClatchy newspaper chain and the technology magazine Wired, according to two of the former employees.

Ozy would also buy in bulk email addresses from third-party websites like U.S. Data Corporation and Exact Data, ramping up the size of its newsletter following in order to fulfill advertising deals with its clients. After Ozy added batches of new addresses to its mailing lists, many recipients would attempt to unsubscribe from the newsletters only to be kept on the distribution lists and even re-subscribed under the direction of Ozy management, a potential violation of commercial email laws...

Despite a "very small" organic audience and low engagement numbers, according to a source with knowledge of Ozy's newsletter audience, Ozy sent a pitch deck to investors over the summer for its Series D funding round that claimed it was achieving an email open rate of 25%, or (in Ozy's words): "2.5x the industry standard." Ozy founder and CEO Carlos Watson admitted that number was exaggerated during a Monday interview with CNBC, claiming it instead represents the engagement rate among Ozy's "best, most regular people." Watson still claimed this subset of Ozy's audience is between 10 and 12 million people.

Forbes adds that there was no response to their request for a comment from Ozy, McClatchy, and Wired's parent company Conde Nast.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Former Employees Allege Most of Ozy's 26M Newsletter Subscribers Were Purchased, Borrowed, or Kept Against Their Will

Comments Filter:
  • Oz-who? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by iced_773 ( 857608 ) on Saturday October 09, 2021 @01:49PM (#61875613)
    I look at social media way more than I should, but I honestly had never heard of Ozy, much less consumed their content, until last week's news. Had anyone else? My guess is no. Shouldn't be surprising such high numbers were completely faked.
    • Investors poured money into this not-a-popular-as-it-claims site... so there's the CNBC outrage of the month.

      • Investors poured money into this not-a-popular-as-it-claims site... so there's the CNBC outrage of the month.

        It's the NYT that's been picking on them for weeks, mainly I think because the company is just a shit show. Strangest was the report about a Goldman Sachs zoom meeting that turned into a conference call when the person from Ozy said he couldn't log on. As the GS people didn't recognize the voice and believed it had been digitally altered they emailed the person at Ozy that supposedly was on the other end who claimed he had never been in the meeting. Ozy then had to issued a statement of apology to GS, the

    • When was the last time anyone willingly subscribed to - or actually read, for that matter - a newsletter anyway?

      • To be fair, Substack built a whole business model off newsletters. I even subscribe to a few local journalism ones.
    • I heard of them...because they started spamming me with their "newsletters" last year which I immediately marked as spam. Had no clue who they were at the time, and had forgotten about it until the NYT story went out. So count me among the 20+ million "subscribers" obtained through fraudulent means.
  • would you please check the status of Bernie's electronics store at the edge of Worcester. They've had a "Going out of Business" sign on their building since I first pointed this site out decades ago. It's like the Going out of Business sale never ends.

    Ozy's going the same way, after being slammed by CNBC for lying to investors, they said they were going out of business. Now this guy wants to continue... time to wonder, do we have an effective way of banning him from the Internet?

  • Ozy would also buy in bulk email addresses from third-party websites like U.S. Data Corporation and Exact Data, ramping up the size of its newsletter following in order to fulfill advertising deals with its clients.

    Probably paid for the email addresses with the $5.7 million they got in PPP loans [cnbc.com].

  • We curse and swear about any government doing anything like this. Yet we frequently give away any and all information for a bit of convince. Hard to buy a IoT type product now that doesn't monitor just about every metric you can imagine. Just because a company is trust worthy today doesn't mean they will not be taken over by someone who is. Happens all the time hell how many owners has Slashdot had over the years. Some operators were better than others but who the hell knows what goes on with the data has

The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude.

Working...