Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

SF Millennium Tower Tilts Quarter Inch In Four Days (nbcbayarea.com) 62

Newly released monitoring data shows that San Francisco's Millennium Tower tilted a quarter inch during the four days it took to install the first test pile to bedrock last month. From a local report: The monitoring data tracks settlement, tilting and water pressure levels underneath the sinking and leaning structure since work began on a fix for the troubled tower in May. Since work began to shore the sinking structure up on the north and west sides, the building has settled nearly 2 inches at the northwest corner and is now tilting more than two feet at that edge. The latest data -- including the four days that the test pile was installed from Nov. 15 to Nov. 19 -- shows a quarter inch of new tilt, as well as a tenth of an inch of settlement at the time the test installation occurred. At the same time, there was marked fluctuation of water pressure below the foundation on the Mission Street side of the structure.
[...]
Still, Ron Hamburger, the fix designer, recently assured city officials that the settlement that has occurred during testing of new methods designed to limit sinking is within expected levels. Hamburger now has city permission to install two more test piles. Hamburger told city officials the additional testing is needed to help determine just how many piles will ultimately be used to shore up the structure.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SF Millennium Tower Tilts Quarter Inch In Four Days

Comments Filter:
  • It'll be demolished within four months.
    • by martinX ( 672498 )

      Be back here on April 9, 2022.

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      One would hope but how many people died in Florida when their condo collapsed? It is a hard decision. In my city a condo building on the edge of failing was condemned, leaving many homeless. Another retirement tower was closed for months. If this building is like the faulty luxury building in NYC, it also has the problem of many owners not living there, only for investment for a place to stay for occasional trips to the US. The people who live there may not have suitable insurance.

      A decent size earthquak

      • Expanda Foam! (Score:4, Interesting)

        by MrKaos ( 858439 ) on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @10:45PM (#62061489) Journal

        This building will fail at some point.

        I'd suspect they will invest significant money into preventing that.

        In Australia a technique has been developed to correct buildings that have tilted from mine subsidence.

        What happens is instead of the large piles that you see being drilled here, they drill small piles about 100mm diameter diagonally *under* the building. Next a cavity is created at the end of the bore. Then a capsule of an industrial grade "Expanda Foam" is injected into the cavity and the bore is sealed.

        As the foam slowly expands over a period of weeks the building rights itself to some extent.

        The process is then repeated as many times as required to gradually correct the tilt of the building. I watched them do this to a building over a period of 6 months, not as big as this tower so it will be interesting to see if it can be applied to a structure of this size.

        The will have to close the road in front of the building where the tilt is occurring to do the drilling - which they could probably do at night.

        • You imagine this expanda foam is better than bedrock, sand and bentonite. It isn't. Modern construction is modern.
          • Re: Expanda Foam! (Score:4, Insightful)

            by Mister Transistor ( 259842 ) on Thursday December 09, 2021 @02:47AM (#62061941) Journal

            The problem is the pilings don't go down to bedrock, as I understand it. There is a layer of Bay Clay on top of the bedrock that is between the bedrock and the pilings beneath the tower. The pilings they showed in the illustration I saw only went about halfway through the Bay Clay, and that's why it's settling and tilting. If they had put in deeper pilings to begin with, all the way down to the bedrock, then this wouldn't have been a problem.

            However, many buildings can't be anchored all the way down to bedrock, sometimes it's just too deep (expensive) and/or the supporting soil or clay layers are strong enough to support the building's weight, after a bit of calculated settling.

          • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

            You imagine this expanda foam is better than bedrock, sand and bentonite. It isn't.

            No, however it's better than demolishing a building you want to keep.

            Modern construction is modern.

            Apparently note modern enough to get the foundations right.

        • by sosume ( 680416 )

          I would strongly prefer not drilling at night

      • A decent size earthquake occurs in the area every weekor so. This building will fail at some point.

        Given that its leaning, it is now partially supported laterally. That support can disappear for a period of time starting the instant of an earthquake, causing it to lean even further as the structure attempts to freefall towards a new equilibrium. Even if it survives an earthquake or two, it still just gets progressively worse.

    • Donâ(TM)t know why they are using Concrete piles when something like this https://mainmark.com/ [mainmark.com] is available it injects a foam that uses the ground fill to create a high strength product we used one that was 5 times stronger than concrete and they do lift entire buildings. Having said that I am not the engineer on-site
      • Re: I'll bet $1.00 (Score:5, Informative)

        by serviscope_minor ( 664417 ) on Thursday December 09, 2021 @06:02AM (#62062197) Journal

        It's hard to tell, but the piles are into a layer of compacted sand on top of the old bay clay layer. The current understanding is that the old bay clay well beneath the bottom of the foundations is settling much faster and much more than expected. The piles go all the way through that down to the Franciscan Complex bedrock.

        The piles are there to move weight from the bay clay. Basically once the pikes are sunk they intend to literally jack the building up with hydraulic jacks.

      • Re: I'll bet $1.00 (Score:4, Informative)

        by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Thursday December 09, 2021 @06:46AM (#62062265) Homepage Journal

        Practical Engineering recently did a video about it: https://youtu.be/ph9O9yJoeZY [youtu.be]

        The issue is that the ground is being compacted more than expected. I'm not sure filling will help.

        The current plan is to insert steel pins that reach all the way down to the clay layer that doesn't compress much, to supplement the existing foundations. They will use hydraulics to transfer the weight of the building onto them. There will be some filling, but the weight will be taken by the clay layer.

        • Just commenting because Practical Engineering is a GREAT YouTube channel. I found it a few months back and have watched many of his videos. Very interesting. I'm kind of obsessed with culverts now.

          • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

            He has a great presentation style, and I never thought I'd be so interested in soil. I like how now when I see random things like embankments I understand why they are built that way and how they work.

        • by necro81 ( 917438 )

          Practical Engineering recently did a video about it: https://youtu.be/ph9O9yJoeZY [youtu.be]

          Came here to say the same. It's an excellent piece of work.

      • I am not a geologist or a civil engineer. I wonder if it's because the foam and clay could perform differently during an earthquake, magnifying the force imparted to the structure?
    • It'll be demolished within four months.

      Ron Hamburger is in an engineering pickle barrel as the plan convince the owners a mirage of stability is possible.

      Well the demolition is far more likely as final result with casualty including the people in charge of reversing that tilt.

      Tommy the pinball wizard needs to shake it!

    • Or they'll build the world's biggest concrete & steel iceberg beneath San Francisco.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      In four months that $1 will only be worth $0.75. #bidenflation

  • How far out of true does it have to be before it becomes unstable? When I'm cutting down very tall trees, a quarter inch at the base raise is sufficient.
    • The building is 645 feet tall. A quarter inch is about one part in 30 thousand. Seems to be about 2 thousandths of a degree tilt from this event. (I'm making some assumptions here because the reporter didn't bother to include any details about what these numbers actually mean. In his(?) defense, he probably had no idea what any of the details could have meant.)

    • When I'm cutting down very tall trees, a quarter inch at the base raise is sufficient.

      This is a quarter inch at the top. Still problematic, but they are hoping it can be stabilized.

      If it fell, it would be the biggest disaster in San Francisco since 1989.

      • by doom ( 14564 )

        If it fell, it would be the biggest disaster in San Francisco since 1989.

        By the way, I like to remind people that that earthquake was only a 6.9. As these things go, that's not all that large-- in 2013, Japan was slammed with a 9.0.

    • Bear in mind these buildings have immense wind loading and deflect a lot at the top already.

  • I'll have a fries and large coke to go!

  • If they sell an NFT of the building, maybe they could raise enough money to straighten out the real one.
    • If they sell an NFT of the building, maybe they could raise enough money to straighten out the real one.

      But who would want an NFT of a now straight building? The 'value' would crash. They'd be shooting themselves in the foot.

  • This story has been "the gift that keeps on giving", but I really hope it stops because if it doesn't, the best case scenario is that a huge area of valuable commercial space needs to be evacuated for a costly demolition.

    The worst case scenario, well you can imagine--that their theory about gradual, predictable tilt is somehow wrong and/or this fiasco meets up with a strong enough quake to bring it all down catastrophically while occupied. You probably don't even need "the big one". What would a 6.0 on th

    • What would a 6.0 on the San Andreas right by the city or on the Hayward Fault do to this mess?

      It better be able to handle that, because it's coming sooner rather than later.

  • Who would, in the future, purchase property in a tower that is known to have had structural problems in the past? Even if it has been "straightened" since (and expensively)?

    Maybe the horse has already left the barn here.

    • An old skyscraper with famous structural problems solved is probably safer than a new, unknown one.
      I remember a TV story about a long thin skyscraper that had too much liberty of freedom at the top (it swayed in the wind) - the architecture/construction company that did the work also found (and solved) a possible issue related to oscillation along the length of the building.

      • That would be the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
        • by doom ( 14564 )

          I like this bit:

          In the original design, potential wind loads for the building were calculated incorrectly. The flaw was discovered by Diane Hartley, an undergraduate student at Princeton University who was writing a thesis on the building, and was communicated to the firm responsible for the structural design. LeMessurier was subsequently lauded for acknowledging his error and orchestrating a successful repair effort.

          LeMessurier was lauded for covering their butts quickly once an undergrad kicked them i

          • by kriston ( 7886 )

            LeMessurier was lauded for covering their butts quickly

            He did nothing of the kind. Not only did he NOT hide anything, he spent $2 million of his own funds to retrofit the building.

  • Sensationalism. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Thursday December 09, 2021 @06:30AM (#62062233)

    Still, Ron Hamburger, the fix designer, recently assured city officials that the settlement that has occurred during testing of new methods designed to limit sinking is within expected levels.

    This actually isn't that much.

    By the end of August, when construction on the fix was put on, hold the building was tilting nine inches to the north and 23 inches to the west. As of Thursday, the Millennium Tower is tilting 9.5 inches north and 23.5 inches west.

    But Hamburger says the numbers are not as dramatic as they sound. He says they have new data that suggests the building can tolerate a lot more.

    “We just recently completed an update of that evaluation, where we looked at the building tilting as much as almost 3 feet to the north and almost 80 inches to the west,” said Hamburger.

    Modern building can do a lot of leaning in movement. The engineering of these structures is impressive but to the ignorant, they are scary things that are likely to fall.

    • 1/4 inch over the building's 645 foot height is about 0.002 degrees. For reference, building code requires at least a 2% slope [up.codes] on outdoor surfaces to allow for drainage. That's about 1.15 degrees, or about 620 times greater slope.

      This isn't a noticeable lean. The only reason we know about it is because engineers are taking very precise measurements. That said, if the trend continues, this will be a big problem.
      • Yeah, but the slope goes the opposite way on the other side. How about telling us the current torque at the base.

    • I'm curious how much of that tolerance uses up any earthquake dampening tolerances...

  • by tlhIngan ( 30335 ) <slashdot.worf@net> on Thursday December 09, 2021 @06:52AM (#62062279)

    Practical Engineering did a video on the SF Millennium building a couple of weeks ago, explaining what's happening, why it's tilting and what's being done to fix it. It's an excellent video on the topic

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

  • Is there anything that SF can do right?

  • Is there any point, where the safety of thousands of people in the tower and the adjoining buildinds, much less anyone on the street, for blocks--is worth more than a a Tofu-Dreg project, where they just didn't want to spend the money to put a good foundation under a building?
  • Ron Hamburger? Seems a likely alias for someone I knew in my youth - one mister âoeRonald McDonaldâ!! #amiwrong

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...