Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United Kingdom The Almighty Buck

Bank Accidentally Deposits $176M In People's Accounts on Christmas Day (cnbc.com) 41

"Thousands of people received a surprise gift on Christmas Day this year," reports CNBC, "when European bank Santander accidentally deposited £130 million ($176 million) across 75,000 transactions." The mistake happened when payments from 2,000 business accounts in the U.K. were processed twice, meaning some employees saw their wages double, while suppliers also got more than they were expecting.

The bank said the duplicate payments were caused by a "scheduling issue" that has now been rectified. It is now trying to recuperate the mistaken payments, many of which have gone into bank accounts operated by rival banks. "We're sorry that due to a technical issue, some payments from our corporate clients were incorrectly duplicated on the recipients' accounts," a Santander spokesperson told CNBC...

Santander said it also has the ability to recover the funds directly from people's accounts.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bank Accidentally Deposits $176M In People's Accounts on Christmas Day

Comments Filter:
  • Itâ(TM)s âoeoh our policy doesnâ(TM)t allow us to send a refund, sorry for your lossâ

    • Horseshit. If you owe them $10 and send them $20 you'll get the $10 overpayment back. If you're talking about owing $20 and sending $10 twice then no, they don't have to pay you back, you owed them money.
  • by rmdingler ( 1955220 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @03:22PM (#62134159) Journal

    "If you were one of the direct deposit employees who woke up to an unexpected Christmas bonus, we apologize for any inconvenience getting your hopes up and then dashing them has caused. Please return the money or consider it your separation package."

  • Too fucking bad. I hooe they don't "recoup" that money.

    You know what would happen if the situation was reversed.

    • by mysidia ( 191772 )

      They'll get it back one way or the other. If they can't get the payment reversed; Direct Deposit agreements usually authorize the employers and the employers' banks the right to enter a Direct Debit in order to correct errors, even if it result in overdrafts. Alternatively, they can subtract the amount from their next Paycheck after this one, or Send the account holder a Bill to repay the erroneous deposit which they'd need to repay or face legal actions.

    • Too fucking bad. I hooe they don't "recoup" that money.

      You know what would happen if the situation was reversed.

      Come on now.

      Are you suggesting that affected employees wouldn't be getting an immediate correction if Santander's automated system had halved their paychecks by mistake?

    • Wow, you're not very forgiving of human errors. Have you ever had a career?

      For what it's worth, Canada has a national banking system. These things are reversible in seconds -- faster than any announcement could get published.

      Doesn't matter if it's across banks, doesn't matter if you've withdrawn the funds, doesn't matter if you've closed your account. Welcome to a stable banking system.

      While I know USA banks aren't the same, I'm confident that USA bank accounts have similarly-resulting constructs.

  • "Santander said it also has the ability to recover the funds directly from people's accounts." Not if the account has a zero balance. Spend it quick and close the account.

    Of course I'm kidding, I'm sure the bank would find some way to come after you.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      For what it's worth, I'm not actually sure they can so there's actually some sense in your point.

      If you bank with them it's easier as they can just take it out, if you bank with someone else and got one of these payments and spent it then there's really nothing they can do I believe as your bank isn't going to want to piss off it's customers on behalf of Santander because Santander fucked up; that's ultimately Santander's problem to swallow.

      Rival banks have said they'll try and return it for them but the ke

      • Re:Spend it quick (Score:4, Informative)

        by bws111 ( 1216812 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @03:51PM (#62134231)

        That is called theft of lost or mislaid property. Your brilliant plan will end up with you in prison (and the court will order all the funds returned). Great plan.

      • That's cute that you think banks have such loyalty to you. But, if the choice is to piss off John Q Public (whose net worth they can directly see), or one of their trusted and powerful banking partners, guess who takes the hit.
  • Regular timed transactions that due to sloppy software practices get double executed. When I have seen this happen it has been double-billing of credit cards for monthly subscriptions.

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      As far as I can tell, Santander does not even require basic validation of contact information. It seems a seriously insecure bank.
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. Somebody fucked up here and not when that happened, but making it possible to happen in the first place. Cheap-ass IT.

    • Yep. My friends who signed up for EA MMOs regularly experienced double billing 'accidents'.
  • by arosenfield ( 998621 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @03:43PM (#62134213)

    When you sign up for direct deposit through your payroll provider, part of the fine print says that the they're allowed to reverse any erroneous payments and withdraw those amounts. That's exactly what's going to happen (if it hasn't already), and anyone who foolishly spent the money and doesn't immediately repay it is going to quickly find themselves quickly out of a job.

    The bank certainly has egg on its, face but they don't look nearly as bad as Citibank did when they accidentally paid off their entire $900 million loan to Revlon.

    • by mysidia ( 191772 )

      part of the fine print says that the they're allowed to reverse any erroneous payments

      They can TRY reversing payments only if they catch it fast enough -- Christmas day was the 25th.. Most payments settle within about 2 days; it's too late to cancel an ETF payment now that the funds already cleared.

      So if your direct-deposit is to a checking account that you have removed Overdraft 'protection' features from, and you automatically sweep all deposits to a savings account at a different bank to keep only $1

      • by bws111 ( 1216812 )

        If they can't reverse the payment, then it becomes YOUR responsibility to return to money. Failure to do so may result in a charge of theft of lost or mislaid property (or similar).

      • If those are paychecks that are the same every time, the bank could just not pay the next one, although they would have to notify the recipients.
      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        They can TRY reversing payments only if they catch it fast enough -- Christmas day was the 25th.. Most payments settle within about 2 days; it's too late to cancel an ETF payment now that the funds already cleared.

        So if your direct-deposit is to a checking account that you have removed Overdraft 'protection' features from, and you automatically sweep all deposits to a savings account at a different bank to keep only $100 in checking, They can't do anything to reverse a Multi-thousand dollar payment. Any una

        • by mysidia ( 191772 )

          But if you keep the money, you can be found with both civil and criminal penalties - theft. Criminal because stealing money is a crime, and civil to recover the money.

          It's not a theft, because the prior owner of the money paid the money to your account; you had no control of it, they just sent you this sum when they technically were required to pay a lesser some. In case you didn't know... if you overpay a bill; not all companies will send you a refund for the excess, sometimes they will only grant

      • Electronic payments in the UK settle in about 3-10 seconds, not 2 days.

    • People in the UK don't "sign up for direct deposit through your payroll provider".

      When you start a new job, your employer will ask for various details, and one of those is your bank account number. The only agreement you sign is your contract of employment, and it generally doesn't say anything about that.

  • by Glasswire ( 302197 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @04:40PM (#62134315) Homepage

    ...what? That you intended to make those mistaken transfers on a different day? So what?

  • by Fly Swatter ( 30498 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @06:33PM (#62134573) Homepage
    It would be all yours to keep, am-I-right or am-I-right?
    • Yeh. Thatâ€(TM)s one of the many reasons why nobody serious is considering using bitcoin as a currency.
      This made the news because it was quite consequent, and on Christmas Day, but it happens and is quietly corrected many times a year, in different banks worldwide. Irrevocability means uncorrectability, and is only ok for thoughts experiments, not for real life.
  • The banks didn't hesitate to just take it bank, though the affected people protested at the lack of even a "by your leave". One went to court to claim at least the interest as a "parking fee". It was millions of dollars, IIRC, and back then interest rates made a difference. But the court didn't side with them.

  • There should be a penalty to the bank for such mistakes. A % of the amount should be OK.

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...