Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Government Politics

Senate Confirms Bedoya To FTC, Establishing Democratic Majority (theverge.com) 55

The Senate has voted to confirm privacy expert Alvaro Bedoya to the Federal Trade Commission. The confirmation secures a Democratic voting majority at the agency tasked by the Biden administration with investigating big tech companies like Facebook and Google over potential data privacy and competition violations. The Verge adds: Vice President Kamala Harris voted to break a 50-50 tie on the Senate floor to finalize Bedoya's confirmation. Bedoya will replace former Commissioner Rohit Chopra who left the FTC last year to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Before his confirmation, Bedoya was a Georgetown law professor with a focus on privacy law, founding the university's Center on Privacy and Technology in 2014. In his academic career, Bedoya explored the disproportionate effects of surveillance on minority groups, particularly regarding facial recognition technology.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senate Confirms Bedoya To FTC, Establishing Democratic Majority

Comments Filter:
  • Net neutrality (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday May 11, 2022 @06:27PM (#62524472)
    Whatever else your feelings are on the two parties one thing is crystal clear: the Democratic party is the party of net neutrality while the Republican Party opposes it. This makes sense, given the traditionally the Democratic party is willing to regulate businesses while the Republican Party stands by the belief that businesses need little or no regulation because the market will regulate businesses automatically.

    From a practical standpoint this means that while the Democrats are in charge we get net neutrality regulations and while the Republicans are in charge those regulations are removed and we have to count on the free market and competition among internet service providers to protect our access to information on the internet.

    So the question you need to ask yourself is how many different internet service providers are in your neighborhood and how much do they compete with each other?
    • >"So the question you need to ask yourself is how many different internet service providers are in your neighborhood and how much do they compete with each other?"

      In my super-blue city? One. And that is a function of government cronyism; it is not a partisan issue. If you don't believe me, then all you have to do is look at the party area of the locality affected and you will quickly discover that there are ISP monopolies or near monopolies in just about every area. The big cable companies come in an

  • Bureaucratic appointments can't all be reversed easily by the next president. DeJoy, for example, the Postmaster General, can only be replaced by the USPS Board of Governors, which requires changing the board of governors first. This requires senate confirmation, a painfully slow process which is crawling along - Biden's two nominees to that postal governors board appeared before a Senate committee last month. I wonder if this FTC appointment will be as difficult for the next Republican president to undo.

  • Title is misleading
  • "agency tasked by the Biden administration with investigating big tech companies like Facebook and Google over potential data privacy and competition violations." Totally makes sense.

    "Bedoya explored the disproportionate effects of surveillance on minority groups, particularly regarding facial recognition technology." Excellent work.

    In a Tuesday floor speech, McConnell said, “He is an essentially foolish choice.” Couldn't say what was foolish about it?

  • Look for the FTC to now harass companies about hallucinated effects on climate change, or inadequate women or transes on boards.

As you will see, I told them, in no uncertain terms, to see Figure one. -- Dave "First Strike" Pare

Working...