Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation United States

EPA Opens Applications For Its $5 Billion Clean School Bus Program (arstechnica.com) 156

The EPA is formally accepting applications for its Clean School Bus Program, a $5 billion program to replace dirty diesel school buses with more environmentally friendly options. Ars Technica reports: Specifically, the EPA is aiming to replace older (model year 2010 or older) diesel-powered school buses, which must be scrapped in order for a clean bus to be bought to replace them. Oh, and the old bus has to be fully functionalâ"this isn't intended as a way to make the government pay for broken junk to be replaced with shiny new buses. But the agency says it will also accept applications from schools looking for zero-emission buses that are prepared to scrap older non-diesel school buses, as well as newer internal combustion buses (which should either be sold, scrapped, or donated).

The EPA isn't requiring the replacement buses to all be electric, however. While the program will pay for battery-electric buses -- such as the Thomas C2 Jouley that was delivered to a school in Alexandria County in Virginia on Friday to mark the start of the program -- it will also pay for buses powered by propane or compressed natural gas as long as they're also model year 2021 or newer and will serve the school district for at least five years, among other requirements.

The EPA will consider applications to replace up to 25 buses at once and has set aside $250 million for zero-emission buses in 2022 and $250 million for clean school buses, with another $4.5 billion remaining for 2023-2028. Rebates range from $375,000 for a zero-emissions Class 7 or Class 8 bus down to $25,000 for smaller propane buses (classes 3-6). The application process is open until August 19, and successful applicants should be notified in October that it's time to order some new buses.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EPA Opens Applications For Its $5 Billion Clean School Bus Program

Comments Filter:
  • by smoot123 ( 1027084 ) on Monday May 23, 2022 @09:27PM (#62560298)

    Can't replace old busses? Are we sure that's what we really want?

    Think this through. I'm running a district with an old bus. My decision is whether to buy a cheap new diesel bus or a flashy new zero-emissions one. I don't get a subsidy on the new one. What am I going to choose?

    Even worse, I might decide to nurse the beat up old bus along for a few more years and replace my newer, probably cleaner busses, with the greener ones.

    Does no one who creates these programs ever think about the perverse incentives they create?

    • I have a perfect plan. Buy some used dual motor model Y, weld an existing school bus body over the power train, presto, zero emission school bus. (Uh, no FSD please, lets not go there)

    • Diesel is $6 a gallon in my state. Electric vehicles are looking better every day.

      • Just make sure not to crash on a rainy day.
        • The EV bus is probably less likely to crash because it has traction control with instant torque reduction. It's probably also more likely to have hydraulic brakes, because it doesn't need the increased braking force of air brakes. The ABS can respond faster with hydraulic than pneumatic systems, and since about 1999 it's been common for buses to have not only 4-channel ABS, but also brake-based yaw control. An EV bus could also have torque vectoring to reduce turn radius and improve handling, though the lat

      • Energy is energy. When diesel fuel prices rise electricity rates will follow. It might not be quite one-to-one but if everybody moves to electric cars because diesel fuel and gasoline prices are getting too high then electricity will become a scarce commodity too.

        If you want to see diesel fuel prices go down then we need more energy on the market. Energy from just about anything will do.

        I've seen power plants that can run their boilers from coal, natural gas, or fuel oil (which is just another name for d

    • by Wycliffe ( 116160 ) on Monday May 23, 2022 @10:33PM (#62560422) Homepage

      It says 2010 or older. So it is designed to replace older buses. They just have to be fully working.

      • by smoot123 ( 1027084 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2022 @12:11AM (#62560590)

        It says 2010 or older. So it is designed to replace older buses. They just have to be fully working.

        That's my point: this is a wasteful program which will promote keeping older, dirtier vehicles on the road in favor of scrapping perfectly functional vehicles.

        I think we'd get much more value for our tax dollars if we subsidized purchases of new green busses, regardless of what the district is getting rid of. For that matter, the older and dirtier the vehicle being retired, the more subsidy you should get. Except that will lead to a black market in buying old, already-retired busses just to get the subsidy.

        That's the problem with this sort of program. There's always seems to be a way to game it and subvert the intent.

        • by jbengt ( 874751 )

          That's my point: this is a wasteful program which will promote keeping older, dirtier vehicles on the road in favor of scrapping perfectly functional vehicles.

          A couple of points:
          From what I understand of TFS, they are only subsidizing replacement of buses built in 2010 and before. That's not promoting keeping older, dirtier buses.
          They are only subsidizing replacement of working buses because if it's already in the junkyard, they don't need to give a subsidy to get it replaced.

          That said, I sort of agre

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          How will requiring the busses to have been manufactured before 2010 keep older vehicles on the road?

          The way this kind of scheme was done in the UK was that you had to have owned the vehicle for at least six months before the scheme started, so there was no opportunity to go and buy one just for the sake of scrapping it.

        • It says 2010 or older. So it is designed to replace older buses. They just have to be fully working.

          That's my point: this is a wasteful program which will promote keeping older, dirtier vehicles on the road in favor of scrapping perfectly functional vehicles.

          You are exactly wrong. They will explicitly only replace buses older than 2010, which is a year when many buses made a big improvement in emissions because of California emissions requirements, which are running ("on the road"). This program exactly targets the vehicles you're concerned with.

        • You don’t understand the purpose of this program. It’s ultimately intended to fund development of cleaner technologies after trickling through school systems and wherever else along the way.

          If some dipshit school admin thinks he’s pulling one over on the system. Well in this case the system was designed knowing that people like him are in the mix.

          • It's also intended to take diesels out and put EVs in, which is clearly what the program does. ICEs used for transit or delivery routes are inherently the worst case. Removing ICE buses from neighborhoods and schools greatly improves air quality in these areas. Buses are terrible things in general for a lot of reasons and we use them for only one reason, they reduce driver manpower requirements. The EV technology available today greatly improves buses by addressing some of their weakest points, efficiency a

            • by shilly ( 142940 )

              Have you seen the numbers to show pavement damage from buses is a net negative? On the one hand, I think the damage scales with the square of the mass. On the other hand, each bus removes multiple cars, and cuts total mileage even further, bc those cars are not all driving a fairly efficient loop route. So it seems to me the calculations would really have to be worked through with some modelling based on real-world data on miles driven, net additional journeys, etc.

              • Have you seen the numbers to show pavement damage from buses is a net negative?

                Nope.

                On the one hand, I think the damage scales with the square of the mass. On the other hand, each bus removes multiple cars

                Yeah, but if those multiple cars are electric then... you know. Anyway we still have to use the buses until we trust autonomous vehicles with the school run, ha ha, because we need humans in them. I just mention the pavement damage because it's a problem with buses overall. They also perturb traffic, which causes problems for everyone else. That's a bigger problem with transit buses than school buses though, because school buses don't run all the time.

                • by shilly ( 142940 )

                  If you're worried about mass and vehicles, electrification is a much smaller issue than the fact that Americans drive ever-larger SUVs and trucks. My Renault Zoe is electric and is heavier than a Renault Clio -- but it weighs 1500kg, so at least 20% less than the lightest F150.

                  As for peturbing traffic, buses overall make traffic run more smoothly by taking car journeys off the road. You have to look at whole system impacts. Take a busy city like mine, London, and run the models for what would happen if buse

                  • If you're worried about mass and vehicles, electrification is a much smaller issue than the fact that Americans drive ever-larger SUVs and trucks. My Renault Zoe is electric and is heavier than a Renault Clio -- but it weighs 1500kg, so at least 20% less than the lightest F150.

                    Sure, but we're now electrifying the trucks. Ford's F150 Lightning is looking like it's going to be a smash hit. However, electrified passenger vehicles and light trucks are irrelevant compared to buses which literally weigh in at multiples compared to them.

                    As for peturbing traffic, buses overall make traffic run more smoothly by taking car journeys off the road.

                    That's potentially true, if you coax, force, or cajole sufficient numbers of people into them. But studies have shown that if you free up freeway capacity, whether by building more or eliminating use, more people decide to drive because the roads are les

              • I don't need to see the numbers to know that the city I live in has been cutting holes in the road at bus stops and pouring "bus pads" of concrete at the stop to mitigate the damage to asphalt surfaces. They've looked at the numbers and used it to justify the work, in a city that absolutely hates the internal combustion engine and would rather spend the money on literally anything else than road work.

          • You don’t understand the purpose of this program. It’s ultimately intended to fund development of cleaner technologies after trickling through school systems and wherever else along the way.

            If some dipshit school admin thinks he’s pulling one over on the system. Well in this case the system was designed knowing that people like him are in the mix.

            I understand the purpose. My point is there are always a lot of dipshit school admins who have a lot of incentive to figure out how to get the subsidy regardless of whether they're working toward or against the program's purpose. And we have example after example of programs like this (e.g. "Cash for clunkers") which sound great, have the best of intentions, and don't achieve diddly squat.

        • How will having a requirement of 2010 or older, and in some semblance of working condition, keep older buses on the road? This is meant to replace old buses that are on the road that have ancient emissions systems that have probably long ago failed.

          If the old shitty bus isn't working enough to qualify, then it probably won't be back on the road any time soon, will it? If they're going to fix some junker, they'd fix it for the trade in on a new bus, wouldn't they?

          The idea behind this is to make sure that s

      • So, $5 billion we don't have in order to replace working busses? That doesn't sound sane to me.
      • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

        You don't want to replace things that work, because building a new thing is a massive investment, and consumer a very large amount of resources. Look up the sheer plethora of valuable minerals that must be dug up, refined, smelted, shipped around etc compared to combustion engines. EVs are not that much climate friendlier than diesel once you take that plus the grid load and need to buff that up into account.

        Which means it would made sense to make a program to replace vehicles that would be replaced anyway.

        • Which means it would made sense to make a program to replace vehicles that would be replaced anyway.

          This is exactly what they are trying to do. That's why they are saying that it has to be at least 12 years old and still in service.
          This is a much better setup than the "cash for clunkers" program that had a limit on how old the car was.
          For schools, it's pretty easy to know whether the bus is still in service so even if it's a 50 year old bus if it's still in active use then it qualifies.

          • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

            That is punishment for the responsible. If you actually maintain your hardware well, 12 years is not that long of an age for a bus that effectively only runs mornings and evenings and only on schooldays.

            But if you just buy and maybe change the oil once a couple of years, then yeah, 12 years is probably a long time.

            • That is punishment for the responsible. If you actually maintain your hardware well, 12 years is not that long of an age for a bus that effectively only runs mornings and evenings and only on schooldays.

              But if you just buy and maybe change the oil once a couple of years, then yeah, 12 years is probably a long time.

              No. It's the exact opposite. If you are responsible and have a well maintained vehicle older than 12 years then it's eligible.
              On the other hand, if you have a badly maintained 10 year old vehicle, it doesn't qualify.

            • How are you people getting this so backwards?

              If you've been responsible and actively maintained your fleet, you are likely to have more buses that are eligible for trade-in, and you get new shit.

              If you've not been responsible and actively maintained your fleet, you have a barn full of junkers that either are not in service and thus not eligible, or you've been replacing your poorly-maintained junkers on a shorter schedule and your have a barn full of newer buses that are not eligible.

    • People could choose to convert it rather than buy a new one. Here in the UK a company called Lunez claims they can convert a diesel to an EV for the price of a new diesel
      Fully Charged trip around Lunez [youtube.com]
      • by jbengt ( 874751 )

        Here in the UK a company called Lunez claims they can convert a diesel to an EV for the price of a new diesel

        Great, so then we'd get a shiny new electric powertrain inside a beat-up old rustbucket.

    • by eth1 ( 94901 )

      At the very least, newer buses replaced under the program should be made available for sale to poorer districts that wouldn't otherwise replace even older/dirtier vehicles.

      If they really cared about emissions, though, what they'd do is forbid parents from driving single children to/from school, and require they take a bus, bike, walk, or a 3-4 kid minimum carpool. That would also help alleviate the insane traffic jams we have in the neighborhoods near schools around here during drop-off/pickup times. Even a

  • Development patterns (Score:3, Interesting)

    by b0s0z0ku ( 752509 ) on Monday May 23, 2022 @09:34PM (#62560308)
    Part of the solution should also be development patterns (community schools, sidewalks, bike paths) that allow kids to walk or bike to school safely whenever possible. I grew up in a small city like that -- the town was about 3x3 miles, and had no busing. All of town was within about 30 minutes' walk of the high school, and there were several lower schools, also mostly within walking distance. I realize that doesn't work with more rural areas, but further school consolidation needs to be stopped.
    • I live in a very walkable town and my nearly school age kid could easily walk daily. However, around here I expect the police will probably be called if I ever let her walk. Not only do kids ride the bus from the corner by our house a handful of blocks from the school but the parents drive the kids to the spot and wait until the kids get on the bus before leaving. This is a moderate size town but with several smaller schools spread out (no doubt a surviving artifact of segregation).

      • Yep, Americans are very ignorant and stupid about allowing kids a modicum of independence. And American cop and CPS pigs aren't much better. Even as an adult, I've been questioned by cops for walking to the store late at night vs driving.

        We need fewer cops, but we also need to change social norms as far as pedestrianism and cycling.

      • In my not so walkable town, every kid within 1 mile of an elementary school or 2 miles from the high school has to walk/bike to school.

      • by shilly ( 142940 )

        This is just so weird to hear from a UK perspective. My kids have got public transport to school by themselves since they were each 11 years old, along with millions of other kids.

    • by FuzzMaster ( 596994 ) on Monday May 23, 2022 @10:12PM (#62560392)

      Many communities are instead moving towards more centralization and busing for many reasons, the biggest one being economic. You can build one large campus with all of the modern facilities and bus kids from all over for a fraction of the cost of replicating or upgrading those facilities across the community. It's also more efficient to manage changes in enrollment with a large central campus rather than several small schools that might end up with empty classrooms due to aging of local population.

      Source: Our local community recently rejected such a referendum, aimed at building one of these large central campuses, in favor of the added expense of upgrading the smaller neighborhood schools. Other nearby communities have built these large central campuses because of the cost savings with the tradeoff of more bus usage and less localized schooling, but ours decided the added expense was worth the benefits of the neighborhood schools where many of the kids can walk the short distance.

      • Yep - sad. We had $500 billion to spend on sending the US military on a homicide spree in Iraq and Afghanistan, but local schools? Nah. And yes, this should be centrally funded and disbursed, similar to how other countries work.
      • Yah, centralization. That offers more administrative positions, anyway. But ask yourself which is better for the students? If you have a class of 50-100 in a neighborhood school, you know most of your class and all of your teachers. The teachers know most of the students in each year group.

        Compare that to monster schools with 1000 kids in each year: kids know almost no one in the school; the teachers know only the kids they are directly involved with. Everyone becomes a tiny cog in a huge machine.

        Sure,

    • Part of the solution should also be development patterns

      That's not the EPA to dictate city layout. Good, bad, whatever your plan. Not the right agency to hurl it at. Don't like that it isn't the right one to hurl at? Contact your Congressional rep, ask them to grant authority for whatever to the EPA.

      I mean are we just going to see (insert some random federal agency) and then be like "Hey, you know what would be a good idea? (insert some idea that has zero relationship to the federal agency being discussed)." I mean, great, I'm glad people are thinking outs

      • No, HUD and FHFA should do that by controlling what kind of mortgages they buy, in what kinds of developments. Give preferential rate and assign lower risk categories to housing located in pedestrian-friendly areas.
    • I'd just be happy if they established school bus stops like they used to, where all the kids within a block or two would go to that one stop to embark / disembark the bus. Seems like I get stuck behind school buses that stop at every fucking driveway on a street, stopping traffic in both directions each time, on streets that have perfectly serviceable sidewalks and low speed limits.

      And then we simultaneously wonder why we have so many fat kids.

      I'm all for keeping things safe if the neighborhood doesn't hav

  • for an insight into the genesis of the dirty school bus read Internal Combustion by Edwin Black.
    http://www.internalcombustionb... [internalco...onbook.com]

  • ideal application? (Score:5, Informative)

    by mcswell ( 1102107 ) on Monday May 23, 2022 @10:51PM (#62560452)

    Seems like school buses might be an ideal application of EV technology. (Disclaimer: we're looking into buying an EV car.) Reason: Apart from a field trip maybe once or twice a year, school buses mostly get used twice a day, and for not much more than an hour at a time. They never get driven far, and they can get juiced up in between times. If the school has a parking lot, the lot can be covered with solar panels (although I understand those are a bit pricy right now), so the buses can get charged up during the daytime, 9 to 3 or so.

    • Solar panels are not that expensive relatively, and there are bifacial panels which can be used over a bus depot, where they will have a maximum effect. This is a best case, with the only exception of some rural school districts where buses may go 20-100 miles each way to pick up rural students.

      As an added bonus, the buses could be useful for batteries in a power outage, similar to how some EVs can be used with an inverter for emergency power.

      Then, there are upkeep costs. An EV is far simpler to maintain

    • They can also be hooked up to the grid for V2G and earn some money while they sit around doing nothing for most of the day/night
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Some places have been using EV busses for close to a decade now, e.g. Shenzhen in China. The technology is proven for this kind of application, and as you say it's fairly ideal due to the usage patterns.

      The battery doesn't even need to be particularly large. School busses are usually on the smaller end of the scale.

      • IIRC Blue Bird built and sold the first modern (HFD) electric school bus in about 1996... hmm nope, 1994. There was little interest in them in this country until fairly recently, but the few units they had out in the field seem to have been successful.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          They appear to have made some prototypes. At the time only NiCd and NiMH batteries would have been available, which was probably the issue. Oh, well there was lead acid too, but it's too heavy.

          • I believe the initial model used lead acid. It had an advertised maximum 100 mile range, so you can assume it was pretty heavy, and got more like 60 miles. Still, NREL says that school buses travel an average of about 75 miles, so for some routes that would have been OK.

    • by RobinH ( 124750 )
      So busses only take kids home on sunny days? I agree with most of what you said, but the solar panels at the school is pointless. Charge them off the grid. If they plug in at the same time every day and use the same amount of power every day, they're a perfect grid based load, and your base load generation, like nuclear, could handle it extremely cheaply. Let the grid (and the market) decide where to put generation and storage capacity to meet demand. What could really be interesting is that you could
      • So busses only take kids home on sunny days? I agree with most of what you said, but the solar panels at the school is pointless.

        Solar panels on the school are pointless in terms of the buses, but they're still a good idea. Schools should have solar power systems with islanding, so they can keep the power on in emergencies. Schools are often used as disaster management centers when things are bad enough that the kids can't go to school anyway, so it fulfills two purposes.

    • According to this report from 2013, school busses are in operation for an average of 5.26 hours per school day. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14... [nrel.gov]
  • They're going to destroy them? What a waste. They could be transformed into campers or similar.

    • Yes the way it works is generally that they have to hole the block and cut the frame. So instead of selling them to some other country with lesser emissions restrictions, where they will replace something even older and more polluting, they just destroy them. I presume the actual logic is that this generates more bus sales overall, even if the number is very small.

    • by eepok ( 545733 )

      The idea is to eliminate the emissions from transportation. If we replace the bus with an EV bus (still some pollution from electricity generation), but the diesel bus continues to be used then it's a net increase in pollution.

  • How much of that $5B do they have on hand or hard approved budget, and how much they are planning to ask for from current and future administrations? Or did they pass it as a law, California style, meaning that Congress has to fund it unless they explicitly vote to change the law to kill it? From the summary it sounds like they have $0.25B in this yearâ(TM)s budget.
  • Why is this the job of the federal government? It has become such a behemoth, sucking up massive resources, some few of which dribble back to localities with program like this.

    Wouldn't it be better to close down the massive federal bureaucracies, reduce the federal budget accordingly, and let states, counties and towns do their own thing?

    • The average working life of a school bus is 12 years, so a 2010 or older model would already be slated, and budgeted, for replacement. Replacing school busses is a State and local responsibility paid for with State and local taxes. The Federal government is WAY in the red, and doesn't have $5 billion to spend.

      So, WTF? The EPA has no role in school funding. None! It should not be buying school busses. That's not its job, that's not its purpose, and so this cannot be a legitimate use of federal tax d

    • Why is this the job of the federal government?

      You may be surprised to learn that pollution doesn't stop at state boundaries.

    • I ask the same thing when they subsidize nuclear power plants.

    • by eepok ( 545733 )

      No, it wouldn't be better to close down the massive federal bureaucracies. They're inefficient, but no other organization in the entire nation is capable of taking on the responsibility to move out such a huge change in transportation infrastructure. Big change always comes from the federal government because they are the vehicle through which we pool large amounts of funds to spark changes at the local level.

      Highways, waterways, railroads, pipelines, phone lines, fiber optic lines, sewage, etc.-- Infrastru

  • All electric buses (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rantrantrant ( 4753443 ) on Tuesday May 24, 2022 @04:18AM (#62560866)
    Where I live almost all the buses are municipally owned & run & are either electric or hybrid. The police cars are too. I think the postal service is next. It's a long-term, planned, organised, coordinated transition. That's what govts are supposed to do for us. The things that corporations either can't or won't do.
    • Where I live almost all the buses are municipally owned & run & are either electric or hybrid. The police cars are too. I think the postal service is next.

      Alas, in the USA, some things are local, some are State, and some are Federal. In general, police cars and buses are either Local or State.

      Alas, the USPS (postal service) is a Federal affair. So it's noone's fault but the Federal Government....

  • This is the perfect opportunity for the private sector to revolutionize things; think about it, with a mass replacement you can think about:
    1) Multi-person vehicle safety
    2) Capacity can be actually studied and we can find optimal sizes for safety and efficency
    3) School busses don't need to be super-aerodynamic in frequent-stop areas
    4) Some kind of centipede "split off" design where you could service multiple areas and then work more like a train on the highway
    5) Unified locking and communication for saf
    • 1) highly studied and accounted for in designs and operations
      2) done and done, taking into account real world issues like cost of drivers, which over the lifetime of a bus exceeds the vehicle cost even though they can cost a half-million bucks (school buses usually do not, but transit buses often do)
      3) they are already less aerodynamic than they used to be for various reasons because they rarely go over 60 mph where drag tends to mount up
      4) haha HAhaaHa HahAh
      5) unified locking? yeah let us know how that wor

  • Can't we just let these buses phase out naturally; what's the rush? If electric buses are a better idea in a locale, they will win out eventually. Forcing anything has unintended consequences. Stupid politicos... Why does my wallet hurt again?
  • Replace school buses with walking and biking to school.

  • I would feel much more comfortable if the first step was to outfit bus yards with the requisite bus/vehicle charging infrastructure. I've seen the work requires to trench in a ton of power, throw down another transformer, and troubleshoot the software on lesser known EVSEs that won a bid due to undercutting.

    Too few people out there fully consider the cost of prepping for EV charging.

  • And not a trace of Funny to be found. *sigh*

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Working...