Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United Kingdom EU Technology

UK Will Not Copy EU Demand for Common Charging Cable (bbc.com) 205

The UK government says it is not "currently considering" copying European Union plans for a common charging cable. From a report: The EU has provisionally agreed all new portable electronic devices must, by autumn 2024, use a USB Type-C charger, a move it says will benefit consumers. Critics say it will stifle innovation. Under the current post-Brexit arrangements, the regulation would apply to Northern Ireland, according to EU and UK officials. According to the a December 2021 parliamentary report, the "new requirements may also apply to devices sold in Northern Ireland under the terms of the Northern Ireland protocol in the Brexit agreement, potentially triggering divergence of product standards with the rest of the UK." The treaty works by keeping Northern Ireland inside the EU's single market for goods, while the rest of the UK is outside it. A row between the UK and EU about how to reform the Northern Ireland protocol remains unresolved. A UK government spokesperson said "we are not currently considering replicating this requirement."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Will Not Copy EU Demand for Common Charging Cable

Comments Filter:
  • by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:09PM (#62604286)

    They scream into their pillows while both Displayport and Thunderbolt were folded into the USB-C umbrella.

    Now those moves have admittedly made the thing a little bit of a mess but there is plainly room to innovate while still keeping to a cable standard. Your innovation has to actually be "innovative" enough to warrant inclusion into the specification.

    Since by "critics" we can assume they mean "Apple" so I would say what really stifles innovation is hiding your very good magnetic connector behind patents and litigation rather than making it an open standard the rest of the industry can use to its betterment.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:08PM (#62604680) Homepage Journal

      This is cutting off our nose to spite our face. It doesn't even matter, everything will come with a USB C port anyway because nobody is going to make a special extra crap version just for the UK market.

      Brexit has been a disaster and the government is desperate to prove that there are some tangible benefits. One way they are doing that is by rejecting EU standards in favour of stupid ones, like the imperial measurements system (feet, pounds, groats etc.) instead of metric. Any way we can punch ourselves in the face is promoted as an "independent country" doing "what's best for it, free from EU sanity".

      • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

        If de Pfeffel is so keen on Imperial measures he should do two things. Firstly piss off back to his country of birth. I hear they still use Imperial measures. Second perhaps he should hold a referendum on the subject and see what the general public think. Even my 77 year old mother who was actually brought up on Imperial measures would vote against it.

      • by ghoul ( 157158 )
        Brexit was sold to to brown Britishers as a way that Britain could be more open to immigration from the commonwealth. it was sold to white Britishers as a way of keeping foreigners out. Both cant happen.
        • And then those same people gave Boris an increased mandate to "Get Brexit Done" without ever asking what that meant.
          Even previously safe Labour seats now have a Conservative MP.

          When they stand in line at the airport in Malaga for 3 hours waiting to come home from their summer holiday, they look over at the EU only lanes and think "This isn't the Brexit I voted for" like the idiots they are.

  • by whoever57 ( 658626 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:10PM (#62604294) Journal

    They don't have a say in the matter. If the EU adopts a common charging cable requirement, that's what the UK will get anyway.

    This is pure posturing from the BREXITEERs.

    • by uohcicds ( 472888 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:15PM (#62604328) Homepage
      Pretty much bang on. The EU market has 400m users. It really doesnâ(TM)t matter that UKG says, the de facto standard will happen. And given Iâ(TM)m typing this on a 6th gen iPad mini that uses usb-c, adding it to the phones canâ(TM)t be too far away. And there are lots of us that think that the current government is populated by palsied gibbons, headed by a honking porky sexdoll
      • The EU market has 400m users. It really doesnâ(TM)t matter that UKG says, the de facto standard will happen.

        Please don't let the idiots in charge hear you say things like this. If they ever figure this out they'll be clamouring for laws to ban USB-C charging ports just to prove the UK is different.

      • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

        For example try buying a none RoSH compliant iPhone in the USA. The EU decided lead based solder in electronic devices was bad and the rest of the world pretty much fell into line.

        • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

          For example try buying a none RoSH compliant iPhone in the USA. The EU decided lead based solder in electronic devices was bad and the rest of the world pretty much fell into line.

          It's because it's basically one device - and China also adopted RoHS rules pretty much so it limits non-RoHS production to other areas. The benefits of leaded solder for mass produced devices doesn't really justify the expense and difficulty in setting up a production line for Europe and one for everywhere else.

          Also since China co

          • In China that compliance is "Print a RoHS logo on the box. Also print FCC, ISO 9001, 128 gigabytes soild state, and an Apple logo. The product in the box is a screwdriver."

    • Based on the summary, it's not that they are trying to have a say, it's that they don't care either way.

      I don't see that as posturing.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Maybe you aren't familiar with brexit. It's all about posturing, because there's nothing else. No benefits at all, only downsides.

        With this the politicians can say they are giving British companies flexibility to screw over consumers with proprietary chargers, and fill our landfills with more e-waste. British e-waste.

    • Reminds me of "50 state legal" products in the US. States have some latitude in making their own environmental rules, and California ends up being the highest bar, and is so large that many products comply with standards that aren't legally necessary in the other 49. (Such as cars and emissions).
    • Or it doesn't matter, so why bother passing a law for something that will happen anyway. Don't they have parties to go to or something.

  • LOL (Score:3, Insightful)

    by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:13PM (#62604316)

    Sorry UK, no one is going to produce special products for you. How you have not realised that after several years of Brexit failure is beyond me. There's literally no upside to being different other than reducing a potential market share.

    I'll wager even British companies based in the UK will follow the EU's rules. After all having 10x the potential market size without a different SKU saves a lot of costs.

    Big man Boris can beat his chest all he wants to look tough for his country bumpschkin voters, all the while they'll text each other how much better an independent Britain is on their mobile phones with USB-C ports.

    • I don't see anyone claiming this is a win for Brexit, certainly not in the linked article.

      You're right, we and producers will follow it anyway, which is fine and what everyone wants regardless of their opinion on Brexit. And this is why we have no need to bother legislating - it's not that we are opposed it it, we just have no need to copy it.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Recent polling now shows that all areas of the UK think that brexit has been bad for us. Demographic wise, only leave voters over 65 think that it's actually going well.

      Even some Tory MPs have been talking about getting back into the Single Market via the EEA, as a way to resolve the problems on the island of Ireland. I say problems, inflation in Northern Ireland is 8% lower than it is in the rest of the UK, so it's only really the unionists who have a big issue with it.

    • Where are you getting that they want special products produced?

      They're just choosing not to legislate on the issue.

      • Where are you getting that they want special products produced?

        They're just choosing not to legislate on the issue.

        Omissions are telling. You may understand this if you were paying attention to Brexit propaganda the past 6 years. A significant portion of debate was about UK companies being able to do what UK companies want without the "tyranny" of EU rules.

        Remember the biggest Brexit wins: Pint glasses now have the CE marking removed and replaced with with the crown emblem (not that EU rules prevented a crown emblem in the first place) and that passports are now blue (not that EU rules prevented blue passports in the fi

  • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:14PM (#62604318)

    Critics say it will stifle innovation.

    I think they misspelled "profitability".

  • by raburton ( 1281780 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:15PM (#62604326) Homepage

    We don't need to copy it, so why waste legislative time on it. USB C is rapidly becoming the defacto standard anyway, it's really only Apple that needs to be forced. They aren't going to stick to lightening just for the UK once they move to USB C for the EU (and almost certainly the rest of the world too).

    • What happens when we enter a post USB-C period?

      • by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:31PM (#62604408)

        Maybe we don't really need to for a good couple of decades, at which point the laws can be changed if anybody comes up with something that has genuine advantages that make it worth it to go back to non-standard charging interfaces. If things like RJ45 and 3.5mm jacks can last decades, I don't see why we can't stick to USB-C for a while. It seems to have plenty of room to grow. At least as cell phones are concerned.

        Also, the law doesn't state that you can't put any other port on your device. So if some company comes out with a port that is truly revolutionary and will change the world, they can add that to their phone in addition to USBC.

        • Maybe we don't really need to for a good couple of decades, at which point the laws can be changed if anybody comes up with something that has genuine advantages that make it worth it to go back to non-standard charging interfaces. If things like RJ45 and 3.5mm jacks can last decades, I don't see why we can't stick to USB-C for a while. It seems to have plenty of room to grow. At least as cell phones are concerned.

          Also, the law doesn't state that you can't put any other port on your device. So if some company comes out with a port that is truly revolutionary and will change the world, they can add that to their phone in addition to USBC.

          I don't think there's a big incentive for manufacturers to invent new USB connectors, pissing off your customers with a weird connector is not good business. Even Apple only did it because the previous standard sucked so much and they had the brand name recognition to make do with alternate connectors.

          I'm not certain why Apple doesn't want to switch to USB-C. I suspect it has to do with a) they don't want to piss off their existing customers with a switch, b) they want the royalties from lightning accessori

      • by sjames ( 1099 )

        Same things as this now that USB2.0 seems to be on the wane. Complete with people complaining that in spite of the standard being updated in a timely fashion twice, they're sure it will never happen again.

    • by _xeno_ ( 155264 )

      They aren't going to stick to lightening just for the UK once they move to USB C for the EU (and almost certainly the rest of the world too).

      It's Apple, they like to Think Different. They're going to ride out Lightning for as long as they can, and since they already don't include chargers in the box, the same box they produce for US markets can work in the UK just as well. Well, not literally the same box, they presumably have localized marketing materials for warranty information and the like, but you get the idea.

      My bet is that the EU will get special proprietary Apple wireless charging-only iPhones once the mandate is in place, because the ma

      • by Teckla ( 630646 )

        My bet is that the EU will get special proprietary Apple wireless charging-only iPhones once the mandate is in place, because the mandate only applies to devices that can be charged via wired chargers.

        I wouldn't take that bet, because I think there's a good chance you're right. But I think there's a good chance you're wrong, too, due to the proliferation and popularity of portable chargers.

  • but what about scotland and northern ireland?

    • Regarding Northern Ireland, the answer is in the linked BBC article - Due to the Northern Ireland Protocol, the regulation is likely to apply to Northern Ireland.

      Scotland will be in the same boat as the rest of the UK. I'm not sure the Scottish government will have any say in the matter as I don't think this will be a devolved issue.
  • Would Apple make two different versions of the I-Phone, one with lightning and one with USB-C? Would it be region specific, as to where you buy each model? All signs point to 'no', because that costs Apple more money to have two separate production lines and separate inventories.
    • Would Apple make two different versions of the I-Phone, one with lightning and one with USB-C? Would it be region specific, as to where you buy each model? All signs point to 'no', because that costs Apple more money to have two separate production lines and separate inventories.

      Samsung does this already. Popular phone models like Galaxy have entirely different CPU and video SOCs for the North American market (Snapdragon/Adreno) and the Euro/Asian (Exynos/Mali) markets.

      Yeah, you would not want to make many variations, those would be better considered as different models, but two seems to not be a big deal.

      • > "Samsung does this already. Popular phone models like Galaxy have entirely different CPU and video SOCs for the North American market (Snapdragon/Adreno) and the Euro/Asian (Exynos/Mali) markets."

        blows my mind, they still do this.

        Boy do I not miss Samsung.

        Just do the one and be done with it, fools.

  • Doesn't matter (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Artem S. Tashkinov ( 764309 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:41PM (#62604454) Homepage
    It doesn't matter. If EU makes the USB-C charging port a requirement, the whole world will comply because economically it makes little to no sense not to comply with EU demands and have two SKUs per each device.
  • They'll use exactly the same connector, but the British one will be measured in inches.

    • by quenda ( 644621 )

      They'll use exactly the same connector, but the British one will be measured in inches.

      I hope "exactly" the same. I've been buying JST connectors from China, sold as 2.5mm spacing. Some are exactly that, others actually the traditional 0.1" . With 8 pins, that adds up to 0.3mm, which is bad! (sorry, 1/8" - death to imperial measurements.)

  • by splutty ( 43475 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @01:49PM (#62604466)

    It doesn't matter what they "want". If companies decide to follow the EU laws/guidelines/whatever then the UK will get it regardless.

    So saying you're "not planning on following" is utterly pointless, and sounds like a political statement more than something that will actually have any actual impact.

    But eh, it's Bojo's government, so I'm not expecting brains there.

  • ... will come with an integral charger and BS 1363 plug on the back.

  • While standardizing can hinder some innovation, say with a smaller cable that will allow a smaller form factor, or a larger cable that can charge your device faster. Being that most device makers even without EU laws, had mostly decided on USB-C for charging. Also most EV makers have settled on the CCS-2 port for auto charging. We only have Apple and Tesla (in America) being the outliers there. However each of those companies are big enough to support their own standards. But really don't offer anything s

    • The legislation itself is set to be reviewed. When the phone companies think USB-D is a better option, they can lobby for it, drafting a white paper or signing an open letter asking for a review. The Commission sends drafts of their working programmes to academia to gather comments on what else to include in their upcoming packages of measures. Also academics on their own initiative draft and send white papers to the Commission about evolutions of their field of technology and whatever they suggest the EU s

    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      If all the other phones are still on USB-C how does one break into the new tech.

      You sell a UK/USA version with the new tech. And when the European customers cry about being left behind, Brussels capitulates.

      • Or you could actually read about the legislation which has provision for revision in it precisely so they don't get stuck on an old standard. But it's easier to just invent stupid reasons to hate the EU, I get it.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:30PM (#62604750)
    Divide and conquer. This way the United Kingdom doesn't have enough clout and wherewithal to resist the advances of mega corporations like Apple computer. It's the same thing corporations do in America with the constant shouts of states rights. They know they can pick the states apart one by one using gerrymandering to take over the state legislatures and then rule Americans with an iron fist. When you're the 1% trying to rule the 99% divide and conquer is the only real solution.
    • As I heard, one of arguments for Brexit was that the UK would have more negotiating power dealing with EU regulations as a non-member than a member. Did not any sense to me but hey neither does Boris Johnson.
  • by wakeboarder ( 2695839 ) on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:40PM (#62604778)

    Because companies don't want to make two products. A company I worked for made two different products for ROHS and then ended up switching everything to ROHS. Apple could easily produce two iphones models with different ports, but they probably won't.

  • The UK isn't wanting a different standard, the UK isn't wanting an imperial version, this is fuck all to do with Brexit. What the UK government have said is that there is no point wasting time and money to bring in legislation to get companies to do what pretty much everyone apart from Apple is already doing and the EU bringing in this law guarantees it. Stuff sold to Europe, not just the EU, including the UK will come with USB C.
    • This is taking back control, right here. We get the dregs of EU legislation anyway but with no opportunity to influence them in any way.

  • The whole world will adopt this, if the EU makes it a requirement.

  • Oh yeah, my dear old country, UK - you know, that country which is world renowned for producing electronic devices and exporting them the world over ... ... oh wait, I must've dreamed that.

    This "stance" by whoever made this pointless vacuous statement, is a pointless one.
    It _would_ be valid if the UK actually manufactured and exported a significant amount of consumer electronic goods.
    They don't. I'm not sure what the percentage is, but it's going to be super super low.

    It seems my current government is under

Keep up the good work! But please don't ask me to help.

Working...