UK's Online Safety Bill On Pause Pending New PM (techcrunch.com) 24
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: A major populist but controversial piece of U.K. legislation to regulate internet content through a child safety-focused frame is on pause until the fall when the government expects to elect a new prime minister, following the resignation of Boris Johnson as Conservative Party leader last week. PoliticsHome reported yesterday that the Online Safety Bill would be dropped from House of Commons business next week with a view to being returned in the autumn. The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) denied the legislation was being dropped altogether but the fate of the bill will clearly now rest with the new prime minister -- and their appetite for regulating online speech.
Reached for comment, DCMS confirmed that the bill's final day of report stage will be rescheduled to after the summer recess -- suggesting it had lost out to competing demands for remaining parliamentary time (without specifying to what). The department also made a point of reiterating that the legislation intends to deliver on the government's manifesto commitment to make the U.K. the safest place in the world to be online while defending freedom of speech. But critics of the bill continue to warn it vastly overreaches on content regulation while saddling the U.K.'s digital sector with crippling compliance costs.
Reached for comment, DCMS confirmed that the bill's final day of report stage will be rescheduled to after the summer recess -- suggesting it had lost out to competing demands for remaining parliamentary time (without specifying to what). The department also made a point of reiterating that the legislation intends to deliver on the government's manifesto commitment to make the U.K. the safest place in the world to be online while defending freedom of speech. But critics of the bill continue to warn it vastly overreaches on content regulation while saddling the U.K.'s digital sector with crippling compliance costs.
Offline (Score:3)
How about making the UK the safest place to be Offline first?
Re: (Score:1)
Apparently you also don't have a bombastic press which exaggerates, tells lies of omission, takes things out of context, etc... or you'd know that about half of those things you mentioned are either not true, or not representative of the US as a whole.
For example, the drinking water problem happened in one town, controlled by liberals. Even in most cities run by liberals, the drinking water is safe, and this particular example made the headlines because of how rare it is. The city went out of its way t
Re: (Score:1)
Apparently you also don't have a bombastic press which exaggerates, tells lies of omission, takes things out of context, etc... or you'd know that about half of those things you mentioned are either not true, or not representative of the US as a whole.
For example, the drinking water problem happened in one town, controlled by liberals....
The water was a Republican appointed to the state water control board. and I agree, when Britain shut down Faux Noise in their country they saved lives by ending exaggerated, omission fueled race hate.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, I could forgive the fourth estate if the only bad actor was Fox News. But the fact that CNN, the NYT, and MSNBC seem to be playing a game of mendacity one-upsmanship with Fox is quite disturbing. It has gotten really bad in the US lately.
Re: (Score:1)
The forth estate is as good as facts can make it, given the evils of Corporate crime
There is nothing in any report by CNN, NYTimes or MSNBC that has been fabricated out of hole cloth and the liar PROMOTED, as Faux does daily.
Re: (Score:2)
It will take a decade to fix, and realistically fixing it won't start until at least the next election which is probably late 2024, new government starting January 2025.
Re: (Score:2)
How about making the UK the safest place to be Offline first?
Not to excuse the utter conservative brain shart of a disaster that is the "UK Online Safety Bill" (AKA. Do something that sounds scary to uninformed Daily Mail readers) but the UK is already a fairly safe place to live in. We don't have regular shootings or even B&Es. The notion that you'd ever be in the position to need to defend your home is utterly alien to most people here and for those that it isn't, it's usually because they live in a paranoid fantasy land.
If someone were to break into my hou
So freedom lives a little longer (Score:4, Insightful)
Remember when we were told dropping trade barriers and embracing China would encourage the Chinese government to create a freer, more open society? It seems as though this has worked exactly backwards, and all the Free World democracies are trying as hard as they can to emulate the terrifying surveillance society China has inflicted on its people.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems as though this has worked exactly backwards
Just like all other neoliberal fairy tales.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You are talking about the same Nixon who broke the Bretton Woods treaty, right?
For one. That's where it all started, with the neocons.
Re: (Score:2)
Please try not to be a stupid prick. I know it's a challenge, but do make the effort.
Re: (Score:1)
The problem is that conservative parties don't have much to offer the average working-class citizen, so they push imaginary issues to rile up their base. Usually it involves taking away rights from some minority segment of the population that can't/won't effectively fight back.
Here in the USA, our speech and guns are sacred, so our right-wing politicians go after women, LGBTQ+, and brown people. Of course, after they get done with that, they probably will decide you have a few too many rights, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You raise a good point, but I don't believe Five Eyes social impact is even a fraction as coercive. I'm not saying they're perfect...far from it. However, the type of social engineering I'm talking about would be driven more by Google's willingness to hand over Ring video data to police without a warrant, or the owners' knowledge or consent.
Re: (Score:2)
Who can do it? (Score:2)
I mean, he failed ant many things but you can't say he wasn't an efficient and vaguely convincing liar.
Re: (Score:2)
Safe? (Score:2)
Good (Score:2)
bill is very important (Score:1)