Roger Federer Announces Retirement from Tennis (wsj.com) 54
Roger Federer, the 20-time major winner whose ruthless artistry defined an era of tennis, announced his retirement on Thursday. From a report: "I am 41 years old, I've played more than 1,500 matches over 24 years, and tennis has treated me more generously than I ever would have dreamt," Federer said in a video on social media, "and now I must recognize when it is time to end my competitive career."
For so much of that career, Federer seemed as if he would go down as the all-time men's leader for Grand Slam titles. He rounded past his idol Pete Sampras with his 15th major championship in 2009 and topped the list until 2022. But by then, his career had become inextricably linked to the other members of tennis's Big Three, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. As Federer struggled with injuries in recent years, Nadal overtook his tally at this year's Australian Open and now sits in first place with 22 major titles, having also won Roland-Garros this year. Djokovic is also ahead of Federer with 21, following his win this year at Wimbledon.
Federer, who will say goodbye at the Laver Cup exhibition in London next week, underwent knee surgery last year in the faint hope of returning to the pro circuit for a last hurrah. But as the recovery dragged and tennis kept speeding up, the Swiss master shotmaker realized it was time to call it a day. The man who once looked untouchable now retires in third place on the list of men's major championships. His dizzying final scorecard reads: eight Wimbledon championships, six Australian Opens, five U.S. Opens, and one Roland-Garros. He picked up 103 titles on tour, one Olympic doubles gold medal for Switzerland, and at one point spent a record 237 straight weeks as the No. 1 ranked player in the world. It earned him $130,594,339 in prize money alone, according to the ATP Tour.
For so much of that career, Federer seemed as if he would go down as the all-time men's leader for Grand Slam titles. He rounded past his idol Pete Sampras with his 15th major championship in 2009 and topped the list until 2022. But by then, his career had become inextricably linked to the other members of tennis's Big Three, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. As Federer struggled with injuries in recent years, Nadal overtook his tally at this year's Australian Open and now sits in first place with 22 major titles, having also won Roland-Garros this year. Djokovic is also ahead of Federer with 21, following his win this year at Wimbledon.
Federer, who will say goodbye at the Laver Cup exhibition in London next week, underwent knee surgery last year in the faint hope of returning to the pro circuit for a last hurrah. But as the recovery dragged and tennis kept speeding up, the Swiss master shotmaker realized it was time to call it a day. The man who once looked untouchable now retires in third place on the list of men's major championships. His dizzying final scorecard reads: eight Wimbledon championships, six Australian Opens, five U.S. Opens, and one Roland-Garros. He picked up 103 titles on tour, one Olympic doubles gold medal for Switzerland, and at one point spent a record 237 straight weeks as the No. 1 ranked player in the world. It earned him $130,594,339 in prize money alone, according to the ATP Tour.
News for Nerds (Score:5, Insightful)
... and... tennis stuff?
Someone help me out here. What angle am I missing?
Re:News for Nerds (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe he is going to learn to code?
Re: News for Nerds (Score:2)
I think the word smash has some relevance to both tennis and msmash.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd say "Welcome back after your long absence", but this does seem like a new low in article picks.
Re:News for Nerds (Score:5, Funny)
Well, in the movie Wimbledon, they inserted the tennis-balls with CGI, which we like, and it featured Kirsten Dunst implied to be nekkid behind a fogged shower door, which we also like...
But that's as close as I can think of.
Re: (Score:2)
If I had mod points, you'd get a funny. That got a chuckle outta me.
Re: (Score:2)
Only a matter of time until Slashdot starts having articles on the results of Sunday Night Football.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait... what happened to Monday night football?
Monday night? (Score:2)
We're all still at work.
Re: News for Nerds (Score:1)
Re: News for Nerds (Score:2)
Msmash, 'nuf said...
Re: News for Nerds (Score:2)
He has an iPhone?
Re: (Score:3)
Might as well report on John McEnroe for inspiring the use of laser line judges or EZ-Pass so he doesn't get stuck again on an expressway in Queens forcing him to forefeit a match.
Re: (Score:2)
What angle am I missing?
I heard that in the 1950s and early `60s tennis was quite popular with nerds.
On slashdot, I know that Anna Kournikova is the most popular athlete from any sport. So maybe they wanted to be inclusive? Or maybe they just didn't understand what the grits were for?
News for nerds? (Score:5, Insightful)
We've had some real stretches lately, like the death of the Queen of England, but isn't the announcement of the retirement of a sportsball player a bit outside of the normal sorts of things that the patrons of this site are interested in reading about on this site?
Is there an information-technology, sciences, or fandom angle to this? Does this affect any of these industries? If I want to read general news, I'll go to a general news site. They probably are more experienced and will do a better job of presenting general news. I come here for the nerdy/techy/sciency stuff that most general news sites don't necessarily do such a good job for. If this place yields the latter for the former, I have no reason to keep reading here because other places do it far better.
Re:News for nerds? (Score:4, Insightful)
Is there an information-technology, sciences, or fandom angle to this?
I'll bet at some point the dude has read a sci-fi novel or seen a Marvel movie.
Does this affect any of these industries?
I'd further bet that he has owned, currently owns, and may own in the future, some form of technology we care about. Maybe a phone or a computer? Maybe a TV? He's probably surfed the web a time or two.
I'd guess that's the only technological connection here.
This site hasn't just lost its editors, it's lost its way. I don't think the "staff" such as they are even have a clue what it is they're supposed to be doing other than generating clicks. Just bring back Jon Jatz already if all they want is clicks. That guy was the best troll to ever inhabit slashdot. He'd post a trashbag article and hundreds of nerds would start foaming at the mouth in their excitement to post flames.
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot did this before, sometime within the last decade, when it was sold to some company that tried to make it into a general news aggregator.
Trouble is, something very, very niche doesn't usually manage to transition into something entirely mainstream because it cannot attract enough mainstream user base fast enough to offset alienating its existing niche userbase. So the existing userbase evaporates, while the new userbase never really materializes.
Slashdot almost died at that point, and it has never
Re: News for nerds? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the interest in Tennis on Slashdot is related to its similarity to the first video game, Pong.
Re: (Score:3)
first video game, Pong.
Tennis For Two: 1958 [wikipedia.org]
Pong: 1972
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent. Keep the nerdage going!
Re: (Score:2)
Every neckbeard's dream: playing pong with Anna Kournikova
Re: (Score:3)
Even then, I fully expect things like the Queen's death to be posted here. That's major international news that we're going to want to discuss in our nerdy little enclave here. It's Stuff That Matters.
But this is the first article I've seen where
But does he run Linux? (Score:2)
NOTHING TO DO WITH TECH (Score:4, Insightful)
Why is this article here???!!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nerds (Score:5, Funny)
This definitely belongs on /. because apparently Federer was actually a robot, which is how his opponents explained their losses.
Slashdot? (Score:2)
Commenters (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Go home msmash (Score:5, Interesting)
You're drunk.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
He/she is the WORST editor of /. EVER.
And that's saying a lot.
Re: (Score:2)
He/she is the WORST editor of /. EVER.
He/She? I've always considered mods here to be poorly coded Perl scripts.
Re: (Score:1)
The End? (Score:4, Insightful)
At this point, biz-x could shutter this place and I'd not shed a tear.
I'd hope they sell it tho -- to a nerd with money, that cares.
This article is the most off-topic thing posted here that I can remember, ever. A far cry from when /. 21 years ago was the only news ticker still working when 9/11 broke the internet.
Yeah, Queen Elizabeth dying was also a stretch, but it made for a discussion on monarchy.
But tennis? Really? Not even F1 with its abundant tech and rampant cheating and now social activism.
Tennis.
We don't have to wait for the Netcraft confirmation -- this place is done. It's just the commenters keeping it alive. The "Why" of that just eludes me. Habit? Inertia? I know it is in my case. Habit. /. has always been there.
Goddamned fintech end SEO bros. Go soak your heads, I bet the eds aren't even real. That's who owns this joint, -- fintech and SEOs... not even nerds.
Re: (Score:2)
I only come on here every few weeks out of habit, or inertia I guess.
Wild to think I've been coming here for well over 20 years. Used to be a lot of fun.
Re: (Score:3)
> It's just the commenters keeping it alive. The "Why" /. has always been there.
> of that just eludes me. Habit? Inertia? I know it is in
> my case. Habit.
For me, it's a little bit inertia, a little bit nostalgia, but mostly just bloody-minded stubbornness. I started to sour on Slashdot for a while around 2014 or so when it seemed to lose its enthusiasm for technology and took a hard luddite turn. For example, the Slashdot party line on Google Glass really irked me. There I was, looking at the th
Re: The End? (Score:2)
I'd hope they sell it tho -- to a nerd with money, that cares.
Maybe Elon Musk? He's lined up an investment group, will likely bail on his planned Twitter purchase, and could pick up /. For *literal* pocket change...
Nerrrrrdddssss!!!!!!! (Score:2)
Tennis involves servers! (Score:3)
What do I win?
Maybe you should tell us what "Tennis" is. (Score:2)
Is that some tech company or what? I mean, it clearly has to be because whoever that guy is (hey, I don't have to know every CEO of every startup in the world), since this is a tech site the whole thing somehow has to have some connection to technology, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, that was William Higinbotham, not Roger Federer.
What does the 3rd best tennis player in history (Score:2)
News for Jocks (Score:1)