Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China United States

TikTok Mulls Splitting From ByteDance If Proposal With US Fails (reuters.com) 33

China's TikTok is considering separating from parent ByteDance to help address U.S. concerns about national security risks, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. Reuters reports: A divestiture, which could result in a sale or initial public offering, is considered a last resort and will be pursued only if the company's existing proposal with U.S. national security officials does not get approved, Bloomberg reported. The short-form video app is undergoing a national security review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and it agreed last year to implement a number of measures under the plan, nicknamed "Project Texas", in an attempt to placate hostile lawmakers.

CFIUS has stalled in its process, leaving TikTok unsure of whether its plans will be sufficient to continue operating in the country, according to the report. Members of CFIUS from the Justice Department have been unwilling to accept TikTok's proposal, it added. CFIUS, a powerful national security body, had in 2020 unanimously recommended that ByteDance divest TikTok because of fears that user data could be passed on to China's government.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TikTok Mulls Splitting From ByteDance If Proposal With US Fails

Comments Filter:
  • by S_Stout ( 2725099 ) on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:44PM (#63371555)
    It provides no value, get rid of it, problem solved.
    • It's the video version of Tumblr, a mental illness factory. Kids go there, get exposed to mental illness LARPing and fringe sexual practices, then mimic it. It doesn't need to be owned by the CCP to serve their interests.

    • It provides no value, get rid of it, problem solved.

      Oh - it provides a lot of entertainment value!

      I for one, hope that TikTok can come up with some way to survive, because it is gold, Jerry, gold!

      Anyhow Seinfeld quotes aside, there is a whole lot of unintentional entertainment going on there. There is a whole Youtube reaction video section that takes clips of angry ladies who are mad that now that they've reached 45 and are ready to settle down and start a family that no guys seem interested, screaming and hitting their phones because a date didn't bri

    • by ranton ( 36917 )

      I have never even used TikTok and cannot see enough value (to me) to even spend the time to give it a shot. Perhaps I'm just getting too old. But it would be ridiculous for me to say any company used by 1.5 billion people provides no value. Even China isn't forcing its populace to use the app. People are only using TikTok because it provides value to them. You can disagree with their life choices, but saying the app provides no value is objectively false.

      • I signed up a while back to see what the fuss was about. So far as I could tell, it's pretty much entirely narcissisistic teenagers filming themselves pretending to be background dancers for their favorite K-Pop groups. Whatever floats your boat, I guess. But I didn't see any value to spending my time watching imitators on TikTok when there are plenty of BTS* music videos and recordings from their concerts showing their real dancers dancing on YouTube if I were interested in watching. I think I had TikT

  • Can we also force Meta to divest Facebook for fears...er...because it does pass user data on to US government and intelligence agencies?

    • Can we also force Meta to divest Facebook for fears...er...because it does pass user data on to US government and intelligence agencies?

      If TikTok guaranteed the US government equal access to the data as the Chinese government gets, I'm sure the US wouldn't have a problem.

      • Oh, ok, sure. So Facebook/Youtube/Twitter should all guarantee the Chinese government equal access to the data as the American government gets?

        • Oh, ok, sure. So Facebook/Youtube/Twitter should all guarantee the Chinese government equal access to the data as the American government gets?

          It sounds only fair.
          Sauce for the goose. How much worse could it be? All the 5 eyes members having access to your data AND China?

        • by migos ( 10321981 )
          No, because Facebook/Youtube/Twitter don't operate in China.
        • by ranton ( 36917 )

          Oh, ok, sure. So Facebook/Youtube/Twitter should all guarantee the Chinese government equal access to the data as the American government gets?

          China would certainly be within their rights to force Facebook / YouTube / Twitter to share any information China asks for in order to operate in China. Facebook / YouTube / Twitter are then within their rights to choose not to operate in China.

          As is stands today, China and these social media companies have made decisions which have caused these apps to be blocked in China. This is likely a combination of these companies not allowing the level of control China would require and China simply not wanting fore

    • by ranton ( 36917 )

      A country that does not consider the US a close enough ally to trust the relationship between the US and US companies would certainly be within their rights to ban those companies from operating in their country. China, Iran, North Korea, Uganda and Russia all ban the use of Facebook within their country. That is a perfectly reasonable response to companies these countries view as a risk because of either being foreign or simply being seen as a threat.

      If you take the EU as an example of a close ally to the

  • They're still owned.
    And you can set all the caveats you want.
    It won't stop the free flow of data to China.

    • The data being: johnny congress man likes to look at dancing ass and boobs. Almost all relevant info about johnny can be freely scrapped from other social networks he is using (because johnny doesn't care about showing its friend list, location and so on). The security risk is just an excuse for protectionism and trade war.
      • by Chas ( 5144 )

        There's a difference between searching and scraping and simply directly funneling data to China.

        And this is China. Steal anything that's no nailed down.
        And if it's nailed down, break in and steal it anyhow.
        Then claim that you "invented" it.

  • Two things: First, westerners don't generally understand that China is not a country in the western sense of the word; it is a corporation. The whole thing. Ever since the party leaders got right with that whole money thing, it's been this way. Now since the party controls the currency and operates the entire governing framework without exception, and every business operating within China has to comply with the legal framework, that effectively makes all such businesses a subsidiary of the party...corpor
    • Second... why? Is there any legitimate use case for non-work video sharing or other social media on a work device, especially one used for sensitive data or national security? No. Absolutely not.

      Bruh we're not even talking about that. This is about whether TikTok will get outright banned in the whole country. It's already been banned from government devices, and nobody is even talking about changing that.

      • by xeno ( 2667 )
        That's my point, it's already legally/contractually banned on most devices in the country, so diddling around with discussion of a 100% ban is a diversion from the real issue. The crux is that a lot (majority? plurality?) of people use their work laptops for personal purposes, and their personal mobile devices for work, in contravention of numerous contracts and regulatory requirements -- and this is where the actual risk to data lies. Anyone who checks work email/messages/workflow/chat on the same device t

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...