Classified US Documents Leaked on 4chan, Telegram, Discord, and Twitter (msn.com) 133
America's Department of Justice just launched an investigation into the leaking of classified documents from the U.S. Department of Defense, reports the Washington Post.
"On Wednesday, images showing some of the documents began circulating on the anonymous online message board 4chan and made their way to at least two mainstream social media platforms, Telegram and Twitter." Earlier Friday, The Washington Post obtained dozens of what appeared to be photographs showing classified documents, dating to late February and early March, that range from worldwide intelligence briefings to tactical-level battlefield updates and assessments of Ukraine's defense capabilities. They outline information about the Ukrainian and Russian militaries, and include highly sensitive U.S. analyses about China and other nations. The materials also reference highly classified sources and methods that the United States uses to collect such information, alarming U.S. national security officials who have seen them.... The material that appeared online includes photographs of documents labeled "Secret" or "Top Secret," and began appearing on Discord, a chat platform popular with gamers, according to a Post review.
In some cases, it appears that the slides were manipulated. For instance, one image features combat casualty data suggesting the number of Russian soldiers killed in the war is far below what the Pentagon publicly has assessed. Another version of the image showed higher Russian casualty figures. Besides the information on casualties that appeared to be manipulated to benefit the Russian government, U.S. officials who spoke to The Post said many of the leaked documents did not appear to be forged and looked consistent in format with CIA World Intelligence Review reports distributed at high levels within the White House, Pentagon and the State Department....
The documents appear to have been drawn from multiple reports and agencies, and concern matters other than Ukraine. Two pages, for example, are purportedly a "CIA Operations Center Intelligence Update," and includes information about events concerning Russia, Hungary and Iran.... Rachel E. VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney and expert on military law, said that whoever is responsible for the leak "is in a world of hurt." Such breaches, she said, constitute "one of the most serious crimes that exist regarding U.S. national security...."
Skepticism abounded Friday among both Russian and Ukrainian officials aware of reports about the leaks, with each side accusing the other of being involved in a deliberate act of disinformation.
The Post notes one defense official told them "hundreds — if not thousands" of people had access to the documents, so their source "could be anyone."
But the photographs received by the Post were apparently taken from printed documents, and "classified documents may only be printed from computers in a secure facility, and each transaction is electronically logged, said Glenn Gerstell, a former general counsel with the National Security Agency who emphasized that he was speaking only about general procedures. "The fact that the documents were printed out should significantly narrow the universe of the initial inquiry."
"On Wednesday, images showing some of the documents began circulating on the anonymous online message board 4chan and made their way to at least two mainstream social media platforms, Telegram and Twitter." Earlier Friday, The Washington Post obtained dozens of what appeared to be photographs showing classified documents, dating to late February and early March, that range from worldwide intelligence briefings to tactical-level battlefield updates and assessments of Ukraine's defense capabilities. They outline information about the Ukrainian and Russian militaries, and include highly sensitive U.S. analyses about China and other nations. The materials also reference highly classified sources and methods that the United States uses to collect such information, alarming U.S. national security officials who have seen them.... The material that appeared online includes photographs of documents labeled "Secret" or "Top Secret," and began appearing on Discord, a chat platform popular with gamers, according to a Post review.
In some cases, it appears that the slides were manipulated. For instance, one image features combat casualty data suggesting the number of Russian soldiers killed in the war is far below what the Pentagon publicly has assessed. Another version of the image showed higher Russian casualty figures. Besides the information on casualties that appeared to be manipulated to benefit the Russian government, U.S. officials who spoke to The Post said many of the leaked documents did not appear to be forged and looked consistent in format with CIA World Intelligence Review reports distributed at high levels within the White House, Pentagon and the State Department....
The documents appear to have been drawn from multiple reports and agencies, and concern matters other than Ukraine. Two pages, for example, are purportedly a "CIA Operations Center Intelligence Update," and includes information about events concerning Russia, Hungary and Iran.... Rachel E. VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney and expert on military law, said that whoever is responsible for the leak "is in a world of hurt." Such breaches, she said, constitute "one of the most serious crimes that exist regarding U.S. national security...."
Skepticism abounded Friday among both Russian and Ukrainian officials aware of reports about the leaks, with each side accusing the other of being involved in a deliberate act of disinformation.
The Post notes one defense official told them "hundreds — if not thousands" of people had access to the documents, so their source "could be anyone."
But the photographs received by the Post were apparently taken from printed documents, and "classified documents may only be printed from computers in a secure facility, and each transaction is electronically logged, said Glenn Gerstell, a former general counsel with the National Security Agency who emphasized that he was speaking only about general procedures. "The fact that the documents were printed out should significantly narrow the universe of the initial inquiry."
Call up Trump (Score:1, Insightful)
He can use his mind declassification powers and fix this whole thing!
Re: (Score:2)
He could if he were still President. Biden could do it right now.
Re: (Score:1)
Biden has learned to drive in the past. Trump has not. Even the Queen Elizabeth learned how to drive and even maintain vehicles during WWII. Trump has no discernible skills as far as I can tell.
Re: Call up Trump (Score:2, Insightful)
Trump also never learned how to shower with his daughter, like Pedo Joe did.
Not all Democrats are pedophiles, but for every Biden voter, that wasn't a deal breaker!
Re: (Score:2)
facts.
something autocrats fear.
autocrat enablers fear facts even more.
Three Likely Scenarios (Score:5, Interesting)
In order of their probabilities.
1) A Russian sympathizer in the US Military leaked the documents onto some kind of Russian pro-war forum where they kept recirculating until now.
2) A Russian spy leaked it to Russian intelligence, who circulated it among military commanders and politicians until it leaked out onto forums.
3) It's deliberate misinformation crafted by the US and "leaked" to the Russians to mislead them in some important way.
Re:Three Likely Scenarios (Score:5, Insightful)
You forgot
4) Never attribute to malice that which can be done through stupidity and ignorance.
Re: (Score:3)
Exactly correct. Probably some idiot's laptop was hacked when he was staying in a Ukraine or Polish hotel. Or, he used the hotel printer to print out the docs.
Re: (Score:2)
Except apparently the documents have been manipulated from their original form.
Re: (Score:3)
The documents, or the photographs of the documents?
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:2)
Note to self: When committing international espionage, do not use hotel printers.
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:2)
That's a mantra for a different era. Not anymore. The leaks that the media have ignored are proof that the leaks they cover are not true leaks. If you ever find the media and government traveling in parallel, more likely than not they are cooperating in the construction of a narrative.
Re: (Score:1)
...or someone who is seeing the true information knows that the public is being lied to to continue the conflict for as long as financially profitable for the liars.
you're missing the obvious - a Whistleblower with the public interest at heart.
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:2)
Except for one of the manipulations was tank casualty figures to an impossible number unless you think deep faked photos of destroyed Russian tanks are coming out of ukraine.
Re: (Score:3)
No one thinks any issue is "worth engaging in global thermonuclear war" except Putin, how about we end that "regime" since it's the only one causing the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:1)
The US overthrew Ukraine's democratically elected government and replaced it with a puppet regime. So yes, Russia is working to replace that regime, just like we would if a hostile foreign power overthrew the Canadian or Mexican government and replaced it with puppets.
I feel sorry for the average Ukrainians, who are being used as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia. DC is literally willing to sacrifice every Ukrainian if they think it'll weaken Russia.
Re: (Score:1)
Simpler:
Elements of the US government don't feel like governing control of Lugansk - in the Donbas region of the Ukraine area - is an issue worth engaging in global thermonuclear war and they want an end to the regime that's pushing the US in that direction.
Don't forget that the Whitehouse burned the CIA on the Nordstream operation.
LOL, when the "deep state" is trying to resist Trump's unconstitutional actions they're villains.
But when the deep state is assisting a US adversary in their attempt to conquer a friendly nation and subject their population to genocide... well now the deep state are heroes!!
Re:Three Likely Scenarios (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't about Donbas, maybe before the war independence for Donbas could have kept the peace for a while ... but ultimately Putin always wanted Kharkiv and he won't settle for less than that and Ukrainian disarmament at this point. On the other hand, Putin isn't going to nuke anyone either. So you're twice wrong.
Getting Putin stuck in Ukraine has made him yolo'ing into Baltics much less likely, especially after Finland joining NATO. Putin steamrolling Ukraine would have created a far greater danger of nuclear war than the current clusterfuck, it would have made the Baltics look like a juicy target.
Re:Three Likely Scenarios (Score:5, Insightful)
Getting Putin stuck in Ukraine has made him yolo'ing into Baltics much less likely, especially after Finland joining NATO. Putin steamrolling Ukraine would have created a far greater danger of nuclear war than the current clusterfuck, it would have made the Baltics look like a juicy target.
I think this is a point many people miss.
Putin has two big objectives, conquer, annex, and Russify Ukraine. And two, destroy NATO so he could rebuild the USSR.
Consider the scenario where Russia steamrolls Ukraine and NATO does nothing. Now Putin starts making a second calculation. Is the US going to risk Nuclear war over Estonia? Latvia? Lithuania?
There's a good chance he decides the answer is "no" and decides to invade. There's a chance he's right, in which case NATO is defunct and those little countries realize they need to make nice with Russian. The other scenario is he's wrong, the rest of NATO declares war, and now you're worried about an escalation to nukes.
That's why it's critical that NATO supports Ukraine, not only because it stops the inevitable genocide (yes, an attempt to erase the Ukrainian language and culture would be genocide) if Russia wins. But because it signals that NATO is serious.
That's also what made Trump so dangerous when he made that commitment ambiguous [newsweek.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but that is pure nonsense. If Russia wanted Kharkiv that badly, they would have put a lot more troops there and they would have defended the territory adjacent to it with a lot more troops. There is zero evidence Russia ever had any interest in attacking the Baltics and no NATO defended territory ever looked like a "juicy target" for Russia. Its clear that they do not have sufficient conventional forces to take on NATO. Their nuclear forces are their equalizer just as nuclear forces were the equalizer for NATO during the cold war. NATO's plan for defending Western Europe during the cold war called for immediate use of nuclear weapons. We weren't bluffing, the USSR knew we weren't bluffing and the result was a COLD war instead of a hot one.
It is clear now with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight that the Russia does not have sufficient forces to take on NATO and that even if they did those forces would be to rotted by corruption, incompetence and nepotism to pull it off. Before Russia's 3 day invasion of Ukraine became a 400+ day long national humiliation the Russian forces were supposed to be one of the best on earth after the USA and possibly China. Why anybody would think that in light of the rampant corruption in Russia completely eludes me be
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, and I'm sure they wanted to have a roadside picnic outside of Kiev too. Putin and his army make mistakes. They were getting ready for a second round of Referendums before Kharkiv was taken back, they were there for the long haul and got caught completely by surprise.
Russia already started Nazi rhetoric about Baltic treatment of their Russophone population long ago, they want parts of the Baltics for the same reason they want part of Ukraine. To get more population and prevent Russian identifying popula
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's two things to know: (1) Ukraine voluntarily gave up it's nuclear arsenal in return for the US and Russia respecting its borders and autonomy. (2) Russia invaded Ukraine and violated that agreement.
If one wishes to avoid thermonuclear war, then it makes sense to reduce the number of nations with nuclear weapons. I don't see how any nation with nuclear weapons will look at what happened and think that it is a good idea to give up those weapons.
Re: (Score:1)
wall of nonsense.
You lost me at Russia did nordstream. You must be new to the world and history to not know that Sy Hersh is reliable.
Re: Three Likely Scenarios (Score:2)
Imagine seeing the "mainstream" news get caught in lie after lie over the last decade and still be dumb enough to believe anything they're reporting on Ukraine...
Let me guess, you still think Iraq has WMDs, and the US just wants to give Afghanis freedom and democracy.
Re: (Score:2)
"I would quote my sources but you probably haven't heard of them."
In other words, you're a greasy hipster and you're not as cool as you think you look.
As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The public has a fundamental right to now when they're being lied to so egregiously by their own government.
Re: (Score:2)
Getting my popcorn ready. Alright, lay it out. What are we being lied to about?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
He will be back to respond right after he finishes fellating Vladimir.
Re: As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2)
You don't find it suspicious that the country where Biden's son was getting paid $600,000/year for a do nothing job, Biden is now sending $200 billion in aid? All when the US economy is collapsing?
And you don't find it a little odd that no one's asking where that money's even going?
The better question is what aren't they lying about.
Re: (Score:2)
No not al all. Hunter never worked for the government and Joe was a citizen at the time. I am however much more suspicious of Jared Kusher getting a secret $2 billion check from the Saudi’s. https://www.businessinsider.co... [businessinsider.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The vast majority of the "money" is in plain sight. If the revealed documents are true, the "money" you are looking for is listed for all to see.
I agree there is and was corruption and people skimming off the top, etc. Some people suck, they always have, and always will. I expect a lot of that will be cleaned up with ongoing American audits and Ukrainian efforts to be an effective democracy.
The US absolutely has people asking questions and tracking results.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't find it suspicious...
No and the only reason that YOU do is because you exist in a stinky fart bubble that is filled with your own bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
The public has a fundamental right to [k]now when they're being lied to
The public isn't being lied to. They are being told that they don't have a right to see the information at this level of detail.
In some cases, it appears that the slides were manipulated. For instance, one image features combat casualty data suggesting the number of Russian soldiers killed in the war is far below what the Pentagon publicly has assessed. Another version of the image showed higher Russian casualty figures.
So, who's lying?
Re: As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2)
Sophistry. A lie by omission is still a lie.
Classification is often abused by government to conceal corruption. The fact we've given Ukraine $200 billion, and we don't know what it's been used for, should be a crime.
Re: (Score:2)
You keep saying "we don't know what it's being used for". It's being used to turn a 3-day special operation into a 400-day war. 'Nuff said.
Re: (Score:1)
...the doctored "total assessed losses", which would mean that Russia had won the war already a couple of times ...
Proof demanded. Let's see your evidence.
Re: As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2)
>This supposed leak shows the assessed losses for Russia to be 16k to 17.5k KIA vs Ukraine 61k to 71.5k KIA.
Both numbers seem a little low, although it's hard to know what's true, since everyone's likely lying.
For example, noted war monger Ben Shapiro was preening over US estimates that Russia had lost 70k in the first two weeks of the war... which turned out to be complete nonsense.
And now you're implying Russia has lost about that same number after a year? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe it is the Ukrainian lo
Re: (Score:1)
SO what you're saying is each person should act purely in his own self-interest. That is the start and end of your ethics.
Re: As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
>At best your always looking over your shoulder wondering if you will every get arrested. At worst you go away for a bunch of years and have a Felony conviction on your record. SO what you're saying is each person should act purely in his own self-interest. That is the start and end of your ethics.
Uh, no. What I'm saying is that to me, any person that divulges Military secrets has already forgone their ethics. To me, they don't have any. Someone may disagree with that but that's my position and I'm not changing it. I was coaxing the ramifications of their actions in blunt terms that they could understand. Basically, "Do you really want to do this such that your life is forever and irrevocably changed and you can never go back to it? Is it worth it?". If they do, that's their decision. But you better
Re: (Score:2)
Re: As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:2)
classified documents may only be printed from computers in a secure facility, and each transaction is electronically logged,
Don't worry. Someone in counterintelligence has downloaded the photos and is analyzing the microdot identification as we speak.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
...Maybe if the current administration hired people for their abilities rather then sexual preference or pronouns this would not happen.
Prove that ever happened under Biden
Re: (Score:2)
As a vet with a similar clearance, I was right with you until you turned it political. I consider that a poor characteristic for an analyst.
Re:As a Former Member of the Military... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's not the reason everything ends up classified. It's far simpler: there is no penalty for over-classifying. There are large penalties for under-classifying.
Why risk being thrown in jail when you can just mark everything Top Secret?
Watermarks (Score:2)
Don't forget that most printers have secret watermarks that identify the individual printer.
Re: (Score:3)
...which will not survive in some low res picture of them.
Re: (Score:3)
It's a repeated pattern. Integrate across the entire page and the pattern can be extracted. Sort of like processing synthetic aperture radar returns.
Re: Watermarks (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Entropy. Magic is not real.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget that most printers have secret watermarks that identify the individual printer.
I highly doubt that there aren't ways around that "classified documents may only be printed from computers in a secure facility" bit. I'm sure the security controls in place would stop a congressman - but not a tech-savvy spy.
"Do top secret computers (Score:3)
detect when flash drives are inserted?"
-Reality Winner's google search
https://nymag.com/intelligence... [nymag.com]
But wait! They're playing 8-dimensional chess intentionally leaking crudely photographed printouts!
Maybe. They certainly could. They certainly would. Or maybe they're all idiots who'd give a clearance to a squashed cockroach if it had a D next to its name when a Democrat is in power and an R next to its name when a Republican is in power.
The latter has more explanatory power.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: "Do top secret computers (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Locked case, cover removal microswitches and unplug the USB ports from the motherboard.
Re: "Do top secret computers (Score:2)
Which doesn't stop someone from taking a picture of the screen with noone looking or squirreling out printouts.
Always fight the last war, folks. You're bound to win it at some point. /sarc
Re: "Do top secret computers (Score:5, Informative)
Which doesn't stop someone from taking a picture of the screen with noone looking
I wouldn't be surprised if digital images of classified materiel contained rather robust watermarks.
Some years ago on another forum, some people put up a challenge to see how persistent these (invisible) watermarks were. They posted a series of watermarked image copies, with unique (serialized) watermarks and challenged others to copy and re-post some of the image copies. And they would tell us which original we had copied. I brought a few up on my laptop (with a crappy display), photographed the display with a Canon A620 and reposted them to the forum. Their identification of my copies was spot on.
Oh, and good luck sneaking a camera, cellphone or any other unapproved electronics into a secure facility.
with noone looking
Smile for the surveillance cameras in the ceiling.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At least was on a "proper place" (Score:2)
Instead of being on war thunder's forum agian
goose = gander (Score:2)
2016-2020 we got to enjoy nearly constant leaking from within that administration (and later, the Supreme Court), with the not-subtle approval / justification of the media and the left. These people were lauded as heroes by #TheResistance.
Exactly how did you think this didn't normalize leaking for ANYONE who simply dislikes the current administration?
This is the new normal, you morons.
Really? (Score:2)
" "classified documents may only be printed from computers in a secure facility,"
Or just photograph them in some orange man's basement.
There are NO reliable sources (Score:2)
More Russian hacking (Score:1)
Summary (Score:2)
Not surprising. (Score:2)
To be honest, China has ALL of out secrets.
We are so compromised that the KKK (Klantanic Cult) can kidnap anyone's kid, and have no chance of getting caught, because they ARE the local police, and China pays them well.
I do not believe there is a US base that is not compromised by China through the KKK.
Re: (Score:2)
just how many viet cong \ terrorists did you kill in Iraq?
Even by conservative non government estimates, a shit ton. Most of them during the ISIS invasion
Re: (Score:1)
Does Fallujah ring any bells? Mercs killed in the line of business so firebomb and WP the poor bastards just trying to stay alive.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Crime spree? Downloading publicly-available documents? When the Pentagon Papers were published was it a crime to buy the New York Times? It is funny to see the same tired "Russia doctored some of the documents (but not all)!" suggestion conveniently trotted out again./ Lets see who believes it again this time.
I get it though. Heaven forbid the public learns how badly they've been lied to about Ukraine and Russia.
Re:cowardice (Score:4, Insightful)
"Heaven forbid the public learns how badly they've been lied to about Ukraine and Russia."
And even if the documents don't prove your traitorous narrative, at least the damage is done, right?
Re: cowardice (Score:2)
Imagine having such a tiny brain to think your government lying to you makes *you* the traitor...
When did Democrats become war mongering pyschopaths? I'm old enough to remember when they wanted to prosecute Bush for lying us into war. Now they're calling people traitors for even talking about leaks and whistleblowers exposing government corruption in Ukraine.
Re: (Score:2)
> When did Democrats become war mongering pyschopaths?
When Trump was nominated. The TDS force field flung all reasoning out of their mindspace.
Re: (Score:1)
"Heaven forbid the public learns how badly they've been lied to about Ukraine and Russia."
And even if the documents don't prove your traitorous narrative
Who the fuck died and made you king?
Get off of Slashdot, go put your ass on a plane, and ask for a rifle when you get to Kiev.
Fucking cubicle warriors.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: cowardice (Score:3)
Don't know why you're downvoted or labeled a troll. Everything you said is factually correct.
When did the Slashdot crowd start leaning neo-con? The concensus here is really pro-war?
Re: (Score:2)
Fun to watch isn't it?
Re: (Score:2)
I get it though. Heaven forbid the public learns how badly they've been lied to about Ukraine and Russia.
I don't get the implication, what exactly were these lies that have been fed to the public, which they believe? I mostly follow European news, and many items are closed with "this could not be verified by independent sources". The fog of war is covering a lot, and no one is shaken about that, it's sort of a common understanding by now.
Re:cowardice (Score:5, Informative)
I've been following this a bit. From what I'm gathering, somebody modified the documents before leaking them, not that you're seeing different estimates from different sources.
In one case it was to drop the last digit for tanks destroyed, for example, making Russian losses look an order of magnitude less. A fraction of even the confirmed losses compiled by Oryx, which requires a unique visual for each one to verify that it isn't a duplicate.
In the case of casualties, they transposed the first two digits, in another they swapped Russian and Ukrainian casualty numbers.
I think that it's going to be very interesting when they catch the person(s) who did it, because there's a lot of questions available for that.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like manipulated by Russia for internal propaganda purposes. ("See, Russia doing well! Enlist now before we conscript you! Also report disloyal neighbors.")
Re: cowardice (Score:2)
They don't need propaganda for that. We know Russia's generally winning because US media is barely reporting on the war.
And since most US outlets are just push state department propaganda, if Kiev was knocking it out of the park, the media would be shouting it from the rooftops.
Re: (Score:2)
"We know Russia's generally winning"
Agreed. Just recently Russia announced the capture of Bakhmut for the fourth time.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't need propaganda for that. We know Russia's generally winning because US media is barely reporting on the war.
And since most US outlets are just push state department propaganda, if Kiev was knocking it out of the park, the media would be shouting it from the rooftops.
Well, CBS, NBC, NPR, et al were "shouting it from the rooftops" for awhile, until it became obvious that the reported casualty figures were crap. We were seeing WWII-like casualty figures for the Russians for awhile. Often they were taking whatever numbers Kiev threw out at face value. That kind of reporting is untenable.
Re: cowardice (Score:2)
Looks like the Yanks have a pro Russian mole in their intelligence services somewhere.
Hardly surprising, but a bit eyebrow raising all the same.
Re: cowardice (Score:3)
It's the new diversity hiring policy. They have so many pro-Ukrainian moles, they thought it only fair to balance things out.
Re: (Score:2)
We can certainly see who the enemies of western democracies are.
"This is news, so cover the news."
Looks covered to me, exposure of state secrets not required.
"The fact they were leaked is a side show."
Is it, or is it all you care about?
Re: cowardice (Score:3)
State secrets shouldn't be a shield to hide corruption.
I, for one, wouldn't mind a little more "leaked" information about a war my government's invested nearly $200 billion in, in one of the most corrupt countries in the world, which our own media was complaining has a "Nazi problem".
Re: (Score:2)
Growing into a democracy is difficult. Putin's invasion of Ukraine is turning out to be an excellent opportunity for Ukraine to turn the corner on clearing out its corruption problems.
Re: cowardice (Score:2)
You don't know how to access one of many 4chan archives? Turn in your Internet license right now.
Re: cowardice (Score:2)
No, please! I need that license to drive to my remote internet job!
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
The media are definitely top o the list when the purge starts. Their bunkers will be their coffins.
Re: (Score:1)
The media are definitely top o the list when the purge starts. Their bunkers will be their coffins.
Says the party of "Constitutional liberties".
Wait, no
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Why the "secret" label? (Score:2)
Nothing's impossible for AI.
Ok ChatGPT: guard these documents.
...Two weeks later everyone is dead.