China Begins Drilling a 10-Kilometer-Deep Hole In Earth's Crust 118
China has begun digging a 10-kilometer-deep hole in the Earth's crust in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang province, as part of its exploration of the planet's interior. From a report: The team will dig deep into the Earth, penetrating more than 10 continental strata, which can be used to reconstruct the history of the Earth's continents, including the evolution of landscapes, climate change, and the distribution of life. Continental strata are layers of rock, which are an important resource for understanding the history of the Earth. They can be used to identify and date past events, such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and climate change. They can also be used to identify and study ancient life forms.
"Drilling a borehole over 10,000 meters deep is a bold attempt to explore the unknown territory of the Earth and expand the boundaries of human understanding," Wang Chunsheng, a technical expert who joined the operation, told China's Xinhua news agency. The borehole will penetrate a depth of 11,100 meters and is located in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, the largest desert in China, which in itself is a challenging environment to work in. While the digging has begun, China has not yet given a full explanation or the reason behind the dig.
The deepest man-made hole on Earth is the Kola Superdeep Borehole in the Kola Peninsula of Russia, which was drilled between 1970 and 1992. The hole touched a depth of 12,262 meters and was aimed at studying the Earth's crust and mantle. However, the team experience several challenges during the project including high temperatures of up to 180 degrees Celsius at the bottoms of the hole, the constant breaking and changing of the drill bit and the strength of the rocks at the depth.
"Drilling a borehole over 10,000 meters deep is a bold attempt to explore the unknown territory of the Earth and expand the boundaries of human understanding," Wang Chunsheng, a technical expert who joined the operation, told China's Xinhua news agency. The borehole will penetrate a depth of 11,100 meters and is located in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, the largest desert in China, which in itself is a challenging environment to work in. While the digging has begun, China has not yet given a full explanation or the reason behind the dig.
The deepest man-made hole on Earth is the Kola Superdeep Borehole in the Kola Peninsula of Russia, which was drilled between 1970 and 1992. The hole touched a depth of 12,262 meters and was aimed at studying the Earth's crust and mantle. However, the team experience several challenges during the project including high temperatures of up to 180 degrees Celsius at the bottoms of the hole, the constant breaking and changing of the drill bit and the strength of the rocks at the depth.
Someone making hole not as deep as previous hole (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It fits in with trying to send a person to the moon 50-60 years after it's already been done.
The great march continues! :)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
"feminazi"?!? Errr...you are aware that Rush Limbaugh is no long among the quick? You didn't get the memo?
Re: (Score:3)
this time we're sending A VAGINA to the moon
It's amazing the lengths that women will go to avoid you
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Fuck off you hateful woke cunt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You're not one of them, though
Oh look, I triggered the hateful woke.
Fuck off you hateful woke cunt.
Fucking classic. Too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
Re: (Score:2)
Woooooooke! Wooooooooooooooke! Woke! Woke! Woke! Say it a few more times, maybe it'll actually mean something. Huuuuuuuuuuuuurrrr.
Still waiting for you to prove that this woman was selected merely because she was a woman. And then show me any other candidate that was more qualified and left out for no reason other than having a dick between their legs. Until then, fuck off, troll.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck off, hateful woke cunt.
You already said that, a couple times actually. Or is that just your signature, and you forgot to type anything?
You need to learn when your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on. I have a clue for you: It's generally right around the time when all you can do is throw childish insults instead of presenting a coherent fact supported argument.
It's dead simple. Are you going to provide any evidence that she was picked over more qualified males? Or are you just going to keep stomping around and hurling profan
Re: (Score:1)
Also Pasco: You need to learn when your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on. I have a clue for you: It's generally right around the time when all you can do is throw childish insults instead of presenting a coherent fact supported argument.
The only reasonable response to schitzophrenic posting like that is:
Fuck off, you hateful woke cunt.
Re: (Score:2)
It's pascoea, it's shown right above where you're typing.
You're the one claiming she was selected over more qualified men solely because she's a woman. You made the claim, defend it like a man. If you don't want to justify your horseshit stance because you're just too lazy to do so, you could just link to somewhere else where you did. Provide something concrete, I'll apologize and never comment to you on the topic again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I bet he's just trolling. He's probably never even seen a vag to know how to feel about one
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
South is full of them. Like Troll farms, but we're paying them via Social Security instead of Putin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And if you upset him enough, he'll simply start parroting every thing you say, verbatim, back to you.
I thought he was a child once upon a time, but I think actually he's an old fuck with the maturity of a child, getting his final revenge against a world he was always too cowardly to confront without a keyboard in front of him.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Sexism is wrong.
Deal with it, you fucking stupid cunt.
Re: (Score:2)
There are literally thousands of people directly qualified for the job.
If we extend that up to people who could be made qualified for the job in short order, that number is almost certainly in the millions.
And yet, despite millions of potential male and female candidates, if a female gets chosen... it's affirmative action?
The unspoken part of your disgusting ass chauvinism- the part that you've learned over time to not say directly- is that you don't believe a woman c
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You're so fucking gross, man.
Huge child molesting uncle vibes.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't hate you. I'm disgusted by you. Very different.
If I hated you, I'd say...
Fuck off, you sick child molesting chauvinist piece of shit.
Hm... why does that look familiar....
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think in general, people who demonstrate that they're full of hate are the ones that need help
I mean you're the one running around telling people to "fuck off you hateful woke cunt", which is... I mean the definition of hate speech, lol
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think that warrants professional help
Re: (Score:2)
learning.
you got to start somewhere.
i guess drilling a hole on the moon is to hard.
my mind wondered for a moment.
it will not happen again
Before somebody else says it (Score:5, Funny)
Digging a hole FROM China? Who knew that was a thing?
Re: (Score:1)
I guess Bugs decided to hang around for awhile.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Here is me wishing I had mod points to give.
The Funniest Thing on the Internet Today Award goes to your, dear user.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks!
Who's Doing the Drilling? (Score:4, Insightful)
Xinjiang Province, eh? Are they planning to used forced Uyghur labor [google.com] from their re-education camps?
Re: (Score:2)
A hole this deep is highly skilled labor, they're not gonna throw Uyghurs into the hole with picks and shovels. The last thing you want on an enormously expensive project is forced laborers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most likely. It's also highly likely that they will not achieve anything like the reported depth, but will lie about it.
The Kola borehole site, sadly, is in ruins and abandoned.
What if they spring a leak? (Score:3)
The planet could deflate and collapse !.
Re: What if they spring a leak? (Score:1)
Prisoner's Dilema. China: if you don't do as we say, we will pop this planet we all live on!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You better get a bunk bed and sleep on the top bunk!
And there it is. (Score:4, Insightful)
While the digging has begun, China has not yet given a full explanation or the reason behind the dig.
Something tells me that this isn't for the benefit of simply understanding the history of Earth.
Re: (Score:3)
We need more information, like the diameter. The previous ones have all been fairly small, so there's not a lot that can be done with them beyond taking samples and measuring the temperature. The one in Russia was something like 20cm IIRC.
Re: (Score:3)
The oil industry started in Russia (well, Azerbaijan) in about 1850, a couple of decades before Spindletop and had already discovered that you need a certain amount of clearance around a string of casing to be able to run it into hole, and to pump cement slurry around it ... from which a series of "standard sizes" for drill bits and casing tubulars were developed.
I used what information
Re: (Score:2)
Is there anything to gain from a 10 km borehole aside from an understanding of the history of Earth? I mean, there's no way they're looking for oil or some other natural resource at those depths - even if there was anything worthwhile that far down, drilling 10 km to get to it places it well outside the realm of profitability. That'd also be a ridiculous amount of effort to put e.g. a seismometer at that depth, but maybe you're right and the CCP knows something we don't?
Re: (Score:1)
Is there anything to gain from a 10 km borehole
For one, we don't know that they are actually drilling a 10 km borehole, only that they have claimed they are doing so. There are a number of reasons to lie but assuming it's the truth, it could be a test site for a geothermal energy well. They could also be doing something like drilling to do nuclear detonation tests. Maybe they want to extract stuff from the resulting detonation because they don't care about irradiating people. I mean, there is a whole books of unethical ideas that you can do when you do
Re: (Score:1)
it could be a test site for a geothermal energy well
That is possible, but unlikely. They are digging down 10 km, they could easily stop at around 3-4 km to run a Geothermal plant. The deepest right now is around 4 km. Geothermal is a cool idea, but pretty problematic in practice. I think this must be for some other reason. Maybe it's a crazy ultra-low frequency transceiver antenna?
Re: (Score:2)
That is possible, but unlikely. They are digging down 10 km,
No, they claim they are digging down 10 km. What in China's history makes you think this piece of information is reliable?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
When the US Navy were applying for planning permission for "site evaluation" works for such in Scotland (Eastern Cairngorms), they wanted to build it on the flat above a uniform, high resistivity granite batholith. Not drilled into the ground. Whatever you emitted (HF, LF, ULF) from the antenna would be absorbed by the ground.
The US Navy's justification was they wanted to build something that they could use to communicate with their nuclear subs w
Re: (Score:2)
It's a very achievable target. 10 km vertically isn't a very big deal - a lot easier than 10km sub-horizontally, and that was passed some time about 2012.
Could be. They'll know their local surface geothermal gradient from the thousands of oil wells drilled in the Tarim Basin over the decades, and heat flow is conserved through volume. So the heat flux from (say) 1000m to 2000m depth is the
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt it. The longest hole in the world is somewhere up beyond the 14km mark (since before I left the industry ; I don't keep up), to a depth of about 4km. Going beyond 10km measured depth is so routine it wasn't making the news when I left the industry, and that was over 6 years ago. (Note : measured
Re: (Score:1)
Something tells me that China would not give a full explanation of anything they do. This is common in authoritarian states. Stonewall inquiries as a matter of course.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a borehole. A relatively microscopic puncture on the surface of the earth, at a depth far too deep to be commercially useful, unless you're looking to sell really fucking hot rocks.
Now if the bore was really big, and with extra boring going on around it, you could say "oh- geothermal energy", and a subsequent "fantastic!"
Are you scared they're going to drill to the US and drop a nuke down (up?) the hole?
Re: (Score:2)
How do you get to be good at drilling deep? Surprisingly, by drilling deep. If this well discovers a significant gas resource at (say) 10km, then the next thing to do (which the plans will already have been done for) would be to repeat the well at the opposite end of (whatever structure they've seen on seismic). Possibly two or three wells, spread out from the "discovery" well. These are called (in different countries) "delineation" or "appraisal" wells. By t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
China trained up literally millions of engineers but they really don't have all that much to do with them.
So you come up with make work projects for them
And just how many do you think it will take to work on this 1 hole?
Re: (Score:2)
Since when does a sovereign nation need to say why they are digging a hole? I get that China is an authoritarian regime and has done some terrible things.... that doesn't immediately mean that digging a hole is for evil gains?
Check your prejudice.
Re: (Score:2)
I get that China is an authoritarian regime and has done some terrible things....
Done some terrible "things"? Understatement of the century, friend. The CCP is on par with the Nazis.
Check your prejudice.
It's prejudice to judge them based on what they are. However, I am judging them based on what they have done.
Being an apologist for a truly evil regime is deplorable.
Re: (Score:2)
Sigh. I didn't forgive them for their past sins, as apologists do, I merely stated that in this particular instance, it was unlikely that they were doing something "evil"
I assume you are the type that says Nazis are terrible and nothing good came from their rule? Of course, while Nazis are the epitome of evil, it doesn't change the fact that they brought economic revival to Germany.
You can separate doing good and doing evil. Does that mean you should trust an evil regime? Obviously not. Does it mean you sho
Re: (Score:2)
I did the same - specifically high precision gas analysis - on an "ultra-deep" borehole in Abu Dhabi back in ... 1992 (or -93, I'd have to check my diary), drilling through a stack of productive horizons (gas, several oil-prone reservoirs, then sever
Act of war! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Dark One (Score:2)
Sounds like a good sollution for clean energy (Score:2)
I would think this was a perfect solution for clean energy. The heat in those depths would definetly create steam and pressure. I wonder what the cost benefit ration would be?
Re: (Score:2)
For geothermal energy, you want to find places where there is hot stuff closer to the surface, you do not want to be pumping fluid down an 11km hole to heat it up. But geothermal in all but the most suitable locations tends to be anything but cheap. The trouble is the higher the temperature the better, as far as efficiency is concerned, however the higher the temperature, the more you get chemical reactions corroding pipes etc, so you end up with high maintenance costs, in addition to the high cost of drill
Re: (Score:1)
Too much pressure (Score:2)
It's not only that the rocks are hard, there's more gravitational pressure, which is a big issue when it comes to drilling deeper.
Re: (Score:2)
I know why. (Score:1)
They want to establish a connection to the mole people, build some infrastructure for them based on long term debt, and establish an imbalanced trade relationship with them, providing them with solutions for previously unmet needs, such as plastic moleman poop.
Re: (Score:2)
I always wanted to dig a hole to China, (Score:1)
Geothermal energy? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the gravitational and thermal potential for convection precisely balance out, meaning you're going to need to pump your working fluid.
Pretty sure a Sterling cycle engine must be less efficient than that pump, meaning I'm pretty sure you could create a cool science experiment that consumed power, and generated some of it back... but always at a loss.
I'm not power station engineer, but I don't see any ways around that.
Geothermal stations generally work by having a
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder what mud chemistry the Iceanders are using?
I don't know what the geothermal gradient is at this location ; it's close to, possibly within the area of the various Tarim Basin oilfields, whic
Project Mohole (Score:5, Informative)
China Digging Too Greedily and Too Deep (Score:2)
How deep? (Score:2)
For those of us who don't do metric, how many football fields is that?
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on what you count as part of the field. If it's only the grass, a field is maybe 10 cm deep, so 100,000 football fields.
"Only" 10km. (Score:2)
Despite understanding physics I find the difference between surface movement and drilling down quite unintuitive.
After all, 10km is a small distance on the surface which can be travelled easily on a daily basis, while drilling, diving, or even climbing the same distance is beyond comparison.
Gravity, while a very weak force as forces go, is a bitch.
Oh no! (Score:1)
Once They Go Deep Enough (Score:2)
...then they can start moving horizontally through the Earth's crust, undetected by any surface sensors, and then under the sensitive parts of other nations.
It's been done before... /s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Water (Score:2)
cool. (Score:2)
Already been done. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Incompetence? Keep in mind that governments have neither morals nor friends, they have interests. Taking the US as an example: If "we" had morals we would have invaded one of the African nations perpetuating genocide within their borders, rather than knowingly lying about Iraq having nukes because our puppet dictator cut his strings. If we had friends we would have honored our promise to protect Ukraine from other nuclear powers when Russia invaded Crimea, rather than just sending a sternly worded letter a