Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Youtube Medicine Social Networks

YouTube Under No Obligation To Host Anti-Vaccine Advocate's Videos, Court Says (arstechnica.com) 48

"12 people account for the lion's share of anti-vaccination propaganda posted to three of the leading social media outlets," NPR reported in 2021, citing a study from a London-based group opposed to online hate and disinformation."

But this week Ars Technica reports that one of those 12 "lost a lawsuit attempting to force YouTube to provide access to videos that were removed from the platform after YouTube banned his channels." Joseph Mercola had tried to argue that YouTube owed him more than $75,000 in damages for breaching its own user contract and denying him access to his videos. However, in an order dismissing Mercola's complaint, U.S. magistrate judge Laurel Beeler wrote that according to the contract Mercola signed, YouTube was "under no obligation to host" Mercola's content after terminating his channel in 2021 "for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines by posting medical misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines."

"The court found no breach because 'there is no provision in the Terms of Service that requires YouTube to maintain particular content' or be a 'storage site for users' content,'" Beeler wrote. Because Mercola's contract with YouTube was found to be enforceable and "YouTube had the discretion to take down content that harmed its users," Beeler said that Mercola did not plausibly plead claims for breach of contract or unjust enrichment.

Mercola's complaint was dismissed without leave to amend.

Thanks to ArchieBunker (Slashdot reader #96,909) for sharing the article.

YouTube Under No Obligation To Host Anti-Vaccine Advocate's Videos, Court Says

Comments Filter:
  • I thought republicans say “let the market decide!”?

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by battingly ( 5065477 )
      It's like elections. Their only hope is to interfere in the process to tip things in their direction.
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Market elements deciding not to host their propaganda? That is clearly a case for regulation!

    • Republicans say "let the markets decide" till the market indicates their view is not the majority. Then they scream bias, lies, cheats, and fake news.
      It's like abortion. they said "let the States decide", then as soon as Roe V Wade fell, they push to pass a national-level ban. Extreme right Reichwingers can't be reasoned with. They believe they are doing "gods work", and since they believe "god" is infallible, they're actions are infallible.
  • That are in part responsible for 1000's of deaths? Cool!

  • They should be under no protection from section 230.
  • YouTube - you don't want to host his videos, then don't.

    But give the creator one chance to download the thousands of hours od content he created over the years - some potentially useful. It's quite possible he does not have a backup of it. How many of us have backups of all the (sometimes quite good) posts we made on Slashdot over the years. Yet our old posts are available to us, both here and on the Wayback Machine (e.g., https://web.archive.org/web/*/... [archive.org])

    However YouTube allows neither. It's famous for pe

Why won't sharks eat lawyers? Professional courtesy.

Working...