20% of America's Plants and Animals are At Risk of Extinction (usatoday.com) 56
It was a half a century ago that America passed legislation to protect vanishing species and their habitats — and since then, more than five dozen species have recovered. Just one example: In 1963 only 417 nesting pairs of bald eagles were found in the lower 48 states. But today there's more than 300,000 bald eagles, writes USA Today. "[T]hough its future remains uncertain, many experts say it remains one of the nation's crowning achievements."
But 1,252 species are still listed as endangered in the U.S. — 486 animals, and 766 plants — with 417 more species categorized as "threatened." The perils of the changing climate add urgency to calls for increased funding and more protection. In North Carolina, for example, the rising sea steadily creeps over a refuge that's home to the sole remaining wild red wolf population. Off New England, warming waters forced changes in the foraging habits of the endangered North Atlantic right whale, putting the massive marine mammals in harm's way more often... One in 5 plant and animal species in the nation remain at risk of extinction, says Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition. "Loss of habitat and climate change are absolutely some of the most important threats that we have."
"We are at what I would say is a pivotal moment with the threats of climate change," she said. "We have to act faster than ever in order to ensure that these species are going to thrive."
But 1,252 species are still listed as endangered in the U.S. — 486 animals, and 766 plants — with 417 more species categorized as "threatened." The perils of the changing climate add urgency to calls for increased funding and more protection. In North Carolina, for example, the rising sea steadily creeps over a refuge that's home to the sole remaining wild red wolf population. Off New England, warming waters forced changes in the foraging habits of the endangered North Atlantic right whale, putting the massive marine mammals in harm's way more often... One in 5 plant and animal species in the nation remain at risk of extinction, says Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition. "Loss of habitat and climate change are absolutely some of the most important threats that we have."
"We are at what I would say is a pivotal moment with the threats of climate change," she said. "We have to act faster than ever in order to ensure that these species are going to thrive."
Long term. (Score:1)
Long term, all species on Earth are at 100% risk of extinction - including humans.
Re: (Score:2)
You should not care too much for the "long run", its net present value is zero.
Re: Long term. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is not a joke.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Not knowing the area at all (is Wilmington East coast or West coast, and does it matter?), I'm going to guess that it's on a stretch of coast that is subsiding relative to the global average, and has been for a long time. That could be (like I said, I don't know the area, at all) because of upper mantle flow over centuries as a response to unloading of the Canadian shield of it's severa
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Yet another junk science cash grab (Score:4)
Wow, you check one city and then somehow your entire point is validated. Sea level rise in any one city is very complicated due to land subsidence, Gulf Stream speed, ocean temperatures. If you look at a large area,
https://ncseagrant.ncsu.edu/co... [ncsu.edu]
you can see sea level rise gains steam along the Eastern and Gulf Coasts. Sea level long those coasts was fairly constant from 1990 to 2010. Then it increases.
It's their own fault for (Score:1)
...being delicious.
[oblig.]
Re: Revisit (Score:2)
Re: Slashdot = Climate Cult Blog (Score:2)
it gets better (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
invasive species, esp. in Florida and California is growing a quick rate. These are killing off many others .
Who decides what is invasive though?
I mean if it arrives here in a bird's belly, is it okay, but if it arrives here in a cargo ship hold, or a traveler's suitcase, it's not?
Does it have to be motorized or jet powered transport that makes it invasive?
Re: (Score:2)
Who decides what is invasive though?
Invasive is ANYTHING that is not native to there. It does not matter how it got there, only that the environment was not used to it.
I'm not really a greenie, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
...humans have taken over way too much land. Other species need a place to live, and our cities and monoculture farmland aren't it. We need to return a portion of all kinds of habitats to nature - not just the areas that we can't figure out a way to use.
There's a campaign along these lines, seeking to protect 30% of all areas for nature. [campaignfornature.org]
Re: (Score:1)
...humans have taken over way too much land. Other species need a place to live, and our cities and monoculture farmland aren't it. We need to return a portion of all kinds of habitats to nature - not just the areas that we can't figure out a way to use.
Thanks for agreeing to give up your home for the sake of woodland creatures.
Re: I'm not really a greenie, but... (Score:2)
Re:I'm really a weenie, and ... (Score:2)
& thats not counting global warming (Score:2)
Are humans in the 20%? (Score:2)
Asking for a friend... A lot of Europeans would regard this as good news ;)
If it's not due to over-harvesting (Score:2)
I don't think there's much you can do about extinctions. "Stop killing them" works, but "get rid of that human habitat that was built over the other species' habitat" isn't going to happen.
Likewise, there's nothing we're both willing and able to do so far to compensate for rapid climate change.
Wherever it's our fault rather than natural cycles, we have options for reducing the cull rate. It remains to be seen how much we're willing to do, and how much trouble we're going to have for not having done enough
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Packing people into ever-denser urban environments doesn't seem like a beautiful future to me... and no matter how densely you pack people, there is a minimum amount of acreage required to support them. You might put a lot of people in cities, but the land around that city is going to get converted from its natural state for farming and resource extraction to support those people.
I'd really rather we stop with the eternal population growth nonsense and take our falling birthrates as a blessing not to be m
Re: (Score:1)
Personally, I prefer to walk or catch public transport & to travel shorter distances to do the things I want to do. I also enjoy having family, friends, acquaintances, & random strangers nearby simply because I'm a social animal & enjoy the company of p
Re: (Score:2)
Your first paragraph was OK, but your second paragraph was not the same thing as providing coherent, cohesive, rational, evidence-informed arguments.
You undermined yourself by including it and effectively admitting that how people want to live is important... which was my point. I'm not an ant in a hive, and city living makes me feel homicidal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We're also getting better finding doomed species (Score:2)
To put it anothe
30 percent (Score:3)
habitat (Score:2, Insightful)
The primary cause of species extinction is habitat destruction. The primary cause of habitat destruction is population increase. One would think that those who are worried about species extinction would also be worried about millions of people streaming unchecked into the US.
Re:wabbit (Score:2)
Too soon to congratulate ourselves (Score:2)
We're still in the low hanging fruit phase. As they say, it's the last 10% that takes 90% of the work.
350-odd years effort (Score:2)
That's really poor efficiency.
Wrong headline (Score:2)
It should be "20% of Plants and Animals in the US are At Risk of Extinction". I know, I know, it's my pet peeve, but America is an ambiguous word. For some people it refers to a whole continent that spans two hemispheres, and for others it refers to just one country.
Using the soecific name of the country is a simple way to avoid annoying misunderstandings.