Hans Reiser Sends a Letter From Prison (arstechnica.com) 181
In 2003, Hans Reiser answered questions from Slashdot's readers...
Today Wikipedia describes Hans Reiser as "a computer programmer, entrepreneur, and convicted murderer... Prior to his incarceration, Reiser created the ReiserFS computer file system, which may be used by the Linux kernel but which is now scheduled for removal in 2025, as well as its attempted successor, Reiser4."
This week alanw (Slashdot reader #1,822), spotted a development on the Linux kernel mailing list. "Hans Reiser (imprisoned for the murder of his wife) has written a letter, asking it to be published to Slashdot." Reiser writes: I was asked by a kind Fredrick Brennan for my comments that I might offer on the discussion of removing ReiserFS V3 from the kernel. I don't post directly because I am in prison for killing my wife Nina in 2006.
I am very sorry for my crime — a proper apology would be off topic for this forum, but available to any who ask.
A detailed apology for how I interacted with the Linux kernel community, and some history of V3 and V4, are included, along with descriptions of what the technical issues were. I have been attending prison workshops, and working hard on improving my social skills to aid my becoming less of a danger to society. The man I am now would do things very differently from how I did things then.
Click here for the rest of Reiser's introduction, along with a link to the full text of the letter...
The letter is dated November 26, 2023, and ends with an address where Reiser can be mailed. Ars Technica has a good summary of Reiser's lengthy letter from prison — along with an explanation for how it came to be. With the ReiserFS recently considered obsolete and slated for removal from the Linux kernel entirely, Fredrick R. Brennan, font designer and (now regretful) founder of 8chan, wrote to the filesystem's creator, Hans Reiser, asking if he wanted to reply to the discussion on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML). Reiser, 59, serving a potential life sentence in a California prison for the 2006 murder of his estranged wife, Nina Reiser, wrote back with more than 6,500 words, which Brennan then forwarded to the LKML. It's not often you see somebody apologize for killing their wife, explain their coding decisions around balanced trees versus extensible hashing, and suggest that elementary schools offer the same kinds of emotional intelligence curriculum that they've worked through in prison, in a software mailing list. It's quite a document...
It covers, broadly, why Reiser believes his system failed to gain mindshare among Linux users, beyond the most obvious reason. This leads Reiser to detail the technical possibilities, his interpersonal and leadership failings and development, some lingering regrets about dealings with SUSE and Oracle and the Linux community at large, and other topics, including modern Russian geopolitics... Reiser asks that a number of people who worked on ReiserFS be included in "one last release" of the README, and to "delete anything in there I might have said about why they were not credited." He says prison has changed him in conflict resolution and with his "tendency to see people in extremes...."
Reiser writes that he understood the difficulty ahead in getting the Linux world to "shift paradigms" but lacked the understanding of how to "make friends and allies of people" who might initially have felt excluded. This is followed by a heady discussion of "balanced trees instead of extensible hashing," Oracle's history with implementing balanced trees, getting synchronicity just right, I/O schedulers, block size, seeks and rotational delays on magnetic hard drives, and tails. It leads up to a crucial decision in ReiserFS' development, the hard non-compatible shift from V3 to Reiser 4. Format changes, Reiser writes, are "unwanted by many for good reasons." But "I just had to fix all these flaws, fix them and make a filesystem that was done right. It's hard to explain why I had to do it, but I just couldn't rest as long as the design was wrong and I knew it was wrong," he writes. SUSE didn't want a format change, but Reiser, with hindsight, sees his pushback as "utterly inarticulate and unsociable." The push for Reiser 4 in the Linux kernel was similar, "only worse...."
He encourages people to "allow those who worked so hard to build a beautiful filesystem for the users to escape the effects of my reputation." Under a "Conclusion" sub-heading, Reiser is fairly succinct in summarizing a rather wide-ranging letter, minus the minutiae about filesystem architecture.
I wish I had learned the things I have been learning in prison about talking through problems, and believing I can talk through problems and doing it, before I had married or joined the LKML. I hope that day when they teach these things in Elementary School comes.
I thank Richard Stallman for his inspiration, software, and great sacrifices,
It has been an honor to be of even passing value to the users of Linux. I wish all of you well.
It both is and is not a response to Brennan's initial prompt, asking how he felt about ReiserFS being slated for exclusion from the Linux kernel. There is, at the moment, no reply to the thread started by Brennan.
Today Wikipedia describes Hans Reiser as "a computer programmer, entrepreneur, and convicted murderer... Prior to his incarceration, Reiser created the ReiserFS computer file system, which may be used by the Linux kernel but which is now scheduled for removal in 2025, as well as its attempted successor, Reiser4."
This week alanw (Slashdot reader #1,822), spotted a development on the Linux kernel mailing list. "Hans Reiser (imprisoned for the murder of his wife) has written a letter, asking it to be published to Slashdot." Reiser writes: I was asked by a kind Fredrick Brennan for my comments that I might offer on the discussion of removing ReiserFS V3 from the kernel. I don't post directly because I am in prison for killing my wife Nina in 2006.
I am very sorry for my crime — a proper apology would be off topic for this forum, but available to any who ask.
A detailed apology for how I interacted with the Linux kernel community, and some history of V3 and V4, are included, along with descriptions of what the technical issues were. I have been attending prison workshops, and working hard on improving my social skills to aid my becoming less of a danger to society. The man I am now would do things very differently from how I did things then.
Click here for the rest of Reiser's introduction, along with a link to the full text of the letter...
The letter is dated November 26, 2023, and ends with an address where Reiser can be mailed. Ars Technica has a good summary of Reiser's lengthy letter from prison — along with an explanation for how it came to be. With the ReiserFS recently considered obsolete and slated for removal from the Linux kernel entirely, Fredrick R. Brennan, font designer and (now regretful) founder of 8chan, wrote to the filesystem's creator, Hans Reiser, asking if he wanted to reply to the discussion on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML). Reiser, 59, serving a potential life sentence in a California prison for the 2006 murder of his estranged wife, Nina Reiser, wrote back with more than 6,500 words, which Brennan then forwarded to the LKML. It's not often you see somebody apologize for killing their wife, explain their coding decisions around balanced trees versus extensible hashing, and suggest that elementary schools offer the same kinds of emotional intelligence curriculum that they've worked through in prison, in a software mailing list. It's quite a document...
It covers, broadly, why Reiser believes his system failed to gain mindshare among Linux users, beyond the most obvious reason. This leads Reiser to detail the technical possibilities, his interpersonal and leadership failings and development, some lingering regrets about dealings with SUSE and Oracle and the Linux community at large, and other topics, including modern Russian geopolitics... Reiser asks that a number of people who worked on ReiserFS be included in "one last release" of the README, and to "delete anything in there I might have said about why they were not credited." He says prison has changed him in conflict resolution and with his "tendency to see people in extremes...."
Reiser writes that he understood the difficulty ahead in getting the Linux world to "shift paradigms" but lacked the understanding of how to "make friends and allies of people" who might initially have felt excluded. This is followed by a heady discussion of "balanced trees instead of extensible hashing," Oracle's history with implementing balanced trees, getting synchronicity just right, I/O schedulers, block size, seeks and rotational delays on magnetic hard drives, and tails. It leads up to a crucial decision in ReiserFS' development, the hard non-compatible shift from V3 to Reiser 4. Format changes, Reiser writes, are "unwanted by many for good reasons." But "I just had to fix all these flaws, fix them and make a filesystem that was done right. It's hard to explain why I had to do it, but I just couldn't rest as long as the design was wrong and I knew it was wrong," he writes. SUSE didn't want a format change, but Reiser, with hindsight, sees his pushback as "utterly inarticulate and unsociable." The push for Reiser 4 in the Linux kernel was similar, "only worse...."
He encourages people to "allow those who worked so hard to build a beautiful filesystem for the users to escape the effects of my reputation." Under a "Conclusion" sub-heading, Reiser is fairly succinct in summarizing a rather wide-ranging letter, minus the minutiae about filesystem architecture.
I wish I had learned the things I have been learning in prison about talking through problems, and believing I can talk through problems and doing it, before I had married or joined the LKML. I hope that day when they teach these things in Elementary School comes.
I thank Richard Stallman for his inspiration, software, and great sacrifices,
It has been an honor to be of even passing value to the users of Linux. I wish all of you well.
It both is and is not a response to Brennan's initial prompt, asking how he felt about ReiserFS being slated for exclusion from the Linux kernel. There is, at the moment, no reply to the thread started by Brennan.
Here is the rest of Reiser's introduction to his 6,500-word letter:
Perhaps some might accept my apology; others might learn from my mistakes if I describe them well; some might find the design issues interesting.
I will leave it to the users to decide whether ReiserFS V3 is still useful. Users should understand that it is a burden for those who maintain VFS and the like to have to test their changes on an additional filesystem, especially given Linux filesystems are hard code at the VFS layer.
ReiserFS 4 provides a more maintainable basis for the future for those users wo like the features of V3. If V3 isn't used it should go, I trust the users and the kernel maintainers to discuss whether it is used, and to make the right decision together.
[Click here to read the letter in its entirety. Below is the beginning of what Reiser has labeled as his main text...]
V3 had a moment in time when it was useful, and I am happy that we were able to contribute to the success of GNU/Linux for a few crucial years during which it was growing rapidly in usage. Chris Mason's contribution of journaling was the most practically useful feature of V3, and I thank him for it...
Didn't read the manual /s (Score:2)
Re:Didn't read the manual /s (Score:5, Insightful)
Better solution - just don't murder your wife (or ex-wife) in the first place.
Re: (Score:3)
Right. There are so many ways accidents can happen...
Re: (Score:2)
and if it wasn't for those meddling kids, he would have gotten away with it scooby dooby tooooo.
Man that's a lot (Score:3)
What a wild letter. ReiserFS, if subject to continued development by someone as passionate about it as Reiser himself, would be really awesome by now. Reiser's story has always been just so tragic and ultimately needless.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
His story isn’t tragic, his wife’s and children’s story is the tragic one.
Re:Man that's a lot (Score:4, Insightful)
Everybody born into a body with a psychopath brain is a tragedy. Everyone born into a massively unhappy biochemistry (including anger problems) is a tragedy. Everyone that discovers the techniques or medicines to escape unhappiness is a miracle.
Being in tragic circumstances such as Reiser's wife and children is obviously also tragic. But my point is that you would not ask to be in the shoes of someone so consumed by rage and fear that they felt the need to kill. It would totally suck.
I also read an interesting analysis on Substack (which I can't find now) that pointed out resentment could indicate low social status, and would lead to decreased romantic opportunity. Because someone with high status would expect their persecutors to be punished, and so would not dwell too much in resentment. A person with low status would continue to feel victimized as their persecutor got away with it. And potential romantic partners would naturally not want to be with this person. My point is that being resentful sucks for other reasons than just the resentment--as though resentment weren't enough suckage on its own. Resentment is drinking poison and hoping it harms someone else.
Re: (Score:2)
Only one person has been known to definitely escape a psychopathic brain. It wasn't through medicine, either. It was through a high quality non-abusive upbringing. He's now a top notch brain surgeon and his story is reasonably well documented because it defied what had been conventional understanding until his case was discovered.
There's no telling if Hans Reiser could have done as well for himself. Nobody understands the brain well enough. But it can't be ruled out.
Re: (Score:3)
That surgeon is super interesting - his BBC special is worth watching.
Down the iq spectrum it's speculated that many men working in slaughterhouses are usefully employed members of this group. Also the military.
Also politics, but they're quite harmful there.
When it's comorbid with adhd, increasing dopamine can help with frontal lobe inhibition problems, but society is 90% lined up against making treatment anything but arduous.
The Curse of the Puritans lines up well with the Prison Guards Union and its allie
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, it is. Same as the wife's and children's. Requires compassion to see that. You seem to be lacking.
Re: (Score:3)
I think he is a human being. That is already enough. You are lacking in compassion as well. There are no "rotten" people. There are just people with mental problems that see others that way. Yet, if such a thing happened to you, even you would deserve compassion.
Re: (Score:2)
His story isnâ(TM)t tragic, his wifeâ(TM)s and childrenâ(TM)s story is the tragic one.
Oedipus' story isn't tragic, his father and mother's story is the tragic one.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. This is the very definition of tragic. Of course, there are always those that want to dehumanize others (only making themselves less human in the process) and these people want to see everybody not as "perfect" as they think they are themselves, as villains and fully deserving what happens to them. In actual reality, almost nobody chooses evil while being clear of mind. And even is somebody did, "punishing" them just serves a deep-set sadistic desire in those wanting to see that punishment. People o
Toxic, brilliant, stupid. (Score:4, Insightful)
Too often people commit criminal acts and are free. See e.g. Donald Trump.
Reiser is so toxic any discussion on LKML, Phoronix, Ars, etc. has devolved to his murder case within 2 post of any topic.
He did the crime. He's doing the time. It's a well-written letter that makes it clear he still knows his shit about filesystem internals.
The linux kernel maintainers have moved on. The users of filesystems in the lk have moved on.
Why did he write such a lengthy letter? What are his goals? Don't know. Don't care.
Brilliant guy, but oh so stupid.
Re: Toxic, brilliant, stupid. (Score:5, Interesting)
An important step for recovering alcoholics is to apologise to as many people that were affected to oneâ(TM)s drinking, as possible.
As an act of contrition on your part, and to perhaps find some comfort or closure for the innocently affected.
Best guess is that Hans needs to do the same. Obviously impossible for his wife, but he would need to do this as well to his extended family. Just one of many such letters. This letter to the Linux community sounds personally written and addresses key issues. The evil canâ(TM)t be undone but it can be minimised.
Re: (Score:2)
Too often people commit criminal acts and are free. See e.g. Donald Trump.
i have zero sympathy for donald trump, he's a really disgusting human being, essentially a pathologically narcissistic conman. if you examine his mandate, however, it turns out he's the president of the united states with less blood on his hands in the last 3 decades (at least), by a wide margin. and that's including the chaotic pullout from afghanistan which left a huge swath of former "collaborators" in the fire.
i concede that this is very likely due to his lack of deep connections to elites. he was an an
Re: (Score:3)
I'm definitely not voting for Hunter Biden thanks to that laptop fiasco.
Re:gavron: Do you get paid for each mention of Tru (Score:4, Informative)
Do you get paid for each mention of Trump, regardless of context
The Oompa Loompa has said multiple times a president should have total immunity to do anything they want, including illegal things.
The Oompa Loompa has also whined that what president Biden is doing (i.e. prosecution for taking thousands of classified documents and lying about having them) is illegal.
Consistency isn't the orange goon's forte.
Re: (Score:3)
Consistency isn't the orange goon's forte.
Oh, like any low-intelligence narcissist with high manipulation skills, he is very consistent: He is allowed to do everything and it is always good. Anybody else that does something he does not like of fails to cheer for him needs to be punished. Definitely not a person that should ever be placed in charge of anything.
Re: (Score:2)
The Oompa Loompa has said multiple times a president should have total immunity to do anything they want, including illegal things.
If republicans want to agree that every president has immunity for life then they should have no issues with Biden walking into the supreme court and "retiring" every Trump appointment.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Just like vice-president Kamala Harris can ignore the results of the next presidential election. She can do the right thing.
Re: (Score:2)
He is the world's most famous malignant narcissist, hard to argue he's not the most relevant example of someone who commits crimes with impunity.
nobody told Reiser Slashdot is dead, too (Score:4, Insightful)
Since his wife doesn't have the opportunity to have a letter printed, I would've preferred that Slashdot not give him this attention, regardless of how limited that attention is nowadays. Weirdly, the letter was transmitted to Slashdot, but this summary references an Ars Techica story about the letter...
Re: (Score:3)
He didn't kill his legacy, that died a natural death. In the open source world legacies die when no one picks up your work. The filesystem isn't murdering anyone, the legacy was still there, but it just got old and slowly wallowed away in irrelevance. It was a shame too since ReiserFS had a lot of promise, but ultimately one of its biggest benefits was obsoleted by ext3 at which point there was little use for it anymore.
But my point is, assuming for the moment he didn't kill anyone, would his legacy remain?
Re: (Score:2)
The filesystem had a lot of innovation. However, times change. Xiafs was awesome for its time as well, but ext2 eventually rendered that obsolete. These days, ZFS or btrfs are probably the best general purpose filesystems going for Linux, with ext4 and XFS also useful.
As far as I know, ReiserFS doesn't have any checksumming or scrubbing available, which is something needed for modern filesystems.
Re: (Score:2)
These days, ZFS or btrfs are probably the best general purpose filesystems going for Linux, with ext4 and XFS also useful.
ZFS if you have lots of ram, btrfs or ext4 if you don't. Still smart to wait for brtfs to have another version or two IMO.
XFS stagnated, no good reason for it now that there is ext4.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't need lots of RAM for ZFS. You can run it perfectly happily on a raspberry pi if that's your thing. ZFS's "requirements" come from default setup of read caching to speed up system performance. It's not a necessary to run caches the size they are setup with by default in ZFS, additionally you can setup caching with any other file system too, in RAM. Likewise RAM requirements is also part of data-dedupe, also not a necessary function of ZFS.
You need lots of RAM if you want to use and turn on every f
Re: (Score:2)
The reason I want to use ZFS is its features. Using the features requires a bunch of memory. So I choose platforms where they are not starved for memory, problem solved.
If I didn't want to use the features, I wouldn't use ZFS.
Re: (Score:2)
I know other people run ZFS on a Raspberry Pi, but I've found btrfs good enough for that. I do agree about a couple versions, especially them mainstreaming fscrypt, so btrfs has some type of solid filesystem encryption, and doesn't need a LUKS layer underneath or using something like CryFS on top of it.
I'd also like to see the nocow stuff addressed, so btrfs can be used for an iSCSI target without the iSCSI image which is presented as a LUN losing all checksumming protection.
Re: (Score:2)
Because it is tainted.
Dirty.
Unpure.
The file system didn't kill anyone. Nothing you said was rational. As for comparing that with eating dead people, get some professional psychiatric help, you clearly need it. Hans Riser is a good example of what happens when you don't get help for your issues.
Re: (Score:2)
Would you also rather that Ian Brady, serial killer and psychopath, had not written a book that outlined deficits in police thinking that allowed him, and later on other serial killers, to go uncaptured for a long time?
Nobody thinks Ian Brady wrote it out of any social concern, but if it leads to less police arrogance and more effective police thinking, then who cares why he wrote it?
Why should I care any more about why Hans Reiser wrote a letter? If it leads to even one person questioning dysfunctional att
Re: (Score:2)
Some people just use failings by others to fake-elevate themselves. These people usually argue against any kind of mercy, which makes me think they may be some variant of psychopath themselves. The person you responded to seems to qualify.
Re: (Score:2)
Prisons that actually try to rehabilitate are too expensive. It's more efficient to use them as a source of slave labor.
Do I think that's morally sound? No. But I think it's what we do. People do change over time, for one thing, among males the testosterone tends to decrease when you hit your 40's. Among women, there's a weakly analogous process called menopause.
OTOH, and with a complete lack of information, my wild guess is that he liked to listen to music like "El Passo", and "Banks of the Ohio". Mi
Re: (Score:2)
Well the worse thing for him is probably that hdd's are practically dead. With 2TB 5GB/s storage being available at 100 dollars, a lot of the possible value of something like ReiserFS will be gone when he comes out in a couple of years. His b-tree and plugin efforts were interesting but ultimately futile efforts to solve a problem nobody cares about anymore outside of some small niches that have their own solutions.
Re: (Score:2)
the logical conclusion is that anyone who commits a crime should be either imprisoned for life, or executed.
If we execute criminals, they won't criminal again. Locking them away still allows them to commit more crimes and costs taxpayers money. Getting rid of them solves that problem once and for all. Even better if you get them when they're young and haven't reproduced.
Re: (Score:2)
Larry Niven enters the chat. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
But it is frustrating to see the histories of violent criminals who have been in and out of jail for years for violent crimes until they finally kill somebody and get locked up for a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a bad opinion and you should feel bad. Literally everything about this statement is stupid and wrong and actually leads me to believe that you might be too anti-social to exist in society properly, and you may yourself one day be in prison. What then, I wonder.
Re: (Score:2)
He currently has a significant interest in convincing people that he is rehabilitated due to the benefit of assisting with his release. This increases the probability that his messaging may be carefully architected to portray him in a favorable light and is certainly a one-sided narrative due to his wife not being alive to comment. I was commenting to criticize Slashdo
At the time (Score:2)
Everybody Loves Eric Raymond comic from around the time
https://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymo... [geekz.co.uk]
In a way, it's a terrible shame that ReiserFS is deprecated. It could have been so much more, the options were ext2, xfs, or reiserfs. It wasn't slow for the majority of workloads. People didn't like xfs much, that didn't seem as tight in the community. Reiserfs looked a very good option.
Memories.
Dear lord, at what point do you say to yourself killing your wife is the answer?
Re: (Score:2)
> For the record, she did embezzle a bunch of money from his company and abduct his children then send them to Russia.
I'm not fond of Russia today, but I don't think that justifies murder to be honest.
More respect, people (Score:2)
Not a Rose (Score:4, Insightful)
Imagine if ext4 were called TsoFS and then Ted was accused of doing something terrible.
Lesson learned: don't ever do this.
Heaven help us if Linus misbehaves or is falsely accused!
Even Gates, of all people, didn't go with Gates, Inc. but let his girlfriend pick a name for his company.
Re: Not a Rose (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That's on us if we are so idiotic that we can't separate a creation from its creator. Asperger's is quite clearly not autism and is not necessarily disabling, with many affected having great family and professional lives. Conflating the two exposes some to unnecessary stigma and interventions and deprives others of full support they need. All because we have some beef with long dead author.
I would be happy to try out ReiserFS if it's indeed better for something. I would also support Hans Reiser being given
Re: (Score:3)
He's in the American legal system, so naturally anybody who can do anything valuable is prevented from doing so. The guy only murdered his wife; he could be prevented from harming wives forever while still contributing to society from his cubical in prison. Instead society has to pay to house him by more than we spend to educate a child.
Aperger's not long before the DSM change had a study showing genetic correlation while proving no correlation with Autism. Knowing both in person, they are not the same unle
Re: (Score:2)
ReiserFS is sprawling shit and it gave rise to Btrfs which is also sprawling shit.
The most obvious reason? (Score:2)
It covers, broadly, why Reiser believes his system failed to gain mindshare among Linux users, beyond the most obvious reason.
You mean data loss, right?
Right?
ReiserFS was unpopular because it was widely known for data loss before we even knew Hans killed his wife. That's why it failed to gain mindshare. You don't "move fast and break things" when you're storing people's data. The same thing happened to XFS. I personally lost data to that one. I was never enough of a sucker to use ReiserFS though, because it was obvious that the developer didn't care about your data from early on. I thought he was just a sociopath, which is common
It's funny (Score:2)
because I don't care, and I can't imagine anyone other than his inlaws do
Oh boy (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hans is sorry (Score:2)
I'm very sorry I got caught -- Hans Reiser (probably)
More importantly, why do I care? (Score:2)
Hans is lonely (Score:5, Insightful)
If you scan through the full letter, the main takeaway is that Hans is very lonely and misses writing code with other smart people.
Re: (Score:2)
If you scan through the full letter, the main takeaway is that Hans is very lonely and misses writing code with other smart people.
The prison should let him write code.
There's no reason not to.
Re:Hans is lonely (Score:4, Insightful)
A lot of people like us could be kept isolated from the rest of the society, writing code, at 100% productivity -- without even feeling like we're missing something. Heck, getting rid of crap like dealing with landlords, plumbers, tax critters, marketeers -- all the kinds of stinking normies -- would be a big win.
You could build some kind of a dorm and keep such people proactively, even before they harm someone. But currently the society insists on forcing everyone to conform to the standards of sociable doofuses. I for one would like to sit with the likes of Hans Reiser and hack in peace.
Re: (Score:2)
We haven't evolved beyond a one-size-fits-all society, so Company Towns, Company Scrip, etc. are all legally prohibited (special pleading for the military).
Even though you and people like you may be much happier in such a situation, and who am I to judge?
A simple exit bond escrow would totally take care of most concerns, but violent monkeys with guns don't want you to have that choice simply because they would make other choices. It's sociopathic OCD and a lack of value for consensual relationships.
I hear
Re: Hans is lonely (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But it is so frequently used to describe people who are merely unsociable that its meaning is shifting. But it still has the old meaning also. So it is kind of a fundamentall
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. The correct term is "asocial".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The prison should let him write code. There's no reason not to.
Modern software development is nearly impossible without routine Internet access. Routine communication, because it is necessarily unsupervised, is not allowed to prisoners.
Re: All hans on deck! (Score:4, Funny)
It's poetic.
For slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
He doesn't have any of those traits.
Re: (Score:2)
Parole boards are not naive. They have access to all his prison records.
People trying to fool parole boards is a real thing, and people benefiting from therapy is also a real thing.
Re: (Score:3)
Parole boards are not naive. They have access to all his prison records.
They still use vinyl? :-)
Re: All hans on deck! (Score:2)
That never stopped anybody from trying.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, there are some who change. The real problem is that most prisons, including in the US, are not set up for "rehabilitation" but rather on punishment or warehousing.
Re: (Score:2)
Everything he does, from building filesystems to strangling his wife, he was obviously pretty good at, and he did them well. She is dead after all,
He's serving life in prison. So not so successful.
Wouldn't be surprised if he had her death planned out well in advance.
Unlikely. He didn't even have basic supplies, such as a tarp to wrap the body and some duct tape.
Re: All hans on deck! (Score:2)
Why would he even need all of that stuff? The police couldn't even find her body without his help. How would that have changed anything?
Re:All hans on deck! (Score:5, Interesting)
You do not understand how psychopaths work. The thing is they have trouble understanding how to deal with people. As soon as they understand that you should not harm or kill others on an _interlectual_ level, psychopaths are actually a lot less dangerous than regular people, because they then need a good and sound reason to kill or harm anybody. Regular people just need to get "triggered" enough. Why you think that somebody that did it in cold blood, but now actually understands what he did wrong and knows better, deserves _less_ mercy than somebody that did it because he has poor emotional control is really bizarre. It is like you want to punish the guy for the way he was born.
Re: All hans on deck! (Score:2)
I already know all of this. Unlike most on slashdot, I don't go around demanding that we jail all psychopaths. Psychopaths tend to have one particular thing that they care about, and they'll often do whatever it takes for that one thing. They can know that killing in the name of that is wrong, but that doesn't mean they're above doing it under what they perceive to be the right circumstances. The ones you jail are the ones with poor judgement.
Reminds me of a friend (Score:2)
Anecdotal. She knew a clinical psychopath. He did a games theory analysis and determined his minimax strategy was to study what people with consciences did and imitate it.
Re: (Score:2)
>Why you think that somebody that did it in cold blood, but now actually understands what he did wrong and knows better, deserves _less_ mercy than somebody that did it because he has poor emotional control is really bizarre.
It has been shown that people who kill for emotional reasons generally don't go on to kill again, unlike someone killing in cold blood, who now just needs a good enough reason for them to kill.
Re: (Score:2)
True psychopaths are very manipulative people. It's hard to believe that they have truly learned their lessons just because they said so.
If the legal and medical systems agree that a person is dangerous and needs to be separated from society, that may not be the one true correct action, but I'll trust their judgement.
Re: All hans on deck! (Score:2)
Having kids with a mail-order Russian bride, who's into bondage and polyamory? Nope, no stupidity there.
What does that have to do with one's intelligence?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What high IQ sociopath could genuinely repent? (Score:5, Informative)
He's far too intelligent to not have believed he was "right" to murder or he would not have murdered, therefore all repentance gestures are attempts at duping the credulous.
Do smart people have different emotions than average or dumb people? Are they more or less likely to change after they massively fuck up?
I'm just a little surprised at the idea that someone's past intelligence would be used to judge their character ten years later. I mean, why not say he's too smart not to have seen the error of his ways?
Btw, did you read the summary or the letter? I'm sympathetic to not understanding all the rules of a system despite being smart, for example not knowing just how much insider politics is involved in a simple meetup group. I only started reading the letter, but a nice version is here: https://ftp.mfek.org/Reiser/Le... [mfek.org]
Re:What high IQ sociopath could genuinely repent? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Right, and if society can't learn from the mistakes of its members, then it's doomed to (re)experience the consequences until it does. It's not like Hans even came up with these ideas; he's just suggesting that it might benefit all of us to have them as part of a standard curriculum, and I'm in agreement there. Social Studies seems like the obvious place, since almost none of it is actually about social skills as it stands, instead teaching facts, names, and dates for rote learning. Perhaps if we focused
Re:What high IQ sociopath could genuinely repent? (Score:5, Interesting)
He's far too intelligent to not have believed he was "right" to murder or he would not have murdered, therefore all repentance gestures are attempts at duping the credulous.
When I was a teenager I lived on the streets, and I had a number of friends who went to prison for various crimes.
When in prison they would sometimes make a phone call or write a letter, and 100% of the time they talked about how changed they were, how different their life was going to be when they go out.
Not a single one seemed different at all when they were released. The ones who didn't go back were not better people, they merely learned specific behavioral boundaries related to felony crimes that are easy to prosecute. If asked about "that letter you wrote," or "that stuff you said on the phone," they'd either laugh and say, "Hey, that's what you gotta say when you're in there, they listen to/read everything," or else, "LOL OMG it was so boring in there!"
Re: (Score:2)
Not everything inside the prison, only what crosses the prison/free world boundary. If they had undercover agents and listening devices inside the prison, it would be much easier to detect those who are not rehabilitating. But that cos
Re: (Score:2)
The carceral system is broken. It absolutely does not do what it claims to do. The prison-industrial complex is only concerned with making money, and prison is basically the only place where slave labour is still entirely legal.
But we put people in jail for crimes because the government does nothing else. It doesn't give aid to the victims (money, counselling, ANYTHING), and it merely puts people away in a place that as often as not makes them WORSE, and certainly gives them no skills to operate in the worl
Re: (Score:2)
Intelligence has absolutely zero correlation with morality, ethics, or compassion.
The sort of intelligence used in coding has no relationship to the sort of intelligence needed to function around others.
In short, your understanding of what intelligence actually is, and your cute but naive belief that intelligence in one thing is transferable to everything, does not impress.
There is a reason why particle physicists aren't usually asked for gardening tips, why Professor Hawking was never hired as a marriage c
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but there's *some* connection. It may not be the strongest, but it exists.
Re: (Score:2)
And you think intelligent people cannot make mistakes or overlook options or get overwhelmed in a situation? Apparently you are _not_ very intelligent.
My take is you just want to put this person down to fake-elevate yourself. Essentially virtue-signalling and just as dumb.
Re: (Score:2)
If you really believe that, you can't have observed your own reactions very carefully. Any specific example I give will likely be wrong, but consider your reactions to pizza and beer after working out.
Re: (Score:2)
Since Reiser hasn't used the Internet since 2006, he probably still believes that Slashdot still has some influence in the greater tech community. Unfortunately for him, the only people who still come here frequently are mostly greybeard Linux admins. The mainstream tech community doesn't care what we think, as it's more of an AI-embracing corporate circle jerk right now.
Maybe he thought that by apologizing for his prior actions publically, the justice system would grant him some leniency and grant him an e
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
for the murder it seems that, although his wife didn't deserve to be murdered, it looks like she wasn't a particularly nice person and could have been putting the children at risk.
The murder described in the Wikipedia page sounds a lot like an emotional murder. They argued, he believed she was inventing illnesses for the children, she defied him, and he snapped - strangling her in the heat of the moment.
That doesn't sound at all like someone who considers whether it's "right" or "wrong" to do the murder, it sounds more like emotions overwhelming common sense, then trying to hide the murder.
I dunno... if someone gets angry and kills in the heat of passion, and claims to be remorseful, is there no room for forgiveness here?
It's her fault for being murdered, got it. Same with OJ's wife and the restaurant waiter.
Re: (Score:3)
Which part of "although his wife didn't deserve to be murdered" made you come up with that inane deduction?
although his wife didn't deserve to be murdered, it looks like she wasn't a particularly nice person and could have been putting the children at risk.
She didn't deserve to be murdered, but.
The implied but says it all.
Re: (Score:3)
Crimes of passion (Score:5, Interesting)
generally don't result in a jury convicting someone of first degree murder. His lawyer made the case for a less premeditated killing and didn't succeed in creating a reasonable doubt.
He has a second degree murder charge only because of the plea deal where he led them to her body.
Room for forgiveness? It's not my place to forgive him. If his personal growth is genuine, if he can somehow show he can live outside without endangering others, that's what parole is for.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Why not just hang all the criminals if reform is impossible in your view?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing Hans only murdered someone and didn't loot a Target.
Re: (Score:2)
"Hannibal Lecter was well spoken, but Clarice was wise to avoid contact with him."
But Clarice caught a murderer by consulting with him? Does not seem to support the narrative you're proposing.
Re: (Score:2)