Only Seven Countries Meet WHO Air Quality Standard, Research Finds (theguardian.com) 23
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Only seven countries are meeting an international air quality standard, with deadly air pollution worsening in places due to a rebound in economic activity and the toxic impact of wildfire smoke, a new report has found. Of 134 countries and regions surveyed in the report, only seven -- Australia, Estonia, Finland, Grenada, Iceland, Mauritius and New Zealand -- are meeting a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline limit for tiny airborne particles expelled by cars, trucks and industrial processes. The vast majority of countries are failing to meet this standard for PM2.5, a type of microscopic speck of soot less than the width of a human hair that when inhaled can cause a myriad of health problems and deaths, risking serious implications for people, according to the report by IQAir, a Swiss air quality organization that draws data from more than 30,000 monitoring stations around the world.
While the world's air is generally much cleaner than it was in much of the past century, there are still places where the pollution levels are particularly dangerous. The most polluted country, Pakistan, has PM2.5 levels more than 14 times higher than the WHO standard, the IQAir report found, with India, Tajikistan and Burkina Faso the next most polluted countries. But even in wealthy and fast-developing countries, progress in cutting air pollution is under threat. Canada, long considered as having some of the cleanest air in the western world, became the worst for PM2.5 last year due to record wildfires that ravaged the country, sending toxic spoke spewing across the country and into the US. In China, meanwhile, improvements in air quality were complicated last year by a rebound in economic activity in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, with the report finding a 6.5% increase in PM2.5 levels.
The most polluted urban area in the world last year was Begusarai in India, the sixth annual IQAir report found, with India home to the four most polluted cities in the world. Much of the developing world, particularly countries in Africa, lacks reliable air quality measurements, however. The WHO lowered its guideline for "safe" PM2.5 levels in 2021 to five micrograms per cubic meter and by this measure many countries, such as those in Europe that have cleaned up their air significantly in the past 20 years, fall short. But even this more stringent guideline may not fully capture the risk of insidious air pollution. Research released by US scientists last month found there is no safe level of PM2.5, with even the smallest exposures linked to an increase in hospitalizations for conditions such as heart disease and asthma.
While the world's air is generally much cleaner than it was in much of the past century, there are still places where the pollution levels are particularly dangerous. The most polluted country, Pakistan, has PM2.5 levels more than 14 times higher than the WHO standard, the IQAir report found, with India, Tajikistan and Burkina Faso the next most polluted countries. But even in wealthy and fast-developing countries, progress in cutting air pollution is under threat. Canada, long considered as having some of the cleanest air in the western world, became the worst for PM2.5 last year due to record wildfires that ravaged the country, sending toxic spoke spewing across the country and into the US. In China, meanwhile, improvements in air quality were complicated last year by a rebound in economic activity in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, with the report finding a 6.5% increase in PM2.5 levels.
The most polluted urban area in the world last year was Begusarai in India, the sixth annual IQAir report found, with India home to the four most polluted cities in the world. Much of the developing world, particularly countries in Africa, lacks reliable air quality measurements, however. The WHO lowered its guideline for "safe" PM2.5 levels in 2021 to five micrograms per cubic meter and by this measure many countries, such as those in Europe that have cleaned up their air significantly in the past 20 years, fall short. But even this more stringent guideline may not fully capture the risk of insidious air pollution. Research released by US scientists last month found there is no safe level of PM2.5, with even the smallest exposures linked to an increase in hospitalizations for conditions such as heart disease and asthma.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you measure air quality in uninhabited areas?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Australia lack of sensors and reclassification (Score:2)
Yeah places like finland have sort of bad air in very few places in few of the cities. Whereas in thailand when the pm2.5 index levels are commonly over 150 going to 200 in ALL of the rural areas. For reference in rural finland it would be something like 5 to 10 (and i have firsthand experience for both of these)
Australia would have great air in most of the country because most of the country is far enough from indonesia. Theres no forests to light on fire in inner australia anyway.
Re: Australia lack of sensors and reclassification (Score:2)
Because they're generally more habitable? I live in the People's Republic of California, and trust me, while this place is inhabited, it's definitely uninhabitable. But don't take my word for it, the numbers don't lie:
https://earth.org/most-pollute... [earth.org]
Why do you think I refuse to live anywhere inland? The beach areas are the only ones that have breathable air. When I drive anywhere else, my windows are rolled up and air set to recirculate. Dead air beats toxic air any day.
https://www.latimes.com/enviro... [latimes.com]
The
Re: (Score:2)
> maybe just maybe someone should look at the PM2.5 concentrations measured from space
Windy uses data from CAMS the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service:
"CAMS is one of the six services that are part of the earth observation programme called Copernicus,[2][3] which is managed and coordinated by the European Commission, the European Space Agency (ESA), along with EU Member States and some EU Agencies" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
NO2 : https://www.windy.com/-NO2-no2... [windy.com]
2.5 : https://www.windy.com [windy.com]
Re: (Score:2)
SO2 is interesting : https://www.windy.com/-SO2-tcs... [windy.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Wildfire pollution you say? (Score:2)
Perhaps we should coat the trees with some all-natural fire resistant material so they wouldn't be quite so flammable. Just don't go into the forest and disturb the asbestos.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was going to ask Musk's supposedly non-woke IA, but it's apparently only available to paid X members, and I already feel like they should be paying me to use the free service. So I asked ChatGPT instead.
Prompt: Are there racial and social justice issues associated with promoting clean air?
Yes, there can be racial and social justice issues associated with promoting clean air. Historically, marginalized communities, often consisting of people of color and low-income individuals, have been disproportionately affected by air pollution. Factors such as industrial zoning, proximity to highways and factories, and socioeconomic disparities can contribute to these inequalities.
For example, in many cases, low-income neighborhoods and communities of color are located near industrial sites and other sources of pollution, leading to higher exposure to harmful pollutants. This unequal distribution of environmental burdens can exacerbate health disparities, as these communities may experience higher rates of respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular diseases, and other health problems associated with poor air quality.
Furthermore, these communities may also face barriers to accessing clean air resources and technologies, such as air purifiers or electric vehicles, due to economic constraints. Addressing clean air issues in an equitable manner requires not only reducing pollution levels but also ensuring that the benefits of clean air policies and initiatives are distributed fairly across all communities. This involves engaging with and empowering marginalized communities in decision-making processes, investing in environmental justice initiatives, and implementing policies that prioritize the needs of those most affected by air pollution.
So yeah, clean air is woke. Now I'm kind of curious what Grok would've said.
Re: (Score:1)
Shorter ChatGPT: "World to end: women, minorities hardest hit".
Whatever (Score:2)
Canada, long considered as having some of the cleanest air in the western world, became the worst for PM2.5 last year due to record wildfires
Australia had some pretty intense fire seasons a few years back too. Seems these things are highly variable. Should let the research team know, maybe they could spread out the measurements and average it over some time, but IQAir (a Swiss air quality organization that supposedly draws data from more than 30,000 monitoring stations around the world) seems to mostly want to sell me something. Download our app, and by the way here are some great air purifiers. LOL.
Re: (Score:2)
West Coast Purple Air Map at Night (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You will heat with your heat pump and cook on your induction stove and the jackboots will come for you if you dare to think otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
You should really show them by using your BBQ inside the house. You don't need to only do it outdoors like some namby pamby who is scared of a little smoke.
Re: (Score:2)
Why ban? Seems a little extreme.
You just need to discourage people from trying to socialise the cost of their actions onto others. People have the right to choose not to implement pollution controls, but that has a cost for others. So apply a sufficient tax on running something with no pollution controls and use the revenue to subsidise pollution controls for those willing to fit them. Let the market sort it out.
To be expected (Score:1)
These countries have a combined TOTAL population of under 40 million people.
So not enough to pollute.