Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Science

Vast DNA Tree of Life For Plants Revealed By Global Science Team 11

An international team of scientists used 1.8 billion letters of genetic code from more than 9,500 species covering almost 8,000 known flowering plant genera to create the most up-to-date understanding of the flowering plant tree of life. The research has been published in the journal Nature. Phys.Org reports: The major milestone for plant science, led by [Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew] and involving 138 organizations internationally, was built on 15 times more data than any comparable studies of the flowering plant tree of life. Among the species sequenced for this study, more than 800 have never had their DNA sequenced before. The sheer amount of data unlocked by this research, which would take a single computer 18 years to process, is a huge stride towards building a tree of life for all 330,000 known species of flowering plants -- a massive undertaking by Kew's Tree of Life Initiative.

The flowering plant tree of life, much like our own family tree, enables us to understand how different species are related to each other. The tree of life is uncovered by comparing DNA sequences between different species to identify changes (mutations) that accumulate over time like a molecular fossil record. Our understanding of the tree of life is improving rapidly in tandem with advances in DNA sequencing technology. For this study, new genomic techniques were developed to magnetically capture hundreds of genes and hundreds of thousands of letters of genetic code from every sample, orders of magnitude more than earlier methods. A key advantage of the team's approach is that it enables a wide diversity of plant material, old and new, to be sequenced, even when the DNA is badly damaged. The vast treasure troves of dried plant material in the world's herbarium collections, which comprise nearly 400 million scientific specimens of plants, can now be studied genetically.

[...] Across all 9,506 species sequenced, more than 3,400 came from material sourced from 163 herbaria in 48 countries. Additional material from plant collections around the world (e.g., DNA banks, seeds, living collections) have been vital for filling key knowledge gaps to shed new light on the history of flowering plant evolution. The team also benefited from publicly available data for more than 1,900 species, highlighting value of the open science approach to future genomic research. Flowering plants alone account for about 90% of all known plant life on land and are found virtually everywhere on the planet -- from the steamiest tropics to the rocky outcrops of the Antarctic Peninsula. [...] Utilizing 200 fossils, the authors scaled their tree of life to time, revealing how flowering plants evolved across geological time. They found that early flowering plants did indeed explode in diversity, giving rise to more than 80% of the major lineages that exist today shortly after their origin. However, this trend then declined to a steadier rate for the next 100 million years until another surge in diversification about 40 million years ago, coinciding with a global decline in temperatures. These new insights would have fascinated Darwin and will surely help today's scientists grappling with the challenges of understanding how and why species diversify.
A list of "remarkable species" included in the flowering plant tree of life is embedded below the article.

Looking ahead, the study's authors believe this data will aid future attempts to identify new species, refine plant classification, uncover new medicinal compounds, and conserve plants in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Vast DNA Tree of Life For Plants Revealed By Global Science Team

Comments Filter:
  • by votsalo ( 5723036 ) on Thursday April 25, 2024 @06:44AM (#64423624)
    > Darwin was mystified by the seemingly sudden appearance of such diversity in the fossil record. ...he wrote, "The rapid development as far as we can judge of all the higher plants within recent geological times is an abominable mystery."
    Flowering plants reproduce via sexual selection of flowers and fruit, and by using insects and animals. Insects like bees select the most attractive flowers. All kinds of animals eat the better looking fruit, transport the seeds across large distances, and deposit them with fertilizer. Does this explain their rapid dominance across the globe? Didn't Darwin have an explanation?
    • by laughingskeptic ( 1004414 ) on Thursday April 25, 2024 @08:03AM (#64423782)
      There was a heavy bias in paleontology towards animals versus plants until after Darwin's time, so part of the problem for Darwin was the libraries where fossils were collected simply didn't have many plant fossils, if any.

      From: Perplexity:

      It was not until the early 19th century that paleontological activity became more organized, and the field began to expand its focus beyond just animal fossils. The coining of the term "paleontology" in 1822 by Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville helped solidify the study of ancient life, including both animals and plants. However, the fossil record was still heavily biased towards animals, as they were generally larger, harder, and more easily preserved than plant remains. It was not until the latter half of the 19th century that paleontology saw a "tremendous expansion" in activity, particularly in North America, which began to uncover a wider diversity of plant and animal fossils.
    • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Thursday April 25, 2024 @12:05PM (#64424560) Journal

      Many believe it's a reinforcement mechanism between flowering plants and insects. Once both plants and insects got into the symbiosis pattern, it flowered (pun half intended) as both sides gained a big advantage: one was able to disperse its DNA further, and the other got an easy meal.

      Why nature didn't invent it earlier is hard to say. Maybe because most insects have crappy eyesight. One then happened to have good-enough eyesight that they could spot flowers at a distance, and evolution improved both bug eyes and flowers after that.

  • Quite an accomplishment, I remember reading some where, plants have for more genes that any animal. I want to say the count is in the millions, but my memory is vague since it was a long tone ago.
    • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      I've heard that also. Plants don't have to outrun predators and thus can waste more DNA weight on marginal genes.

      • That's an evolutionary just so story and while cute they are usually bunk.

        You can fuck with plants in a lot of ways which would kill animals, especially vertebrates very dead. Sometimes pants end up with double the DNA for example. That's simply not survivable for animals, but it gives a lot more latitude to have more DNA.

  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Thursday April 25, 2024 @10:56AM (#64424322)

    There's stuff popping up in my lawn that no one has ever seen before.

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]

Working...