A Growing Number of Americans Are Getting Their News From TikTok (theverge.com) 197
According to a new survey from the Pew Research Center, TikTok is the second most popular source of news for Americans after X, "though most TikTok users don't primarily think of the shortform video app as a news source," notes The Verge. The survey looked at how Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X play a role in Americans' news diets. From the report: Among TikTok users, only 15 percent say keeping up with the news is a major reason they use the app. Still, 35 percent of those surveyed said they wouldn't have seen the news they get on TikTok elsewhere. And unlike other apps, the news users see on TikTok is just as likely to come from influencers or celebrities as it is from journalists -- and it's far more likely to come from total strangers. (Meanwhile, most Facebook and Instagram users say the news that pops up on their feeds is posted by friends, relatives, or other people they know; on X, users are more likely to see news posted by media outlets or reporters.)
So stupid. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:So stupid. (Score:5, Funny)
The Chinese government literally controls it.
Yes; those fools are allowing the communists to control their minds! Tune into Fox News with the enlightened people like me.
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese government literally controls it.
Yes; those fools are allowing the communists to control their minds! Tune into Fox News with the enlightened people like me.
I was wondering who was going to show up and go through these mental gymnastics, lol.
You do realize that this works 100 time better in reverse right?
Random Slashdot dude: "Evil Fox News wascally wepubwicans blah blah ... "
Other guy: "Oh, so I should get "news" from TikTok instead like you guys, right?"
Re: (Score:2)
I find it interesting that your reaction to the assertion that TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese government, is controlled by China is to sneeringly imply that the accuser must be a right wing reactionary.
Huh.
Re: (Score:2)
That might be coming from a Chinese shill...there appears to be a few of them out here, even on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, that was mostly Tucker Carlson. The rest may be deluded but they're nothing like him. Anti-Russia has been a big Republican stance so it was a surprise when Trump cozied up to Putin and the remoras had to follow along. If there's on sort of person that Trump loved while in office, it was a dictator.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If you don't kiss his ring you'll get cancelled. Maybe some former Republicans can try and form a 3rd party one day. If Trump hasn't done away with elections and parties by then.
Re: (Score:2)
From the party that got offended everytime someone got cancelled for spouting anti-semetic, racist, or other hateful things.
The Anti-Woke loves to cancel just as much as the Woke.
Re: (Score:3)
LOL WAT - getting canceled and getting booted from a political party while you actively advocate and work against the current planks/platform is hardly the same thing.
Nobody is canceling the Neo-Con or Chamber of Commerce wings of the party. I have not read about any GOPs calling for news media to black out Ken Buck etc. What they are doing is encouraging these non-adherents to the current agenda to leave the party and in some cases showing them door by picking other primary candidates to back, or not lendi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And of course the CCP love
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:So stupid. (Score:4, Informative)
Donald Trump: Spends four years publicly gushing over his dear pal the genocidal dictator Vladimir Putin, and trying to dismantle NATO, against the wishes of practically everyone other than said pal. Exposes American nuclear secrets to Russia. Provides Russia with intel about the positions of American troops in Afghanistan. Expropriates top secret documents from US government agencies to his private properties. When prosecuted for a tiny fraction of these, conspires to have the judge in the case be one that he himself appointed.
You: Total coincidence! Ve believe in nossink, Lebowski, nossink!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mad, bro?
Please go read something. Educate yourself. It is so wild that you're on here angrily pushing very debunked conspiracy theories as truth.
Re: (Score:2)
As the other poster stated, the Steele dossier has been proven to be a complete fabrication, coordinated and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign....geez, do a bit of googling, eh?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Your belief in the completely 100% utterly debunked Steele dossier and the pee tapes makes you a conspiracy theory nut head.
You conspiracy nutters are briefly amusing but your mad insistence on counter reality gets boring quickly as there is no way to engage with you. You are utterly immune to logic, facts, reason, and reality. Your sense of self worth is so tightly wrapped up in your erroneous beliefs, you become shielded from the truth.
You are a conspiracy nutter.
The rest of your ad hominem, appeal to e
Re: (Score:2)
Gosh, I sure hope you don't try to threaten jurors or judges like your Nazi comrades do. It would break my heart if you ended up in prison where you belong.
Re: (Score:3)
I've made 2 statements:
1) Steele dossier was debunked.
True
2) Pee tapes debunked.
True.
Please quote a lie I've made. A actual real quote where you're not putting words in my mouth.
Good luck, I'll wait.
Re: (Score:2)
By the time their unhinged bullshit Human Centipedes down the line to someone like you,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's fine. You can believe that even if you have no evidence of it.
I hope you don't believe the debunked Steele dossier and pee tapes are real, like my nutty friend on this thread.
My only point here is those are debunked. He keeps trying to spin and dodge and weave and distract and gets super emotional when I refuse to be distracted from my only point and won't defend other things that he wants me to defend because he said something stupid and nutty and indefensible and he's embarrassed but is unwilling
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would add the fact that Trump has been indicted by an American grand jury for 32 counts under the Espionage Act. But hey, I'm sure it's nothing.
Should I believe my lyin' eyes when I look at the FBI photos of the classified documents [wikipedia.org] seized as evidence of the crimes?
If I've learned anything in the last ~8 years its that throwing money at lawyers, even bottom of the barrel lawyers, works to defeat justice due the American voters because delay, delay, delay 'just works' against the US judicial system for serious white collar crimes.
Re: (Score:2)
But then a state like Flori
Re: (Score:2)
Oh speedy trial. You like those. Like putting hundreds of people in prison for years without a trial, most of whom did nothing more than take a selfie tour?
Your cognitive dissonance level is through the roof. Or maybe it's just simple intellectual dishonesty.
Re: (Score:2)
You're clearly one of them, and clearly live in a rotten, narcissist fantasy world where nobody but you is worthy of rights or respect. Whiny crybully sack of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Lol, you totally dodged. I never said if they were guilty or not.
I followed up on what YOU said about having speedy trials.
They did not.
Do you believe sitting in federal prison for 2+ years without a trial is ''speedy"?
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody who invokes the right to a speedy trial spends 2 years in prison without one. But you have to invoke it. If you do the opposite and delay because you're a psychotic attention whore like yourself, the courts are happy to oblige.
Re: (Score:2)
Many of those people already have. Please educate yourself.
Your ignorance does not make me a liar.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The people the psycho above brought up, the Jan 6 terrorists, were not representing or defending any nation, unless the Confederacy counts. They're just terrorists who don't accept the right of other people to vote agai
Yeah and so what? (Score:4, Informative)
All of the news media you consume is controlled by extraordinarily wealthy people for the purposes of manipulating you with propaganda. Fucking Noam Chomsky told us this shit.
It's a big club and you ain't in it.
Go learn some critical thinking and media literacy skills and then demand that those same skills get taught in public schools. And when the religious wackadoodles get mad about it and when your kid comes home and starts saying shit about your own personal beliefs you don't like hearing take those critical thinking skills and use them so you don't stop teaching them in public schools just because you're upset.
That's it That's the solution. Absolutely nothing else you try or do is going to work. You can't have vast swaths of ignorant people bred to believe the shit you're comfortable with and a functioning civilization. Pick one
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Nor is it rational to make excuses for a social media platform under the direct power of a totalitarian state when we've already seen even how destructive and Orwellian even indirect influence has been. And for what? What is the irresistible cont
Re: (Score:2)
That is not quite what Chomsky said actually.
The Propaganda Model says that what media organizations put out has been tuned a lot by them adapting to their environment. One factor in that environment is ownership but the other 4 are important too.
Then Chomsky points out two more things. One is that the people in the media are selected to fit in. Hence "you can say what you like because they like what you say". This may be outdated a bit but it is still very relevant.
And a second thing he points out is the l
Because if he was (Score:4, Interesting)
Hell that's the really amazing thing our ruling class has pulled off. We are a self-oppressing pack of serfs. The king's at least need at knights to keep the peasantry in check. We do it all by ourselves because we are absolutely terrified of trans girls in our bathrooms
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you see, none of those Americans became rich, so it wasn't propaganda. *head explodes*
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At least you agree with me that he's a clown show although I don't think you realize you did that. Stupid Bunny on the job!
Re:So stupid. (Score:5, Insightful)
And yes, TikTok's parent company is Chinese and subject to influence by the interests of the Chinese government. While Twitter is a privately owned company and used as a plaything of its owner, Elon Musk. There may be some question about which of those parties acts in a more self-interested way, contrary to the interests of the American people, but regardless: this is a problem.
I had no idea that Twitter was such a popular source of news. I would question how that's measured, but given the limitless ignorance of the American populace I don't have reason to doubt it.
Re: (Score:3)
Twitter is not a great source of quality news, but it's good source of stuff that just happened minutes ago. But stuff that just happened needs time to settle down, let more information show up, and a clearer picture gets time to form, the sort of stuff Twitter is bad at.
TikTok... Well, get your news from 6 second dance moves from teens...
Re: (Score:2)
Twitter can be a great 'source' of quality news. Just follow the people who spend their time collecting the quality news, linking to it and maybe even summarizing it.
Re: (Score:3)
Major understatement. All media companies worldwide are subject to influence by the Chinese government, as Apple has shown by censoring political content at their behest. But as an actual Chinese company, TikTok is under the direct control of the Chinese government. And by extension, people who base their consumer or political behavior on its content are essentially under that control as wel
Re: (Score:2)
People go to Twitter and TikTok because those places have news that is rarely reported by professional outlets, and if it does make the cut it tends to be long after it trended on social media.
Often the stories people find relevant are not the main headlines, and social media feeds them those stories so they don't have to go digging through news websites to find them. With the election in the UK that has been happening a lot lately. Often the social media posts actually link to articles by respected publica
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Optimism is one of the
Re: (Score:2)
The new talking news heads (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:So not so much actually (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not like the kind of propaganda you get with Fox News
I say this as a dyed-in-the-wool Liberal, and as respectfully (to you) as possible: "Our" side, the MSNBCs of the world, aren't any better. You may agree more with what they are saying, that doesn't mean it's not the exact same garbage as Fox News. Same shit, different stink. 24-hour news-entertainment channels are the bane of an educated populace.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
OMG, have you seem Prager U? It makes MSNBC seem like it's a bunch of Walter Cronkite clones with Einstein giving the science news. Prager U, the University that literally tells you to beat your children.
NBC is fine, MSNBC has the cable news syndrome, where you need 24 hours of constant blathering to keep those eyeballs engaged, using the news equivalent of click bait. Just like Fox and Fiends and CNN.
Disengage hyperdishonest mode (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't make a scummy drive-by attack like "Prager U, the University that literally tells you to beat your children." without a link to the proof.
I get it if that site and its content are not your cup of tea, or if you disagree with their politics, or you hate the style of animation they use, etc. but when you claim they "literally tell[s] you to beat your children" you owe everybody a link to the text or video on their site that tells their readers/viewers to beat their children. Where is it?
I'm betting eith
Re: (Score:2)
I mistake PragerU for a different videos that had advocated for spanking I had seen around the same time and linked together via youtube algoritms ("you watched prageru, now watch this too!"). I can't find the actual video anymore, but it seems it was not PragerU, and Prager himself advocated against it. So yes, my mistake.
However, PragerU does has weird and strange possibly disturbing advice from some guests: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
OMG, have you seem Prager U?
Unfortunately. Not even going to touch that insanity with a 10-foot pole. I specifically ignored Prager, and others like OAN and Newsmax, specifically because I feel like bringing them up is "punching down" so to speak. At least Fox has the veil of a news organization.
Re: (Score:3)
As an outside observer: what.
MSNBC is not very good, to be sure, but Fox isn't even legally news.
Re: (Score:2)
MSNBC is not very good, to be sure, but Fox isn't even legally news.
Again, not defending Fox here, but Rachel Maddow and MSNBC are the ones that first used the "[not] legally news" defense. [courthousenews.com] Their quote: “The statement could not reasonably be understood to imply an assertion of objective fact, and therefore, does not amount to defamation.” Tucker Carlson and Fox just took that defense to a whole different level of insanity.
Re:So not so much actually (Score:4, Insightful)
I say this as a dyed-in-the-wool Liberal, and as respectfully (to you) as possible: "Our" side, the MSNBCs of the world, aren't any better. You may agree more with what they are saying, that doesn't mean it's not the exact same garbage as Fox News. Same shit, different stink. 24-hour news-entertainment channels are the bane of an educated populace.
Cut out this "both sides" bullshit.
MSNBC et al suck but they're not even in the same universe as Fox News.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Not surprised but it is surprisingly sad (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
...that American society is devolving into a population of smooth brained hominids who only seek reaction and emotion without any context or meaning involved.
This pretty much sums it up [imgur.com].
Honestly they're getting a lot better (Score:2, Interesting)
The Chinese government is of course under
The path to happiness (Score:5, Insightful)
Turn off the news completely and you'll find yourself in a better mood.
Turn off all the Social Media and you might even be happy again . . . .
Re: (Score:2)
Turn off the news completely and you'll find yourself in a better mood. .
Turn off all the Social Media and you might even be happy again . . .
This used to be a selling point for Slashdot. You could read stories without political slant because they were tech stories, not political stories. There was a time I would have said this story doesn't belong on Slashdot because its only intent is to inflame readers.
I get my news from /. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
And you often get it multiple times.
Just a hunka hunka burnin' dumb (AAAAAAH!) (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Gen X thought (Score:2)
All *I* could think was: Sometimes it is real good to be older than the internet :-)
"getting their news from Tiktok" (Score:2)
and where does Tiktok get their news from?
People get their news from other people grabbing it from mainstream media and collecting it for you. So a big part of its function is as a news aggregator.
It makes a huge difference what man in the middle you pick.
"they get it from social" is chosen to disparage it, mostly because of the desire to have more control over what people take up as news.
Because clearly some young crowds on tiktok escape narrative control and have unwanted ideas.
Re: "getting their news from Tiktok" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We're now at a stage where mainstream media is broken in many ways - but not in all - , and your common sense has become crap. Knowing which one to pick won't help you there.
It's also true that those who turn off the mainstream will often end up worse.
Whenever you're mobilized against some official enemy, disinformation, China, Russia, Iran, rest assured that everything you believe is garbage.
2 minute news stories (Score:5, Insightful)
'News' (Score:2)
OMG !! (Score:2)
Journalists? (Score:2)
Stupid people for the most part (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think that is any good and I'll prove it by adding that it does not mean you're stupid.
There are two ways we get closer to truth:
- by applying more time, brains, effort, background knowledge
- by becoming better at knowing whom to trust
A stupid person has to rely more on the second part - and if that second skill isn't very good then sorry but that is what you have to work with. But a smart person who has only so much time to spend on the issue also has to rely on trust with all its limitatoins
It fol
Filtering is the Problem (Score:3)
As with all Internet and Social Media content, the problem is that what you see is largely determined by an algorithm (which tends to heavily favor the type of thing you've seen before). So, once you view a low-quality source, you are likely to be exposed to more low-quality sources. If you watch a few conspiracy theory videos, social media will ensure all you get is conspiracy theories.
In some ways, this is an evolved problem of the cable news phenomenon. Prior to cable news (and prior to video news period), you had very limited access to news. You got your local newspaper and maybe a national news magazine. That news was vetted by a professional editor whose job it was to make sure the paper appealed to as wide a swath of the population as possible. If you had a strong political bias, you'd need to take affirmative action to join some organization like the John Birch Society and subscribe to their news letter to reaffirm it. A passive news consumer would mostly see dry headlines. When Cable News came onto the scene, they were something other than the "default" so they had to grab attention. A good way to do that was to drive outrage while reinforcing prior beliefs (most people don't like to have their beliefs challenged). As sources multiplied, they had to "shout" even louder to get noticed and keep an audience.
For people who just want "straight news", it's become almost an impossible environment. Even the major national newspapers (such as still exist) tend to just report "both sides" instead of straight news. So it's no longer a dry statement that "X happened." Now, it's "Politican A says X is the greatest thing ever, Politician B expresses outrage at X."
Re:The real reason to ban Tiktok (Score:5, Informative)
because the deep state has trouble controlling what information people can get from Tiktok, so it must either be banned or be brought under control.
The so-called Freedom of the Press is meaningless when all MSM are own by a small group of people.
I dunno. The Chinese Communist Party's "deep state" seems to have no trouble at all controlling what information goes on TikTok. Right down to shadow-banning and tailoring comments to create a false-bandwagon effect.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I'm not a fan of the Chinese political party. I refuse to call them a communist party they don't even have universal fucking health care they have an American style private insurance system. There is nothing at all communist about China and it's laughable to pretend that they are.
Calling China communist would be like calling my flabby ass a dream boat.
Re: (Score:3)
A Tik-Tok-ing Timebomb: How TikTok's Global Platform Anomalies Align with the Chinese Communist Party's Geostrategic Objectives [networkcontagion.us]
By the studies own admission this isn't conclusive and requires further investigation, but it's interesting and makes sense for how you'd lowkey "steer" a social platform.
So let me rephrase that (Score:2)
It's 2024 man I've got the internet in Google it took me a few seconds to figure out that your "source" is basically the daily mail with a coat of paint from a couple of guys who teach classes at universities...
To be fair there's a few neoliberal clintonian types mixed
Re: (Score:2)
Do you take issue with any of the facts they present? Do you think the theory they presentis out of the realm of possibility? ProPublica was founded by a couple of billionaires as well and I imagine they've done more than one story that you're interested in. Facts are facts and narratives are narratives, I don't agree with the narratives CATO prescribes but they do a lot of actual work to get facts as well. We can't go dismissing sources out of hand, we have to tackle with whats presented, we're talking a
Re: (Score:2)
Congress couldn't find its own ass with all 1070 hands plus help from volunteers.
Re: (Score:2)
The control mechanisms are communist. Just not the benefits.
Re: (Score:2)
The mystery to me though is why anyone pays attention to news from any form of social media. I'll stick with professional journalism.
TikTok collect l
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese Communist Party's "deep state" ...
The Chinese DS has goals and interests very different from the American DS, so it's a good way to diversify your news sources.
Re: (Score:2)
The Chinese Communist Party likes to exert a veneer of strong centralized control, but it really doesn't exist. Most of the power is with regional parties and their bosses. As long as they don't make waves that disturb the central party, they can get away with a lot of crimes. But screw up, and those bosses end up executed. China is just too damn large to be controlled centrally.
Re:people (Score:5, Funny)
Ever feel like you are surrounded by idiots?
What, here on Slashdot??!?
Re: (Score:2)
Who? Exactly.
Romney has said many stupid things. Do you agree with everything he's said or did you cherry pick one stupid thing that fit your agenda?
Exactly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Idiot drools the usual stupid "ok, boomer" line at someone younger than him, but is smart enough to do it anonymously to avoid further embarrassment.
If you had something worth saying you would have.