Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI News

Perplexity AI Will Share Revenue With Publishers After Plagiarism Accusations (cnbc.com) 11

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: Perplexity AI on Tuesday debuted a revenue-sharing model for publishers after more than a month of plagiarism accusations. Media outlets and content platforms including Fortune, Time, Entrepreneur, The Texas Tribune, Der Spiegel and WordPress.com are the first to join the company's "Publishers Program." The announcement follows an onslaught of controversy in June, when Forbes said it found a plagiarized version of its paywalled original reporting within Perplexity AI's Pages tool, with no reference to the media outlet besides a small "F" logo at the bottom of the page. Weeks later, Wired said it also found evidence of Perplexity plagiarizing Wired stories, and reported that an IP address "almost certainly linked to Perplexity and not listed in its public IP range" visited its parent company's websites more than 800 times in a three-month span.

Under the new partner program, any time a user asks a question and Perplexity generates advertising revenue from citing one of the publisher's articles in its answer, Perplexity will share a flat percentage of that revenue. That percentage counts on a per-article basis, Dmitry Shevelenko, Perplexity's chief business officer, told CNBC in an interview -- meaning that if three articles from one publisher were used in one answer, the partner would receive "triple the revenue share." Shevelenko confirmed that the flat rate is a double-digit percentage but declined to provide specifics. Shevelenko told CNBC that more than a dozen publishers, including "major newspaper dailies and companies that own them," had reached out with interest less than two hours after the program debuted. The company's goal, he said, is to have 30 publishers enrolled by the end of the year, and Perplexity is looking to partner with some of the publishers' ad sales teams so they can sell ads "against all Perplexity inventory."

"When Perplexity earns revenue from an interaction where a publisher's content is referenced, that publisher will also earn a share," Perplexity wrote in a blog post, adding that the company will offer publishers API credits and also work with ScalePost.ai to provide analytics to provide "deeper insights into how Perplexity cites their content." Shevelenko told CNBC that Perplexity began engaging with publishers in January and solidified ideas for how its revenue-sharing program would work later in the first quarter of 2024. He said five Perplexity employees were dedicated to working on the program. "Some of it grew out of conversations we were having with publishers about integrating Perplexity APIs and technology into their products," Shevelenko said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Perplexity AI Will Share Revenue With Publishers After Plagiarism Accusations

Comments Filter:
  • Paying out copious amounts of cash for deliberately breaking copyright and probably a similar amount for data theft. The stuff scraped to train the AI almost certainly has tangible value in and of itself.
  • by ebunga ( 95613 ) on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @06:30PM (#64668324)

    If a publisher opts out they must delete that publishers data. And also, since money is now on the line, seems like it should strictly be an opt-in situation for future training material, right?

  • by ewhac ( 5844 ) on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @06:39PM (#64668346) Homepage Journal
    ...Not authors. Not creators. Publishers. So the ones already raking off the lion's share of the revenue for creative works have "struck a deal' with a bunch of snAIke oil salesmen who will charge a toll to access those works, after reducing it all to pink slime.

    Who says there's no honor among thieves?

    • A deal with the "owners" of the "intellectual property rights".

      What is so surprising or new to you? It's been the case for many decades. The people who get most profit from the "IPR", formerly "copyright and related rights" are the lawyers that invented that fiction in the first place.

  • by Big Hairy Gorilla ( 9839972 ) on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @06:47PM (#64668372)
    What about the little people? Where half the ideas came from? 70%? 20%?

    Can I get my 0.000000012% ?
    Why not? I want to buy into the model too.
    Sounds quite a bit like "share capital".
  • The will give a revenue share, but what about if revenue is zero?

    Or if it is just much lower than what publisher expected by publishing themselves?

Avoid strange women and temporary variables.

Working...