Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

GPS Jamming Is Screwing With Norwegian Planes (wired.com) 156

An anonymous reader shares a report: From the ground, northeastern Norway might look like fjord country, peppered with neat red houses and dissected by snowmobile tours through the winter. But for pilots flying above, the region has become a danger zone for GPS jamming. The jamming in the region of Finnmark is so constant, Norwegian authorities decided last month they would no longer log when and where it happens -- accepting these disturbance signals as the new normal.

Nicolai Gerrard, senior engineer at NKOM, the country's communications authority, says his organization no longer counts the jamming incidents. "It has unfortunately developed into an unwanted normal situation that should not be there. Therefore, the [Norwegian authority in charge of the airports] are not interested in continuous updates on something that is happening all the time." Pilots meanwhile, still have to adapt, usually when they are above 6,000 feet in the air. "We experience this almost every day," says Odd Thomassen, a captain and senior safety adviser at the Norwegian airline Wideroe. He claims jamming typically lasts between six and eight minutes at a time.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GPS Jamming Is Screwing With Norwegian Planes

Comments Filter:
  • and I can confirm that a world without GPS is survivable. In fact, you may take comfort in the fact that no GPS denies Googles the ability to track your location.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      This isn't about cell phones or your weird hangups with Google.

      • by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:22PM (#64874941)

        I was referring to planes being able to fly without GPS, not just cellphones.

        • by joe_frisch ( 1366229 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:42PM (#64874985)
          Many airports now have GPS-only approaches and there are many flight routes that require GPS navigation. Most large aircraft also have inertial nav, but that is neither required nor available on smaller aircraft, and some small aircraft (legally) have GPS as their ONLY source of navigation. Older navigation aids are being decommissioned in many areas, and navigation radios that can use those older sources are an expensive addition to an aircraft.

          GPS jamming is dangerous and spoofing even more so. I would have thought that there were international treaties on transmissions in the frequency ranges used for navigation.
          • No one can control airwaves wave. That has been a long standing fact, widely known to anyone paying attention. GPS is awesome, but it was always the height of hubris to rely on GPS for aircraft navigation without backups. I can practically guarantee you it wasn’t the engineers, but the bean counters who decided that was a good idea. There are laws, sure. But even in times of peace there are idiots and malcontents. In times of war; it renders the planes liabilities, at best.
          • Airports also have NDB's, VOR's and ILS, and these are NOT being decommissioned for the simple reason that multiple redundancies are maintained in order to ensure safe civil aviation. No one system is infallible.

            • Airports also have NDB's, VOR's and ILS, and these are NOT being decommissioned

              A quick google search shows that you're incorrect. At least in the US, the FAA is decommissioning most of the ground-based navaids, transitioning to a system where primary navigation is GPS only, with only a minimal backup network of ground-based navaids, only intended for temporary use in the event of a widespread GPS outage.

              https://www.faa.gov/ato/navigation-programs/vor-target-discontinuance-list

              https://www.southernavionics.com/blog/why-is-the-faa-decommissioning-ndbs

              https://pilotworkshop.com/tips/v

          • "legally) have GPS as their ONLY source of navigation." I would want at least one, if not two or three backup methods for navigation. Even if the law only requires me to have GPS. Shutting down older radio beacons is a very bad idea.
          • "I would have thought that there were international treaties on transmissions in the frequency ranges used for navigation." .... You must not be paying attention to any treaties between the west and Russia.... How many has America completely broken or ignored? How many has Russia? Both of those are pretty much all of them.
    • by hey! ( 33014 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:28PM (#64874955) Homepage Journal

      Sure, you can survive it, but things you take for granted go away or become impractical or expensive. I lived through the transition working on systems that introduced GPS and GIS to things like public health and municipal services, and that was a story of suddenly being able to do things you'd only have dreamed of before.

      Take something like municipal snow removal. Transmitting a snow plow's position and whether the plow is up or down allows you to create a real time map of which streets have been plowed, and which have not or need to be re-plowed. Snowplowing existed before GPS, but either a lot of streets got overlooked or you needed to pay for a lot more labor that was mostly wasted.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @02:32PM (#64875331) Homepage Journal

        It's become extremely important for timing information too. Synchronization of radio transmitters down to tens of nanoseconds, and many other uses.

      • by cusco ( 717999 )

        Even worse, electrical grids throughout the world synchronize their line frequency using GPS signals. Shut down GPS and the frequency of different sections of the grid will start wandering. I've seen a video of what happens to equipment when that happens, it can be impressive. Much if not most of the old pre-GPS equipment has been replaced with new and considerably more efficient kit.

        This does not bode well for our civilization if there's another Carrington Event.

        • "This does not bode well for our civilization WHEN there's another Carrington Event." Fixed that for you. It's not if, but when. There will be another, but who knows - this year, next? Whenever it happens, It's going to suck to be in any major city. People panic buy toilet paper... What happens when there's no mass transportation available. No cars newer than 1990ish? No cell phones. No Internet. No computers. Possibility of mass lithium battery explosions? Possibility of transformers exploding on
          • by cusco ( 717999 )

            'When' indeed. Stupid mistake, normally I'm the one correcting other people.

            I lived in Peru during the height of the Sendero Luminoso activity, being cowards they mostly just continuously attacked the electrical grid. What happens without electricity? Not bloody much. Ports shut down, refineries go offline which means there's no fuel, refrigeration stops, telecom shuts off, hospitals rarely have more than a day or two of fuel for backup generators, security systems go offline, factories close, banks sto

    • by Ksevio ( 865461 )

      Yeah I hate it when Google tracks my plane's location (side note, Google doesn't need GPS to track YOUR location).

      The issue here is planes are using GPS to navigate so if it becomes unreliable, they need to use another less efficient method. Same way if someone start spoofing VORs then planes wouldn't be able to reliably use them and would need to navigate using some other technology

      • side note, Google doesn't need GPS to track YOUR location

        Really? How do they do it?

        • by tragedy ( 27079 )

          They have a lot of ways to track your location. If you're connected through a cellular device, they can look at what cell phone tower you're connected to. If you're connected at home, they do a traceroute and get info from your ISP. They correlate this with all kinds of other information about you.
          There are, of course, ways to work around this with VPN's etc., but geolocation has become pretty sophisticated. It serves their interests to know where you are, so they collect and correlate all the information t

          • LOL. There probably are some people at Google who wish they could do that. The NSA, too.

            • by tragedy ( 27079 )

              They don't wish they could do that. They just do that. Look up "how does geolocation work" on Google. It immediately discusses multiple methods. They do include GPS, but also cell signal and wi-fi based triangulation, ip-based geolocation and data processing methods.

        • by Ksevio ( 865461 )

          Cell towers and wifi networks usually. GPS is unreliable indoors and a lot of city areas and uses more power while the cell and wifi antennas are already receiving anyways so they're basically free. It doesn't give the exact location, but it's usually accurate to a building

    • by fabioalcor ( 1663783 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:48PM (#64875009)

      a world without GPS is survivable

      Depending on your conception of "survivability", a world without electricity is survivable.

      • by garett_spencley ( 193892 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @02:34PM (#64875335) Journal

        Depending on your conception of "survivability", a world without electricity is survivable.

        My wife and I have occasionally dreamed of homesteading. We're very unlikely to actually make the plunge, but it's a nice fantasy when tech burnout sets in.

        Anyway she once asked me if I wanted a hypothetical fantasy off-grid homestead to have electricity.

        I told her that electricity leads to circuits
        Circuits lead to logic gates
        Logic gates lead to ALUs
        ALUs lead to CPUs
        CPUs lead to ethernet
        Ethernet leads to the Internet
        The Internet leads to Twitter

        IT'S A SLIPPERY SLOPE!

        Best not risk it

      • A world without electricity is survivable for the few. We're past the critical mass now, that without electricity society couldn't exist in the sheer numbers that we are. Without, we couldn't transport the amount of consumables into these mass cities that they depend on. A huge exodus of those cities would result in mass casualties as people try to find the means to live without.
    • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Friday October 18, 2024 @01:21PM (#64875121) Homepage Journal

      "In fact, you may take comfort in the fact that no GPS denies Googles the ability to track your location."

      What? No, it absolutely does not.

      If you are in range of two cell sites your location can be determined within a surprisingly small area through DTOA, which is basically GPS in reverse.

    • Good for you buddy. How difficult is it finding whale oil for your reading lamps?

    • Do you remember why Ronald Reagan ordered the military to make Navstar (now GPS) open to the public? It was because air travel was not safe do to inadequate navigation.
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Actually that's only true in that they can't track your exact location, they still purchase all the data about which cell towers your phone connects to and when so they can locate you to within a few hundred meters.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      and I can confirm that a world without GPS is survivable. In fact, you may take comfort in the fact that no GPS denies Googles the ability to track your location.

      Well over a decade ago I picked up an Apple iPod at Best Buy for interop testing. It had no internal GPS or cellular modem yet when I turned it on it knew my exact location via crowd sourced WiFi triangulation. Somehow I highly doubt availability of GPS system denies Google or anyone else the ability to stalk you.

  • by Pinky's Brain ( 1158667 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:03PM (#64874877)

    Those signals are strong and have almost certainly been triangulated by American satellites with images being taken of the source.

    If it's abandoned jammers, destroy them. If it's saboteurs, catch them. If it's Russians in international waters, fire an anti-radar missle.

    • If it's Russians in international waters, fire an anti-radar missle.

      and start WW3.

      • by Fly Swatter ( 30498 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:46PM (#64874991) Homepage
        No one wants it, but many of us are getting tired of this passive aggressive shit.
      • You're right. If someone is transmitting a jamming signal from international waters, what you want is a nice deniable EMP torpedo that surfaces, fries anything connected to a transmit antenna and then drops back out of sight.
      • by Local ID10T ( 790134 ) <ID10T.L.USER@gmail.com> on Friday October 18, 2024 @01:48PM (#64875193) Homepage

        Sometimes you have to punch a bully in the nose.

        Maybe they come back tomorrow with a gun and kill you. Usually they just back down after you stand up to them, but it is always a risk.

        The question is what kind of a person are you? The kind that takes bullying as their due? Or the kind that stands up to the bully?

        • by hey! ( 33014 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @02:47PM (#64875385) Homepage Journal

          I agree punching the bully on the nose is somewhere on the flow chart, but that's not necessarily the automatically best first move for every situation even though it always feels that way. It's error-prone to reason from analogy to an emotion-charged memory from your middle-school days. Cold sober game theory type reasoning is really more appropriate in international relations where the price of escalation is measured in lives.

          But looking at maps of the interference, it appears likely this is a land-based jamming originating on Russian territory. Sure, launching missiles or raids on the jamming sites is something to be considered, but before we get there there's a range of options for response, e.g. launching tit-for-tat electronic warfare attacks from Norwegian and Finnish territory.

          • Certainly. The world of international politics is more complex than middle-school recess.

            Some things are handled openly, with brinksmanship. Some are handled diplomatically, with words. Some are handled silently, with quiet teams under cover of darkness doing things that neither side acknowledges.

        • The question is what kind of a person are you?

          The kind that's alive or the kind that's dead?

          I supposet Iran, Hamas and the Houthis are standing up to bullies. I think they would be smarter not to. But I suppose you weren't talking about us.

          "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata

          It is the rallying cry of all revolutionaries and particularly those with no hope of victory.

          But here we are talking about temporary interuptions of GPS. This is not a cause worth dying for.

          • Your assertion that capitulation or death are the only options ...is a false dichotomy.

            • Well yes, there are other options. But punching violent bully in the nose who has a gun is likely not one of them. Ukraine is the perfect example. Does anyone really think preserving the right to join NATO is worth the death and destruction Ukrainians have suffered? And neither is starting a war with a nuclear power over GPS jamming.
              • by WaffleMonster ( 969671 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @11:26PM (#64876451)

                Ukraine is the perfect example. Does anyone really think preserving the right to join NATO is worth the death and destruction Ukrainians have suffered?

                NATO was not the cause of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The triggering event was EU association agreement and their puppet in the Ukrainian government losing power. It was Ukraine wanting to join EU that set Putler off.

                At present there is no credible alternative to NATO membership. The Ukrainians are never going to agree to a peace deal and wait for Russia to regroup, rearm and repeat what they did in Chechnya. It simply isn't going to happen.

                • In particular, Ukraine refused to renew Russia's lease in Crimea. And what is the first thing Russia invaded in Ukraine? Crimea.
                  • In particular, Ukraine refused to renew Russia's lease in Crimea. And what is the first thing Russia invaded in Ukraine? Crimea.

                    Ukraine agreed to renewal thru 2042 under the Kharkiv accords circa 2010. Russia backed out at the end of March 2014 _after_ invading Crimea.

              • by tragedy ( 27079 )

                Jebus. You can't possibly believe that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was just about the right to join NATO. Russia invaded Ukraine because of imperial expansionism and an arrogant Russian belief that they essentially own all Slavs and/or Russian-speaking people.

      • by hey! ( 33014 )

        That's what submarines are for. You sneak up on the ship, fire a torpedo, and then because it's Russian ship they assume it was taken out by a careless smoker or falling debris.

      • by guygo ( 894298 )

        Too late. It started a while ago. Vladimir Putin vs The World. Have fun.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Attacking things in other countries, even "abandoned" things, is generally considered an act of war. So is blowing up military vessels in international waters.

      Legally, Russia would be within its rights to issue a proportional response, blowing up some military asset of the country that attacked it. Do we really want that?

      • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

        Develop a "drone" that circles and if it detects a GPS jammer below it, will lock on and target. Make them automatic and let the Russians know what is happening. If they then choose to jam they where warned in advance that would have consequences.

      • Attacking things in other countries, even "abandoned" things, is generally considered an act of war. So is blowing up military vessels in international waters.

        Legally, Russia would be within its rights to issue a proportional response, blowing up some military asset of the country that attacked it. Do we really want that?

        Personally I would really love to see proportional responses to acts of war already committed by the Russian state.

        Skip to 1hr at the start of Weiss's testimony.
        https://www.youtube.com/live/j... [youtube.com]

    • Those signals are strong and have almost certainly been triangulated by American satellites with images being taken of the source.

      If it's abandoned jammers, destroy them. If it's saboteurs, catch them. If it's Russians in international waters, fire an anti-radar missle.

      Look up the Norwegian county Finnmark (mentioned in the post as the area where jamming routinely occurs) on Google Maps. To the east of that county you find a region with city names with cyrillic letters. That's right, it's Russia. They do not need to place jammers in international waters or on Norwegian soil. And I feel confident in saying that neither Norway, nor the US, nor anyone else will be going into Russia to destroy those jammers.

  • by jenningsthecat ( 1525947 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:10PM (#64874907)

    The summary doesn't quote a really important part of the article, namely the part that tells us Russia is doing the jamming. To be fair though, the article itself is poorly written in that it doesn't mention this early enough in the text.

  • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:13PM (#64874915)

    Just follow the reindeer with the red nose.

    • You jest, but once you are above the clouds the stars are rather visible. Just don't mistake a starlink satellite for one and it might be doable with AI (chuckles).
      • by Megane ( 129182 )
        Does Starlink have a navigation data service? I'll bet it knows where you are better than rusty old GPS, and before long, most commercial passenger aircraft will have a terminal.
      • "You jest, but once you are above the clouds the stars are rather visible. Just don't mistake a starlink satellite for one and it might be doable with AI" People did this centuries ago with paper charts and a sextant, and did it well. But I guess we all need AI these days. :-/
  • by williamyf ( 227051 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:48PM (#64875001)

    One just puts GPS + GALILEO + SBPNTP (when available) + IRNSS , and, if you are not averse to Russia and China, GLONASS and BEIDU and do a majority rule. This will get rid of the SPOOFING part, as spoofing every single SNS in existance to signal exactly the same position is EXTREMELY HARD.

    Fixing the JAMMING part is harder, and relies on the method above + innertial guideance (in the case of planes and missiles) + Ground based location beacons (Like Loran in the USoA).

    While JAMMING every single SNS system in existance is relatively easy, it also denies YOU of SNS capabilities, and, on top of that, if you KNOW that the adversary is also using innertial and Land based backups, makes it a pointless excersice...

    Alas, the nowegians (along with the French) shut down their "Eurofix" transmitters on Dec 31, 2015, forcing their remaining partners (the UK and Germany) to shut down as well. I guess they are thinking about reviving the partnership now...

    Having said that, retrofitting the enhanced receivers everywhere, including all the validation and certification of whorthiness for purpose (for example FAA + EASA + CAAC + others approval in the case of planes) is devilishly complex and hard.

    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:59PM (#64875067)

      This has become a norm since Russians were banned from EU airspace and EU countries banned from Russian in retaliation. They just randomly jam GPS near border intermittently. Ground based beacons are devilishly expensive to maintain in low population regions, since there's very little road infrastructure in place. And since Russians don't really need GPS near border since they're banned from flying over it, they seem to just randomly fire up the jammers on their side, jamming their side and to some extent on the other side of the border.

      This is by far the biggest problem for aviation, since aviation has become extremely reliant on GPS for so many things. But it's also quite a bother for locals living near the border.

      A lot of Asian carriers can still overfly both EU nations and Russian Federation, so bulk of air traffic going over Russia is various Asian carriers at this point, flying routes between much of Asia and Europe.

      • This has become a norm since Russians were banned from EU airspace and EU countries banned from Russian in retaliation. They just randomly jam GPS near border intermittently. Ground based beacons are devilishly expensive to maintain in low population regions, since there's very little road infrastructure in place. And since Russians don't really need GPS near border since they're banned from flying over it, they seem to just randomly fire up the jammers on their side, jamming their side and to some extent on the other side of the border.

        This is by far the biggest problem for aviation, since aviation has become extremely reliant on GPS for so many things. But it's also quite a bother for locals living near the border.

        A lot of Asian carriers can still overfly both EU nations and Russian Federation, so bulk of air traffic going over Russia is various Asian carriers at this point, flying routes between much of Asia and Europe.

        One wants to fix this sooner rather than latter, not because of the cojuntural situation between the EU and Russia, vis-a-vis Ucraine, but rather, in anticipation to a world where this things become more and more common, and we become more and more reliant on SNS. Also, this happened in the past, the most prominent case:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The UK's eLORAN system is still running. It's being used for timing rather than for location services. At work we are evaluating some new timing hardware from Microchip, but it's having issues. I just got assigned some work related to it, in fact.

      It will probably never be as good as GNSS systems, but it might be good enough to be useful.

      • The UK's eLORAN system is still running. It's being used for timing rather than for location services. At work we are evaluating some new timing hardware from Microchip, but it's having issues. I just got assigned some work related to it, in fact.

        It will probably never be as good as GNSS systems, but it might be good enough to be useful.

        Glad to hear that! no sarcasm there.

        Now, is only a matter to convince Britain's OTAN (not euro, they brexited) friends to put a few EuroFix stations all around in order to re-establish the system.

        Given what is happening in the north, it should be relatively easy.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          They might be tempted if we can get it working for timing applications, but they have Galileo and apparently think it's anti-jamming technology might be adequate.

  • by chipperdog ( 169552 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:49PM (#64875013) Homepage
    Keep the VORs and NDBs running....and LORAN for the ships.
    Can't believe the US is retiring all those, not sure what their status is in Norway...It is very short sighted to entirely rely on GPS/GNSS systems
  • by Qwertie ( 797303 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @12:58PM (#64875059) Homepage
    TFA:

    Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, jamming has dramatically increased across Europe's eastern edges, and authorities in Baltic countries openly blame Russia for overloading GPS receivers with benign signals, meaning they can no longer operate.

    It's notable that Norway doesn't border Russia except at a small strip of land near the north pole. If the map in the article represents a typical day, Norwegians are unaffected unless they are flying way up north near that border. Finland is affected dramatically more, but isn't mentioned until the second half.

    While most people are ignoring the Ukraine war, Russia--in its propaganda to its own people, anyway--treats the situation as if they're in an all-out war with the entire Free World and its "nazi" leaders ("First to Kyiv, and then to Berlin [x.com]"). The GPS jamming is just a token of that. Vandalism of subsea internet cables is another. [atlanticcouncil.org] Their increase to military spending has been enormous--$140 billion this year alone, with plans to increase it 25% again next year. They have allied with Iran and North Korea to attack Ukraine with numerous Iranian and North Korean weapons (especially Iranian Shahed drones and NK 152mm artillery), and in the past week they've taken the next step by sending thousands of North Korean troops into Ukraine and also along Ukraine's northern border.

    Ukraine has been left to fight this battle alone with a "trickle" of aid--I know that the U.S. $60 billion military aid package sounds like a lot, but that came after a 6-month period when there was no aid (because Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson was blocking it), and in purchasing-power parity (PPP) terms, Russia's $140 billion budget goes as far as $300 billion or so. On top of that, Russia is fighting mostly with Soviet weapons stockpiles, and it costs much less to send 1960s-era and 1970s-era tanks to the front line than to build new tanks. At current rates of destruction, Russia will run low on tanks in decent condition late next year, [youtube.com] but until then, Ukraine is fighting against the entire Soviet stockpile of weapons plus Russia's $300-billion PPP equivalent, 80% of their electric grid has been destroyed, and now they face North Korean troops to boot.

    I hope people will pay more attention to this war and ask their representatives to give Ukraine more weapons. The percent of people living in "electoral democracies" or better is lower than it has been in 40 years, [x.com]. If Ukraine can't hold off the Russians, the Free World will shrink even more. And can you imagine the size of the refugee crisis if Russians achieve a breakthrough and Ukrainians are forced to flee west? And seriously, listen to what the people who want to take over Ukraine have to say. Their cultural genocide rhetoric sometimes crosses the line into actual genocide. [x.com]

    • Yup, a whole 1500 North Koreans. There have been an estimated 1,000,000 killed on all sides since the latest Russia invade two and half years ago. I’m sure the mighty North Koreans will surely tip the scales. But you are right that eventually Ukraine is highly likely to have to cede more territory to its bigger greedy cousin. Most people across the world don’t like what is happening in Ukraine. Most people don’t care enough to make it their life mission to stop it. Russia has more people,
      • by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

        The North Koreans are there to learn how to storm South Korea creating their own version of meatgrinder.

        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          Yeah, really sounds like they're preparing to do that, they just blew up most of the bridges leading to the border last week. /s

    • Why not jam GPS and other navigation signals within Russia? From Finland, Norway, etc?

      Let them have a taste of the same medicine. After all GPS signals are used for alot of things - not just navigation, cos of it's accurate timing.

    • Err... What kind of map are you looking at - Mercator? Norway is awfully close to Russia. Look at a Globe instead.
  • GPSJam (Score:5, Informative)

    by laughingskeptic ( 1004414 ) on Friday October 18, 2024 @02:14PM (#64875277)
    Nice map: https://gpsjam.org/ [gpsjam.org]

    Really a map of airplanes reporting low accuracy of navigation via ADSB ... but the most common cause is GPS interference.
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Interesting that the source of the densest cluster of GPS jamming worldwide is not mentioned, Israel, while the largest area of low-intensity jamming is the US.

      • Low-intensity (green highlight) is defined as 0% to 2%. One would assume the majority in the US is at 0%. The use of green in place of nothing simply indicates that samples were performed in that geographical area. The more interesting thing to see is GPS jamming on previous dates. Turn time back to the start of the Ukraine conflict to see the contrast between before and after.
  • Best solution to this problem I can think of is giving Ukraine so many anti-radiation missiles that it would gladly tune some to GNSS frequencies.

  • > The jamming in the region of Finnmark is so constant, Norwegian authorities decided last month they would no longer log when and where it happens ..

    Is the jamming coming from Finland or elsewhere, like a military airbase? Or direct to low orbit satellite communication from mobile phones.

    > .. Norwegian authorities decided last month they would no longer log when and where it happens -- accepting these disturbance signals as the new normal.

    You mean they've been ordered not to find out.

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...