Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

Republican States' Attorneys General Sue SEC, Gensler Over Crypto 'Overreach' (foxbusiness.com) 61

Eighteen Republican state attorneys general have sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Chair Gary Gensler on Thursday, challenging the agency's authority to regulate cryptocurrency markets.

The lawsuit, led by Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman, alleges the SEC has exceeded its statutory powers by attempting to assume broad regulatory control over digital assets without congressional authorization. The complaint argues the agency's actions infringe on states' rights to develop their own cryptocurrency regulations and harm consumers by imposing ill-fitting federal securities laws on digital assets.

Speaking at a legal conference Thursday, Gensler defended the agency's approach, citing consistent court support for SEC enforcement actions in cryptocurrency cases. The regulatory landscape appears set for change following President-elect Trump's victory. Trump, who previously dismissed cryptocurrency as a "scam," has pledged to make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the planet" and remove Gensler.

Republican States' Attorneys General Sue SEC, Gensler Over Crypto 'Overreach'

Comments Filter:
  • by Pseudonymous Powers ( 4097097 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:07AM (#64947613)

    CRYPTO D00DS: This is a currency market.

    SEC: Oh? We're charged with regulating currency markets.

    CRYPTO D00DS: Not like that.

    • where I live crypto is not a currency in eyes of the law
  • Based on the previous Trump administration, I expect regulatory agencies to be broken and run by Trump loyalists who will do what they're told regardless of rules on the books.

    So .. Trump does occasionally try to suck up to crypto bros. Will he weigh in and force a particular outcome, or will the bureaucracy function because he's moved on and will ignore it?

    • Trump is now effectively a crypto bro himself, although he personally doesn't know anything about it and his kids know barely more.

      • Trump is now effectively a crypto bro himself

        You just made me shudder and throw up a little in my mouth.

        For a moment, I envisioned crypto "Trumpcoin" -- a gold medallion with his self-satisfied smirk on one -- no, both sides. Heads or heads? Sold as a collectible at its current crypto-market value.

        Yeah, I know, they exist already, bigly. [google.com]

    • by nightflameauto ( 6607976 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:45AM (#64947715)

      Based on the previous Trump administration, I expect regulatory agencies to be broken and run by Trump loyalists who will do what they're told regardless of rules on the books.

      So .. Trump does occasionally try to suck up to crypto bros. Will he weigh in and force a particular outcome, or will the bureaucracy function because he's moved on and will ignore it?

      Based on the way he's going about cabinet appointments, I assume he'll appoint Sam Bankman Fried in the newly created position of Government Crypto Oversight Tsar to take care of this whole issue.

  • by timeOday ( 582209 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:17AM (#64947639)
    I suppose this will make bitcoin shoot up, but is it really good for crypto? For it to go mainstream, people want protections against being swindled, robbed, and blackmailed. Upfront maybe they don't but letting it run wild is going to result in a steady stream of stories about people who got victimized. You can sneer at them, but doesn't it erode your confidence about putting your own, hard-earned money into crypto?
  • Mark my words (Score:5, Informative)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:19AM (#64947645)
    This is going to get out of hand. It's going to make its way into the broader economy and into your 401k and you're not going to like it when it does.

    The only inherent value in crypto is its utility in money laundering and Ponzi schemes. It is not a good payment facilitator because it requires way way way more computing power and therefore expensive electricity than a simple banking system like we have now.

    Now the risk was always that governments were going to finally crack down on crypto and the crimes there in. Without the election in America when that's basically impossible now.

    But those are crimes for a reason and the probability of a major savings and loan style crash is now the main risk. Imagine for example if the banks did what they did in 2008 with mortgaged back securities but replaced mortgages with pretend money. Unlike 2008 where the bleeding eventually stopped because there were houses you would have pretend money that is completely and genuinely worthless. There is absolutely no bottom to that crash.

    What I'm saying is fasten your seat belts it's going to be a bumpy ride. we have had just enough regulation and oversight to keep the worst from happening and all of that is about to go out the window. It's like how we don't have major problems with our ozone and everyone thinks that means we don't have to worry about it but we did a ton of stuff to fix the ozone layer...

    It's the classic problem that nobody gets a ticker tape parade for stopping a disaster.
    • Re:Mark my words (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Pseudonymous Powers ( 4097097 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:28AM (#64947677)

      "The only inherent value in crypto is its utility in money laundering and Ponzi schemes."

      That's an unfair characterization. It's also good for illicit trafficking on the dark web and ransomware.

    • Unlike 2008 where the bleeding eventually stopped because there were houses you would have pretend money that is completely and genuinely worthless

      Even the 2008 crisis could've been avoided, [pbs.org] if it hadn't been for a clash of personalities:

      early warnings of the crash, reveals an intense battle among high-ranking members of the Clinton administration, and uncovers a concerted effort not to regulate the emerging, highly complex, and lucrative derivatives markets, which would become the ticking time-bomb within the American economy.

      • than an individual one. I mean, what you're describing isn't really a clash of personalities so much as "elements in the Clinton administration wanted to do risky deregulation and other, smarter or less corrupt people didn't want to take those risks".
        • what you're describing isn't really a clash of personalities so much as "elements in the Clinton administration wanted to do risky deregulation and other, smarter or less corrupt people didn't want to take those risks".

          The summary doesn't go into details, but essentially someone with knowledge of what was coming (I don't recall her name at the moment) tried to educate the powers that be about the dangers of the derivatives market, but since Clinton didn't get along with her, she never was put in any position of power or influence for her warnings to ever even be considered.

          Note that it's been years since I watched that, so there's a possibility I'm mixing it with another documentary, but I do recall this scenario occurrin

      • A direct cause of the ARM A meltdown was the repeal of the Glass Steagall act by Bill Clinton. This was a gift to the banking industry by Bill and in my opinion was a marker of the shifting of the DNC/democratic party to what they are today. There were protections in place before this happened that would have prevented this from happening.

    • What's to worry about my 401k....I can always count on Social Security when I retire in another 25ish years right..............

      (I'm going to have to work until I'm dead aren't I).

      • I've never heard of a 401k offering crypto-currency. In some cases, a person might have indirect exposure due to a stock in an index having exposure. (i.e. you own the SP500 index and one or two companies in the index have meddled in crypto-currency.)

        If you still have 25 working years left, such a crash is a 401k opportunity as you can buy the crash and juice your returns. If you're 10 years from retirement, well, that could bite pretty hard.

    • Crypto really isn't good for the things you mentioned, it's just convenient.
    • by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:47AM (#64947721) Journal

      Yes, the administration can. Which is exactly what it is. This is no different than the SEC regulating the financial markets. If people are claiming that crypto can be used as cash, can be traded, and there is an entire industry built around it, the SEC can regulate it.

      If these AGs had a wit of intelligence about them, they would know this is how inflation happened in the early days of our country. Every state had its own currency and the value of the state currency was dependent on a multitude of issues including how far from the state you were when trying to exchange their currency.

      But apparently, due to the lack of basic education in this country, people don't know the history of our country and why things are the way they are. Considering how inept the Supreme Court when it comes to Constitutional issues, this isn't surprising.

      • But apparently, due to the lack of basic education in this country, people don't know the history of our country and why things are the way they are. Considering how inept the Supreme Court when it comes to Constitutional issues, this isn't surprising.

        The leopards are getting fat lately. https://www.bbc.com/news/artic... [bbc.com]

        People who voted for him are suddenly asking what's going to happen with their special needs child...

    • It's possible Congress can.

      An executive agency definitely may not.

      That's the whole point of the /Virginia/ case and the Major Questions Test.

      We're in an odd position now where the people who want unlimited federal executive power, in general, have to think about Trump wielding it.

      The Biden/Harris SEC has been flagrantly flouting the /Virginia/ decision, running totally amok of the Law.

      Gensler should be arrested.

  • by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @09:33AM (#64947683)
    Republicans love every form of fraud they've ever met, but they have a special jones for ones that transfer wealth from average fools to wealthy pigs.
  • by cpurdy ( 4838085 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @11:21AM (#64947975)
    I love how the entire Republican Party has been turned into an apparatus for supporting cons and scams.

    You just can't make this shit up.
    • It always was. But the mask is finally off and they don't care because checks and balances only work when politicians operate in good faith.

  • ... collecting Beanie Babies. It needs only one regulation: We don't know what it is or how its market works. Therefore, banks' crypto portfolios will be valued at exactly zero for the purpose of capital reserve calculations.

    We should have done this several decades ago with CDOs and other synthetic securities. There would have been no crash in 2008 because it would have been no different than some kid losing his bottle-cap collection.

A CONS is an object which cares. -- Bernie Greenberg.

Working...