DHS Says China, Russia, Iran, and Israel Are Spying on People in US with SS7 (404media.co) 75
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) believes that China, Russia, Iran, and Israel are the "primary" countries exploiting security holes in telecommunications networks to spy on people inside the United States, which can include tracking their physical movements and intercepting calls and texts, according to information released by Senator Ron Wyden. 404 Media: The news provides more context around use of SS7, the exploited network and protocol, against phones in the country. In May, 404 Media reported that an official inside DHS's Cybersecurity Insurance and Security Agency (CISA) broke with his department's official narrative and publicly warned about multiple SS7 attacks on U.S. persons in recent years. Now, the newly disclosed information provides more specifics on where at least some SS7 attacks are originating from.
The information is included in a letter the Department of Defense (DoD) wrote in response to queries from the office of Senator Wyden. The letter says that in September 2017 DHS personnel gave a presentation on SS7 security threats at an event open to U.S. government officials. The letter says that Wyden staff attended the event and saw the presentation. One slide identified the "primary countries reportedly using telecom assets of other nations to exploit U.S. subscribers," it continues.
The information is included in a letter the Department of Defense (DoD) wrote in response to queries from the office of Senator Wyden. The letter says that in September 2017 DHS personnel gave a presentation on SS7 security threats at an event open to U.S. government officials. The letter says that Wyden staff attended the event and saw the presentation. One slide identified the "primary countries reportedly using telecom assets of other nations to exploit U.S. subscribers," it continues.
Israel? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably using the funds we send them. https://apnews.com/article/isr... [apnews.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Iran also!
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2... [fdd.org]
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Israel? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
After Pollard, why would that surprise anyone?
Re: Israel? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The people whose job it is to secure our telecom networks would know.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Israel? (Score:4, Interesting)
You have it completely backwards. Russia, Iran and China care little about what the US public thinks of them. Israel, meanwhile, has purchased nearly every legislator, and its lobbies like AIPAC brag about how every candidate they fund wins. Israel is the US' aircraft carrier, so if the US doesn't support Israel anymore, it's doomed--and public opinion has already turnrd against it during its active genocide.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
"They stay away from crazy"
They choose candidates that will support Israel's agenda in the US, not because the candidates "aren't crazy". How is this complicated? They are backing nearly every neocon there is, and some of them are Christian fundamentalists who literally believe that Revelation ending is right around the corner.
In fact, evangelicals have been Israel's strongest contingent even though their religion believes only a few tens of thousands of Jews witll be delivered after the Rapture. Does that
Re: (Score:2)
Mossad in here downvoting you as "troll" when you're 100% factually correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah yes, Pokrovsk, which has been facing imminent Russian capture since what, July? I've been seeing breathless media reports about how it will be taken any day now for about six months. Now, sure, it may eventually happen just like with Avdiivka and Bakhmut, but I'm not sure how anyone can call such a slow advance with so many Russian casualties a "victory" for Russia. They are gaining back a tiny fraction of the area of land that they actually occupied back in 2022. They are also expending a huge number of
Re: (Score:2)
Trump does not have any power to "give" parts of Ukraine to Putin. They are their own country. It should be quite obvious that any flattery or acquiescence that Zelensky applies to Trump is just to try to placate him. Trump has no viable plan for Ukraine. He's just been lying about that. Zelensky will not select surrender to Russia and Russia has quite clearly stated that they will only accept surrender by Ukraine to even start talks. These are intractable positions. Even if the US drops support for Ukraine
Re: (Score:2)
They have enough to keep going for about a year at most. German financial support is not guaranteed to continue at anywhere near the same level. Starmer has already said that the UK cannot meet its previous promises because they can't afford it, and France is in a political/economic bind as well.
As for progress along the front, everything slows down now until the end of winter (say March 2025) and then for at least another 2 months during rasputitsa.
A year is another year. Turning the three-day "special operation" into a four-year very much a war. In the meantime, Russia is still burning the candle at both ends. We will see how long they can keep it up. We will also see how many "volunteers" they get as they run out of prisoners with death wishes and as people living in the poorest parts of Russia start to hear stories from their neighbors about their sons who went off to Ukraine and just "vanished" officially, so no death payment. I mean, as it is, y
Re: (Score:2)
So just stating that it has cost Russia many troops to advance of Pokrovsk has no basis.
I mean, there are quite a few verified dead independently. Then there's the obvious growth of Russian military graveyards in satellite photos. So I would not exactly say that there's no basis.
As for territory that Ukraine will not get back, why do you think that? Ukraine is building a war machine. Currently Russia is pounding their infrastructure and that curtails that. Why do you think Russia is so desperate to ensure Ukrainian neutrality if there's a ceasefire or truce? Because they know if Ukraine is lef
Re: (Score:2)
How do you think they trick us into supporting their holy war & land thievery?
Re:Israel? (Score:4, Informative)
They're mostly dead due to the IDF applying the Hannibal Directive to kill not only captured soldiers, but their own captured hostatges. What a joke, a "country" that postures about the safety of its hostages in enemy hands, while bombing the shit out of their captors and actively starving them. You are completely untethered from reality. And what about the over ten thousand Palestinian prisoners held without charge in military detention, even children? Find hell.
Re: (Score:1)
you're funny. Netanyahu himself bragged about helping to found Hama, and giving them money right up to Oct 7, to keep Palestinian politics in disarray. That 5D chess worked out really well, didn't it?
For decades Israel has been committing human rights abuses such that they have more resolutions from UN condemning it over the years than all other countries combined. What an evil nation, founded on religion nonsense and genocide.
Re: (Score:1)
In that case the war will last forever.
Re: (Score:3)
If you look at the State Department people who resigned, almost to one they talked about the lies which came from Israel about October 7th, and the
Re: (Score:3)
Why is it surprising? Israel is not the best ally, they did steal nuclear secrets from us too.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Why not? (Score:1)
SS7? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm guessing this is SS7? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re:SS7? (Score:5, Informative)
Yep. These "revelations" about SS7 vulnerabilities should be no surprise. This has less to do about deliberately engineered backdoors and more about longstanding vulnerabilities associated with maintaining backwards compatibility with legacy standards.
It's like forcing HTTPS traffic to be downgraded to HTTP when going over certain network paths for compatibility reasons (well, except for the fact that the phone carriers aren't even using encryption...). My understanding is that everybody's unencrypted phone traffic is subject to spoofing, interception, tracking, etc. because the carriers registered in the global network are assumed to be trusted by default.
https://github.com/simplerhack... [github.com]
"Lack of Authentication and Sec SS7 trusts all network nodes implicitly, assuming they are legitimate. This trust model is problematic in interconnected networks where access is not tightly controlled.
Insufficient Encryption Messages in SS7 are typically transmitted in plaintext within the network, exposing sensitive information to interception.
Global Accessibility (Belgium example) With the proliferation of inter-carrier connections and the advent of IP-based signaling (SIGTRAN), access to SS7 networks has become more widespread, increasing the attack surface."
https://www.theregister.com/20... [theregister.com]
"At issue are the Signaling System Number 7 (SS7) and Diameter protocols, which are used by fixed and mobile network operators to enable interconnection between networks. They are part of the glue that holds today's telecommunications together.
According to the US watchdog and some lawmakers, both protocols include security weaknesses that leave folks vulnerable to unwanted snooping. SS7's problems have been known about for years and years, as far back as at least 2008, and we wrote about them in 2010 and 2014, for instance. Little has been done to address these exploitable shortcomings.
SS7, which was developed in the mid-1970s, can be potentially abused to track people's phones' locations; redirect calls and text messages so that info can be intercepted; and spy on users.
The Diameter protocol was developed in the late-1990s and includes support for network access and IP mobility in local and roaming calls and messages. It does not, however, encrypt originating IP addresses during transport, which makes it easier for miscreants to carry out network spoofing attacks."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
because the carriers registered in the global network are assumed to be trusted by default.
Yes.. It's something like how internet IP address routing works with BGP. You have to be a carrier network to get a BGP feed, but once you are Tier1 provider such as ATT: everyone has to accept the routes you advertise into the table giving your peer the technical power hijack any IP address you want and route it to your network. What stops the bad guys in theory is only authorized personnel at the trusted
Re: (Score:2)
If you're interested in some cool stories about this and older vulnerabilities/exploits, this is a fun book from the OG, Captain Crunch:
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Beyond_The_Little_Blue_Box/IWNmDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
I highly recommend it, those were different times and people don't know how bad the technology was before SS7...
Re: (Score:3)
There was a recent video from Veritasium on this topic that describes all of the problems in a simple and accessible way.
https://youtu.be/wVyu7NB7W6Y [youtu.be]
SS7 was designed in the 70's (Score:5, Informative)
What do you expect?
The engineers in the 70's has no concept of attack surfaces and the fact that it became so easy for malicious outfits to connect to an SS7 network. When SS7 was designed, the Bell System kept it close to their chest and only allowed themselves and recognized independent phone companies to interconnect using it.
Nowadays, just about any fly-by-night phone company can gain access to the SS7 data network.
We need to move away from these antique protocols.
Re: (Score:2)
Nowadays, just about any fly-by-night phone company can gain access to the SS7 data network.
I mean it's likely worse than that.. For about $1000 a month people are able subscribe to ISDN PRI lines which are SS7 signalled over the D-Channel. Before Voice over IP started becoming popular.. just about every sizable business would have ISDN connections to the phone company to handle all their phone lines and feed their PBX. And a PRI would be most efficient any place that needed more than 20 external ph
Re: (Score:2)
Not even kidding, we were posting here about SS7 in the 90's on the ECHELON articles.
At first we wanted to replace it with something secure but then we realized the IC wanted it insecure for illegal domestic spying.
Many crypto wallets were stolen via SS7 hijacking.
IIRC only Pixel 6+ doesn't allow raw memory access over the SS7 modem interface.
This isn't lazy, it's enemy action.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the SS7 network was designed to be a trusted network
Baron Yam reports: (Score:2)
DHS has missed several dozen other countries spying on Americans of importance to them.
Old news (Score:1)
Really? I could swear I heard that some yrs. ago (Score:2)
Ohh .. time travel seems to exist!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
in other news... (Score:2)