Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
China United States

China Halts Rare Earth Exports Globally (fortune.com) 285

Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares the news that China has halted all rare earth exports globally -- including to the U.S., Japan, and Germany. Fortune reports: After Trump unveiled his "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2, China retaliated on April 4 with its own duties as well as export controls on several rare earth minerals and magnets made from them. So far, those export controls have translated to a halt across the board, cutting off the U.S. and other countries, according to the New York Times. That's because any exports of the minerals and magnets now require special licenses, but Beijing has yet to fully establish a system for issuing them, the report said.

In the meantime, shipments of rare earths have been halted at many ports, with customs officials blocking exports to any country, including to the U.S. as well as Japan and Germany, sources told theÂTimes. China's Ministry of Commerce issued export restrictions alongside the General Administration of Customs, prohibiting Chinese businesses from any engagement with U.S. firms, especially defense contractors. While the Trump administration unveiled tariff exemptions on a range of key tech imports late Friday night, China's magnet exports were still halted through the weekend, industry sources told the Times. Beijing's export halt is notable because China has a stranglehold on global supplies of rare earths and magnets derived from them. They also represent an asymmetric advantage in that rare earths constitute a small share of China's exports but have an outsize impact on trade partners like the U.S., which relies on them as critical inputs for the auto, chip, aerospace, and defense industries.

China Halts Rare Earth Exports Globally

Comments Filter:
  • FAFO (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:03AM (#65306887)

    Well done Donnie.

    • Re: FAFO (Score:5, Funny)

      by rkit ( 538398 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:05AM (#65306889) Homepage
      Trump around, find out
    • by v1 ( 525388 )

      so much winning! art of the deal!

    • by drnb ( 2434720 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @01:25PM (#65307981)

      Well done Donnie.

      Don't be too quick in your expected outcome. For example China largely has control through predatory pricing. For example a rare earth mining operation in California shut down due to China offering rare earths below their costs. With no rare earth exports from China, mining in California will now be profitable. This may also be the case in many other areas.

      Control via predatory pricing requires that you keep shipping products, stop shipping and that control is lost.

      We've seen such behavior before, with oil for example. Increase the price and various exploration and acquisition operations becomes viable. Ex offshore oil drilling becoming a viable option with higher prices.

  • by greytree ( 7124971 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:23AM (#65306907)
    "Beijing's export halt is notable because China has a stranglehold on global supplies of rare earths [...]"

    Is this still correct ?
    I thought we knew years ago that China was trying to shut us out of rare earths and would use them to blackmail us and we were preparing replacement sources?
    What happened?
    • Re:"Stranglehold" ? (Score:4, Informative)

      by greytree ( 7124971 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:26AM (#65306911)
      2013:

      "Rare-earth mineral substitutes could defeat Chinese stranglehold"

      https://archive.ph/61ILW
      • I think the word here is could. Mining those minerals is not without environment risks and the Chinese are cheaper, if only because they mined them first. I don't think we wanted to defeat the Chinese stranglehold that much.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward

          That's why Trump wants to invade or force Greenland to be a part of USA so that Trump and friends can strip mine the whole island without caring about the environment and the people that live there

          • Apart from the immorality and violations of International Law of annexing the territory of a sovereign state, I imagine actually extracting rare earths in Greenland is going to cost a helluva lot more than the price China can extract and sell rare earths for. The plan seems like the delusional rantings of a narcissist suffering mid-stage dementia....

            Hmmm....

        • Re:"Stranglehold" ? (Score:5, Interesting)

          by HiThere ( 15173 ) <(ten.knilhtrae) (ta) (nsxihselrahc)> on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @10:05AM (#65307371)

          They didn't mine them first. They're cheaper because taking over that business was an economic decision made by the government...and stably adhered to.

          "Rare Earths" aren't rare, but they're hard to separate. I suspect that China is planning to convert it's "rare earth" production into "more valuable product" production, and sell those products at a markup...and possibly only to friends. But the cost of that supply chain will keep everyone without strong government support out, as China could flood the market at low prices if it chose to.

          • Re:"Stranglehold" ? (Score:5, Informative)

            by RockDoctor ( 15477 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @11:39AM (#65307641) Journal

            I suspect that China is planning to convert it's "rare earth" production into "more valuable product" production, and sell those products at a markup...and possibly only to friends.

            This has been their published policy for ... more years than I can remember. (As a geologist, I probably pay more attention to mined goods than most people.)

            Why sell REEs (at whatever level of refinement) at $10,000/tonne profit, when you can sell products using those REEs at $100,000/tonne profit?

            As for substitutes ... you need the right number of protons in the nucleus, to generate the right electron energy levels to have magnetically active electrons at one energy band, while other electrons are at bonding energy levels. That means substitution by transmutation. You can do it - that's how you got plutonium for your nuclear weapons. But it's not going to be either cheap, or environmentally friendly.

    • 2007:

      "The US now imports over 90 per cent of its so-called &ldquo;rare earth&rdquo; metals from China, according to the US Geological Survey. If China decided to cut off the supply, that would create a big risk of conflict, says Reller. Reller and Graedel say urgent action is required."

      https://archive.ph/Q4m9g
    • Re:"Stranglehold" ? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by phantomfive ( 622387 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:45AM (#65306945) Journal
      This article gives an overview of the issues [eastasiaforum.org].

      Companies with ambitions to develop new mines are thus trapped between a price that makes project returns unattractive for potential lenders and customers that are happy to retain the status quo...Instead of developing a true supply chain-based strategy, the bulk of Western lending seeks to expand supply in an already depressed market.

      Perhaps the real answer is that China put a lot more effort into maintaining their monopoly than the other side did in trying to break it. They tried, but somewhat lazily.

      ... led to the bankruptcy of Molycorp, whose Mountain Pass mine in the United States would later be bought by MP Materials and funded through a series of agreements that gave Chinese company Shenghe control of its output.

      • Perhaps the real answer is that China put a lot more effort into maintaining their monopoly than the other side did in trying to break it. They tried, but somewhat lazily.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org].

        Sodium ion batteries were being developed at the same time as Lithium batteries, and Lithium won out. Doesn't mean sodium ion batteries don't work.

        And we've all been talking about China's rare earth issues for a long time now. One might be tempted to call their investment advisor to put a bit of money into companies making Sodium ion batteries.

    • by e3m4n ( 947977 )

      Complacency

    • Re:"Stranglehold" ? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:41AM (#65307041) Homepage Journal

      The issue is that rare earth elements are typically acquired as part of some other large mining operation. If you want the produce them affordably you need to be able to compile extracting them with something else. Everyone was hoping that they could just keep getting them cheap from China, instead of at much greater cost from elsewhere.

      • The issue is that rare earth elements are typically acquired as part of some other large mining operation. If you want the produce them affordably you need to be able to compile extracting them with something else. Everyone was hoping that they could just keep getting them cheap from China, instead of at much greater cost from elsewhere.

        Which is why I'm betting on Sodium-ion batteries.

        Meanwhile, a whole lot of smartphone addicts are probably freaking out.

    • You’re calling this blackmail? It’s simply reciprocal. Shit in the pool of your trading partners and then act surprised when they get upset.

    • Whoever owns the last US mine of REEs (a site in Nevada or California border, IIRC ; in granite mountains, somewhere along the Rockies) has done considerable work on repairing the access roads, repairing the tunnels to the mining face, repairing the ventilation systems ... a lot of work "on the ground".

      Permissions for "breaking ground" on a processing facility to turn un-crushed rock into usable product are still waiting on an acceptable pollution control plan.

      The main reason that China reached a (near) m

  • Look at that. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:23AM (#65306909) Journal
    I can't believe that senile belligerence only makes everything feel like a position of strength. Crazy stuff.
    • To be fair, I'm running out of northern hemisphere countries left to boycott.

      In an act of war, the poutine-eating philistines to the north just banned Vegemite.

      https://www.smh.com.au/politic... [smh.com.au]

      • by ukoda ( 537183 )
        Well that is bad but it's no Marmageddon https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/... [nzherald.co.nz]
      • by Barny ( 103770 )

        Those bloody cunts. Let's send them Rupert Murdoch as punishment! After all, it worked on the Yanks.

      • To be fair, I'm running out of northern hemisphere countries left to boycott.

        In an act of war, the poutine-eating philistines to the north just banned Vegemite.

        https://www.smh.com.au/politic... [smh.com.au]

        Utterly bizzarre. "Added B vitamins" is a bad thing? Was there a rationale? A lot of people benefit quite a lot from them, including people who for one reason or another don't process them correctly. And they are in enriched flour(enriched with B vitamins because processing removes the vitamins) , energy drinks and other foods.

        So it appears the Canadian Politicians are as nutty as our own.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The worst part is that the rest of the world has to suffer along with America. Not just the economic damage, or the new permits to export this stuff, but the inflation too. Sony has said that the PS5 will increase in price, both for the US and for Europe. We are being made to absorb some of the Trump tariffs, even though we don't have to pay them.

    • In his defense, to the narcissist, as long as people react like you're a big powerful man with a mandate then, in your mind, that's what you are.
  • Long time (Score:5, Informative)

    by phantomfive ( 622387 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:26AM (#65306913) Journal
    They've been talking about doing this for a long time. Deng Xiaoping in 1992 said, "the Middle East has oil, China dominates rare earths" [jstor.org]. We talked about it on Slashdot decades ago [slashdot.org] (a fraction of a decade is enough to turn the noun plural).

    The Graph at the beginning of this article [theoregongroup.com] gives a good picture of rare earth mineral production around the world, including the impressive overproduction in recent years.

    The problem is more than just mining the minerals (which the US does), it's also producing them into in usable magnet form [federalregister.gov], which is combining neodymium mostly with iron. With initiatives already underway, the US is expected to be able to reach 50% of its own magnet production by 2026.
  • And there it is (Score:4, Interesting)

    by quonset ( 4839537 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:32AM (#65306923)

    I was waiting for something like this to happen. I give it until next week when the orange goon will "graciously" roll back more tariffs and give more exemptions.

    The world needs these exotic components to keep running at this point in history. Any long-term disruption will have a far reaching effect on a wide range of industries.

    This is what happens when you make things up as you go along because you have no idea what you're doing.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Dan East ( 318230 )

      I was waiting for something like this to happen. I give it until next week

      In the meantime the goal was achieved - Americans are talking about this issue (like here on Slashdot), politicians have been woken up to it again, and production in the USA can begin ramping back up.

      • Re:And there it is (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Ly4 ( 2353328 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:29AM (#65307113)

        The goal was/is to make money via insider trading.

      • In the meantime the goal was achieved - Americans are talking about this issue

        Americans have never stopped talking about manufacturing in America, so that's bullshit.

        Americans are also now talking about trade imbalances without understanding what they mean, just like you, was that the goal?

        and production in the USA can begin ramping back up.

        The reason it left was because wealthy people in charge decided it should leave. No amount of average Americans talking about it moves the needle in any direction because the wealthy don't give two shits about what we think. In fact, they give not even one shit.

        • Also this is just sortoff a fantasy playground for Americans, very telling in this poll that 80% of Americans say "America would be better off if more American's worked in manufacturing, however only 23% of those same Americans say they "would be better off if I worked in a factory" so everyone else should be turning the screws, but "not me, I like my high paying service job, that's for other folks"

          Nostalgia for manufacturing will make the US poorer [ft.com]

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Production in the US won't ramp up to anything like the needed levels to prevent massive cost increases and shortages, and even that will take years.

        The way to do this is ramp up your supply first, not screw every industry that relies on it and hope they survive somehow.

        • Moreover, China is probably ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to the technologies of rare earth extraction. Production elsewhere will be far more expensive.

    • Re:And there it is (Score:4, Interesting)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:46AM (#65307051) Homepage Journal

      Will China reverse these new export controls though? Even if Trump walks back, they may not do so themselves until the full 125% tariff is removed, or maybe not at all to prevent the US from getting into a better position and trying the same shit again.

    • by ukoda ( 537183 )
      Looking back at when trump and Zelensky had that meeting about the USA getting rare earth materials from Ukraine it would appear that maybe Zelensky did actually have some cards and trumps little temper tantrum has come back to bite him in his fat butt.
    • Re:And there it is (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mjwx ( 966435 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:29AM (#65307115)

      I was waiting for something like this to happen. I give it until next week when the orange goon will "graciously" roll back more tariffs and give more exemptions.

      The world needs these exotic components to keep running at this point in history. Any long-term disruption will have a far reaching effect on a wide range of industries.

      This is what happens when you make things up as you go along because you have no idea what you're doing.

      The problem is, the damage is done. The US is no longer a trusted trade partner, let alone a top level trusted one. Countries the world over are looking to other nations for trade.

      For years China's growing influence in the Asia Pacific region has been a concern... so what did Trump do... Put tariffs on everyone which sent APAC nations straight into Chinas waiting arms... Well fucking done, the issue is now worse.

    • I was waiting for something like this to happen. I give it until next week when the orange goon will "graciously" roll back more tariffs and give more exemptions.

      The world needs these exotic components to keep running at this point in history. Any long-term disruption will have a far reaching effect on a wide range of industries.

      This is what happens when you make things up as you go along because you have no idea what you're doing.

      While I don't disagree with the stupid tariffs, don't be in panic mode. There are alternatives to Lithium-ion batteries. Sodium-ion is waiting in the wings, safer, doesn't use exotic elements. It doesn't have quite the same energy density, But everything won't fall apart if Pooh Bear and Cheeto are having trouble being nice.

  • by shilly ( 142940 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:39AM (#65306937)

    Misha Glenny just did an excellent series covering rare earths. Link here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/s... [bbc.co.uk]

    This is pretty bad news. However, Beijing's strategy seems unclear to me. They wanted to paint themselves in contradiction to the US, as a reliable trading partner for other countries. This really doesn't help their case. Trump has really made life shittier for everyone now. I guess there's going to be a scramble to use induction motors in EVs in the coming months and years.

    • by Malenfrant ( 781088 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:47AM (#65306949)

      As per the article, they are setting up a licensing system before resuming exports. I would guess that this licensing system will be intended to prevent them being sold on to the USA, with any instances of this being grounds for license revocation. I would not expect this to take very long to set up, but perhaps a slight delay is intended to focus minds and dissuade other Countries from allowing them to be sold on to the USA.

      • by shilly ( 142940 )

        That seems plausible. But will still emphasise that they are not a trading partner in whom Western countries can fully trust. In the UK, that's been emphasised pretty sharply in recent days with British Steel.

      • Yeah but that's still not reliable. Reliable would have been announcing that, giving warning, implementation time then finally implementing it. Might not take long, but it's just reminded everyone very firmly that China too has control of crucial things and both can and will cut them off with no warning if they feel it's OK. We all kinda knew that, but assuming it wasn't the case was a good working assumption. Now it is not.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          Probably done this way to prevent hoarding before the licence comes in. A lot of companies tried to beat the tariffs by importing big stockpiles before they hit.

          At this point Beijing is so far ahead of the US in terms of stability, they can afford to cash in a little bit of that reputation.

    • by gtall ( 79522 )

      "contradiction" you mean "contradistinction". There is no contraction to what China is doing except with promoting itself as free trader.

    • This is pretty bad news. However, Beijing's strategy seems unclear to me.

      They're reaching for anything they can use as leverage. Maybe they'll remove the export controls next week.

      Or maybe it's only Trump who is that capricious.

    • by DrXym ( 126579 )

      Most likely they're halting to put in legal barriers to stop exported materials ending up in the US. I'm sure if dementia Don chickened out (again) that suddenly the need for restrictions would also stop.

    • Misha Glenny just did an excellent series covering rare earths. Link here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/s... [bbc.co.uk]

      This is pretty bad news. However, Beijing's strategy seems unclear to me. They wanted to paint themselves in contradiction to the US, as a reliable trading partner for other countries. This really doesn't help their case. Trump has really made life shittier for everyone now. I guess there's going to be a scramble to use induction motors in EVs in the coming months and years.

      I'll have a listen, don't have time at the moment. But much of the hand-wringing over this seems to be non-technicals who believe there is no other source of portable energy. We either have Li ion batteries, or the world goes back to the stone ages.

  • So far, those export controls have translated to a halt across the board, cutting off the U.S. and other countries, according to the New York Times. That's because any exports of the minerals and magnets now require special licenses, but Beijing has yet to fully establish a system for issuing them, the report said.

    I'm guessing the delay to "establish a system" is deliberate to remind the world of their advantage. China is not subtle in its threats to other countries that criticize it for any reason.

    • by MeNeXT ( 200840 )

      That is one way of looking at it. The other is, it just reminded the world you can't depend on China. The world is relearning a lesson they should have learned in elementary school.

      I am starting to believe that the human race can't be educated.

      I wonder if the republicans realize that all the power that they give to the current administration will be passed onto the next which they may not control.

  • by rossdee ( 243626 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:23AM (#65306997)

    were what the Donald wanted to buy Greenland for.

    Then He also wants to get some from Ukraine...

  • So how many people are those new American factories employing?
  • No, they don't (Score:5, Insightful)

    by usedtobestine ( 7476084 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:25AM (#65307005)

    "Beijing's export halt is notable because China has a stranglehold on global supplies of rare earths and magnets derived from them."

    No, the only have a lock on very-low priced and mines with zero polution controls and safety systems.

  • Undercut (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Dan East ( 318230 )

    This is just one of the global tactics companies like China have done to undercut the USA and drive production out of our country. As a capitalistic economy, things that are not profitable to produce in the USA cause production to go out of business due to competition. China flooded the globe with cheap rare-earths, and mining in the USA ceased.

    The same thing happened with oil several years ago, when fracking in the USA resulted in huge numbers of small companies springing up and making money off oil again.

    • It's not China's fault that American companies and people are locked into finding the cheapest resources and prices in general, then cease to function if that isn't available. That's the weakness of capitalism. Now that consumers and companies are addicted to the lowest prices, there is no way to go back.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by DarkOx ( 621550 )

      Exactly, security demands we produce these things domestically. Reality says we will never be able to do it as cheaply as others are able.

      The case here isn't economics it is security. The problem is economics and the only answers are some kind of protectionist strategy. Everyone knows advanced microcomputer technology and communications equipment are necessary parts of the national security picture. It is at least widely suspected that rare earths are needed to make electrification of transportation worka

      • Anyone can disagree with Trump's approach, complaints are easy coming up with real alternatives is hard.

        CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act.

        The former was a targeted bill around a specific sector with the goal to get domestic production online, and it worked/is working.

        The latter put aside hundreds of millions for rare earth production facilities in the US, a lot built around magnetics for motors including a grant for rare-earth-free magnet production. We can't say these aren't alternatives simply because Republicans refuse to do this type of legislation because of their ideology. Were those bills perfect? Fa

  • by DrXym ( 126579 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:38AM (#65307033)

    ... grown men with tears in their eyes will salute and thank him for wiping trillions from the market, annihilating their 401Ks and sending the US economy into something worse than a recession.

  • by MacMann ( 7518492 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @07:42AM (#65307045)

    The USA used to produce all manner of rare earth metals until there were laws limiting the sale and disposal of thorium. Ore in the USA that is rich in rare earth metals tends to be also rich in thorium. This wasn't a big problem some time ago as thorium had a number of uses. Thorium glows a bright white when heated so it was used in gas lantern mantles, and filaments for light bulbs. Thorium apparently helps in making good lenses. There's steel alloys with thorium that are useful for welding and corrosion resistance. There's probably more but that list should get the point across.

    The sale of thorium was then restricted when there was concern over the radioactivity. This is quite silly for a number of reasons. Laws on disposal of "radioactive materials" meant the mining tails containing "too much" thorium had to be hauled off to a radioactive waste disposal site, at considerable expense. With few places to sell the thorium, and it costing money to bury it in one hole versus another, that made all kinds of mines unable to make money selling rare earth metals.

    We can get these mines open again fairly quickly with a few changes to laws that never made sense in the first place.

    A bonus on having thorium rich mining tails is that is a source of fuel should we decide thorium fission reactors are a good idea. It is a good idea but that has get to the powers that be in Congress, DOE, EPA, White House, a few state capitols, and a few other places I'm likely missing.

    The USA is not lacking in rare earth metals. The issues is a matter of silly laws making mining of these metals unprofitable. Being unable to get the metals from China is not likely enough to change the costs enough to make it profitable. It likely just means we import from Australia, Brazil, India, or something. We need the laws changed. I suspect it might happen now, but there's going to be resistance on this from a number of places and it might be enough to keep it from happening, at least until things get far worse for us.

  • by necro81 ( 917438 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:24AM (#65307107) Journal
    From what I can tell, the rare earths affected [reuters.com] are samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Those are important ingredients for a bunch of technologies, so there will definitely be effects. But I don't see neodymium on that list, indicating that NdFeB magnets aren't on the chopping block...yet.
  • The US is poised to completely topple our corrupt and fragile economy that's already seeing population collapse damage and stock collapse and real estate collapse. What should we do?

    I HAVE AN IDEA! Let's piss off the entire world simultaneously so nobody is on our side. That should work, right?
  • Just a reminder (Score:4, Insightful)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:59AM (#65307181)
    Congress can stop this today. They can take away Trump's tariff powers the simple resolution that he can't veto because it's not a law it's a resolution. The Senate could do it immediately but they pussied out and resolution they passed requires the house to also pass a resolution even though the Constitution gives them authority in matters of international affairs similar to how the house controls the purse strings.

    Still if a handful of Republicans in the house are forced to stop Trump then all this bullshit stops in the economy will at least stabilize enough that we might make it to the midterms.

    Of course there's still a looming threat of Elon musk's money. He has threatened to challenge Republicans in the primary election using his fat stacks of cash. Basically one man now controls more then half up national politics. But it's okay. He's the star of Iron Man 2 so he's clearly a genius.
    • And we saw just how much Musk's money meant in Wisconsin, didn't we?

      I'm pretty sure the guy who lost would have done better if Musk stayed the fuck away from Wisconsin altogether. All the political donations in the world don't matter if you're running the "I'm with the idiot burning it all down" campaign.

  • I would not be surprised if Trump reaches out to Russia for these materials in exchange for lowering sanctions.

    • I'd be surprised if he doesn't, but it may take a while before it happens. Right now he's pretending he's angry about Ukraine negotiations.

  • Now we can all forget about the "renewables", AKA unreliables and build nuclear fission and eventually fusion reactors. Well done, China!

Nothing is faster than the speed of light ... To prove this to yourself, try opening the refrigerator door before the light comes on.

Working...