Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
AI Books

Authors Are Accidentally Leaving AI Prompts In their Novels (404media.co) 42

Several romance novelists have accidentally left AI writing prompts embedded in their published books, exposing their use of chatbots, 404Media reports. Readers discovered passages like "Here's an enhanced version of your passage, making Elena more relatable" in K.C. Crowne's "Dark Obsession," for instance, and similar AI-generated instructions in works by Lena McDonald and Rania Faris.

Authors Are Accidentally Leaving AI Prompts In their Novels

Comments Filter:
  • by MpVpRb ( 1423381 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @02:47PM (#65399541)

    ...to create stuff using AI, its commercial value will drop to zero
    We are still in a transition period where people believe that they can automate their work using AI and sell it as if it was original
    This will change quickly

    • by DarkOx ( 621550 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @02:56PM (#65399571) Journal

      This is true. The other thing a lot of people need to get thru the last 35 years of economic orthodoxy is that actually "stuff" is the future of economic success.

      Things that AI can generate, be books, software, whatever, will approach zero value, while stuff AI can't generate, everything from farm products thur injection molded crap all the way to machines using the most advanced metallurgy or ICs using fanciest photolithography process will still have value.

      The future of wealth is in building of actual things, be that with people or capital like robots. The age of the 'information worker' is drawing to close..

      • by JeffSh ( 71237 )

        it'll have value, but it will be reduced to and approach the cost of the electricity

        • Did you know that retail electricity rates are typically set by state regulatory commissions explicitly directed by decoupling laws not to use supply and demand in their price-setting?

          • Depends on where you are...

            I here as example it is supply and demand.
            As a consumer you can select from among several hundred plans from more than 20 suppliers.

            Some of them are fixed price for a term. Some are fixed price with no expliry, but the supplier can change the price be telling you a given time before and at that point you can change supplier if you want and some are variable with the market rate+fixed margin. The market rate changes hour by hour and is sometimes negative.

            The plans also have differe

        • agreed. it'll just be a cheaper commodity. Like youtube video learning. nobody is going to subscribe to Bob Villa's Home Improvement book club anymore now that youtube exists. His books still have value, but it's marginalized by fungible products
    • by Anonymous Coward

      audible is gonna be one the first to find this out the hard way as they replace voice actors with AI and people find out open text-to-voice models can run on their devices for zero cost over the epub.

    • The same way that right now people will pay extra for artisan works of art and craft even though technically they may be inferior to stuff from a factory, similarly in the future people will pay a premium - or maybe even simply just pay - for human created works.

      • by allo ( 1728082 )

        If AI novels are good enough, they will pay as often premium for human novels as they pay for hand-knitted pullovers. Some will more often, some less often. But the human product will be premium and not necessarily better.

    • ...to create stuff using AI, its commercial value will drop to zero We are still in a transition period where people believe that they can automate their work using AI and sell it as if it was original This will change quickly

      You think we don’t already live in a society filled with humans who lie constantly with false appearances, selling it as if it were original? For massive profit and/or gain?

      Let me give you a little hint. They’re not real. Nope. Those aren’t either. Or those. Or those. Or any of those.

      The last time the carpet matched the drapes was when carpeting was in style. Natural eye color? Nope, contacts. Doesn’t look like her picture? Filters. Hair that long? Nope, extensions.

      Sure

    • by allo ( 1728082 )

      And increasingly personalized. Why buy a finished AI novel, when you can have an interactive one?
      You didn't like the direction in the chapter? One click and you get an alternative (and change the whole path the story goes).

      AI is not just a way to produce content like we're used to consume it and then distribute it to consumers.
      It is a way for consumers to create content to consume without relying on someone to anticipate what they might like, finish producing it and then make an offer and hopefully advertis

    • I've seen this firsthand in the art community. Various online artists offering AI-assisted commissions, and even jacking up their prices on the grounds that the AI now makes their art "look better".

      And then they're shocked when all their fans just disappear and their Patreon runs dry. Idiots.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @02:48PM (#65399545)
    Did a short video about a bunch of books on c64 programming that were AI generated slop. Actual books you could order from Amazon physically.

    Frankly I'm just a bit surprised that that kind of on-demand printing is cheap enough and accessible enough to make these kind of scams viable.

    And they were absolutely scams. The information in the books was either completely nonsensical or stolen wholesale from other authors.

    Some of the stuff that got stolen was fairly recent, books written in 2020 or 2022.

    AI makes it possible to do a whole new world of plagiarism where you can steal somebody's work and it's jumbled around enough you can no longer obviously tell it was stolen.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      If you're talking about 8-bit Show and Tell's video, they were all stolen from the same book, were pretty much the original book verbatim other than formatting errors and some AI slop at the beginning (the slop varied from book to book to defeat Amazon's dupe detection). And as a punchline the original book wasn't that great either, e.g. it had some stuff that was lifted literally from the Commodore C-64 manuals with an error intact.
      • Yeah he picked out specific books because the way Amazon works it's going to keep recommending the same scammer and he just kept buying the books being recommended but I have no doubt there's tons and tons of scammers there

        And great or not it's still stole from someone. It's automated high scale plagiarism.
    • by karmawarrior ( 311177 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @04:13PM (#65399809) Journal

      FWIW the original guides to programming in the early 1980s were slop too, it's just a human wrote most of them.

      A typical "How to program your Commodore 64" book in 1982 was a direct copy of a book called "How to program your Sinclair ZX Spectrum." The original author would go through the book with a manual for the Commodore 64 and change anything they could easily see needed changing. Most of the sample programs were "Guess my number" or variants thereof, because those required virtually no system features that varied and were substantially different on a ZX81, Oric Atmos, or BBC Micro - no graphics, no colour, just plain text output. Even information about string handling and arrays were completely inaccurate because the ZX81 and VIC 20 had radically different ideas about how to make a substring and the author didn't know or really care that much.

      So... a modern book on programming a Commodore 64 being slop? They probably trained it on the originals...

    • by allo ( 1728082 )

      "Frankly I'm just a bit surprised that that kind of on-demand printing is cheap enough and accessible enough to make these kind of scams viable."

      Search for cell phone covers. You'll find them with every motive you want. Most the time you see from the preview that it is a low-resolution motive automatically downloaded from social media (or whereever). Of course they do not have thousands of phone covers with "The OSI-model as shown in Wikipedia" and other motives nobody would ever buy, but they print the cov

  • Is it possible productivity is being kept up by AI while workers take more siestas?

  • by whoever57 ( 658626 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @02:55PM (#65399565) Journal

    Since AI's often don't create copyrightable works (depending on the depth of the prompts), what's to stop someone ripping off the prompter's work?

    • The only reason to do so is because it's essentially legal to (or would be much harder for them to prevail in court if they were to sue) and you wanted to in order to prove a point. If you were the first to do it you might be able to skim a few sales, but unless you live in some country where the piddling amount you'd get is actually worth the time investment, there's little reason to when anyone else can freely compete at the same ridiculously low opportunity cost. You'd still be competing against the exis
    • by drnb ( 2434720 )

      Since AI's often don't create copyrightable works (depending on the depth of the prompts), what's to stop someone ripping off the prompter's work?

      What about recursive use? An AI reads an AI generated book as part of its training. The prompters work may be more difficult to spot.

      • Copyright is obviously not a natural property of anything. It's a legal attribute defined by jurisdiction. 'Inheritence of copyright infringement by proxy' as a concept is a good illustration of the fact that we really haven't dug too deeply into all of the edge cases.
    • Amazon's ebook market is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Cory Doctorow has had a few choice words to say about how little the sellers respect copyright and how little Amazon did to remove clones of his books.

      https://doctorow.medium.com/wh... [medium.com]

  • Here's an enhanced version of your post, making your slashdot post more relatable.
    For anything generated or influenced by AI, we need a simple disclaimer to keep things transparent.

  • If an AI reads the AI-generated book for me while I go cut the grass or get my garden ready for planting...did a tree really fall in the woods?

  • by larryjoe ( 135075 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @03:56PM (#65399755)

    This is mainly a failure of the editor. How could a minimally capable editor not catch this? Either the editor was incompetent or there was no editor.

  • by R.Mo_Robert ( 737913 ) on Friday May 23, 2025 @04:11PM (#65399805)

    Not to nitpick, but if we're going to pinpoint a specific issue, it should probably describe the correct one. Both TFA and TFS only show an example of an AI response being left in the published text. The prompt itself was not included, although the problematic part of the response that was copied into the finished product happens to summarize the model's interpretation of the prompt. (Not that either is good, but it's at least more understandable how this one might have happened...)

  • Maybe some authors are deliberately leaving prompts in their works to see if they are being scanned by a AI bot. Sort of like a poison pill that will somehow issue a response when prompted with a special prompt.
  • It's never okay to burn a book. "Here's an enhanced version of your passage, making Elena more relatable..." ...It's never okay to burn a book written by a human.
  • We should mark the years as demarcation points when literature and writing in general changed.

    1930 - The short sentence lengths in Hemingway's novels start ending the complex, comma heavy early literature

    1950 - Start of darker post-WWII noir novels, and slipping far downward towards the lowest common low-brow denominator for what once was called pulp or railway novels

    1980 - When most of the novelists careers who started after WWII aged out and, importantly, when the common dictionary started removing 'obsol

Last yeer I kudn't spel Engineer. Now I are won.

Working...