

In Last-Minute Move, Canada Rescinds Digital Services Tax, Restarts Negotiations (newsweek.com) 132
"Canada and the United States have resumed trade negotiations," reports Newsweek, "after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to rescind the country's digital services tax on U.S. technology companies."
The development follows President Donald Trump's announcement on Friday that he was suspending all trade talks with Canada "effective immediately" over the tax policy... Canada's quick reversal signals the high stakes involved in maintaining trade relationships with the United States, particularly given the countries' deeply integrated economies.
Carney's office confirmed on Sunday that both leaders have agreed to restart negotiations after Canada committed to abandoning the 3 percent levy targeting major U.S. tech giants including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb. The tax was scheduled to take effect Monday and would have applied retroactively, creating an estimated $2 billion bill for American companies. The conflict escalated rapidly after Canada's Finance Department confirmed Friday that companies would still be required to make their first digital tax payments Monday, despite ongoing negotiations. The tax targeted revenue generated from Canadian users rather than corporate profits, making it particularly burdensome for technology companies operating internationally...
Canada's decision to rescind the tax came "in anticipation" of reaching a broader trade agreement, according to government officials. With negotiations resuming, both countries will likely focus on addressing broader trade issues beyond the digital services tax.
Carney's office confirmed on Sunday that both leaders have agreed to restart negotiations after Canada committed to abandoning the 3 percent levy targeting major U.S. tech giants including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb. The tax was scheduled to take effect Monday and would have applied retroactively, creating an estimated $2 billion bill for American companies. The conflict escalated rapidly after Canada's Finance Department confirmed Friday that companies would still be required to make their first digital tax payments Monday, despite ongoing negotiations. The tax targeted revenue generated from Canadian users rather than corporate profits, making it particularly burdensome for technology companies operating internationally...
Canada's decision to rescind the tax came "in anticipation" of reaching a broader trade agreement, according to government officials. With negotiations resuming, both countries will likely focus on addressing broader trade issues beyond the digital services tax.
We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:5, Interesting)
Screw big tech. Way too much power and influence. No reason why countries cant grow their own digital services. Governments are failing to recognise this and letting Big Tech leach money from their economies. Big Tech is reliant on national infrastructures paid for by public money, comms, transport, law and education. They are taking us for a ride and your politicians are in their pocket.
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:2)
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:2)
You could however have nation-specific sites selling foreign content.
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't really see what motivation Canada has to negotiate anyway. Once Trump's tariffs kick in and the inflation pressure amplifies, Americans will be in the streets calling for his resignation. If the 'big beautiful bill' doesn't already do that. Trump is throwing pennies at the poor and hoping they will run the other way and not notice loss of healthcare and the fact that the wealthy got so much more than they did.
Re: (Score:2)
Canada needs to negotiate because Trump doesn't care about Mutually Assured Destruction.
Unfortunately for the rest of the world, as long as you have meaningful exports to the US that aren't impossible (economically) for them to replace from somewhere else you simply don't have a good point of leverage. The US can't replace China... but there are very few other examples. If Canada were to impose an export tax on oil and lumber to the US then it simply causes short term pain for the US and long term pain fo
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
A) Return his brinkmanship in kind, or
B) Just sever ties and move on to more friendly nations.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What does the US make that isn't made somewhere else in the world?
Fast food, movies, television. That's about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:3)
Music, movies, and microcode, baby.
Re: (Score:2)
What does the US make that isn't made somewhere else in the world? Canada has the closest ocean point to Europe. Already China beats the US on price for most things even if it has to be shipped. Canada currently has ports in Vancouver and Halifax there is another one in Hudson's Bay that can open very easily. They are talking about building at least two more. All of this will be good for Canada's economy in the end.
Pharmaceuticals, plastics, and a fairly large amount of high-end electronics and machinery are directly imported. The bulk of Canadian goods still come via US ports, even adding a couple is unlikely to change that. The real sting is on the other end though. Canadian trade in things like lumber, metals, cereal grains and finished goods would struggle to find export markets anywhere near the size of the US.
In general, large trade barriers between a small nation and a much larger adjacent nation don't tend to
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:2)
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:4, Informative)
Once Trump's tariffs kick in and the inflation pressure amplifies, Americans will be in the streets calling for his resignation. If the 'big beautiful bill' doesn't already do that. Trump is throwing pennies at the poor and hoping they will run the other way and not notice loss of healthcare and the fact that the wealthy got so much more than they did.
Won't happen because cult leaders are never wrong. Anything bad happening is Biden's fault. At least that's what Fox will tell people.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:2)
Why do you say that?
Already have cultus who are saying that it's good that we should tighten our belt and that they don't mind prices going up.
Re: (Score:2)
Once Trump's tariffs kick in and the inflation pressure amplifies, Americans will be in the streets calling for his resignation.
Some will. His devouts will think something along these lines:
"Sure, prices are high, but that's because they are attacking the US, and killing babies, and mutilating children, and then grooming those mutilated children into going to their secret pizzeria underground dungeons where they're raped and then sacrificed to Beelzebub, all the while their invading hordes of international military cat-and-dog eating gangs roam the cities causing riots, because they hate 'Murica and must be stopped! And He's stoppin
Re: (Score:2)
That is probably the calculus behind it. You have to remember the G7 agreed to a minimum income tax which includes a DST, just Canada and France implemented it early.
This was a huge thorn in Biden's side, and Biden himself was trying to get it rescinded. No doubt in another timeline, Kamala Harris would be challenging it
Re: Ed McMahon once did all land deal with Trump (Score:3)
"Well you can't be very good to have to break laws and still have at least 6 bankrupt businesses."
The bankruptcy laws are designed to let the corporate owning class profit even while destroying profit for others.
Do we actually know why Trump got away with it (Score:2)
Basically Trump was almost completely broke at that point and his creditors would have gotten nothing. So they let him keep a chunk of his remaining assets rather than take what little he had so that h
I don't think Trump did any of that (Score:3)
Studies show Trump got billions and billions of dollars of free advertising during the 2016 campaign. And the 2024 campaign was insane. I watched dozens of well-respected editors and journalists dog walked from major institutions like the New York times and Newsweek and even USA today because they criticized Donald Trump or corrected misinformation about Joe biden.
My favorite example was a case
I know it's useless to reply (Score:2)
Well not exactly I think one of the editors over at the New York times tried to and got fired for it. Or maybe he just decided to resign all on his own after decades of working there...
Dude you won. You
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:3, Insightful)
Itâ(TM)s all about finding the right balance. In the US itâ(TM)s the opposite, where they are scared of taxing the rich, to the point some have more wealth than some nations. This all while the US is bleeding money and more focused on taxing anyone, but the rich.
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:4, Informative)
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The top 10% of earners have a lot more than 72% of the wealth.
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:4, Insightful)
Before making the claim that the 'rich' pay the 'lion's share' of taxes, you should expand your definition beyond income earners.
Compare net worth to income, and you will likely see that very often high net worth correlates to very little income. I believe Jeff Bezos recent income was shown to be $0.00 for one noteworthy example.
I myself have benefitted from this tax structure. A few years as a self-employed I brought in six figure gross income, but by corporate structuring and perfectly legal categorization of income and expenses, I reported very little taxable income.
So yes, the US very much favors the rich when it comes to taxes.
Re: (Score:3)
If I make $262K my effective tax rate is like 18% so like 42k so take home like 220k
Yeah I think they are doing fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
FICA is fixed rate and not subject to yearly budget fights the same way so I consider it out of scope for discussion.
I support a top weighted but still broad based tax increase but I think it's quite moral in a liberal capitalist democracy for the wealthiest to pay the lion's share for society. Marginal utility of money is a real thing and wealth inequality is a societal rot issue.
Re: (Score:2)
FICA is fixed rate and not subject to yearly budget fights the same way so I consider it out of scope for discussion.
Ehhh, you were judging the money left over after taxes. Not factoring in FICA is a mistake there. My FICA taxes are about $20k a year. That's uhhh, not nothing.
I support a top weighted but still broad based tax increase but I think it's quite moral in a liberal capitalist democracy for the wealthiest to pay the lion's share for society. Marginal utility of money is a real thing and wealth inequality is a societal rot issue.
So do I. I'm not complaining about my taxes at all.
However, it is a mistake to think that people in that income bracket pay an 18% effective tax rate on their actual income, unless there is a huge amount of long term capital gains income. No matter how you swing it- FICA counts.
Hell, one could argue it's among the most important contributions of t
Re: (Score:2)
It's not that it's nothing in terms of money but in a discussion about tax rates and what class pays what amount it's pretty much a literal flat tax so it's off the side in terms of discussion, those rates are driven by their programs and those programs have goals which a whole different animal than the general budget and a progressive rate system.
I should have said effective income tax rate so I can remember that. Your effective rate at 30% I would say is fair at $190K but a 38-40% effective at $2 to 10M
Re: (Score:2)
The logic that "they're not going to use it" doesn't pass the smell test. They're rich at the expense of those who will use it.
Also helps keep the SS Trust Funds solvent regardless of whatever dumb shit Congress is doing with the General Fund.
But it *is* important to me that high-wage earners aren't treated as if they don't pay their taxes or something. I lose a third of every che
Re: We're ready for more national firewalls (Score:2)
It would be good if true.
Bullying... (Score:1)
works !
Re:Bullying... (Score:4, Insightful)
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, how did that work out for Mark Carney? Or Iran? Maybe Canada shouldn't have overplayed its hand by threatening a retroactive tax.
Re: (Score:3)
The rest of the world is simply ignoring Trump. He's resorted to sending out physical letters because they don't return his calls. https://www.yahoo.com/news/tru... [yahoo.com]
Re: (Score:2)
If people ignore him too much, he renames the Gulf of Mexico or something nonsensical to regain attention.
Re: (Score:3)
The world is not ignoring Trump.
The whole world is definitely watching Trump, the same way you would watch a toddler running around in a China shop. With scissors. We don't really care if you stab yourself in the eye, we just hope you don't break too many vases.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Bullying... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Bullying... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't get anything in exchange for this action in addition to what they already had. All they got was americans agreeing that they will continue negotiations Trump stopped two days ago in response to this law. And Americans likely added a few more points to the agenda limiting taxation capabilities of Canadian state.
So all that happened is that Trump just called another bluff. This was a Canadian mistake similar to one Trump made when he stated memeing about annexing Canada, getting a much less friend
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
When Trump announces a ridiculous new punitive tax like 100% on inbound moose nuts, then TACOs a week later you say it was a brilliant negotiation strategy because the real 4d chess goal was to gain things like .... uh, IDK, this?
I don't think so. I think they're just pointing out that everyone TACOs under pressure.
CA did, indeed, overplay its hand. It predictably pulled it back when they found out that Trump is more than willing cause some harm to the US economy to utterly fucking devastate people who piss him off.
Make no mistake, economically speaking, CA needs the US far more than the US needs CA.
They didn't "do the same thing back to him to show that they could do it".
Trump is afraid of domestic pressure. CA is afraid of b
Re: (Score:2)
You assume this is a loss for Canada - quite the opposite.
I don't like Trump but props where they are due, thanks for killing one of our taxes. By all means feel free to kill some more of our taxes for us.
Re: Bullying... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Bullying... (Score:2)
Wrong Move... (Score:3)
I hope that means Digital Services sold in Canada will now have to collect and remit GST, just like everyone else. Otherwise, Gov't must stabbed Canadian Companies in the back! (not that I want to pay more tax, but giving US companies a 13% price advantage over Canadian companies is *huge*. Digital tax has to either be evenly applied, or scrapped altogether for everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
They already do.
At least Facebook, Netflix, do
Re: (Score:3)
There's been a broad obligation to do that for four years: https://www.canada.ca/en/reven... [canada.ca], although maybe some companies claim their goods or services are exempt. Google, for example, apparently collects and remits GST/HST for sales through its platforms unless the seller provides documentation that a Canadian official has determined that the good or service is exempt.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the link. Looks like I wasn't paying attention to tax law in '21.
Re: (Score:2)
Canada should have... (Score:5, Funny)
...called it a "tariff" instead of a "tax," then we could all have delighted in the display of cognitive dissonance south of the border.
Good tactics (Score:2)
Also, do something to annoy your opponent to keep your opponent's attention focused on minutia.
+1 Carney.
Trade Deficit does not = getting ripped off (Score:2)
taxit (Score:2)
If it moves, taxit.
Re: (Score:2)
In the United States, if it commits rape and fraud, elect it.
Dumb move (Score:2)
This was IMO a dumb move on Carney's part. He should have suspended the tax just so long as negotiations were under way. Now Canada has one less point of leverage.
Though I suppose if things go badly, the tax can always be resurrected.
And selfishly, the tax would not cost me anything because I don't buy or use products or services from any companies that would be affected. :) (No Netflix, Amazon, Meta, etc.)
I think they should do more of this to the USA (Score:3)
Trump won't understand the point being made by flip flopping other than thinking they are "tough" like him. He can't grasp somebody mirroring his idiocy to make a point.
So maybe not.
I'd say TACO but Canada is the one Trump treats the worst, even more than China. They can't simply wait for TACO.
Watch for a similar tax soon ... (Score:2)
It is likely as part of the negotiations that Trump will cave in and they will introduce a similar tax - but this will spun as a triumph for Trump ...
How does it work? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, yes, Canada belongs to the Commonwealth of Nations, which is why King Charles has to approve every law that they try to pass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If the monarch were to do it, there would promptly no longer be a monarch.
The monarch's powers are only wielded upon request of Parliament in modern constitutional monarchies, and parliamentary primacy has been established in the Westminster system since the Glorious Revolution. i.e., Parliament can vote for the King to no longer be a King.
Re: Vassal state should behave like one (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't need to pre-judge. Every poll on global happiness and life expectancy demonstrates it.
Interesting, Wanna know who is unhappiest? Liberal women. https://ifstudies.org/in-the-n... [ifstudies.org]
Interesting isn't it? Is this one of those polls about what 'Murricans are unhappy? Perhaps one needs to dig in deeper.
Rather than work through problems by toughing it out, as conservatives tend to do, modern liberal people tend to use mental problems and "trauma" as a flex. I've experienced a bit of that in person, with some people whine bragging about all the psych meds they are on. And a lot of other vali
Re: Vassal state should behave like one (Score:4, Informative)
Re: Vassal state should behave like one (Score:4, Informative)
Liberal women admit being unhappy, they can do that without anyone blacking their eyes
Re: (Score:2)
According to the World Happiness Index [worldpopul...review.com] the USA is number 23, Canada is 15.
I'm actually amazed the USA ranks this high and wouldn't be amazed if this website tweaks its results a bit.
I've talked to some Americans. Each... and... every... one... of... them is unhappy about their own country, it's behavior, and it's systems. All of them are ashamed of its behavior.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm quite happy, and also quite ashamed.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, sorry. Forgot to type the word "also". My error.
Re: (Score:2)
Can we seriously at least not agree that we shouldn't be trying to prove points with fucking political think tank "research"?
The original cited study doesn't not support the author's argument in the slightest, it in fact states that increase in depression among liberal women corresponded with the backslide of the US into large backslides in policies they cared about being undone by the election of Donald Trump.
i.e., to answer the question being asked, Why So Blue: Liberal Women are Less Happy, M
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, you're such a fucking creep.
Next stupid fucking question.
Coming from you, I am very pleased you think that. Your hate feeds me.
Just make certain you aren't looking into a mirror. I don't often deal with people who cannot enter a discussion without dropping to profanity. But in previous conversations, you have proven that profanity, is the alpha and omega of your ability to have discussions. You do you, but it ain't a good look.
Victim.
Re: (Score:2)
Coming from you, I am very pleased you think that. Your hate feeds me.
Hatred? How does condescension require hatred?
Hatred requires energy. Dismissing you as a malformed semi-sentient pond scum is free.
Just make certain you aren't looking into a mirror.
I don't often deal with people who cannot enter a discussion without dropping to profanity.
My profanity makes me a creep? lol
But in previous conversations, you have proven that profanity, is the alpha and omega of your ability to have discussions.
I like my language like I like my food- spicy as fuck.
You're a real meat and potatoes motherfucker, and there's the whole problem with spicy food being enjoyed by brown people, so I'm unsurprised it's not to your palate's liking.
You do you, but it ain't a good look.
I'll take a foul mouth over your bizarre attempts at trying to categorize women as depressed because of their freed
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I stopped reading at liberal women. Just seems like an attempt to conflate the issue with a totally different conversation.
Of course you did. You do love your echo chamber.
You do you homie, and never let the real truth interfere with your "personal truth". That's a far left thing too.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
He'll work his anti leftist agenda in anywhere he can. Don't even get him started on trans people and vegans...
The ironic thing is that a few years ago he spent months beginning any political post he wrote telling everyone how moderate he was prior to going straight to conservative talking points. He doesn't do that anymore because enough people finally shouted him down.
Re: (Score:2)
Life expectancy in the US is complicated. For the top quartile, it far exceeds Canada's. For the middle 2, it's about the same. For the bottom, it's considerably less.
Funny enough, CA also has this distribution.
Basically, whether in the US, or CA, your life expectancy is tied to your wealth.
Where CA excels, is that its bottom rung of the latter isn't quite as destitute as the US' bottom rung of the ladder.
However, pretending like that means
Re: (Score:2)
Life expectancy of the top quartile in the US does not exceed the the top quartile of CA. Yes life expectancy of the top quartile in both the US and Canada exceeds the average of everybody but you seem to have deliberately lied or misled.
Re: (Score:2)
And not by a small amount.
This shouldn't be a surprise, we have the best healthcare that money can buy.
You seem to be full of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Canada's Digital Services Tax was promised in 2019 and passed in 2024, so it's pretty safe to say it was not "a response" to anything Trump did as president. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi... [www.cbc.ca]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps you missed The Fine Headline ("In Last-Minute Move, Canada Rescinds Digital Services Tax, Restarts Negotiations", emphasis added) and the rest of TFS? I am sure you were not being intentionally off-topic....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A tariff is a consumption tax. It's paid for by consumers of imported goods.
Re: (Score:2)
I still don't get it. Tax and tariff are not the same thing.. Are you suggesting they are?
Tariffs and taxes are both paid by the same person - the end consumer of the taxed or tariffed goods..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: let's see if I understand (Score:2)