Downloading From the RIO 59
Trey writes "MP3 Place
reported this. Previously you could ONLY upload files to
the Rio, and you could only upload Mp3 files. With the Riogeo
program, you can now upload and download any file format,
With this, you'll have a 32 MB portable
drive! Currently it is a simple DOS command line prog."
What about a Linux port? More importantly, what is the RIAA gonna
think about this? Maybe the next Rio (or comparable product)
will have sync capabilities like a pilot- just connect with your
friends and trade tunes? Oh dear, this industry is going to
get crazy real fast.
Linux version exists! (Score:1)
Another call for help from /. (Score:1)
thanks..
Audio Home Recording Act (Score:2)
The issue here is not really one of tape piracy. If the music industry really wants to stop its CDs from being copied digitally, it can easily put "flags" in the digital signal that would prohibit all copying. However, a 1989 study by the U.S. Office of Technology Assessment found that about one-quarter of all pre-recorded music purchases were made after the consumer heard the artist or recording on a home-made (pirated) tape. It turns out that a little piracy, if it's not overdone, is good for the music business.
Easton: So you're saying that we're better off, that a record company may be better off with people out there pirating audio off the 'Net because that could conceivably increase your sales . . .
Griffin: Yes . . .
anybody used it? (Score:1)
So have any of y'all actually used RioGeo yet? Does it work to dl stuff from the Rio, as claimed? I don't have a Rio so I can't test...
Ditto those q's for David Weekly's hack.
I'm looking into it. (Score:1)
Since I don't have a RIO device yet, it would probably make more sense to write the filesystem module first; that can be nicely tested over other block devices without having an actual rio. I can use your program as a test tool to generate and read disk images; if it's compatible with your program, it's highly likely that it will work with the Rio.
Maybe someone else will end up writing the block device driver in the meantime and then we put the two together. If not, something could probably be hacked (using the ram disk or IDE code as an example perhaps).
My only concern is how much time to take away from the freeware macro preprocessor I'm currently working on (which, although of lesser political value, could be of much more benefit to the hacker community than kernel support for an MP3 player).
Anyway, enough clap-trap, time to look at some code.
Nothing new... but check out these ideas. (Score:2)
It turns out that the Rio is in fact a random-access block device with a block size of 32K.
I'm thinking of writing a Linux block device driver that will treat the Rio as yet another hard drive, so you could mount your ext2fs on it. Also, a filesystem module ``riofs'' that would let you mount the RIO file system. This way you could just use good old ``mount'', ``unmount'', ``cp'' and ``rm'' to manage the MP3's in the Rio rather than using some specialized command line program. And of course whatever GUI file manager you may currently use should also be compatible. In other words, the integration of Rio into Linux would be a heck of a lot better. Also the problem of having to run a suid root program would go away.
What do you slashdotters think?
Right (Score:1)
Diamond should take this idea and run with it. (Score:1)
Sweet Reseach (Score:1)
Ron
Analog signal degradation is the problem.. (Score:1)
Naturally, this limitation doesn't apply to digital media, because the n'th generation copy is bit-for-bit identical with the original. This is why the RIAA was so scared of DAT when it came out (and through legal wrangling managed to essential kill the format), and later MiniDisc and now MP3. The only difference is that, because MP3 is open, they can't extort any money from the makers as they seem to have done with MD.
-Jake
mpman could always do this... (Score:1)
I think it does have SCMS (Score:1)
I just got a Rio, and the documentation implies that it does have some kind of SCMS support in it. I guess the acid test would be to make an MP3 with the "copyright" bit set and the "original" bit reset, and see if a non-Diamond upload utility can stick it on the Rio.
Yes! Upload & Download Capability (Score:1)
David E. Weekly (dew)
Well (Score:1)
I find it hard to be at all sympathetic to those money-grubbing bastards who call themselves RIAA.
The sooner we pull them down, the better.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
Too late to save them (Score:1)
Nothing new... but check out these ideas. (Score:1)
RioGeo (Score:1)
Trading Tunes between friends (Score:1)
Too bad that record companies can't see past the end of their wallets... Im sure most musicians would also support this capability for people to share thier music. (at least the ones that arent famous and rich yet) If a musician is playing and writing music for the love of music, he will want to share it... And get at least recognition when he writes good music... Much like the way the open source developers write for the love of it and generally are psyched when they get recognition for thier labor of love...
RIO (version 1.1?) (Score:1)
Time flies like an arrow;
how long do you think? (Score:1)
"Put down the walkman and come out with your hands up!"
~Grell
"We gladly feast on those who would subdue us
Morticia Addams
A quote from Bloom County comes to mind... (Score:1)
Jay (=
(I might have to buy one of these...)
Another call for help from /. (Score:1)
According to Iomega's info, you stick a CompactFlash memory card into one end of the drive and a Clik disk into the other.
Could you just carry around a Clik drive, and a pile of disks? I guess it'll depend on if you can download info fromt he disk TO the card at this point.
I know we're getting too unwieldy... maybe another commercial MP3 player will incorporate such a drive in the future.
Jay (=
The RIAA sucks (Score:1)
Long live MP3!
heheh
friscoz3@usa.net
LwZ rawx
Dumbass (Score:1)
$160-$200.. (Score:1)
DAT! (Score:1)
the DAT stuff had been available oversees (Japan?) for a long time, but not in the US for this very reason. even NOW, you don't see DAT much for personal entertainment.... (well, -I- don't see it around!)
_______
Well, computers are exempted at this point in time (Score:1)
Downloading from Rio using NT (Score:1)
To do this, download RioShell (http://w3.to/rioshell/)...
Bye
DElyMyth
"A Linux version will be here soon." (Score:1)
I bought a Rio yesterday, and have already concluded that 32MBytes is NOT enough. And it looks like the Rio can only address 64MBytes, which is still not enough. I'm thinking somewhere around 0.5 to 1 GBytes should be sufficient... when are those 512MByte flash modules going to come out?
Even if massive Internet bandwith becomes dirt cheap, there will still be a demand for MP3, 'cause flash will still be expensive!
Waste of money (Score:1)
Of course, I'm assuming here that flash will rapidly come down in price, eventually making 512MByte modules no more expensive than 32MByte modules are today. Remember, 15 years ago people couldn't imagine the PC would ever need more than 640KBytes of memory...
a real small HDD vs FlashRAM (Score:1)
The lack of moving parts also makes them much better in terms of power consumption. Why do you think a Palm Pilot can go for a month on a battery, while the average Laptop dies is less than 2 hours? How long do you think the single 1.5v AA battery in a Rio could keep your 1GByte HDD spinning? Certainly not long enough to listen to all the music on it!
HDD are good for non-portable applications. Flash is used for portable applications because of it's low power, long life, fast access speed, and far superior resistance to harsh environments, e.g. shock, temperature, humidity, magnetic, etc.