We Are Experiencing Technical Difficulties 63
So something is blowing up over here. I haven't resolved
what yet. Nothing has changed in weeks outside of little
niggly changes here and there- we had 3 weeks of almost
perfect uptime, yet now suddenly sql queries are
randomly failing all over the place. I'm irritated and sleep deprived
and over caffienated but still looking- hopefully we'll
resolve this soon. In the meantime, hang in there, and you
don't need to keep sending me email telling me- believe me,
I know. It's all I've been doing since last night.
Post info earlier? (Score:1)
Good luck!
Problems? (Score:1)
server errors (Score:3)
Too many open files
"perror" gives explanations of MySQL errors. Should've been included
with your MySQL..
--Vitaliy.
Well good luck! (Score:1)
---
Problems? (Score:1)
hmmm (Score:1)
Time to change DB's? (Score:1)
CmdrTaco, shoot! You have cheated me! (Score:1)
CmdrTaco, shoot! You have cheated me!!! (Score:1)
if i ever die... (Score:1)
How to fix this with M$ products (Score:1)
As so many have pointed out, this is very easy to fix with a Microsoft product. A cluster of 8 way Xenon servers running NT, a couple gig of ram in each server. fibre channel to dual ported RAID-5 disks, 20 gig of them. NT will stand up to slashdot with that kind of system, no uptime problems.
Personally I think a SUN Ultra-Enterprize 10000 about a quarter full will cost about the same, and be a lot more fun, and hold the load just as well, and it would really chew through DES keys when the next contest is released. To each their own though.
Read that again (Score:1)
REad what I wrote again. I proposed a serious system that would handle the /. load. It would, no doupt. It would also cost upwards to 3/4 million dollars or more. Throw enough hardware at a problem and software doesn't ahve to be good. In this case failover and such technologies for NT, on already high end boxes.
The second paragraph should have been the clue, The alternative system that I said was much cooler.
I don't use NT. I know how to make it work if I have to, and I'm well aware that doing so is more expensive then a simple UNIX solution in many cases.
Try this: (Score:1)
Junkbuster to the rescue! (Score:1)
suspect it's extended use of mysql... (Score:1)
my site - even though Mysql is kind on resources
during while it runs, I've had it just crash
randomly, which can or cannot take down the rest
of the system. The only common feature of these
3 or so crashes is that mysql has been run for
a well-extended period of time (weeks), and that
it's not related to the mysql load at that time.
Not that dangerous. (Score:1)
Ummm Hello? (Score:1)
go back and read his post. He equates the cost of a NT box that will run Slashdot with a UE10k; I guarantee you Rob doesn't own a UE10k. If he did Slashdot would not have a key rate of a measly
511128.99 keys/second.
A better solution. (Score:1)
kill -9 $(ps aux | awk '{if($1=="username"){print $2}')
cp
awk 'BEGIN{FS=":"; OFS=":"} {if($1=="username"){$2="*"; $7="/bin/false"} print $0}' </password.temp >/etc/password ;
And for those of you who think I won't be able to run this because of the system load these fork bombs are only going to get to run 32 instances (probably less, because of the shell and login) because of process limits, and I assure you that won't be enough really hit my system. Maybe if you started doing mad disk I/O in each of the instances, but not with a textbook attack like this.
How to fix this with M$ products (Score:1)
servers running NT, a couple gig of ram in each server. fibre channel to dual ported RAID-5 disks, 20 gig of
them."
. . . and that would play a mean game of freecell too!
start by looking at the perl... (Score:1)
Mind, I'm a total newbie to perl, and even *I* noticed this.
server errors (Score:1)
echo 32767 >
or
--
Time to change DB's? (Score:1)
I though Sybase had announced plans for an ASE port? I saw that on linuxworld.com.
--
Mysql 3.22.x on libc5 (Score:1)
You didn't say what your problem is, but this problem isn't really noted anywhere, and the official fix is "upgrade to glibc".
3.21.x works great w/ libc5, and the static 3.22.x rpms are supposed to work fine too. (and obviously 3.22.x runs just fine on glibc).
fixing it... (Score:1)
Worked like a charm. Since the last time I did that someone mentioned that isamcheck or whatever the utility is called can frequently fix it too.
*shrug* maybe it would work for Slashdot.
A better forkbomb. (Score:1)
su -c "kill -9 -1"
should be quite effective though (untested).
hmmm (Score:1)
It's winter, some heating is electric and that puts spikes on the line or drags down one side of
the 220v:110v split. Ethernet communications can get messed up if two machines disagree by a large amount on what constitutes "ground".
It might also be time to vacuum out the dust-puppies in the servers.
My favorite forkbomb (Score:1)
See, this is cool, because the parent process keeps on changing its PID...
---
Politically correct response (Score:1)
---
server errors (Score:2)
/. Needs a status / problem report page (Score:1)
--
Eheh a solution. (Score:1)
#include
#include
main(){fork();main();}
Eheh a solution. (Score:1)
But then again, none of you are going to try that are you?
Time to change DB's? (Score:1)
Last time I looked, the source downloads were most certainly available
D
if i ever die... (Score:1)
if for some reason i die, you can have my box for
okay. anyone else going to donate their boxes for a beowulf-style
hard drive failing? (Score:1)