Beat on the Server 1 More Time 79
The new box is stabilizing at 206.170.14.76.
Thanks to the several of you who've commented on various things.
Yeah, its a bit slow- but thats actually because I think we
were hitting our bandwidth cap. Anyway I've got a new kernel
and I've shut off the useless services, and I think we're
almost ready, but I need some of that Slashdot Effect
for once to make sure we're gonna go uninterupted tomorrow.
So go to 206.170.14.76 for
a couple minutes and post some comments or something. Lets
see how revved up this beast really is. (don't worry
about 404s- I haven't moved the 200 megs of old articles over
yet) Update: 03/09 01:31 by CT : Wow! You guys kicked more pages out of that thing
than I would have thought possible. It was doing about 3 times
the load of Slashdot. I think its stable. You can be gentle
again *grin*
200 megs? (Score:1)
linuxonline.org [linuxonline.org]
I logged in but (Score:1)
a really annoying song... (Score:1)
hehe
first beating!!!! (Score:1)
Update: 03/09 09:16 by BK: (Score:1)
THUD. that didn't take long.
:)
Looks better than yesterday (Score:1)
triton comes in fine
traceroute to 206.170.14.75 (206.170.14.75), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 routerA.galaxy-net.net (207.90.164.254) 2.908 ms 4.211 ms 3.122 ms
2 166-90-118-209.geo.net (166.90.118.209) 7.528 ms 8.574 ms 8.078 ms
3 SF-core1-f0.geo.net (166.90.5.4) 7.462 ms 8.25 ms 9.52 ms
4 pb-nap.pbis.net (198.32.128.23) 10.199 ms 8.765 ms 8.484 ms
5 ded1-fe12-0-0.snfc21.pbi.net (206.13.28.83) 8.962 ms 19.137 ms 9.579 ms
6 209.232.138.214 (209.232.138.214) 9.368 ms 9.791 ms 9.718 ms
7 triton.slashdot.org (206.170.14.75) 13.258 ms 20.616 ms 12.283 ms
The 'Walnut Creek' of Geek News! (Score:1)
Distro wars already? (Score:1)
Personally, if it's free and runs the Linux kernel, I'm on it! Who cares where files are put, and how packages are managed. If you're so fussy about RPM or somesuch nonsense, just use sources for everything.
Personally, I use Redhat, but only use it for the absolute *minimum* base install...everything beyond that I compile by hand.
seems to be good Perfectly (Score:1)
Looks better than yesterday (Score:1)
1 adsl-216-100-248-254.dsl.pacbell.net (216.100.248.254) 23.935 ms 24.157 ms 31.861 ms
2 srvr1.snfc21.pbi.net (206.13.28.1) 16.673 ms 14.648 ms 16.337 ms
3 ded1-fe11-1-0.snfc21.pbi.net (209.232.130.4) 15.328 ms 14.451 ms 16.207 ms
4 209.232.138.214 (209.232.138.214) 16.116 ms 15.985 ms 16.609 ms
5 triton.slashdot.org (206.170.14.75) 26.256 ms 16.207 ms 18.498 ms
-----------
Worldwide /. Network (Score:1)
390 kb/s (Score:1)
Maybe I should get a provider thats less then 25 hops away from
If ya really want to test it... (Score:1)
I you really want to test it, mirror the
star wars trailer on it for a few hours.
--T
Ouch! I'm 17 hops away! (Score:1)
Well, at least I have a cable modem. Nyah.
traceroute to triton.slashdot.org (206.170.14.75), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 bab60-1.optonline.net (167.206.60.1) 20.86 ms 17.42 ms 17.881 ms
2 10.8.80.1 (10.8.80.1) 20.351 ms 22.864 ms 23.796 ms
3 cv-bb-hicks-01-fe-3-0.cvnet.com (10.1.1.75) 27.097 ms 64.866 ms 103.594 ms
4 sl-gw11-pen-11-0-T3.sprintlink.net (144.228.164.5) 27.189 ms 37.833 ms 24.678 ms
5 sl-bb11-pen-2-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.5.81) 30.047 ms 25.654 ms 23.85 ms
6 sl-bb12-pen-10-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.5.158) 23.653 ms 26.769 ms 23.262 ms
7 sl-bb10-rly-5-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.8.153) 26.689 ms 27.701 ms 24.047 ms
8 sl-bb12-rly-9-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.7.214) 23.556 ms 28.628 ms 23.799 ms
9 sl-bb1-rly-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.0.34) 25.143 ms 28.477 ms 24.131 ms
10 beth1sr2-2-0.md.us.ibm.net (165.87.97.226) 30.838 ms 27.282 ms 30.787 ms
11 165.87.29.162 (165.87.29.162) 31.02 ms 29.798 ms 30.854 ms
12 sfra1br2-2-0-1.ca.us.ibm.net (165.87.230.102) 138.019 ms 120.268 ms 137.402 ms
13 165.87.13.42 (165.87.13.42) 126.1 ms 126.464 ms 126.738 ms
14 165.87.161.73 (165.87.161.73) 119.358 ms 120.494 ms 120.174 ms
15 ded1-fe12-0-0.snfc21.pbi.net (206.13.28.83) 117.514 ms 120.036 ms 119.906 ms
16 209.232.138.214 (209.232.138.214) 126.501 ms 123.852 ms 124.8 ms
17 triton.slashdot.org (206.170.14.75) 133.482 ms 127.02 ms 145.201 ms
new server (Score:1)
Redhat (Score:1)
However once you get that stuff out of the way it does just as well as any of the other Linux's (How does one make Linux plural?).
The same way one makes 'box' plural, with an -en ending... Boxen, linuxen...
Worldwide /. Network (Score:1)
Canada - candot.slashdot.org
Europe - swissdot.slashdot.org
Far East - japdot.slashdot.org
I think those three would spread the load fairly evenly, more or less. It gives us Canucks our own server so we don't have to bang on slashdot/cachedot, Europe has one, and the Far east has one. Those are pretty much the major population centres, we'd have two/three in NA (is cachedot it's own server?), one in Europe, and one in Japan.
Try and get the servers all on networks connected to somewhere like Teleglobe - it has a huge backbone system across the world, supports a hundred ISPs around the world, and seems pretty decent. Satelites and the whole bit. Hmmm... Fast to update. I propose Vancouver (my nearest NAP =]) or Toronto, London, and Miyazaki (did I spell that right?)..
Worldwide /. Network (Score:1)
Anyway, it would be the ideal setup...
~Sentry21~
scalability (Score:1)
Lookit the source. :) (Score:1)
Unfortunately for my projects, I still hav eto use that old method of pretending there's a databse by making files.
Won't get a database? (Score:1)
Right there with ya...
----------------------
New server is rockin! (Score:1)
Looks good from here. (Score:1)
slashdot effect (Score:1)
How long do you think it will take sites to pay Rob to -not- link to them?
- d
Slashdotted to death? (Score:1)
Error
The requested operation could not be performed by the proxy.
Document contains no data
Tried 6 times.
Don't use winders! (Score:1)
Slashdot mirrors? (Score:1)
AFC.
new /. not really being tested? (Score:1)
200 megs? (Score:1)
Of course, here in Australia, it'd be $17.95 thanks to import charges and other crap =/
1.4k/sec .. much slower than this server (Score:1)
Slashdot mirrors? (Score:1)
seems to be good (Score:1)
Timed Out (Score:1)
get some bandwitdh. (Score:1)
I think it be slashdotted (Score:1)
a Little slow (Score:1)
I believe we're at the edge (Score:1)
Hehe (Score:1)
Couldn't help myself there.