On Emulation and Transmeta 67
Curious writes "The Economist this week talks about the growing use of
emulation technology and Transmeta's newest patent involving hardware/software hybrid in multi-host emulation."
Whatever they emulate, their employees win Harley's at
conferences, so they're doing something right.
The Economist! (Score:2)
Hands-down, the finest mainstream, English-language dead-tree thingy in the world. But even they can't breach the Transmeta Cone of Silence.
The Economist makes all the other "hard news" weekly magazines look like People magazine. The reason this is so is very cool, and possibly offers a business model for free software.
Most news magazines make money based on advertising, and the ad rates are directly dependent on the magazines circulation. So there is an economic incentive for the magazine to expand its circulation, which more-or-less translates into trading hard news for fluff -- movie reviews, "News you can use," that sort of stuff.
So how does The Economist avoid this trap?
Simple -- The Economist is a loss-leader for the company that publishes it. They make their real money by doing analyses of political and economic trends for big companies, governments and think tanks, and they charge big dollars for these analyses. Now, someone who is going to fork over thousands and thousands of dollars for analyses of, say, the political situation in the Uzbekhistan, wants some guarantees that their analyst isn't talking out of his butt.
By publishing The Economist, the Economist Intelligence Unit (I think that's the name), basically shows their stuff to the world. They say, "If you want to know what kind of work we do, go check out the Economist magazine." So the magazine is basically advertising for their custom analyses.
This means that they have a really strong incentive to publish genuinely in-depth and thoughtful news coverage. If they publish garbage they will lose their reputation for quality, and they die.
So how does this relate to free software? It's probably possible to build a software business along very similar lines. You have a firm that primarily writes custom software for clients, and establishes a reputation for quality by releasing free software.
If someone asks, "How do I know you aren't a gang of cowboy coders who write unstable trashware?" the firm can point to its free software as proof of its ability to write solid, well-designed programs -- the source is available for inspection and proof of the firm's ability.
Harley's == Jewellry for your Butt. (Score:1)
The Economist! (Score:1)
--
Who won a harley? (Score:1)
Pity it couldn't have been a decent bike.. but at least he can sell it for a tidy profit and buy himself a nice bike.. or two.
So you are slamming Harley-Davidsons? (Score:1)
So you are slamming Harley-Davidsons? (Score:1)
So When Do We Know? (Score:1)
beowulf 'em! (Score:1)
beowulf 'em! (Score:1)
Another way to make money giving away software. (Score:1)
Congratulations! Enjoy! (Score:1)
Personally, I'd opt for a Buell, but that's just me. Meanwhile, I commute on a battered Kwack, which cost me 1/200th of a Harley.
Gotta do something about that income...
More on Transmeta Patents (Score:1)
There's a missing "h" in there, and it wasn't made a link; here's a link to the patent [ibm.com].
But wasn't that mentioned in a Slashdot article ages ago?
Who won a harley? (Score:1)
Need a fact checker -- aisle 9 (Score:1)
New Beowulf net topology? (Score:1)
Sounds to me like they're trying to interlink the independent kernels together into a node to allow you to simply add computers to increase the processing power.
Such a system would be highly redundant, scaleable, and have a geek factor of about a billion (perhaps it's most important trait!). It could also be built at incredibly low cost.
But, more importantly - where can I buy one?
Ah, another thing I can say "NT can't do that!" to the microsoftian droids at work who think if NT can't do it, it is impossible.
--
Who won a harley? (Score:1)
Who won a harley? (Score:1)
Any luck Intel will hit it with a backhoe
Not to burst your bubble but ... (Score:1)
Dollar for dollar, there are many other bikes that will outperform/outhandle a hog. But, nothing says motorcycle like a hog rolling down the highway.
Hmmm, anyone else out there old enough to remember the Indian? Too bad the company trying to bring them back was unable too.
Harley: the M$ of motorcycling (Score:1)
-Overpriced
-Overweight/bloated
-unreliable
-crash more frequently (of course, part of this is due to the higher rate of clueless
posers drawn to all the shiny chrome)
Yes...it is the windoze of Motorcycles. Get a crotch rocket. Or anything that has that attribute called 'handling'
Emulate this (Score:1)
So you are slamming Harley-Davidsons? (Score:1)
Oh well, I'm gonna' slam you. Slam.
There.
Wasting Bandwidth
Caut10n
98 FatBoy
So you are slamming Harley-Davidsons? (Score:1)
Actually the factory Harley pipes (with the crossover pipe) are way too quiet, which is why most people buy aftermarket pipes right away. You don't get that 'blat blat, blat blat' sound at idle with the factory pipes.
Seriously, loud pipes save lives. Anyone who isn't deaf who says "I didn't see any motorcycles around" if they hit a Harley, in my book has no excuse.
Seriously though, most Harleys are quiet compared to my Chevelle... So nyea nyea to you.
So you are slamming Harley-Davidsons? (Score:1)
Bullpuckey. I can hear a Harley when it is in front of a car in front of me, when it is coming up behind me, or when it is approaching from a cross street. Your car must have too much sound insulation from outside noise. That can be a bad thing.
Emulating ENIAC (Score:1)
I think your basic ten-dollar scientific calculator can emulate ENIAC. Except it goes faster, takes up less space, uses less power, etc.
Need a fact checker -- aisle 9 (Score:1)
According to PSM:
Sony Computer Entertainment publicly unveiled the technology [PlayStation 2] on March 2, 1999 at the PlayStation Meeting '99 in Tokyo, Japan. It was unveiled to developers and press from all around the world.
Emulation (Score:1)
Who won a harley? (Score:1)
I'm all for it. I liked the economist article, I think it did well for a general-consumption magazine. It's funny to me that there has been no mention of this (afaik) in the US press. Pretty sad when a european magazine is our best news source for US news.
Zagmar
Harley: the M$ of motorcycling (Score:1)
-Overpriced
-Overweight/bloated
-unreliable
-crash more frequently (of course, part of this is due to the higher rate of clueless posers drawn to all the shiny chrome)
Italian bikes are the only ones that matter. (Score:1)
Interesting trivia David Cronenberg (Canada's finest Film Director) has been collecting Ducati bikes for over 20 years.
I still own a 1972 350 Desmo and lovingly reshim the cam rods every summer.