Cygnus Name Change 82
An Anonymous reader writes "Cygnus Solutions is changing its name. They're
doing that in a Open Source/Free Software way by
asking for net contributions. The selected contribution wins a fully loaded PII Linux workstation. Check it out.
" Name the Company. Thats a new contest.
New Name!!! (Score:1)
Gnuru-co? (Score:1)
(And would this be pronounced /gn'uruco/, /gnur'uco/, or /gnuruc'o/?)
---
Hey, that's how Unisys got its name (Score:1)
The new name was announced by the board in a worldwide broadcast to employees. They announced the word with great fanfare. Everyone was on the edge of their seats. "And the new company name is....... UNISYS."
And every single employee said at the same time, "Unisys????" with a mixture of extreme sarcasm and puzzlement.
It was a sign of things to come. Five years later, they had about a third of those employees left, after massive layoffs and several restructurings.
Cygnus sounds too much like: (Score:1)
Hmm.... (Score:1)
How about: Cygnus (Score:1)
What's wrong with the current name?
what's wrong with "cygnus"? (Score:1)
Rent-a-gnuru? (Score:1)
Cygnus the Swan... (Score:1)
What's this about GNU? (Score:1)
The name Cygnus is taken from the constellation Cygnus, the swan, and it's a nice name. In fact, the constellation graphic is right there on the front page. Their web site could use a makeover, as I don't find it very pretty, but it's functional enough. The name is established and unique, at least in my frame of reference, but a fresh clean makeover could really make the marketability difference.
WING Software (Score:1)
I think Dogbert had it right... (Score:1)
Now Cygnus has me worried... (Score:1)
While I am not 100% sure about my interpretation (I would have to reread it more carefully, and I will), it looked to me mostly that Cygnus simply uses Open Source as a business modell that allows them (them being the first mover in multiplatform compiler technology with many many embedded system targets) to stay ahead of the competition.
Under this conditions it is neccessary for them to take control of the compiler development.
Question: Is this an evil thing in itself?
My answer: I cannot tell right now.
So far Cygnus has behaved well, taking from and giving to the net. If everyone is happy it is likely that they keep their leading position.
Crucial might be their relationship to the FSF, as happy as I'm about to see the progress on egcs, a starvation of gcc development would make me worry.
I would really like to know the FSF's point of view on the gcc/egcs issue.
Now Cygnus has me worried... (Score:1)
Better not call it CygCo :-)
over 100+ comments? (Score:1)
as for the namechange, kudos to them. it's about time...
Cygnus sounds too much like: (Score:1)
The roots of the old name (Score:1)
But then, I'm a geek...
I'ts a pity (Score:1)
<sound of furious grepping comes from behind the screen>
How about interregnum?
How about: Cygnus (Score:1)
Simple. They want to go public, but the name "Cygnus" is already taken by a pharmaceutical company.
http://biz.yahoo.com/n/c/cygn.html [yahoo.com]
Cheers,
- Jim
how about... (Score:1)
;-)
I wanted to hail to the original "Cygnus" (Score:1)
Christopher A. Bohn
Nuts (Score:1)
Christopher A. Bohn
Better yet! (Score:1)
OK, here are some names... (Score:1)
The obvious name (Score:1)
Gnews (Score:1)
What else can you think of with a stronger positive impression, and a connection with GNU (which is what their old name had going for it)?
Ben
Suggestions (Score:1)
I think Dogbert had it right... Nahh (Score:1)
Joey announcing himself as
Holden McGroin...
Sure it's more of a personal name, but aren't there plenty of companies named after someone?
- alex
Brings a question to mind.... (Score:1)
: The counters that fronted the booths displayed
:hundreds of slivers of microsoft, angular
:fragments of colored silicon mounted
:under oblong transparent bubbles on squares of
:white cardboard. Molly went to the seventh booth
:along the south wall.
Anyone else able to shed some light on this, or know other plausible origins for the term "microsoft"? Wouldn't it be funny if Gibson decided to sue MS for use of the name? heh.
Incidentally, for all you copyright fiends, you're generally allowed to quote sections of a publication...
Invitation to get spammed (Score:1)
GYGNUS is already taken... (Score:1)
Search web for "cygnus"
Check this (Score:1)
Cygnus, Inc [cygn.com]
I think they want to get rid of the GNU part (Score:1)
Brings a question to mind.... (Score:1)
Of course, he couldn't possibly be expected to go through computer books and actually read them so he had a clue. After all, he's an artist, and way above all that technical stuff.
Heck, we're such lowly peons in terms of understanding art that the book "Difference Engine" will only be understood by us in 10-20 years or so.
I've read most of Gibson's books, but that doesn't mean I have to like him. :-)
BiCapitalization (Score:1)
End of roots (Score:1)
How about "GoNadUs"? (Score:1)
What GNU part? (Score:1)
P.S.: I was going to suggest OpenWorks, something with some built-in allegory <g> But alas, it's taken. (You know, I worry sometimes, when it takes a good fifteen minutes to think up of something that isn't already in the InterNIC...)
perl to the rescue (Score:1)
strings
ALGONQUIAN ALGONQUIN ANDROGYNOUS ARGONAUT CONSANGUINEOUS CORRIGENDUM CYGNUS DISINGENUOUS DOUGHNUT EIGENFUNCTION EIGENVALUE ENDOGENOUS EXOGENOUS GAINFUL GARGANTUAN GATLINBURG GELATINOUS GENEROUS GENEROUSLY GENIUS GENUINE GENUS GEOSYNCHRONOUS GERANIUM GERMANIUM GINSBURG GLANDULAR GLUTINOUS GRANDDAUGHTER GRANDEUR GRANDILOQUENT GRANULAR GRANULARITY GRANULATE GRANULE GRANULOCYTIC GREENHOUSE GROWNUP GYMNASIUM HETEROGENEOUS HETEROGENOUS HOMOGENEOUS IGNEOUS IGNOMINIOUS IGNORAMUS INDIGENOUS INGENIOUS INGENUITY INGENUOUS INHOMOGENEOUS INTERREGNUM LEGUMINOUS LIGNUM MAGNANIMOUS MAGNESIUM MAGNITUDE MAGNUM MAGNUSON NITROGENOUS OVERGENEROUS POLYGYNOUS SANGUINEOUS SIGNATURE
No-brainer (Score:1)
Now Cygnus has me worried... (Score:1)
This is the same Cygnus Solutions as the one in California--we're just the Atlanta office. If you look closely, you'll find Cygnus Solutions in Toronto, Canada, and Cambridge, U.K., which are also part of Calfornia's Cygnus Solutions.
Cygnus sounds too much like: (Score:1)
Now Cygnus has me worried... (Score:1)
Cygnus sounds too much like: (Score:1)
Zagmar
LUGNUT (Score:1)
How about (Score:1)
Now Cygnus has me worried... (Score:1)
There is no official reasons given on thier web site as to why they want to change thier name... just a vague impression that they want to distance themselves from the FSF's GNU project.
IMHO, companies dont change thier name after 10 years -- after gaining prominent name recognition in the community -- without some VERY pressing reasons.
So it seems to me that Cygnus not only wants to distance itself from GNU but is willing to take DRASTIC measures to do so.
The most obvious reason to worry is egcs.
egcs (experimental GNU compiler system ??) has been positioned as the successor to gcc, and in fact is increasingly being relied on by distros like RedHat, Debian and others.
gcc -- the GNU C compiler -- along with glibc (which is also moving towards Cygnus control) are the cornerstones of the GNU project. These products are important to the future of free software.
Cygnus cannot deny that they have been seen in the past as a GNU friendly company... I think that much of the quick acceptance that egcs has enjoyed is due to this perception. egcs has been seen as a "friendly continuation" of gcc rather than a "bad faith fork" of gcc.
So to the folks at Cygnus I say:
Come on guys, this is a community you are dealing with here... sure it's not nice (or even professional) to air grievances in public... but in this case niceties should not stop you from making your case to the community.
If Cygnus has a problem with FSF, they need to inform the community about the problem... and give us some idea about where The-Company-Formerly-Known-As-Cygnus is headed.
If you answer only one question, try this one:
Q: Why should the community trust egcs to be the new cornerstone of free software?
J. Weesner