Scratching MP3s with a real turntable 101
Em writes "Wired News spotted these guys and their cool idea for making real turntables scratch and mix MP3s. Plug your Technics into your BeOS machine and scratch with their special vinyl. They map the 'record' to your MP3 file. I reckon I'd buy BeOS for this. " Jeez-combine this with the audio equipment we got yesterday, and Rob and I might cut a record. There's a disturbing thought. Someone alert DJ Shadow to this-I want the new album to come out soon.
wow...gimme (Score:1)
As a dj (happy hardcore
Also, imagine the possibilities for scratch samples. . .
*guh*
I might just get BeOS after all.
The only other thing i'd need would be a RealEncoder thingy for BeOS to do live broadcasts like with Win95 (eww).
cheers,
dj.nofrills
ANything like this for Linux? (Score:1)
Natas
http://www.mp3.com/pedophagia
Probably a stupid question... (Score:1)
Ummm, when did records become uncommon for DJs? Maybe CDs work for Top 40 but you can't get most good techno/house tracks on CD, and besides who'd want to use a CD mixer anyways? Most of the interesting DJ "tricks" and mixing can, IMHO, be performed much better using a couple of 1200s and a decent mixer than with CD players and mixers.
Now with CDs too, in BeOS (Score:2)
The ever-fabulous M. Nelisson is currently developing a CDDA filesystem driver for the BeOS that will allow you to do similarly crazy things with the CD in your CD-ROM drive. Play multiple CA tracks at one time from the same CD in the same drive, play them backwards (400% pitch control) in Soundplay, mix two or more CD tracks together, not to mention drag&drop to extract DA right from the filesystem. Currently it's in its third beta I think, and even on my old-ass 2x results were OK.
I admit I didn't believe it when Be went with thise whole "Media OS" schtick, but now... I'll be surprised if they don't own all of the audio market in short order.
Moderators don't have access to delete (Score:1)
Why Real when you can MP3 (Score:1)
Why use real's technology when you can scream cast? You can already do that with be afik. And if you can't - it would be soo easy to write the app to do it.
Junglism. biatch. ;)
How fast is "quickly" though? (Score:1)
Well, I can scratch pretty well. I've heard others that are absolutely incredible though. Quick response time is critical. I hope this program/hardware can keep up.
For now, I'll stick to vinyl (thousands of pieces of which are scattered about my room...)
- A.P.
--
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
Depends what you call expensive. (Score:1)
- A.P.
--
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
The SL-1200 isn't *exactly* the same. (Score:1)
- A.P.
--
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
The Sounds of Slashdot (Score:1)
I'd buy it. Where do I send the cash?
DJ Shadow DOES need fake records (Score:1)
Like all things, it'll go digital to an extent. It'll slowly replace older stuff for most people, being techinically superior. It happens everywhere constantly. I've heard lots of sound tracks produced through high end midi synths that sound exactly like a real symphony. Scratching is one of the easiest sounds to produce and imitate. Much easier than say a group of trumpets (which in most midi patches sounds like shit). Algorithms for beat detection and rapidly improving. So if the product grows this far (if it doesn't one will take its place) it'll probably eventually do that. And since most jungle and dance music (or 'electronica' in general) usually have clear beats often designated by bass drums of some type. It only makes it easier and more realistic for a computer to do the beat matching for you. So next time DJ Shadow is doing a live performance and is in a pissy mood, he can let the computer take over. Much like Madonna lip syncs to songs very often when on tour. Except she does it because of the dancing.
Who would pass up the oppurtunity to have a computer correct your mistakes in music? Most musicians don't, I don't think djs are an exception. Its very possible for the software to do that. When you get off beat and you start looking like ass, it'll could correct you.
This product, because of BeOS, the new media kit, and translators, will also work on other formats than mp3s.
Maybe not in the first release, but probably shortly thereafter.
-soco
Quite Cool BUT Most of the BeOS Software is FREE (Score:1)
Yup, as even noted by AltOS, the BeOS has an exceptional amount free software, and as the few kinks are worked out in the posix stuff, more and more gnu stuff is compiling right outta the box.
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
Well music isn't quite like a circus or illusions. You listen to it, not watch it. So long as it sounds good, does it really matter? Lip Syncing and to an extent beyong that faking the playing of musical instruments is quite common. Who said that portishead or dj shadow never tried that once because the just didn't feel like it.
Its much easier to carry around a cd or disk, than it is to carry around a live orchestra. Live music still has no real comparison. Not even the CD. My point is that all things are replaced. It'll happen with this to. No one says that eventuallly this won't be harder to play in the future, thus granting more technical merit (atleast from me). Musicians shouldn't be in it to 'look' good, if they are, they aren't true musicians.
Its all about the actual music/sound being produced.
Something for Linux... (Score:1)
Beatmixing (Score:2)
Ok, here's my idea for an MP3 extension, that I don't think anyone's gotten around to coding yet. There's one semi-related plugin for winamp, but it's not quite there.
First, maintain some timing information about all of your MP3s: beats per minute, and a 'reference beat' offset time that indicates a time offset from the start of the track that the first 'beat' occurs. Now, the beat through a track is not constant, so for beatmixing purposes we'll probably need two 'reference beats', one near the start and one near the end. No need to perform realtime waveform analysis to try to figure out the beat, we can precalculate it or set it manually once.
Next, plug all that info into a database. Point your MP3 player at the database.
Now, as we approach the end of a given track, we start playing another MP3 with a 'compatible' bpm (we can set some sort of difference threshhold), matching the reference beats. Then, just crossfade from one track to the next. We can 'crossfade' the playback speed of the two tracks to compensate for any discrepancy in the bpm, as well.
Viola! Perfect, automated beatmixing.
Of course, there's lots of opportunity to add manual control, the crossfade and track selection to start with. No need to make the DJs feel like they're out of a job.
Oh pluuueeeze! (Score:1)
Sheesh!
J.
Vaporvare is on Linux too! (Score:1)
J.
Yup, snobs are everywhere... (Score:1)
awe-some! (Score:1)
Most of the stuff I did was rock/dance/trance/techno so the MP3 loss of fidelity or choppiness of soft soft music wouldn't have been noticed...
Something similar for Linux.... (Score:1)
How about being able to burn LPs? (Score:1)
Now with CDs too, in UNIX (Score:1)
Playing multiple tracks at a time is a pretty cool hack though. I can't think of a single good use for it, except to show that it can be done (and isn't that reason enough?)
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
Shadow doesn't need dumb ass representatives (Score:1)
What i was commenting about is the fact that everyone thinks that this is some ground breaking thing when in the eyes of real dj's its along the lines of CD DJ's.
Sure it may take skill that is similar to spinning real records, but is it the same thing?
No.
Does it produce the same sound and feel that real records do?
No.
Its some toy for slashdot reading technogeeks to jizz their pants over.
So calx instead of slamming on me for a post try replying to the content of my post.
P.S. Calx is a dodo head.
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
So ha
Almost... (Score:1)
[alsa.jcu.cz]
alsaplayer.It's not quite ready yet. Mixed with terminatorX it should do the same. The Vinyl interface is cool though (hi Markjan!
Adnans
ANything like this for Linux? (Score:1)
Most common in search engines (Score:1)
WHO DELETED ALL MY POSTS??? (Score:1)
-Eric
Thanks for the Response (Score:1)
-Eric
wow...gimme (Score:1)
If I'm spinning, digital is bad.
Besides, I really don't want to carry my computer to every show. Things go wrong with computers, especially in a dark, sweaty, smokey environment such as a party or whatever. When was the last time you've seen a Technics 1200 have memory problems or a hard drive crash?
For making tapes, I just run the output from my mixer into my computer and record it with some nice multi-tracking software. That way, I can layer to my hearts content and when I'm happy, burn to a CD or record to a DAT.
In my opinion, scratching is supposed to be gritty noisy and analogue, not something digital. But then again, that's just me getting whimsical.
cheers,
JayPee
Midwest Massive
DrunkenMasters(TM)
ps,
Gabber bizatch!
yo it's tuff on tha streets (Score:1)
Don' dis ma home bo'
How fast is "quickly" though? (Score:1)
"There is a delay between when the DJ scratches
the record and when the sound happens, said
Bastian: 'About 12 milliseconds.'"
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
Quite Cool BUT (Score:1)
--Dave
Quite Cool BUT (Score:1)
Old Idea... (Score:1)
Pop mixer controls on teh top and scratch disc's on tops to give control of the CD's et. voilla a perfect DJ box... leave the record box behind...
I'm currenty trying to get an interface which does the same with the mouse on a screen.... for liveIce mp3 broadcasts.
mynameis...mynameis...mynameis... (Score:1)
ANything like this for Linux? (Score:1)
The BeOS scheduler currently has a quantum of 1 ms, with a maximum of 3 ms available in a timeslice (correct me if I'm wrong). So a realtime priority thread could theoretically awake within a few ms of when it needs to run. This is important if you're listening to input from a turntable
On Linux, if I have been told correctly, the scheduler quantum is 10 ms. (again, I could be wrong) Not exactly optimized for quasi-realtime.
cool (Score:1)
How does this affect other applications though? Any worse than on BeOS? (since you have experience there as well
Dude, this is hella cool! (Score:1)
Probably a stupid question... (Score:1)
If I understand correctly, this lets you change the playback speed of an MP3 by turning a vinyl record. It's set up so that when the record is playing at normal speed, the MP3 is playing at normal speed. When you stop the record or move it backwards, the MP3 playing stops or moves backwards. If you "scratch" the record by moving it back and forth, MP3 playback moves back and forth in the same way. The idea is to make it sound as if the MP3 was stamped into the record, which lets you do the same kinds of record tricks that DJs did when records were common.
_If_ I understand correctly
BeOS (Score:1)
I don't use BeOS all the time, because I cashed in for a SBlive.. and there is no Sound Drivers yet.. 3 week of april.. and i'm in beos all the time.
Hopefully Bochs is speed up, or Bewine is created.
RAruler
Beatmixing (Score:2)
-- Eric
Quite Cool BUT (Score:1)
The world needs more DJ Shadow (Score:1)
Running Linux? (Score:1)
I'm planning to maybe do a little mp3-proggy (using the xaudio-sdk) and
building a denon 2500f-like DJ-MP3-Player.
Do any of you know of a pogram which already does that (without using a fancy interface)?
The Porblem is: I'd like to use a little LC-Display or something, and not carry a whole monitor around for dj-ing.
Any answer appreciated
Ciao
Leo
FS!=FB (Score:1)
free as in free speech. not free beer.
If I go get BeOS, say I buy it (like I bought RedHat and Debian GNU/Linux), and I like it, can I give a copy to my friend who might also like it? If not, I'm not interested.
(FS!=FB)==BS (Score:1)
In order for an operating system to be really useful for me, I've got to be able to give out copies of it -- it has to do with the way that I use computers: I only use other people's computers. Most frequent are computers at my work, clients' computers, and my friends computers (many of which I assembled).
I typically have some level control over the software that is installed on all these systems, and don't want to cause the owner to have to pay for software. Because if it belongs to my work, I'd rather get a raise 'cause I provide less expensive solutions. If it belongs to a client, I'd rather they pay me to set up a free system than blow their wad on software. And if it belongs to my friends, most of whom are not rolling in dough, I just want to save them some money. And I want to do it legally. So I can only in good conscience use freely distributable software. (and not all of this software is GPL "free" or even DFSWG "free")
Probably a stupid question... (Score:1)
Why Real when you can MP3 (Score:1)
your pal,
johnnycal
Quite Cool BUT (Score:1)
Whimper (Score:1)
Good god! (Score:1)
Quite Cool BUT (Score:1)
I hope that someone will make a clone for linux, and since we already have terminatorX we already have a ground to build on...
no pluuueeeze! (Score:1)
What attitude should linux have, shoud it maybe just go kill itself and leve you to BE ?, is it so dangerous to wish we get cool apps cloned to linux?, its the way it works
GNU ain't commercial and GNU is lots more than LINUX. the only thing thats damaging to the community is looser who can't accept GNU but run it for some other strange reason.
as linux said -- World domination --
lets hope we wont have to run crappy oses within 10 years.
Underground musicians reading slashdot? (Score:1)
Does anyone have any info about what OS's they use? Atari, MacOS?
I've heard RDJ uses a PowerMac. Thomas Jenkinson ought to have quite poor equipment, while Luke started out with just a synth.
What kind of music do other slashdotters listen to?
http://www.hyperreal.org/ hosted at apache.org
DJ Shadow doesn't need fake ass records (Score:1)
Have you ever tried to carry boxes and boxes of records around? It sucks.
Having the same physical interface, and only having to lug two or three boxes around is what it's all about.
How fast is "quickly" though? (Score:1)
No one in the audience heard the difference. The only noticable difference was that the DJ entered the building carrying only 2 vinyl records instead of his usual 4 heavy boxes