RealNetworks buys Xing 46
Keith Russell
writes "Caught this on ZDNet. RealNetworks
is buying the Xing Corp. for ~$75M in stock. Looks like Real and IBM are gearing up for a fight with Microsoft over digital audio. " True-combine this with the IBM partnership and Microsoft's announcements about digital vidoe-things are about to get messy.
Improve... (Score:1)
They can start by producing a FakeAudio player that runs from the console, so I don't have to waste n million colours that I don't have on my X display just to play a radio broadcast...
Talk about chasing a user into the arms of Nullsoft. Of course, I'm probably the only one who's using monochrome X anyway.
Slightly off-topic (Score:1)
And Don't forget Sony! (Score:1)
ttyl
Farrell
watch out for quicktime (Score:1)
Apple is supposed to have one of their product announcement conferences on the 19th of this month. Everyone's expecting quicktime 4, which will support live streaming of audio and video. I don't see how real expects to compete with a vastly superior technology, widely deployed, that requires very little server overhead. A mac os x server is needed to serve LIVE video and audio, but prerecorded content can be hosted on ANY server, and it will "just stream". Also, if you want proof, goto http://quicktime.apple.com. Check out the examples of the qdesign codec. Very high quality audio that starts playing almost immediately on a 56K connection, and loads faster than it plays! Also, quicktime supports 3d technologies, interactive panoramas, and (few people are aware) a more or less complete toolbox. Entire cross platform apps can basically be written using the quicktime toolbox, and it's now ported to java. Pretty crazy stuff!!
fix. (Score:1)
Looking for Linux testers (Score:1)
Look at this.. they're looking for linux beta testers....
Where does IBM fit in? (Score:1)
Which reminds me, some time ago IBM had their own streaming audio and video format, called Bamba. Did they abandon it? (like with so many good IBM technologies...)
Slightly off-topic (Score:1)
Free Video? (Score:1)
I did a 10 second avi and got 46 MB. Something tells me this would require hardware to process the bandwidth.
Oh yeah, then there's QuickTime (Score:1)
And Don't forget Sony! (Score:1)
Slightly off-topic (Score:1)
Offline RealAudio? (Score:1)
Is there a good solution for offline RealAudio? What I'd really like to do is slurp down files listed in a
I know one possibility is to redirect
On a related note, is RealAudioMP3 possible? Are there any utilities for manipulating Real files? Is the RealAudio format open?
Hehe, more proprietary audio (Score:1)
It's interesting watching dinosaurs fight.
REal --bad bad bad (Score:1)
Talk about a company aspiring to be MSesque this is it.
Thier buying Xing will be interesting. Can they incorporate mp3 into thier way fo thinking, will crappy sounding RA files bcome MP3s with another extension?
Hehe, more proprietary audio (Score:1)
Stuart.
Slightly off-topic (Score:1)
I refuse to run NetShow... Will RealAudio ever release the G2 player for Linux?????
This is a great thing for RealNetworks (Score:1)
I'm sure the aquisition of this encoding technology will be a good thing for Real. I can't wait to listen to NPR on the net and hear the same quality I get on my radio.
RealNetworks and Linux (Score:1)
They made one really cool touch in the GUI, FWIW. In the preferences there's an option to output the command line syntax for every command the GUI runs. Very cool for scripting and stuff...
Don't give up on RealNetworks and Linux yet...
e;
Just a shame that Real are spammers (Score:1)
Pop your head into the seething pit of hell that is news.admin.net-abuse.email and you'll see that Real have been guilty of sending out email to completely fictional addresses in the hope of hitting a real box.
I myself have an email sitting in my queue addressed to 'temp', which has never been a correct address, and has never been used by me to register anything. And trust me, I *always* say I don't want email (or use completely fictitious addresses, poor old billg@microsoft.com must be getting hammered
Real have spammed before, apologised for the mess-up, spammed again, apologised again, and are now spamming completely non-Real related junk to the very people they promised they had removed from their lists.
Until they clean up their act, I won't use their software, it's as simple as that.
Just a shame that Real are spammers (Score:1)
I'm not a happy bunny.
Linux Version (Score:1)
Go to Macintouch [macintouch.com] and scroll down 3/4 of the way.
And Don't forget Sony! (Score:1)
But if Sony can put out a player that can hold more music
than MP3-Players can store on flash-cards these days they might get
away with a proprietary format...
bye,
cord
--
Xing never worked right (Score:1)
And Don't forget Sony! (Score:1)
No kidding Real benefits (Score:1)
Not quite bought yet... (Score:1)
The winner is Linux (Score:2)
What might the future hold... (Score:2)
So where does this leave real/ibm. First of all, they can put add a bit more weight by working more closely with AOL/Netscape/Sun since their also countering the small and squishy company. Second, they need content, and lots of it. Ibm/real seem to have a good head start with audio but video is where the future is. Get working with Apple, Fox and some of the cable networks. A good pilot would be to test out weekly boardcasts of South Part/ Simpsons/ etc. There is already a market there that can be used. And from there, who knows what can happen..
It's called MPEG, (Score:2)
MPEG-1 (ISO-11172) and MPEG-2 (ISO-13818) which cover audio, video and system streams are open standards, and for most parts of it you don't have to pay royalties if you distribute an implementation. (The exception as I understand being MP-3 which really is MPEG-1 Layer III)
Xing got 'big' by building MPEG codecs.
Their codecs used to be only partially complaint with the specs, they lacked some major parts in the decode engine which made it (in my opinion) a useless product. Dunno what the current status is, because I think Xing was sorta blown away by far better products,- I lost interest...
(And YES, the ActiveMovie MPEG software decode is pretty decent,- to bad they don't release source.
Breace
IBM bad at consumer products (Score:3)
Microsoft also has a *bit* of an advantage in the consumer OS market, which is the platform all this stuff depends on.