Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media

Epitaph Selling MP3s 83

ElJefe writes "According to SonicNet, Epitaph Records (Offspring, Bad Religion, NOFX') is going to start selling songs and albums in MP3 format on Emusic. The songs are 99 cents each, or $8.99 for a whole album. The article quotes the president of EMusic [Ed: "SDMI will die" guy] as saying "You go where the customers are, and they're going to stay with MP3." Although I'm not a huge fan of any of the bands, it's nice to see someone using MP3 instead of SDMI. " The site also has yet another article on SDMI that says SDMI will treat copies like physical objects, limiting copies to a number specified by the content distributor.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Epitaph Selling MP3s

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    It's in the spec.

    The four copy thing is a little misrepresented. They're saying if you own a cd, rip, encode, and SDMI tag a song, you can only make four of them (SDMI'd )at a time. You can make more, but you have to do the process again. The assumption is that you're not going to want to dump the song that you're legally entitled to copy into more than four players at any given time, thus cutting down on people making mass dupes.

    It makes sense in a way.

    You can do whatever else you want to the song in other formats. And remember, SDMI doesn't cover algos or encoding schemes, it's just a copy protection device.

    What was more irksome to me was the fact that a portable player is not allowed to slap the SDMI tag on, that has to be done on the computer (or whatever) side. Sure, it makes a lot of sense from a business standpoint, but it utterly precludes someone from producing a single, handy device any time in the future. You gotta buy at least two things.

    Heh. Which again, makes sense from a business standpoint.
  • That still doesnt stop me from ripping a cd I bought (Because I liked the low quality I downloaded for free) and giving it to you.

    --nrl
  • Offspring didn't rerelease the Epitaph stuff on their new label (Columbia). Their first (self-titled) album from 1989 was originally self-released, and they rereleased it in 1995 on Nitro Records (their own label) which is distributed by Epitaph (hence the Epitaph logo on it). Their two Epitaph records (Ignition and Smash) are still only sold by Epitaph.
  • First of all, NOFX did already leave Epitaph for their own label. However, there are still 3 or 4 of the older NOFX CDs that Epitaph has the rights to. Epitaph also has the rights to two Offspring CDs and around 6 or 7 Bad Religion CDs. They also still have Rancid, Pennywise, and quite a few other good bands.

    As for Brett Gurewitz, he was never the lead singer of Bad Religion. He was the lead guitarist and co-songwriter (he wrote about 1/2 the songs, with the other half being written by the lead singer, Greg Graffin). He's been on and off of various drugs for the last 20 years. However, I don't think he personally runs the label much anymore. He was particularly upset when The Offspring left his label before the end of their contract (he finally agreed to let them go in return for some payments in order to avoid having to sue them). Rumor has it he's going to be rejoining Bad Religion for their 20th-anniversary album in 2000.
  • Tada! Impossible to copy data (except by analog sampling the speaker output) and all the user has to do is buy a USB SDMIdrive and USB SDMIspeakers. Fire away if you see any technical problems.

    Instead of 'analog sampling the speaker output' I just crack it opne, and reroute the speaker wires to the audio in of my stereo, or, send it right back into my computer for re-digitizing... hmmm?

  • Greg Graffin is the lead singer of Bad Religion (at least on: Suffer, No Control, Against the Grain, Generator, Recipe for Hate, Stranger Than Fiction and Gray Race).

    Brett was the guitarist..and helped write about half their great songs. Greg wrote the other songs. Brett departed sometime around Stranger Than Fiction (but I dont' really remember when).

  • What people dont understand is that the cost of the CD's has nothing to do with productin cost. In only cost a label like Sonya dime or so to make a CD. The cost of cd's are because of promotional cost, markup from the label to distributor, distributor to reseller, and reseller to public. Until the prices of CDs go down, the prices of mp3s shouldnt see a big price drop. Why does software cost so much? Uhh? It doesnt cost 180 dollars to package Windows 98. The cost has nothing to do with packaging.
  • Mr Brett was the guitarist for Bad Religion, not vocalist.

    The Offspring screwed Epitaph and Mr Brett by demanding to be let out of their contract so they could sign for mega-bucks with a major label. Rather than hold them to their contract as he very legally could have, Mr Brett gave the Offspring brats the release they requested.

    This was documented in Alternative Press [altpress.com] back around the time it took place.

    Jack


  • ...with the hits "Self Esteem"(RealAudio excerpt) and "Come Out and Play."...

    ...included the song "I'm Insane" (RealAudio excerpt)...

    You wouldn't think that in the middle of a gung-ho article about the success of mp3, they would know better than to include that most-proprietary of formats that is RealAudio?

    Who's with me here? I for one can't stand RealNetworks stuff! I'm sure it's a wonderful format, but it requires their ugly, unstable player, which keeps expiring, forcing me to download it over and over again, while they keep trying to sell me their "Plus" version, and which, when it installs, changes my Netscape prefs, making itself the default player for all the media types (to be fair, QuickTime does this too -- Grr!), and doing everything it can to stop me from saving anything locally. No application is entitled to modify config files belonging to another application without my permission. Aside from being incredibly rude, things that do this are my prime suspects when my prefs file gets corrupted. And why won't they let me save files locally? Who owns this machine anyway?

    For all I know, the expiring-version thing might have been just for beta, but I doubt the rest has changed. I wouldn't know, though, because I refuse to touch the stuff anymore. Unfortunately, that means that whenever some wise guy puts something up only in "Real" formats, it's inaccessible for me. I guess now I know how the rest of you feel about those QuickTime codecs without Linux players. My message to web designers: Fewer Formats, Fewer Clicks.

    David Gould
  • I've been thinking about this. I'm not up on the theory, but I would believe that it probably is possible to watermark a track pretty much transparently (by doing something more sophisticated than twiddling the low bits), so that it would be very hard for a filter to destroy the watermark without also losing significant fidelity.

    As you said, who wants low-quailty tracks? And whatever quality the original is, the filtered bootleg is going to be lower, right?

    David Gould
  • Now if Matador and Merge

    Matador has - http://www.matador.recs.com/mp3 is the address if I remember correctly. It's not big or anything, but they're throwing the "gimme free music now or else I'll pout" crowd a bone. :)
  • slightly off topic, but, yes, Neutral Milk Hotel is an Elephant 6 band, but E6 has become more of a recording consortium than a label. Beulah is on Sugar Free, Apples in Stereo are on SpinArt, Olivia Tremor Control are on Flydaddy... only a few assorted EPs and 7"s have actually been released on the Elephant 6 label.

    The more you know...
  • Not only did Tom Waits recently say that he'd commit to Epitaph (I believe the recent quote was that they are "a bunch of dedicated guys who actually care about the music that they're producing"), but Epitaph has been stretching its fingers past the "punk" scene: into blues and folk. So this doesn't just mean that punk will become readily accessable, but so will other genres.

    MP3s for sale, well, I support, but I don't think they're the hottest idea. I've always been a big fan of music in general, and therefore a big "try before you buy" advocate. Sell the songs for 99 cents and you might have some buyers, but drop the bitrate or dub them to mono and put 'em out for free and you'll get a following. How many times have we heard Hip Song X on the radio, said, "Oh, I'll buy that album," then found out the album sucks, or the band is overproduced and can't play three chords live, or some other horrible situation? The way I see it is that MP3s are a nice way to reintroduce musicianship and integrity to the industry, things which have long gone unrecognized. They allow independant artists who are talented to get recognized and popular artists to have a chance to truly prove their worth. It's been said millions of times: set the water level and society will swim to meet it. Now we can hear Hip Song X on the radio and then go and find the rest of the album somewhere to determine whether or not its worth our $13.99 or greater. If it isn't, oh well. That band will have their moment and then fade away, perhaps faster than usual. However, if it truly is a great record that deserves notice, it will be noticed and bought and exhalted, despite what the big six and other critics think.

    I'm just ranting, really, at this point, and we all know the virtues of MP3s. Epitaph is taking a step in the right direction. Now if Matador [recs.com] and Merge [mrg2000.com] (Superchunk's label, with Neutral Milk Hotel, Rocket From The Crypt, Portastatic, Magenetic Fields, Ladybug Transistor, and Third Eye Foundation, amongst others) and Touch & Go [southern.com] (Jesus Lizard, Blonde Redhead) and SubPop [subpop.com] (a whole buncha bands, even though the label tends to get sneered at) and, hell, Grand Royal [grandroyal.com] (Beastie Boys' label, now with Lucious Jackson, Ben Lee, Butter 08, and some other fairly hip groups) would open up and do the same thing, we'd really be cooking with gas. Show the RIAA just what they're up against.
  • I'm happy at any rate, this is Tom Waits' new label.
  • that maybe true, but when you are driving 70mph down a busy interstate, you cant tell the difference between an mp3 and a song from a cd.
    At least, I cant.
  • ...when I first read the "headline" that one of my favorite groups in college was recording again. That'd be Epitaph that made "Outside the Law" on Billingsgate. Too bad.

    BTW, to keep this slightly on topic: My $0.02 is that MP3 is a great idea for making samples of each song on a CD available. Long gone are the days when radio stations used to play most of the songs on an album/CD. Now you just get the bit hit single ("With a bullet? With a bullet!"). Not enough for me anyways in order to make the decision to buy a CD.

    I'd like to know where the poster who said he was paying US$15 for CDs was buying them. The last few times I've looked in a music store at the local mall the average price was in the $18-$19 range. Last time I paid as low as $15 was when I bought a CD that Richard Pinhas was selling at his show in Chicago. I actually prefer buying them that way; at least I know that the artist is getting the lion's share of the money and it's not going for lights and floor space rental at a megamall. Mail order CDs are usually a much better buy as well (but you gotta know what you're looking for).


  • ``Try Best Buy, if you have one in your area.''

    Been there... done that. Best Buy's OK for some things. They used to have a decent jazz section but they seem to have pretty much phased that out. About all I'd buy from them now is a CD version of an old album that I like.

    I judge a music store by the artists that they see fit to make a plastic divider for. It's not a perfect method but it tells me something about the music they choose to stock. If I don't see dividers for artists that I like I look for the "miscellaneous" dividers like "Rock - A", etc. If they don't see fit to stock artists that I would want to buy under either of those categories then they're probably not worth wasting the time looking for anything. Life's too short to keep returning to a store that thinks that what everyone wants to buy is the Back Street Boys and N'Sync. Maybe I'm too harsh on Best Buy but they haven't been stocking anything that I'd be interested in spending money on (although I did stumble upon a re-release of Henry Cow's first recording) and their clerks are fairly clueless. True story: Teenage kid (holding up a copy of "Dark Side of the Moon"): Is this good? Best Buy droid: "Oh Yah! That's their first CD."

    Maybe I've just known too many folks who've actually owned record stores and really gave a damn about what they stocked and really knew about the music to tolerate outfits like this that couldn't even be bothered to hire people who knew what they were selling.

    ``Tower used to have great prices''

    Agreed. Tower prices are getting out of hand. What ruined Tower for me, before their prices got jacked up, was the narrowing selection. If they carry an artist it's usually just the latest couple of releases and that bothers me. One of the Towers in the Chicago area used to be a place called Rose Records. Before Tower bought them out, they were the best place to find a great selection. That used to have a really cool method of stocking their records. You looked up the artist in one of the dozens of Schaum (sp?) catalogs that were scattered around the store (attached to strings with masking tape - really high-tech) and looked up the recording by the label and the record label's stock number. It was wierd that you'd be going through the racks and find some really strange artists in the same bin.

    But then isn't this quite the thread fork...

  • SDMI can only be dumped to a portable mp3/SDMI player *three times*?

    All the more reason to *not* get one of those players then. The technology just doesn't support it. If you want to shell out the big bucks, you can get an hour's worth of music on those things. But if you want to listen to something different and don't want to pay ~$50 for another memory module, you'd have to erase it and dump a different set of files to the device. Meaning you can only take the SDMI files with you three times.

    portable mp3 players are a nice idea, but the technology/market isn't up to a point where they're yet feasable as an affordable portable listening device. You're better off getting a soundcard with an optical output (like the Xitel Storm Platinum [xitel.com] ) and recording those songs onto minidisc. Cheap, swappable storage, and if you can listen to them on the computer, you can dump them on as many minidiscs as you like as often as you like.


  • Indie labels like Epitaph and Fat sell to distribs for anywhere from $6.50-$8.00.
  • Greg Graffin has always been the singer for BR... Brett Gurewitz started Epitaph mainly to release BR records... He left after the recording of Stranger Than Fiction because BR signed to Atlantic and Brett wanted to focus on Epitaph...
  • Flaw #1 is of course that just capturing the analogue output and digitizing that would be a breeze, and the quality would be CD-like (at least, much, much better than what MP3 encoders claim to be CD-quality)

    Flaw #2 is simply that some hacker will spent a few weeks and crack the security.

    Flaw #3 is that the "storare box" will be either to big (heavy) to carry around as a portable player, or to small to be able to contain all i want.

    Flaw #4 is that if the "black box" fails, you'll lose your data, without a chance of recovery. That wouldn't happen if your CD player broke down...

    Flaw #5 is that you'd have to purchase boxes for your car, the bathroom, the living room, the computer room, ... They better be cheap...

  • At US$0.99 a song - I would much rather buy individual tracks instead of a US$15 CD with 9 songs I dislike and 1-2 I really like. Once auto MP3 players become less expensive I will never use CD's again. With MP3's I can store all my music on cheap medium (ie 18gig IDE, w/r CDs, etc) instead of hauling a bunch of scratched audio CDs around with broken cases and best of all, CD changers will no longer be needed (10 disk just isn't enough). I look forward to the day I can pay 10 bucks to download 10 _really_ good songs onto my laptop, home, and auto system.
  • If you're looking for a particular song you (or at least I) probably don't have the time to surf the web and scan newsgroups for a free copy. Even if you do, after you download the ~4meg song you have no idea of the quality. The sites that become popular as "free MP3" sites will attract attention and get shut down. I will save myself time and just by the MP3 - $0.99 is just so cheap. Besides, what's to keep me from ripping a CD sending it as MP3 to all my friends? Also, CDs can now easily be copied using CD writers. MP3 or CD - they face the same problems.
  • MP3s can't be like the radio because some people download entire albums @128/160/192/256kbps which is very close in quality to a CD
  • Go to the site and click on Punk O Rama 4. They want 4.99 for the entire album. IIRC the cd costs $3.99 (unless the price has gone up from punk o rama 3, i really haven't checked). The point is production costs are $0.00, atleast for a cd it costs them something like $1 to produce. They should want less money for the mp3s, not the same ammount. And even $8.99 isn't that great of a price. From what I've heard thats about the same that they sell cds to record stores for. So if this works for them they will make more money (again, $0 production cost). It's nice to see that they are still screwing the customer.
  • fine just add the mp3 header to /etc/magic. then delete all files that have an mp3 header. It's not that difficult of a concept. Yet another dumb pattent
  • You don't even need a sound card to rip the "protected" formats. Just write a dummy sound card driver that does nothing but redirect the output to a file. Digital copy, no D/A conversion. Copy protection in general doesn't work. Even when companies were doing interesting copy protection on computers it didn't work.
  • that only the RIAA record companies (there's only six of them AFAIK) really givea rat's ass about SDMI. The companies that don't have much to gain from supporting SDMI because the big six would buy them out or subsidize them are beginning to support the open formats (MP3 and 4). I just think this really proves that the RIAA has no one's interest but their own when they propose all these closed formats. Down with the RIAA! Free Antarctica!
  • *sigh* Ok, yes, that's cute, but you're still having to make an analog copy. (And I guess after that, you can make as many digital copies as you need to.)

    But I was hoping someone would tell me that my idea was implausible, or that some aspect of it, higher upstream, wouldn't work because ________. Instead, I'm just seeing silence. If what I described works, then SDMI may be similar.

    BTW, once they have a closed black box that uses a secure protocol (with the chips all dunked in epoxy so you can't easily anaylze it ;-) to store and retrieve music, they won't have just stopped digital copies. It'll also be easy to add "features" like usage counting/logging, and automatic "uploads" of those logs to the record companies, as part of the download protocol, so they can bill for on a per-listen basis. They'll get everything they want.

    Ugh, I don't like this. We gotta do something, or else it's going to really happen.

    I think the best defense it to talk the musicians out of it. Many of them (well, at least in the metal genre) are pretty accessible. Or better yet, prove to them that they can make money selling MP3 music, by pointing to Epitaph's success (assuming Epitaph actually succeeds).

    Without musicians, the SDMI backers will have nothing to protect, except for "corporate music" which will probably generate enough revenue to keep 'em going, but shouldn't effect everyone else too badly.

  • by Sloppy ( 14984 ) on Wednesday July 14, 1999 @05:11AM (#1803591) Homepage Journal

    I have an entirely speculative idea on how SDMI might work, based simply on how I would do it, if I were a music industry asshole. You're all going to hate it, but maybe it will be fun to poke holes in my idea. Gee, I'm just begging for flames, aren't I? :-)

    The goal: Minimize the exposure of digital data in plaintext form. If the data ever passes through a user-programmable computer system or a network, it must be in encrypted form.

    The first thing I'de do is tell users to forget about any delusions that they will ever be able to play SDMI music through a conventional sound card. As many others have mentioned, it is impossible to protect the data if that happens, because someone will just use a virtual soundcard driver to slurp up the plaintext data. Likewise, SDMI music "files" stored on a general-purpose computer must never be reusable. In fact, your SDMI music is not going to be stored on the same drive your Windoze system is....

    And here is the gimmick: I would design a spec for a black box that plugs into a USB or firewire port. This box would be an embedded computer with hard disk. This system would be used for all SDMI storage. Users would never have access to music files on their own hard disks which are accessible by general-purpose computers.

    Downloading music from a server would really be a transaction between my storage box and the server. There would be a secure encrypted link. That way, the data can pass through a general-purpose computer, so users can use the internet, web browsers (with a plugin, of course), etc. to get the files. But the data would be encrypted and useless at any point between the server and my box. Only as it is written to my embedded system would the data be decrypted. (And it would probably be scrambled, like DVD is, before writing to HD, in case some cracker takes the HD out of my box.)

    Playback would be the same idea: a secure link between the embedded box and a SDMI speaker.

    Tada! Impossible to copy data (except by analog sampling the speaker output) and all the user has to do is buy a USB SDMIdrive and USB SDMIspeakers. Fire away if you see any technical problems.

    And if you think you see a marketing problem (e.g. "Users would not buy the fucking box and new speakers") then I'de like to remind you that we're talking about the same kind of people who throw away a perfectly good P100 because it didn't run Win98 fast enough, and they "upgraded" to Win98 because someone sent them an MS Office 2000 document. So don't try to tell me that consumers aren't suckers or that they reject bad ideas.

    I think I see some ways to attack SDMI, but it's going to be a long hard battle, where you're not only fighting a large industry, but also fighting the hypnotized herd who funds it... It will be like Windoze all over again. Please point out my logic flaws, because this is getting depressing.

  • And if you start looking for files with a copntent looking like an mp3, people will compress and/or cryptate their files. Protection and regulations are allways one step behind freedom and crime.
  • I could be proven wrong in two years, but I quite honestly doubt that the online sales of MP3's will do much better than SDMI. I'd rather buy good old hard plastic Compact Discs, wouldn't you? Buying MP3's I'd feel like I was being cheated out of my money. Here's a bunch of data that I'm getting that I could make a million copies of, that I probably could've copied from my friends... and I'm paying green money for it! Yes, it costs a little less than an album, but I don't mind paying a couple bucks extra if it means I can just swivel my chair to the right, scan around, pull an album out of my CD rack and pop the CD into my drive. There's something about that that feels better than scanning through a bunch of playlists.

    Don't get me wrong: I love MP3's, I've endcoded 11GB of them so far, and until I buy a second CD drive I'll be playing them when I know I have to swap a lot of data CD's in and out of the computer. But still...
  • There's no link from the article, but it's talking about this [emusic.com].
  • SDMI means nothing.

    Who in their right mind would buy digital music that gets stored on their hard drive when they could buy a CD and not have to worry about losing the data or accidently deleting it.

    The pirates won't stop pirating. MP3 encoders won't stop coming out. MP3 players won't stop coming out. Rio won't go away.

    RIAA can't stop MP3 any more than they can stop Microsoft from using their Word document format. All they are doing is trying to provide a "legal alternative" for the consumer buzz about MP3. I don't buy it, probably nobody who has MP3s will, and the new consumers won't see any advantages SDMI offers over a real CD.

    So who cares? The MP3 "industry" and underground have nothing to fear.
  • How do they plan to keep Mr x, who downloaded a $.99 song, from sending it to everybody he knows?

    I don't really understand why everybody seems to think downloadable music is such a great thing. Maybe when MP3 sound quality improves (like, to CD quality), and the portable players can hold a reasonable amount (at least 300 MB) for a reasonable price (sub $200), it'll be great. But for now I really see it as "the way to listen to songs you don't like enough to actually buy."

    Honestly, I've bought more CDs since I started listening to MP3s than I ever did before. Download a song, find out you love it, download a couple more from the album, love them too, buy the whole album.

    From what I understand, the amount of money the artists make off radio plays is insignificant; it's all about the publicity. In that regard, MP3s can just be the new radio. Let everybody download the new single for free in 96 khz, then if they like it, they can just go buy the cd for the regular ridiculous price.

    But what do I know. I know I have 5 more problems to do solving recurrences for my Algorithms class, and it's due at 11 am, and it's 4:30am right now. Sigh. What a slacker I am.

  • Try Best Buy, if you have one in your area. In my neighborhood, $15.99 is usually the highest price on most non-sale CDs, and you can find a lot for less than that. Tower used to have great prices, but they went the way of Sam Goody a year or two ago.
  • tell that to epitaph (or any other company).

    they'll crap themselves that the market will fall out from under their cds, and then they'll be left with a bunch of plastic on their shelves.

    the only way e-music companies can get big labels to allow mp3 distribution is to present them with a model that is very similar to the current cd market. The labels probably don't want to shift millions of mp3s for a small price, they just want to make sure they aren't left out in the cold if the whole thing takes off.


    +++++
  • Hellcat Records has a lot of really good bands. lots of ska and punk.
    hell, often i'll consider buying a cd just because it says Hellcat on it. (so far i've not been disappointed by anything they've produced)

    as far as epitaph goes, there's still some good bands on epitaph and many of them seem perfectly happy with where they are. I've never heard anyone in Rancid have anything bad to say about Bret or Epitaph. While i dont read a whole lot of punk mags and zines lately, the only person i have heard say anything bad was Dexter from Offspring. (and his problem sounded more like he and bret just dont like each other).


  • since all the freely available mp3 encoders and decoders won't go away anytime in the future.

    Any protected digital music format needs to be decoded and played back through the soundcard.
    There are plenty of soundcards with digital output. It's impossible to hinder people to make high quality MP3s from the digital signal.

    And there are still those old fashioned audio CD thingies. They are easy to rip and won't go away anytime soon.

    One can restrict future portable MP3 players. Yes. But that's it.
  • definitely right.

    but with a digital sound card you get the same result anyway. Anyway, a dummy driver surely is a cleaner solution.
  • Can someone please explain to me how this SDMI scheme of only allowing 4 copies of a track on your computer and only allowing 3 of them to be copied off to another medium? It seems like there are just too many easy ways of circumventing this plan to make it a feasible way of controlling piracy. What's to stop someone from using non-SDMI compliant programs to manipulate the files after they've been ripped and encoded?
  • How do they plan to keep Mr x, who downloaded a $.99 song, from
    sending it to everybody he knows?


    They probably don't.

    There will always be pirates burning CD's, and people illegally
    trading MP3's.. but I'm guessing that the fact that it's simple and
    cheap enough to do it legally now will encourage people who honor the
    artists to do buy legitimate copies.

    Personally, I think this is a _GREAT_ idea (one I had some time ago,
    too..) I'm hoping that this becomes widespread, so I never have to go
    to a store and waste time *hoping* that they carry a CD I want (which
    doesn't happen often - usually the CD's I want to buy are 'out of
    stock'.)

    The key behind this is convenience - it's inexpensive, and it's easy.
  • I can defeat several well known watermarking technologies fairly easily, but it not necessarily the case that everyone can or has the motivation to do this.
    If the watermarks survive the output stage of the soundcard, then sdmi enabled players may still not play them (or is that sdmi-II)

    anyway, don't hold your breath coz sdmi is dead in the water

    also, it is the copyright holders own decision as to what licence/format they release their music on, somewhat similar to the case with software.

    I support the right to release sdmi crippled music, I just don't expect anyone to want to bother downloading it and playing it.

    But then again, a lot of ppl eat McDonalds, so don't underestimate marketing power.

    -- Reverend Vryl

  • Havent thought of that one. I think it could work.

    #include "various_economic_and_marketing_reasons"
    // sorry, gettin lazy after like 5 posts
  • With all of the hoopla that has been going on lately about MP3s, it seems like everyone wants to throw those "obsolete" cds out the window and download more MP3s.

    I'm just as guilty about downloading tons of MP3s as the next guy, but let us not forget that the sound quality of an MP3 is nowhere near as good as a cd. Yes MP3s are easy and convenient and I love them, too. But they are not as good.


    -
  • OK, Kiddies, you want to make the RIAA look stupid, convince people that SDMI isn't worth the trouble, thwart the record industry's monopoly on music, and guarentee MP3 a long, successful life?

    Recognize efforts like these, and pay a measely buck for guarenteed, easy, and fast access to songs you like that puts money in the artist's pocket too.
  • Brett was an is the lead singer of Bad Religion..

    as for his heroin addiction, a few people say that he's back at it, again. alledgely, Epitaph isn't doing so hot, since almost all the music they've put out in the last year has sold like poop (probably because dumb punk rock gets old after 15 years).

    Tom Waits, however, is God.
  • just to clarify, Fat Mike and his wife are the sole proprieters of Fat Wreck Chords, which they started in 1993 with an EP release from Fat Mike's band, NOFX. but yeah, Fat Mike has been founded NOFX and has been playing in said back for 15-someodd years.
  • He has had more than one trip to rehab, if I recall correctly. And he is notorious for asking his bands to do things that no other independent labels would ever dream of. Virtually every band that has hit it big on Epitaph has been very, very tempted to go elsewhere, and with good reason.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • I think it's fairly apparent that the major labels are the ones really trying to stop MP3s from gaining a foothold. DeSoto, my personal fave label, has been putting up RealAudio files... Hopefully, they'll move to a more MP3-centric format. I mean, if you're staying in business selling your CDs for ten or eleven bucks in the first place, it's not a dramatic change in your business model, is it? (And I thought Neutral Milk Hotel was an Elephant 6 band?)
  • watermarking also fails. i can rip a watermarked song, run it through a filter, and poof! the watermark is gone. if the watermark survives that, then it is aurally significant enough to reduce the quality of the track.

    who will pay for low-quality tracks?
  • I wonder how well it deletes from CD-R's...
    "The Man(TM)" doesn't always think things through



    _______Dan________
    I also sang on "do whatcha like"
    and if you missed it
    I'm the one that said "just grab em in the biscuits"

  • I'm not sure why anyone would pay for digital music under the current distribution system. Download lower quality songs for a *slight* price break? No thanks. Not to mention that I have to pay for the storage... And, when my HD bites it, I lose all the songs that I haven't burnt to CD yet. What a mess. For a few bucks extra, I get a relatively permanent CD (plus booklet) that I can create MP3's from at any bit rate I like.

    Before I pay for digital music, I need to know that I can download songs I have paid for anytime I want. I want the company to keep track of the songs I have paid for, and to make the songs available for download by me at anytime (at higher and higher bit rates and in different formats as times change). That way, I can pay for a song once, and never have to worry about losing it. This way, the music companies can still control the music (I don't agree with them doing this, but it is inevitable that they will try) by making the music players unable to save to disk; you will need to download a song each time you want to hear it. Plus, each portable device can be given an encryption key, and the PC music players can encrypt the song for one portable device only. That way, per download, you can only send the song to one portable device, and can't trade from one portable to another. Furthermore, each download could be watermarked with the owner's information. If said owner distributes his songs, the record companies can trace it back to said owner.

    Of course, there will always be ways to circumvent any security measure. The only thing the record companies can do is make their distribution so much more convenient that the majority of people don't bother to pirate. It looks like they can do that, too: with the new satellite networks going up (designed to provide digital music to cars across the entire country), record companies could stream songs I request (that I have purchased already... Or, they could implement a pay-per-play system) to my devices (each with a separate encryption key). That way, only devices I have authorized can listen to my songs (I can register my friend's car radio so I can listen to my songs in her car), and the record company can make sure I am only listening to one song at a time. Under this system, I have every song I've ever owned available to me at any time on any of my home or portable devices. On a pay-per-play basis, I have virtually every song available to me, all on a portable satellite device. Pirate MP3s just don't compete with that sort of convenience, even if they are free. Record companies remain in control, can charge for songs, albums, pay-per-play, or even stream me advertisements and give me the songs for free. And it seems as though the technology to distribute songs in this way is almost available.

    Unfortunately, the artists lose under a system like this. Once again, the record company gets rich while the artist gets squat per album sale. Oh well, once a proletarian, always a proletarian.

  • If you don't pay the artists for their music, they do one of three things:

    Get another job, no music.
    Get another job, little music after work.
    Die from starvation.

    When, and if, I release my stuff, I'm gonna do it on my own, over the 'net, bypassing the record companies as well, not because I'm greedy, but because I need money in this society to pay for all sorts of things . . .

    hasta la bye bye

  • I respect your reply sounds like you know about Brett's stupid habit but at least it's a move in the right direction, MP3's are the next "indie scene" and alot more fun then Heroin.
    Check out Lint's (Tim Armstrong lead singer for RANCID) label Hellcat (distibuted by Epitaph), hopefully he'll follow suit.
    MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm MP3'sssss
  • I see your a PUNK Rock Enthusiest but if you knew FAT Mike you wouldn't like him!

    Unless he released all of his stuff in MP3 format that is, His only saving grace is Max and Johnny from the Swinging Utters.
  • Tom Waits MP3's HMMMMMM
    I think I've got the new album around here somewhere?????
    Oh Yeah I've saved a backup copy on my hard drive in commpressed format to save space.
    caseyriddell@yahoo.com
  • by TheRain ( 67313 )
    I think this is cool. Epitaph has always rocked.
  • Maybe that your operating system, while reading that determines it and do proper thinks :-)
  • I have a lot of faith in the future online sales of MP3's and other downloadable music formats. But we don't need to debate. I think the issue will be settled by my company's internet music network which includes buyMP3.com [buymp3.com]. But you shouldn't take my word for it... Buy an MP3 from us for $.99 and let us know exactly what you thought of the service.
    audiosurge.com [audiosurge.com] Capturing the Energy of Music

Swap read error. You lose your mind.

Working...