3-D Memory May Revolutionize PC Data Storage 89
Lots and lots of people have turned us on to this story and this follow-up in The Register about a "three-dimensional memory system" that is supposed to pack up to "2300GB into a PC Card-sized device" and may cost as little as $30 to manufacture. Sounds great, but it's apparently still in the pre-vaporware stage of development so don't throw away your hard drives quite yet.
Follow Up (Score:1)
But those toilet-bowl brushes sure do sound cool. Can't wait to upgrade mine.
100GB on a watch (Score:1)
The second article doesn't instill confidence (Score:1)
The biggest problem there is right now in this field is moving from 2 to 3 dimensions. If someone were to come up with a method of moving waste heat out of the substrate and made the technology stackable, densities wouldn't be as much of a problem. There is some interesting optical reading of magnetic effects going on in some of the labs these days which should improve access times but this usually means that the 3rd dimension is needed for the optics (like heads over media). One thing that I think was played around with was vertical positioning with edge bonding as well as double sided dies but that never went very far in the 80s when I was involved (I was a wirebonder in a previous life, now it's all automated)
Geek me baby! (Score:1)
Think about those übergeeky Casio calculator thingies packin' a 100 megs (or was that migs? :D)
Questions questions... (Score:1)
give enough details other than 'magneto-optical' -
what, 3 lasers and a field reading/writing bits in a
cube of stuff? Maybe the next 'bubble memory' device?
(anyone old enough to remember those?) I know a MO
disk you have to buffer and rewrite a whole track just
to alter one bit. Maybe a data access rate of 100Mbps
but it takes 3 minutes to write? Who knows....
Chuck
Vaporware? (Score:1)
The question is, when will we have watches that act as personal HD's... If your within 5 ft of the computer, say... it could be automounted over an RF channel... "Quake. Never leave home without it."
Re:Questions questions... (Score:1)
Not $30 it's 35 pounds (Score:1)
Re:The second article doesn't instill confidence (Score:1)
Tabloid alert (Score:1)
Ohh, the register... (Score:2)
Has it ever occurred to you that God might be a committee?
Future News (Score:2)
"Professor invents 4 dimentional storage device. Coming to stores 20 years ago!"
SirSlud
(looking for more storage space for all his prOn)
Re:Not $30 it's 35 pounds (Score:1)
rightshift-alt-3 on a US keyboard (under Xfree86 anyway)
Nick
Brain for sale (Score:1)
It ought to be just the thing to go with... (Score:1)
...my 256-bit 64-processor wearable -- the one that's integrated into my leather jacket, with the wireless 100 Tbps Internet connection and the little plastic tiara of electrodes for direct neural I/O. (paging William Gibson, white courtesy telephone, please...)
"'Tis a consummation devoutly to be wish'd."
Red Herring... (Score:1)
Hey wait, I think I'll patent 3D storage devices right now!
Holographic Memory (Score:1)
Technical details from one of the JV companies. (Score:1)
'KEELE' ULTRA HIGH DENSITY MEMORY SYSTEM
A Quantum Jump in Memory Storage and Access
Professor Ted Williams at Keele University, Staffordshire, England has developed a patented solid state memory system with the capacity of 86 Giga Bytes per square centimetre of surface area. The system uses a magneto-optical system not dissimilar to that of CD-ROM, except that the system is fixed, solid state, and has a different operating approach.
The system has applications for computer and processor memory for credit cards and smart cards, and for high security bank notes, among many other uses.
In computer memory format, the system has a capacity per sq cm in excess of 86 Giga Bytes of re-writeable RAM data - this equates to a memory capacity of 3400 Giga Bytes(3.4 Tb) within the surface area of a credit card! Data access time is around 100 Mb/sec. A single unit with this capacity, but using the computer's processor, has a physical size of about 3 cm x 3 cm x 1.5 cms (high). An additional advantage over existing data storage systems is that only 20% of gross capacity needs to be allocated for error correction, which is significantly less than the 40% for hard disks and 30% for optical storage. Production costs are anticipated to be less than £30 for such a unit.
Patents have been granted for parts of the system, and patent applications have been filed for other aspects.
The invention will have a major impact on the computer industry, giving even small palmtop computers the capacity of a mainframe! The effect on other industries will be equally significant - for example, televisions could have built-in solid state video recorders, wristwatches could have vastly more power than today's PC Computers. Implications for the security of financial instruments credit cards and bank notes - will be profound, as the high data-density substrate used can be put onto virtually every surface.
Uh, that's my thesis... (Score:1)
Re:It ought to be just the thing to go with... (Score:1)
all dressed up and no place to go?
Sounds familiar (Score:1)
This reminded me of our old friends the American Computer Company [accpc.com] who have been known to make similarly ambitious announcements [slashdot.org].
Maybe CMR and ACC should collaborate on reverse engineering alien sanitation technology. If they're thousands of years ahead of us, they must have worked out how to clean a toilet by now.
That time of year? (Score:1)
Re:Ohh, the register... (Score:1)
I take it The Register is the UK version of The Onion?
toilets (Score:1)
Assuming that aliens _had_ toilets to clean.....
People still repost the Register's lies? (Score:1)
New tack on old idea (Score:1)
It sounds like it was a different approach, but some researchers had come up with an idea that could allow over a terabyte of storage on a 'translucent' cube using technology similar to CD ROMs. The data could be accessed by moving lasers to different angles and positions on the surface.
I'm guessing the research didn't pan out, because I haven't heard anything about it since then. But the principle of this story is the same as then: Packing data in three dimensions to allow much greater density.
I think speculation on price and/or specs is premature, since its possible existence is still in question. But I think this kind of technology is inevitable, somewhere down the road.
hahahha 100 Mbps (Score:1)
heh 100 Mbps is pretty slow
Re:Ohh, the register... (Score:1)
They have real news too - Their Microsoft Vs DoJ trial coverage is (IMHO) unsurpassed.
Re:Ohh, the register... (Score:1)
It's also good to remember that they have a good sense of humor too - else it would be utter rubbish (now it's fun but you have to take care not to believe everything)
Erik
Has it ever occurred to you that God might be a committee?
...and MS Office will then require 2.3TB to load (Score:1)
Re:It ought to be just the thing to go with... (Score:1)
Whoops, forgot that all-important power source. Did I fail to mention the combination of solar, biothermal, nano fuel cells, and mechanical generation from swinging my arms while I walk?
I guess we're getting off toward quantum nanocomputing, though, aren't we? Sorry for the tangent.
Come to think of it, wearing that leather jacket in South Carolina in August is gonna be murder...
Re:Ohh, the register... (Score:1)
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villany.
Get a grip! (Score:1)
a) Technically accurate
b) Interesting (did you read the stuff about Fab 30?)
c) Entertaining
d) Prescient (lots of pre-release info)
And after all, you don't have to read any of it...
Get a grip! (Score:1)
a) Technically accurate
b) Interesting (did you read the stuff about Fab 30?)
c) Entertaining
d) Prescient (lots of pre-release info)
And after all, you don't have to read any of it...
Which link is which? (Score:1)
Re:Future News (way off topic) (Score:1)
If I want to call time the first dimension, well there it is. X, Y, Z, and however many other dimensions we discover/invent will just have to wait their turn.
Oops. Posted in the wrong place (Score:1)
Money conversion (Score:1)
£35 > $35
that's why you always feel like you're getting screwed if you order albums from other countries.
It aint even vaporware yet (Score:1)
I'll bet you that if you were to approach these developers (read: venture capitalists) with a request for a demonstration of a working prototype, they would begin shuffling their feet and coughing nervously only to tell you that it's "in the hands of our testing department" or not being demonstrated due to "patent concerns".
...but you notice how they are already looking for investors? me too.
I hate to be pessimistic (No, I don't...I lied) but it seems that there was this guy at one time who had a V-6 engine that ran on evian, and his scam sounded remarkably similar.
I just need to see that their concept is based on good science before i start saving my pennies.
And think about this: There is'nt a semiconductor firm in the known universe that would'nt be scrambling like little weasels to get their hands on a technology such as this...least they be put out of business. Suffice to say- I'm basing my judgement as to the validity of these claims on how those companies react. (And they ain't even twitching, people.)
By the way...what happened to that guy who had the engine that ran on water? He's not returning my calls.
£35 -> $56.21 U.S. (Score:1)
btw. .
The RIAA, SPA, and BSA will no doubt oppose this. (Score:1)
LK
Looks like the story has gone... (Score:1)
Complete hoax then?
Re:Technical details from one of the JV companies. (Score:1)
Re:Vaporware? (Score:1)
Well, that particular info is a few years old, but I suspect the principle holds up. You can't use liquid nitrogen, because the thermal stress cycling would quickly destroy your chips (maybe you could go with total immersion and a refer that automatically kept the LN at a good level?), etc. Not impossible, but too expensive to become common during the next 20 years.
Still, someday... room temperature superconductors of heat! That'd do the trick!
Re:mp3, pr0n, beowolf, oh my! (Score:1)
No offense intended, but does anyone else think that comment sounded like a semi bad Anime translation ala Final fantasy 7?
Even the flattest things have thickness or 4D RAM! (Score:1)
Pull out your credit card, if you have one. And if you don't, look at mommies. First take a look at the thing, wow, pretty small, right? Now, turn it on it's side, no, better yet, lay it down. Good. Notice how it sticks up off the surface of whatever you put it on. That's thickness. Now, stack 2 (if you can get them from daddy too) of them . . . still pretty thin, right? Keep going . . . oh, and file those bumpy names off of the cards while your at it . . . that will give you a more accurate representation.
Learn something every day, don't ya?
I'm still waiting for the 4D ram, or true 3D TV . . .
Re:Future News (Score:1)
Re:Future News (Score:1)
Holographic Storage (Score:1)
That technology is far from new. It's been around for over ten years, and anybody on
Currently the biggest holdback still seems to be the limited writing cycles these crystals can survive. Last time I read up, it was something like 1000 cycles, maybe they improved it an order of magnitude. Also, many researchers seemed to be targeting it not only as persistent storage, but as RAM replacement. Done right, it can offer access speeds many times above silicon RAM. Also, it offers the possilibity of purely optical parallel searches: the query data is written to the LCD, then projected into the crystal. Through interference patterns with matching data in the crystal, planes containing matches are found instantly without sequential searching. I only skimmed the theory on that one, so don't quote me on details.
Anyway, all this theory comes from people who don't also claim improved toilet brushes. I don't know about the guys at Keele, but this stuff is for real. When it'll crop up at Wal-Mart is another question.
Re:That time of year? (Score:2)
Re:35 pounds?!?!? (Score:1)
--
Re:Future News (way off topic) DOH (Score:1)
man's lack of foresight yet another problem.
If it's real, grab your BEOS stock now. (Score:1)
humongous drive and file sizes like BeOS. What's
the max file size on BeOS again? Something like
16 petabytes or something?
-WW
--
Why are there so many Unix-using Star Trek fans?
When was the last time Picard said, "Computer, bring
Re:Not $30 it's 35 pounds (Score:1)
WOW
¦¥£Yzoes(TM)---ÈÉËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛÜÝßàáâãäåæçèé
êëì
WHEE!!
Re:New tack on old idea (Score:1)
Using 2 low-power lasers they can choose a cluster of molucules.
However, I'm not certain of the reliability of the report (I don't remember which TV station).
--
Re:Holographic Storage (Score:1)
Can anybody tell me .... (Score:1)
It is something about a quartz-like device, and the storing/retriving of data is through laser, and the data supposed to be stored in holographic images, something like that.
If this 3D image storage thingy is the quart-zlike device, then it is certain _NOT_ a pre-vaporware thing.
Industry Week magazine carried a short intro-article several years ago (sometime pre-1996!!!) and the thing may have been going through several years of development already.
Re:2.3 terra? (Score:1)
Safe Storage (Score:1)
If something that small can hold that much data, wouldnt it make it very easy to corrupt data?
My
--SlayFire