

Project Grizzly 111
theGEEK writes "A friend came across this article on Suck yesterday. I actually know this guy... and his Anti-Bear Suit is actually quite impressive. Troy is a very interesting, if somewhat dramatic guy-so much so the National Film Board of Canada made a movie about him, and his project.
You'll never believe your eyes when you see him repeatedly get hit by a truck at at 50 KPH or when he gets beaten by bikers wielding axes and baseball bats." So, if anyone wants to get me a Christmas present, I'll take one of these.
This is too cool (Score:1)
The man deserves more credit (and funding) (Score:1)
The G Man suit itself might not be a stunning success, but I fugure it will lead to some very pratical applications in fire fighting, search and rescue, military, space, underwater, and who knows where else. Someone's got to develop this stuff eventually and the best ideas usually come from some eccentric out in left field rather than a government funded think tank.
I hope this guy is not deterred by the snickering masses who don't have the balls to persue their own ideas with such enthusiasm.
Yet Another Server Benchmark? (Score:4)
DrunkBikerWeb: Maximum number of concurrent biker-beatings server is able to sustain while still serving web pages.
SleepyTruckerWeb: Maximum number of hits from a three-tonne truck travelling at 50 kilometres an hour while still serving web pages.
FallingTreeWeb: Maximum number of collisions with a 136 kilgram (300 lb.) tree from a height of 9 metres (30 ft.) while still serving web pages.
Re:Yet Another Server Benchmark? (Score:1)
Rent it... it's hilarious (Score:2)
He doesn't ever get attacked by a bear (sorry to ruin the surprise) but the rest of it makes it worth it.
Re:I saw this on TV about 6 months ago (Score:1)
Re:You know we don't live in a comic-book world... (Score:1)
They'll tranq the bear long before that happens. He's planning to get the bear out of the den, not go in after it. Then he just has to let the bear use him as a chew-toy for 3-5 minutes until the tranquilizer takes effect.
Re:Class 10 Armor??! [way OT] (Score:1)
AC 10 in 3rd Ed = AC 10 in 2nd Ed.
AC 20 in 3rd Ed = AC 0 in 2nd Ed.
AC 30 in 3rd Ed = AC -10 in 2nd Ed.
Re:Where do you buy the video? (Score:1)
guy is crazy (Score:1)
His suit is pretty amazing though. Right now he funds a lot of his research through selling various types of armor as sports equipment. Even if no amazing bear research gets done, a lot of good will come from his armor breaktrhroughs.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:2)
I've seen this guys experiments. As impressive as they are, I am not convinced. If the guy was willing to attach himself to an inanimate object, then attach his arm to a truck, and had the truck pull the arm into some unnatural position without breaking it, then he might begin to convince me.
Imagine this situation. The guy is laying on his chest, with his arm on at about a 90 degree angle with the hand pointing towards his feet and the palms pointing upwards (a very natural position for someone laying on their chest). Then the bear puts its weight over the guy's shoulder or anywhere near the upper arm, grabs the hand, then pulls it upwards. Can you imagine the amount of torque that would place on the elbow and shoulder?
This whole bear suit deal reminds me of an experiment that was done with white sharks some years back. They were trying to develop this "shark proof" suit made from a very tuff metal mesh. They had successfully tested against smaller sharks, and had tested in the lab against penetration by a sharp blade driven at a force equivalent to a great white's jaws. So they put it on a test dummy, put some pieces of very bloody meat in there for bait, then threw it near a great white. The suit remained intact, yet the dummy was torn to bits by the ferocity of the attack.
Re:Read the damn article (Score:2)
But even in this case. So far, from all the high-impact tests that I've seen, I haven't seen a single test against high torque joint manipulation on the suit. Yes, the suit may be restricted to the natural range of motion, but how strong are these range limiters? Can they support the full power and weight of a charging grizzly on a lever as long as a leg? And what about torsional forces, such as taking a leg that is bent 90 degrees at the knee, then spinning it outwards? That is still within the "natural range of motion".
Not invulnerable. (Score:3)
The two main problems I see with this are.
1 - He has no mobility whatsoever in that suit. He can hardly walk, and forget about standing up after falling down. If the bear moves while he is in there, he will be trapped. Even if the bear doesn't move, there is a very good chance that he will be trapped.
2 - The suit may resist a bear's punch and claws, but the guy is still vunerable at the joints. If the bear grabs his arm, and pulls it around his back or up and over his head, there is one broken arm right there. Same thing can happen to his legs. I wouldn't want a grizzly playing lever with my leg, or putting its whole weight over my bent arm, no matter what I'm wearing or how invincible I feel.
Yet I wouldn't mind one of those the next time I go skiing. Tree? What tree?
Re:The IgNobel people don't think so (Score:1)
This guy is an idiot, and he's been recognised for (Score:2)
His so-called "research" has been "recognised" by the IgNobel institute as "research that should not have been undertaken and should never be conducted again". See
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/ig_nobel/
for info on IgNobel, and
http://www.improbable.com/ig/ig-pastwinners.html
for a link directly to the winning entries of last year, including "Project Grizzly".
Dont take his "research" too seriously: his last suit (Ursus Mark VI) was so immobile that he couldn't even climb a small hill, as the hip joints would not allow his legs enough vertical movements. This forced him to abandon his research for that year (that's actually how the National Film Board's documentary ends...).
I saw this on TV about 6 months ago (Score:1)
KPH? (Score:1)
--
[OT] ISO-8601 (was Re:KPH?) (Score:1)
I'm very happy, however, to see the standardisation going on with dates. ISO-8601 is catching on in a big way. Finally, we won't have to wonder if 01(random separator)02 is February 1 or January 2. "1999-09-21 16:44:05.24 +00:00" and "09-21 16:45" are examples of ISO-8601 dates. (Most) Europeans give up their day-precedes-month convention, Americans give up the 12 hour clock, and everybody gains something much bigger.
PS. Can someone answer definitively the question "Is noon 12 pm or 12 am?"? I once witnessed a long argument about that and I don't remember there having been a result.
--
Not far off indeed (Score:1)
He's a lot closer to that ideal than you think, and VERY close indeed to something that could have viable military applications.
Give the suit minimal powered assist and a lone soldier (with some specialized training and conditioning) could 'run' at a good clip for hours at a time, over almost any sort of terrain using minimal resources and leaving very little evidence (compared to a HumVee or whatever). Garage-level devices have been created that already do this sort of thing (no links off-hand, but I'm looking) without the 'armored' exterior.
You could also fit it with a self-contained breathing apparatus for use in harsh environments or underwater (underwater, of course, VASTLY increasing the complexity of engineering if you want to completely seal the enterior, although you could have the occupant wearing an inner enviro/survival type suit and then just build the shell to drain easily and quickly upon exiting the water).
Computer and electronic navigation and whatnot could be fitted, but I'd want to have manual backup (however primitive) for all vital operations (vision, hearing, etc.) I'd also want to be able to throw the suit into 'neutral' if the power plant is disabled, so I can move it under my own power, however inefficiently.
Such a device would not be used in a massive 'powered infantry' style ground conflict, but would instead be used exclusively for recon and 'terrorist' type attacks in the midst of enemy territory.
Weapons could easily be devised to thwart such a device (magnetic or sticky 'clingers' that stick to a hard to reach area of the suit and then drill or laser their way in to deposit a charge, armor-piercing missles and whatnot), but that would not negate its utility in specialized circumstances.
Hacker Geek Of The Year (Score:1)
I see a lot of mean-spirited postings decrying this guy a looney, but those posters, in my view are missing the whole point. The man has a technological vision, and he's using whatever resources he can find to see it through. He has a LOT to show for his efforts, unlike a LOT of the vaporware crap [asi.org] that gets hailed as 'visionary' these days.
Hacking is not specific to UNIX, C and shell-scripting. It's a state of mind.
This guy's got it.
Mrs. Fletcher rules! (Score:2)
Ahh, for the days when my music sucked in an inspiredly-stupid way. Nowadays it's just mediocre. :)
---
"'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
Bubblegum Crisis meets Yogi Bear (Score:4)
Narrator: Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup-- wait, wrong series...
[Narrator leaves]
Yogi: Hey, Booboo, I see a picnic basket! Let's have lunch!
Booboo: I don't know, Yogi, what if the Knight Sabers catch us?
Yogi: Not to worry, Booboo! I am a bear! I can maul them easily!
[Yogi reaches into a basket. Suddenly, his arm is shot off.]
Priss: Eat death, evil!
[Priss and Sylia swoop down from the sky, guns blazing. Yogi dies.]
Booboo: Nooooooooooo! CURSE YOU, KNIGHT SABERS!
---
"'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
On the other hand, it would seem you'd take a big dexterity penalty wearing this thing, so the old covered pit idea still works.
This guy is fascinating (Score:3)
The world needs more Troys out there.
- -Josh Turiel
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
Just put a small, durable computer in there(Image Recognition, targeting, et al...) and some weapons, and you'd have one heck of a marine unit.
Don't think so. Wear this plus the gear you've added, plus another 60+ lbs of personal gear and weapons, water, etc. and then go on a route march or assault an enemy position? Naaaah. Nobody's said this'll stop bullets and shrapnel -- just bears. Besides, like somebody pointed out, there's the "Help, I've fallen and I can't get up" factor.
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
--
Ian Peters
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
Re:Where do you buy the video? (Score:2)
Jon
Sorry about the name-calling, etc. (Score:1)
As far as limb manipulation, as I said before, I'm sure his joints were wracked pretty hard with the previous testing. As for the new suit and it's 'class 10'(what type of system is that?) rating, well, no one can know how 100% how this thing will fare against a grizzly attack until it actually happens. Most grizzly attacks tend to be a mauling, and a bat to the head/torso (which can easily remove said head). Bears aren't too much into wrestling and figure-4 leglocks last time I checked.
Read the damn article, idiot. (Score:3)
If you read the article, you'd know he has no intention of entering the bear's den.
If the bear grabs his arm, and pulls it around his back or up and over his head, there is one broken arm right there.
Okay, I'll give you this one, because you haven't seen the suit in action. But if you had, his limbs are restricted to their natural range of motion. Don't you think that the force of being hit by a truck at 30m.p.h. would've broken something, or the 300lb. log, or perhaps the 150 ft. escarpment? If you see this in action, you'd understand. I mean, I watched Penn (or is it Teller? It was the big guy of the two) unwind on him *full tilt* with a baseball bat, that suit is so damn bulky, he doesn't even *flinch.* You'd think he was hitting him with a foam bat. Troy's my hero.
You know we don't live in a comic-book world... (Score:2)
Of course, without a super-reactive neural-linked set of motors in that armor to give him super-strength, he'd be reduced to standing there chortling in a super-hero manner as they wasted all of their ammunition/strength on him. Then he'd end up vainly yelling at them to stop as they beat a hasty retreat.
>clunk!clunk!whew!CRASH!
And we'd call him "The Indestructable (but not wholly effective) Man!"
Re:guy is crazy (Score:1)
Re:KPH? (Score:1)
- 8Complex
The newest extreme sport? (Score:1)
Bungie-jumping? Pfft, that's for wimps! What do you need a safety cord for? Just throw yourself off a 100-foot cliff -- and LIVE!
Now there's an adrenaline fix...
Jay (=
Re:I saw this on TV about 6 months ago (Score:1)
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
--
I want a G Man Genesis (Score:1)
"Yes, officer bitch, I have a driver's license."
"Yes, officer pussy face, I have an insurance card"
"Kiss my ass barney fife, I don't CARE how fast I was driving."
"This ain't Miami Vice and you ain't Don Johnson. You and your piss ant 40 caliber can go to hell."
"Hey, officer XXXXXX I went to high school with your daughter, I was there when she blew the whole football team. Did she ever get those teeth replaced? I know she's made many men happy over the years."
Lord Kano
Re:I want a G Man Genesis (Score:1)
Then for once I can treat cops with the same amount of respect that they treat the rest of us, with impunity no less.
Any clearer now?
LK
Actually useful (Score:5)
He touches on some really good stuff there, and the potential for the new suit he's working on, the G-Man, is pretty awesome. 90% mobility, 120lbs!! As Troy says, it's the gear of a fully dressed fireman. Consider the SWAT/RIOT applications? The earthquake disaster recovery usage - where you don't have to worry about dying in a collapsed building, but you can still climb a crumbling stair case... The military apps, as some have said, approach Starship Troopers... Yeah, at $300K a piece it's pricey, but it's cheaper than a tank, and with some power-assist it might do just as much damage.
Then there's the blurb about the suit enabling him to get a sample of Grisly blood during semi-hibernation, for use in NASA research into astronaut hibernation for extended, deep-space flights.
At first glance at the vid this may seem goofy, but there's real potential there.
How comfortable? (Score:1)
he has patience (Score:1)
i remember seeing this in grade 13, which was 4 years ago. i remember seeing him get hit by trucks and thinking he was nuts.
but as this nutty guy continues, think of the implications: "Welcome to the zoo. Please do not get out of your suits. please be careful when petting the lions"
Re:mine-field? (Score:1)
Yo moron, read the article before you post. Using it to sweep for mines is one of the ideas he was planning on using it for.
mine-field? (Score:1)
If so, it would be ideal mine-sweep armour.
D'oh! (Score:1)
Class 10 Armor??! (Score:5)
Why would anyone think they could get away with selling Class 10 armor for 1.2 million ca (obviously that is a typo and they mean cp. Weird Canadians, why can't they use gp like everyone else). Sheesh anyone with a good old Player's Handbook knows that even a plain old cloak will get you a Class 9. Heck, you could get cheap old chain mail and get a whole Class 5 and that might cost 10000 cp (100 gp, but those Canuks?!). I personally would want some decent Plate Mail for a wonderful class 3 (and at only 30000 cp, a comparative steal).
Is this thing some sort of artifact? Am I missing something?
Ahh safety (Score:4)
Think of the great uses:
Mommy can I have one for XMass.
-cpd
Where do you buy the video? (Score:1)
JW
Re:[OT] ISO-8601 (was Re:KPH?) (Score:1)
12:01 am -> 0:01
...
12 noon -> 12:00
12:01 pm -> 12:01
12 Midnight corresponds to 0:00, which is the start of the new day, so 12 midnight is 12 am.
Unlike with years, time counting starts with zero, because it's counting elapsed time. 0:00 doesn't mean the 0th second, it means that 0 full seconds have elapsed since the start of the day.
Thus, because counting starts at 0, it's 0 -> 11:59 instead of 0:01 -> 12:00... Thus, if noon:01 is pm, then noon is pm too, because that cycle starts at zero.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
The two main problems I see with this are.
1 - He has no mobility whatsoever in that suit. He can hardly walk, and forget about standing up after falling down. If the bear moves while he is in there, he will be trapped. Even if the bear doesn't move, there is a very good chance that he will be trapped.
If you read the article you would have seen the fact that he has no plans to go inside the den. He plans on the bear comming out of the den and darting the bear. The suit is just there to keep him alive for the 3-5 minutes it takes for the bear to be affected by the tranquliser(?spelling) dart. While the bear is out of the den his team will come in and do the plasma extraction and install cameras in the den.
Scared silly (Score:2)
Re:Ahh safety (Score:1)
People do this all the time. I believe it's called, "Marching Season". It's kind of like the KKK marching through South Central LA with police protection.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:2)
Bears usually attack people by claw swipes. Occasionally some biting. Probably the worst would be biting and hanging on then shaking it back and forth, which might produce some of the effects you are describing
Arms race (Score:2)
It's just another escalating arms race. Peace Now!
No Suits! No Suits! No Suits!
Re:Velocity x Mass / Stupidity = Bear Suit (Score:1)
In your subject line you show an inversely proportional relationship between Stupidity and Bear Suit.
Meaning that more Bear Suits will decrease stupidity. Makes sense to me, it'd be pretty stupid to roam bear country without any protection.
I assume you have no bear suits soooooo you have infinite stupidity.
Well, there you go... (Score:1)
I hope this title makes it to my local video rental store - it's not something I would buy, but $5.00 overnight would be a small price to pay to see this little jewel.
Just the mental image of this guy being piss-bowled by a small truck has me in hysterics, not to mention launching himself off an escarpment....it's gotta be like that super-sumo stuff they do in pubs and nightclubs!
Sure there may be some legitimate scientific uses for this kind of tech, but the comedy value alone is outstanding...
Re:Where do you buy the video? (Score:2)
Not online though, so you may have to actually pick up a phone or write a letter
Re:You know we don't live in a comic-book world... (Score:1)
And that's what will happen. The bear will simply knock his ass down and wear him out. He'll pass out from exaustion. Then the heat will get him as the batteries to the fan wear out. Then the camera goes out.
Then the bear will knock him around a bit every day as he slowly starves and dies in his hot dark supersuit.
He is only a man. With the limited strength of a man. In a big heavy suit. Against a bigger, stronger bear with all of its mobility and strength.
Re:I saw this on TV about 6 months ago (Score:1)
They should call it the "Bear Amusement Suit" (the bear's amusement, not yours)
or the "Become a Bear Toy Suit".
It may protect you, but how will you get away. Anyone know how well "bear repellent" works?
Re:read the f*cking story (Score:1)
Bear deterrent sprays. You can buy them in stores in the States and Canada. You go into the store, you pay 50 to 60 bucks, you get a little can. And it's bear spray;
you take it into the bush. Well, they don't work. I mean they wouldn't stop a dog, let alone a bear.
There was three links to read, I read the last two, and skimmed the first. I do this at work so I don't have much time. Anyway, I thought I had read enough to post. I hate it when someone posts with out reading too, but hey I missed that "bear spray" part. I had to go back and read it again to see what you were talking about.
Geeze, don't get so p*ssed off. I was just trying to make a point about the suit that I saw when it airred on TV.
The "bear repellent" remark was just to say that I wouldn't count on it. And as the story says, It won't work.
Damn </i>! (Score:1)
;)
Re:Ahh safety (Score:1)
Do they make one for boom boxes? If so, I've got Der Fuerher's Face on CD.
/.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
It's 120 pounds versus
147 for the Mark VI. See,
120 pounds is a
full-dressed fireman, and
everybody knows what they
can do. The flexibility is
up to 91.5 percent. With
the Mark VI you had 15
percent. So I can drive a
car, climb stairs, do a
dive roll, run full tilt
in the G-Man.
Re:Scared silly (Score:1)
Re:This is too cool (Score:1)
Besides, the military has a tendency to be very traditional about the weapons it uses. It usually takes a crushing defeat or extreme circumstances (e.g. Pearl Harbor was a major factor in the rise to prominence of U.S. aircraft carriers) for the armed forces to adopt anything as radical as these suits.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
The article covers in some detail his plans for getting the bear plasma. None of it involves crawling around inside any den.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
Re:Class 10 Armor??! [OT] (Score:2)
So this baby has a natural AC of -10. With a good Dex (say, 16), enough Strength to move this baby around, and say, a body shield, you're walking around with a -14 AC without magic adjustment. Fear the Barbarian wearing that thing!
(Disclaimer: YES, I know he wasn't talking about D&D AC.)
"There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts."
Insane, yes, so what? (Score:4)
This Bear Suit sounds like it's an awkward approach to the problem it was designed to solve (sustain a Grizzly's attack), but it sounds like it has fantastic applications. Put a cop in that suit, and off he goes into a terrorist-laden building. Make this suit airtight, and you've got a Battletech-like elemental suit.
I bet this suit will be useful down the line. His creator will be barely remembered, only perhaps as a footnote, as the guy who tried so very hard, but didn't quite succeed in the end. They'll look back on the wacko shaving with a Bowie, and smile, thinking the only application he saw was to tackle bears.
I wish him luck. He may be insane, but the most remarkable men are.
"There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts."
A new target!!! (Score:1)
Then again, the guy sounds more interesting in the interview than he seems as the two dimensional hick weirdo from the sticks portrayed on TV. So I guess he's really an inventive and innovative wacko hillbilly from north of the border.
-M
Its useful research (Score:1)
I hope he's got the patents, he could make money on it.
Tickets for the IgNobel Awards (Score:1)
As a side-note, they will also be live web-casting the presentation, although I sincerely hope it won't be slashdotted. I don't have tickets. :)
The IgNobel people don't think so (Score:3)
I've actually been involved with the IgNobel people for several years now, and Marc Abrahams - the heart and soul of the Awards - genuinely respects him. Troy is leaps and bounds more scientifically respectable than the inventor of the plastic lawn flamingo or some guy who puts Barney dolls in formaldehyde (both of whom have received awards).
What Marc and the others were stunned at was the fact that Troy tests all of this stuff on himself. He doesn't much around with testing equipment; rather, he measures the real-world implications of the armor.
I, for one, think that there is something to all this. He's not someone to be snickered at and dismissed, even if he has won an IgNobel.
Re:I saw this on TV about 6 months ago (Score:1)
They should call it the "Bear Amusement Suit" (the bear's amusement, not yours)
or the "Become a Bear Toy Suit".
It may protect you, but how will you get away. Anyone know how well "bear repellent" works?
The new version of the suit is supposed to be almost as flexible as not wearing one, so you would be able to get up after beinf beat down. It's also about 50 pounds lighter than the last version.
Bear spray works on the same principle as pepper spray, but mostly it just REALLY pisses the bears off. A good way to get killed is to spray bear spray at a bear that is wandering through your campsite....
Kintanon
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
The newest version of the suit sustains a 4000 degree farenheit external temperature and is still cool enough to put your arm into. I don't think Napalm will stop it.
Kintanon
Re:This guy is an idiot, and he's been recognised (Score:1)
Re:This guy is an idiot, and he's been recognised (Score:1)
You can find the info about tickets here. [improbable.com] It has info about a free showing of a film about the bear suit at MIT tomorrow night (wednesday 9-22-99) and the ignoble award ceremony on the 30th at harvard. Plus some other related stuff.
See you all there.
Suck.com just sucks (Score:1)
Sure, its a nice place for hipsters to log
on to and make believe good writing has
to be 4.3 words per line with retro graphics.
Oh, how I can see them holding their mouse
in one hand and a martini in the other.
Its not like formating that can be classified
somewhere between wacky and stupidass is so bad,
I mean this IS the WWW. Its that once you
remove the pretentious air, arrogant attitude,
and bad webdesign theres just no content.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
Yet I wouldn't mind one of those the next time I go skiing. Tree? What tree?
And if you lose your balance, you become a human sled.
Re:Not invulnerable. (Score:1)
I'm not sure , what the above poster described, is at all funny. This moderator must enjoy pulling the wings off of flies.
Project Grizzly(And other stupid ideas...) (Score:1)
I think this has more practical applications.
Re:Velocity x Mass / Stupidity = Bear Suit (Score:1)
Re:Hacker Geek Of The Year (Score:1)
Doh! That really Freaking Hurt...
Doh! That really hurt..
Doh! That hurt...
Doh! That's a little better
Doh! Not Bad
Mmmmmmm...Bear Suit.
Not a very scientific way to test. If it hurts like hell, then back to the drawing board.
Re:I want a G Man Genesis (Score:1)
Re:The newest extreme sport? (Score:1)
Next BIG question... Does a Bear Suit bounce???
Velocity x Mass / Stupidity = Bear Suit (Score:3)
read the f*cking story (Score:1)
Nothing irritates me more than people who post on Slashdot without ever reading the fucking material first.
sheesh. sorry for that little rant.
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
Government $$ (Score:1)
Still worth the rent to hear the story of what inspired the suit and to see him getting hit with trucks,logs and 2x4's.
Bear suit (Score:1)
Seems kind of bitter though, huh?
2 questions... (Score:1)
2. Will the suit run linux? I don't think I'd trust windows CE to protect me from bears.
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
Re:Combat Armor isn't that far off, after all... (Score:1)
It's close to millitary application in a lot of ways- but I don't expect to see powered armor any time soon.
One thing that people seems to be neglecting is that although this suit is proof against a lot of things- it can't stop bullets. That 12 gague shotgun (??) he tested it with is probably a gentle kiss compared to the kind of things that fly around a modern battlefield. Tanks use armor that's something like a foot thick, and there's now special ordinance to disable them with one shot. The entire "defense" lies in not getting hit- and since this suit would make it harder to take cover, you can kind of forget about that.
OTOH, since it's immune to small arms, you could use it as a riot suit... but then you have the problem of someone pushing you over...
Re:The man deserves more credit (and funding) (Score:1)
Re:Ahh safety (Score:1)