Townshend and Generative Lifehouse 67
reformhead writes "Just found this article over at Canoe about how The Who's Pete Townshend is planning on releasing 3 box sets of his rock opera "Lifehouse". The third box set will be a limited edition that will include a software key you can use to import personal data about yourself that will in turn be used to generate an individual piece of music for you. " 1. Pete Townshend==God. 2. Generative Music==Cool. 3. The original Lifehouse was based on this same idea, but its pretty cool that its finally gonna happen. And if any of Townshend's PR people stumble on this, I wanna interview Pete for Slashdot.
Generative Music??? WTF? (Score:1)
Generative Music sounds to me a bit strange... why would i like music based on my personality but done by someone else? and who would make this music? Townshend himself would read all that data or some software would automagically output some digital sounds based on my input?? If the latter is true, then i would say - no thanks!
But even if it would be human-made, isnt the entire concept in conjunction with the whole idea of music - listening to what OTHERS has to say, and to the why they want to say (or sing...) it.
If i wanted music based on MY personality, I would have created the music...
Oh, and yes - Townshend==GOD?! , more likely Reed==GOOD!
Re:Tommy leaves something to be desired?? (Score:2)
As opposed to the excruciatingly embarassing film. But seriously, The Who parted with many of their early fans over what was seen as a pretentious folly when Tommy came out. It also didn't endear them to a generation of punks (myself included), despite the fact that `Live in Leeds' can be seen as a seminal influence on both punk and heavy metal.
Chris Wareham
Re:Generative music. (Score:1)
1. Pete made demos of just about all the songs he wrote for The Who. That's Pete Townshend playing everything - in the beginning just guitar and vocals (overdubbed for multiple parts), but later everything - bass, drums, piano, synth, etc... Some of these demos can be found on Scoop and Another Scoop.
2. A few Who tracks used the basic tracks from Pete's demos - Baba O'Riley, Won't Get Fooled Again and Love Reign O're Me being a few notable examples. This is how The Who's version of Baba came about. Pete recorded a demo version (over 13 minutes long) with synth, guitar, drums, piano, etc. It didn't have any vocals. The synth and piano tracks were later used for The Who's version. This long instrumental version was edited down (to 10 minutes?) for one of Pete's "Baba" LPs.
3. Most people confuse the title of "Baba O'Riley", calling it "Teenage Wasteland". It turns out there actually *was* a song called "Teenage Wasteland"! I still have yet to hear it, but it's on the new box set. Looking at the lyrics to it at Pete's site, it looks like he decided to take some of the lyrics from that song and put them on top of his "Baba O'Riley" demo. The demo version of "Baba" with vocals will be on the box set as well - a sound clip is on Pete's site.
4. While it's been commonly quoted that Pete entered statistics of Baba Meher into a computer to come up with the "Baba O'Riley" synth track, I believe Pete actually just wrote and recorded the synth track how he *thought* it would come out if he fed the info into a computer...
BTW, I'm a bit bitter...I submitted info on Pete's new site and the box set over the weekend and it was rejected. Grr.
Terry Riley ? (wavering from the topic) (Score:1)
I don't have a link handy, but if anyone's curious, Riley most famous work includes
THe Who and Punks (Score:1)
> punks (myself included), despite the fact that
> 'Live in Leeds' can be seen as a seminal
> influence on both punk and heavy metal.
But if you look at it another way, The Who weren't really punks...they were more Mods than punks, although they did have an influence on everything. I think the Broadway version was fantastic, at least with the original cast. The cast I saw the night it closed was pathetic up until Pinball Wizard. But either way, Tommy is still an excellent piece in its own right.
--
Re:A bit of WHO triva... (Score:1)
Re:Rock operas ... (Score:1)
Re:Interesting to me... (Score:1)
yeah... I never pay attention to the song titles. I just assumed that was the title
It is a great one.
whats up with http://www.eelpie.com/ (Score:1)
cgi-local/ 09:35:43 AM 01/22/98 0.5Kb
local.cshrc 09:35:42 AM 01/22/98 0.1Kb
local.login 09:35:42 AM 01/22/98 0.6Kb
local.profile 09:35:42 AM 01/22/98 0.5Kb
ooops.
ciao,
-rob
Re:Generative music. (Score:2)
On the other hand O'Riley is a analog synth pioneer who, last I heard, is still playing shows.
If you're really interested you can do a few web searches, which I'm probably gonna do on O'Riley (of course I dont remember his first name).
Roger Watrers did it already, didn't he? (Score:1)
--------
Yeah, I'm a Mac programmer. You got a problem with that?
Re:Yeah, How the heck does it work? (Score:2)
Height and weight doesn't really fit neatly into music theory. I'm sure after a dropping a hit or two it starts to make sense, "Yeah, if you're fat than you're all bass notes, man."
"Small chested girls, definately B-flat."
Neat-o (Score:1)
--
Max V.
Generative music. (Score:2)
I'm fairly sure that the 'continuo' synthesizer part to "Baba O'Riley" (on Who's Next) is an example of how this was supposed to work.
Notice my qualifications in the claims above; further information/confirmation would be appreciated.
--
It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?
Privacy!!! (Score:2)
"Who does Townshend think he is?! Using my personal info to make a song! What ever happened to privacy in this country?!"
The article didn't mention that both Tommy and Quadrophenia, more so the latter, were based on each memeber of the who's personality, not just those two songs listed.
Great bands (Score:1)
A bit of WHO triva... (Score:1)
Re:Neat-o :or...WHO should you listen to? (Score:1)
Yeah, How the heck does it work? (Score:1)
Go ahead, flame me... (Score:1)
--
Re:Neat-o (Score:2)
For Styx fans, definitely start with Who's Next. Just listen to the whole thing (or at least the 9 original tracks, if you have the remastered CD with the bonus tracks). Then probably Who are You.
--
It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?
Rock operas ... (Score:2)
And for the guy who reckons Weller is better songwriter than Townhend - well your wrong. They're both insanely good songwriters. (And that's coming from a Goth
Chris Wareham
Re:Generative music. (Score:2)
I saw the WHO two days ago. (Score:1)
Re:Neat-o (Score:1)
For general 'Interested-in-The-Who', but not necessarily fans of any particular band, "Who's Next" is definitely their best single album, but if you've got a few extra bucks, pick up "30 Years Of Maximum R&B", the four disc box set they put out four or five years ago.
It has most of "Who's Next" included on it, plus highlights from "Tommy", and the relevant singles including "Magic Bus", "My Generation", "The Kids Are Alright", plus a lot of live stuff and previously unreleased material, along with the standard box set book that details the history of the band. It's a little bit of overkill for the casual fan of The Who, but you can pick it up for about 50 bucks and not have to worry about ever buying another album unless the box set turns you into a die-hard fan.
Wont get fooled again (Score:1)
Point the B--Why is it that in a place such as slash dot the first reactions of many, not all, to something slightly off the charts or beaten paths is negative? You would think slashdot has become a haven for closed minded fundamentalists to read some of the posts surrounding new things.
Petes track record should speak for itself. This Third Disc generative thing is either going to be utter cheese that the reocrd company is foisting on him or something amusingly cool.
Why are, in this place, are there not more stabs, regarddless if they fail or not, at making new evenues of expression?
Has the clacification creeped in such a tight weave that its all restritive motions?
--just a though
bell boy, got my lip buttoned down
The Gift (Score:1)
"Trying to forget your generation...your generation don't mean a thing to me."
Sham 69
Who rocks! (Score:1)
/.origin (Score:3)
And if any of Townshend's PR people stumble on this, I wanna interview Pete for Slashdot.
Slashdot is just a gigantic ploy to let Rob Malda satisfy his lifelong wish to talk to Pete Townshend!
"...and thus it was written in the Book Of Dot, 'O Lord, How May I Speak To Your Musical Prophet', and the Lord replied, 'Yea, ye shall verily speak with thy prophet, but spread far and wide my message of openness and birds that do fail to fly. For that is the way to happiness; the road to bethlehem is with the Geek!"
Yours (Hopefully) Amusingly,
Dan Kaminsky
DoxPara Research
http://www.doxpara.com
Interesting to me... (Score:2)
Well, it cracks me up at least...
no, this isn't cool (Score:1)
Re:/.origin (Score:1)
Would be nice to hear a piece of music based upon my stats, but it would be even better to hear one based upon Pamela Anderson's stats. I wonder how curvy and melodic it would be?
SF SORROW - Boston Rock Opera (Score:1)
Rock/Opera fans in or around the Boston area can check out the first production ever of the Pretty Things lesser-know but highly esteemed rock opera, SF SORROW [geocities.com]. The music will be live and loud and the show features some great talent.
Please check it out!
-kent
Re:Yeah, How the heck does it work? (Score:2)
Art imitating... (Score:1)
I can name a couple albums, or sounds or even muscians that have changed who I am and even broadened my perspective through music. Not only through the lyrics but thought provocing instrumentals. Although generative music is a cool concept, what about the sharing of idea through music. Music based on one's current self is a bit stagnant, and could have the social implemintaion of inbreading. Just re-enforcing your current ideas untill they mutate into dilusions. Of coarse I am going way out on a limb here.
Now back to the people mentioned previously, I think that in some cases certian people lack self esteem to the point that their identity souly defined by the music they listen and to some extent the music that is popular at the time. Generative music may be a tool that can be used to open a path to self-relization. Answer the questions honestly, or really express yourself truely and the end result may suprise or enlighten you.
As a muscian I use music for self-enlightenment, to share ideas, and to grow. I enjoy making music according to my own tastes, but listen to everyone elses compositions for inpiration and creative prosparity. I could also see genertive music being used as a tool to form compositions around muy feelings easier than playing an intrument, but then again leanring an instrument is a disciplin that is VERY charecter building. I know I am conflicting in all my arguments, but I have the firm beleif that music isn't just always playing around. Its very much a foundation of society, and can influence it in negative ways.
Oh well... so much more to say, but I feel I have made enough grammatical and spelling errors tonight.
Bortbox
Re:Pete Townshend is a dimestore Paul Weller (Score:1)
Re:Generative music. (Score:2)
That was PT's personal guru. (He couldn't go off and chase the same gurus the Beatles and Stones did, now could he?)
I don't know Meher Baba's precise religous stance. I think he was associated with Sufiism. He was most famous for a vow of silence, and spent much (most?) of his adult life without speaking a word. I believe there are some references to this in PT's music, but possibly only in his non-commercial work (i.e., the albums bundled into the Meher Baba set described in the article).
--
It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?
Tommy leaves something to be desired?? (Score:1)
--
All Hail! (Score:1)
All hail the ayatollah of rock'n'rollah, the one, the master, Pete Townshend!
Re:Interesting to me... (Score:1)
decieve me?
"I can't believe it"
Let's granulate the flame war: Reverse side of "A Quick One" sucks! Side A rules!
Run Run Run!
Boris The Spider!!!
I Need You!!!
Whiskey Man!!!
Heat Wave!!
Cobwebs and Strange!!!
Quadrophenia (Score:2)
Including the tracks not written or performed by them
Chris Wareham
Re:A bit of WHO triva... (Score:2)
Not trying to start a flamewar, but in the words of someone whose name I've forgotten (Charlotte, perhaps?):
Kids these days (Score:1)
Re:A bit of WHO triva... (Score:1)
Re:Generative music. (Score:2)
I forgot to mention... prior to the familiar version of "Baba O'Riley" (popularly known as "Teenage Wasteland"), there was an extended, instrumental-only version that PT did in his home studio. The synthesizer part appears to be identical to the published version, albeit substantially longer. PT overdubbed guitar, bass, and drums similar to what appeared on in the published version, but no vocals at all. (Thus the already obscure vocals need not necessarily be relevant to the fact that the music was generated from Meher Baba's vital statistics. PT always recycled his music.)
The version of "Baba O'Riley" described above appeared on various bootlegs, and perhaps even on one of the non-commercial albums dedicated to M.B.
--
It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?
Re:Interesting to me... (Score:1)