Mac OS X Hints 182
Mac OS X Hints | |
author | Rob Griffiths |
pages | 461 |
publisher | O'Reilly/Pogue Press |
rating | 8 |
reviewer | Emma Story |
ISBN | 0596004516 |
summary | The perfect sequel to the Missing Manual, this book contains 500 tips for OS X |
Addressing the Obvious
The most immediate question I had when I heard that O'Reilly would be publishing a book containing hints from macosxhints.com was, of course, Why I should get the book when the hints are already on the site for free? Both the author and the publisher also thought of this, understandably enough. Here's how Rob Griffiths answered the question in a post on the site, when the book was first announced: "The book isn't just a 'cut and paste' job from the site-to-print form. Every hint was rewritten and retested from scratch, and hundreds of screenshots were added to help clarify and explain the hints. In addition, many of the scripts and programs posted here are included (the author of each program was contacted for approval to include their original work in the book -- thanks to each of you for agreeing!)."
The response included in the O'Reilly press release for the book is along the same lines: "'The 500-plus hints in this book are based on tips published in the Mac OS X Hints web site,' explains Griffiths. 'But it's not just a rehash of what's there. Every hint has been rewritten, expanded, organized, indexed, tested for compatibility with the latest version of Mac OS X 10.2, and in many cases, illustrated, making the book an even better resource than the web site."
So the question then becomes: is this really the case? Are the differences between the hints as posted on the site and as printed in the book really significant enough to merit shelling out $24.95?
The short answer is that, in my opinion, the book is worth its price. The long answer is (predictably) a little more complicated. There are, of course, people who are more than willing to do the extra digging on the web to get the relevant content for free -- they'd rather do without the little perks (increased readability, revision, testing, screenshots) than spend potential beer money for a glossy O'Reilly book. And that's fine -- I'm more than sympathetic with this position, being frequently hard up for beer money, myself. But of course there are also people for whom the convenience is just as important as the cost, and who consider the price of the book well worth it in terms of the time saved. If you fall into the former category, don't bother buying the book -- but then, you weren't going to buy it anyway, were you? As for the latter group, rest assured that your investment will not, in this case, be wasted.
What I Liked
I've read several other books on Mac OS X. The one I believe everyone should start with is still David Pogue's Mac OS X: The Missing Manual . If you've already read this book (and enjoyed it) or didn't read it but are confident you've already got the equivalent experience, then Mac OS X Hints is a good next step.
Griffiths assumes you're comfortable using OS X for basic tasks: he doesn't tell you how to log in, or what the Dock is. If you're fuzzy on those kind of basics, you're not quite ready for this book (but you're positively crying out for a copy of the Missing Manual). Additionally, he pushes some not-entirely-obvious processes to the introduction, so you don't have to read the same instructions over and over in the meat of the book itself. After all, once you've been told the first time how to view the contents of a package, you're probably all set in that regard. This is one of the aspects of Mac OS X Hints that I found most appealing, actually - Griffiths just explains in the beginning that he's assuming certain things, and then doesn't bother dumbing anything else down.
I've been a fan of macosxhints.com since I first installed OS X, but it seems like Griffiths's style has really improved for the book -- this may be a function of Pogue's role as editor, as the writing in Hints displays the same familiar, comfortable tone while not skimping on depth or details. Like other books Pogue has been involved in, this one is highly readable but not oversimplified.
It seems like the revision process the hints went through during their transition from site to print has been pretty successful, as well -- despite being familiar with the site, there was a great deal of material in the book that I had never seen, even after reading other OS X books. Additionally, the testing involved in the book's creation removes a great deal of the frustration inherent in the site. As much as I like the site, there have been several hints that have mysteriously declined to function on my own system for whatever reason -- but everything I've tried from the book worked without a hitch.
I also enjoyed the fact that this book, like Mac OS X Hacks , is made for sampling. Each article is short and to the point, and while related hints are grouped by chapter, no single tip depends on the reader having already performed one of the others (unless otherwise specified). You don't have to read the book cover to cover -- you can flip around at will without getting lost.
Incidentally, another plus is that 15% of all Griffiths's profits from this book are being donated to the Doernbecher Children's Hospital. That in itself isn't a reason to buy the book, but it's good to know.
What I Didn't Like
If I can be nitpicky for a moment, I was bothered by the frequency of purely typographical errors. Little things like "than" being used instead of "then," or the bottom edge of a line in a sidebar getting cut off. It didn't keep me from enjoying the book, and I'm sure it's the sort of thing that will get corrected in future printings, but this sort of error occurred often enough that I noticed it, anyway.
Another little thing: I wish URLS had been included whenever a third-party shareware program was mentioned. Of course I know I can Google for DragThing and find it immediately -- but if I'm paying for a book, it seems to me that I shouldn't have to.
There is also the fact that this book is undeniably a book, and that limits it in certain respects (at least when compared to the site). The index is comprehensive and useful, but it's just not as useful as the ability to search the entire text of the book. It's also inevitably dated to a certain degree -- new hints posted to the site, even if they're infinitely more fabulous than ones already present in the book, just won't show up in print for a long time to come. Similarly, if a new version of the OS breaks one of the hints, you'll be able to find out somewhere on the web, but it won't be immediately obvious when you're just reading the book. Of course, these are problems shared by all print technical books, and not just Hints.
One final note: there's a lot of overlap between this book and Mac OS X Hacks, although each book has a significant amount of unique content. If you own one, you probably don't need to get the other, but it's difficult to say which I'd buy if I had to choose. Hacks contains only 100 articles, but they're more in-depth and the tasks they cover are often trickier or less obvious. Hints contains over 500 tidbits, but they're much shorter and often deal with things like key commands that allow you to increase your efficiency, and things of that ilk.
The Bottom Line
If you're the sort for whom time is at a higher premium than money -- maybe you're the kind of person who would buy a boxed *nix distribution instead of downloading it -- then I'd say go ahead and get this book. It's well worth its price as long as you understand that what you're paying for is ease of use and reliability, as well as content. If, on the other hand, you're living on Top Ramen for the foreseeable future, you're probably better off sticking with the site. If you do buy it, I think you'll find it will make a happy addition to your bookshelf -- stick it next to the Missing Manual and dip into it whenever you're sitting through an install or reboot.
You can purchase the Mac OS X Hints from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
Too late? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Too late? (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh hell, maybe I should just get the book now.
Re:Too late? (Score:2)
Not only that... (Score:2)
Re:Not only that... (Score:2)
Next Week: Mac OS X for Unix Geeks (Which is darn spiffy, IMHO, the best of the 3)
Re:Not only that... (Score:1, Offtopic)
M'Bad. Those O'Reilly guys need more unique titles for people like me with Attention Def...hey! What's that over there! ;)
Hmm (Score:5, Interesting)
That's a bit of a downer. The popular misconception about Macs is that lack of software. You'd think a book that aims to show you the true power of the MAC would lead you to every little cool piece of software for it.
Perhaps some day when jobs are stable I'll shell out the moola for a powerbook. Until then, linux thou art my savior.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Hmm (Score:1, Offtopic)
MAC is NOT the correct spelling.... Geeeez people!
Re:Hmm (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Re:Hmm (Score:1, Offtopic)
When a non-acronym word is spelled in capitals, it's either shouting, or you're somehow dealing with FreeBSD revisions or cvs branches :)
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
For the humor impared, I'm a Mac user, not a troll, and just thought that was a funny acronym.
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Interesting)
me too
</aol>
I've plonked many a relative for doing the same thing. I've plonked tie-wearing microsoft-obsessed upper management types for doing the same thing.
And by the way, MAC also stands for Mandatory Access Control (MLS), Message Authentication Code (SSL, SRT, cryptography) or Membership Advisory Committee (ICANN). I can understand full well the namespace pollution.
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Re:Hmm (Score:2)
Ill get it out of the way (Score:5, Funny)
Now can we have an intelligent conversation?
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:2)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1)
personally i don't like having a mouse that's so far from my keyboard. any movement to the mouse after typing is cumbersome. anyway. go apple and this good ole' book on tips!
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:2)
Good luck!
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:2)
of course they do (Score:3, Funny)
Do these $2000 machines support usb mice?
It's not linux, you know.
Re:of course they do (Score:2)
You see, there is a world outside of Apple, and it is technologically advanced
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1)
> Tip 1. Throw apple mouse in trash, plug in 2 button scroll wheel.
That's fine and dandy until your applications must assume that its users have no more than one mouse button. On Windows/KDE/Gnome, developers can assume the user will make use of the second mouse button and design functionality accordingly.
Re:Ill get it out of the way (Score:1)
Still typos? Did it come with pdf version? (Score:5, Interesting)
If there's a PDF version, then it should be searchable, making it FAR more useful.
Re:Still typos? Did it come with pdf version? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Still typos? Did it come with pdf version? (Score:1)
I'll wait for it to come out on Safari (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Still typos? Did it come with pdf version? (Score:2, Insightful)
Ummm... Use the book's index?
As an Avid Mac User. (Score:3, Insightful)
Well Goodbye Karma.
Re:As an Avid Mac User. (Score:2)
Re:As an Avid Mac User. (Score:1, Insightful)
I'm sick of you fuckin armchair editors.
Re:As an Avid Mac User. (Score:2)
Armchair editor? The whole idea of an armchair whatever is when a person doesn't do something, eventhough they talk about it all the time. In this case, it's unfair, because he can't be an editor at slashdot. If he was at kuro5hin.org, then you could call him an armchair editor.
This guy thinks there is a problem, and it's the part of the point of disscusion forums to be able to brin
Re:As an Avid Mac User. (Score:2)
Of course, if the edtorial was done properly, then people wouldn't bother talking about it.
Bloody hell. I swear slashdot wasn't like this when I was first here (and I mean people like you, not the editors, they've always been the way they are).
This guy thin
Re:As an Avid Mac User. (Score:2)
That's just silly, since he's not a complete stranger here, slashdot is a public site, and it is meant to be used by the public. In fact, he is even a member here. Just like you.
So? Everybody knows that Slashdot is a fucking disaster. There's nothing insightful about pointing that out.
Maybe some people a c
Some OSX Books in pdf format here (Score:5, Informative)
P.S. I just bought a new Power Mac(1.25GHX x 2) and I love it! Install an X windows server and you can run just about any existing X app. Really impressive.
Re:Some OSX Books in pdf format here (Score:1)
Side note - I've had my TiBook for about a month, now. When I launched Ethereal for the first time at work, there was a moment of awe among my coworkers.
Plus, all the graphics guys I know went crazy. "Wow! A real computer geek - who has a Mac? That's fantastic!" Apparently, their experience with Mac users has been an "you're either a designer or Nick Burns [geocities.com]" kind of thing.
Re:Some OSX Books in pdf format here (Score:1)
Not only that, I was able to install JBuilder on OSX thanks to this link [alofmethbin.com]. So far I am extremely pleased(exc
url's in a book are a waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:url's in a book are a waste of time (Score:2)
However, I think it's good when they include links to resource web sites. For example, planetsourcecode.com might totally overhaul its pages down the road, but the main page/URL will likely be there for quite awhile, and it's a good resource that may or may not be an obvious hit in Google.
Re:url's in a book are a waste of time (Score:1)
Solves the Catch-22 (Score:4, Interesting)
judging a book.. (Score:4, Funny)
what the hell? mod this -1 redundant!
dump the caps lock (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:2, Informative)
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:2, Informative)
Anyone else with a similar experience?
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:1)
When uContol does turn the CapsLock into the Contol Key it is very bothersome that it is sticky ( ie, the control key stays pressed when the caps lock light is on ).
I am anxiously awaiting a solid CapsLock / Control switch hack...
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:1)
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:1)
Kind of frustrating, but not as frustrating as having the CapsLock where the CTRL key should be!
Re:dump the caps lock (Score:3, Informative)
"Amazingly enough"? (Score:1, Interesting)
For one thing, they've released countless books on Windows (and I remember the times when their only books on MS issues were the "(X) Annoyances" series). For another thing, OS X is actually quite a serious system. Have you used it? Try it, it's Neat(TM).
I used to ru
Re:"Amazingly enough"? (Score:1)
Re:"Amazingly enough"? (Score:4, Insightful)
It's nothing to do with the fact that ORA printed it.
Right you are (Score:1)
upsetting? (Score:1)
As a Mac OS X user, this is upsetting...
I think the reviewer was just trying to inject a little humour, read that sentence again. It was a joke, i.e. of course a book entitled Mac OS X Hints is going to contain hints about Mac OS X, what else would it be expected to contain?
Re:"Amazingly enough"? (Score:1)
Euh no, the poster finds it funny that anyone wouldn't be able to figure out that the hints are about OS X since it's in the NAME of the book.
Re:"Amazingly enough"? (Score:2)
"unaware that it wasn't funny"? (Score:2)
ROTFL. I have never seen a more egotistical statement. Thousands of people read those words, grinned and moved on. You and one other person failed to see the humor - but they are wrong and you are right.
Damn. You must be in Congress.
some examples (Score:1)
Just wondering (Score:3, Insightful)
A lot of people contributed time and energy to make that site better, free of charge.
Re:Just wondering (Score:5, Interesting)
Pay attention... (Score:2)
My "payment" for my hint (scripts for automatic command line aliases of .app files) was a free copy of the book - which is more than I expected.
I'm happy to see Rob get a little compensation for all the work he does.
Re:Just wondering (Score:2)
Rob also did a MASSIVE amount of work in the process of going from what's on macosxhints.com to the book. It took a long time to write and revise. And revise. If the content of the book doesn't convince you, go ask the guys in #macosxhints on irc.krono.net.
Impressed that the Hints are not just for newbies (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't know if I'd buy it though, since I do have enough skill to find all the hints on the site, without the pretty screen shots and all. It is a great book if you're on the cusp of getting deeper into how OS X works and getting the most out of your Mac.
Top Ramen!? (Score:1)
Can it compete with itself? (Score:4, Interesting)
I haven't read the book, although I would imagine a fair number of the hints published are from earlier in MacOS X's lifecycle. This would be good to help new users adopt to the OS, although with all the hints available online for free (with a decent search engine attached), is there really enough incentive for people to get the book as well?
Cheers.
Re:Can it compete with itself? (Score:1, Funny)
Yeah agreed, I learned a lot of stuff from that site (and I know when I get a new Mac I'm going to have to go back and remember all the obscure things I changed).
But I do get annoyed these days at these types of hints:
Re:Can it compete with itself? (Score:2)
[robg adds: I haven't tested this one myself.]
Re:Can it compete with itself? (Score:1)
I've actually found quite a bit that is worthwhile on MacOSXhints. I subscribe to the RSS feed and usually find two or three topics a day that range from moderately interesting, to very cool.
There's a news feed? (Score:2)
I did not know that... I checked the site and it doesn't seem to mention it.
Table of Contents... (Score:1)
Given the BSD core of OS X, I wonder:
Re:Table of Contents... (Score:3, Insightful)
I really wish they had the same committment to manpages as, say, the FreeBSD project. Mac Help just doesn't cut it! And the Apple Developer site is hopelessly cumbersome.
The reason I bought it... (Score:5, Insightful)
The guy has a full-time job, he's got one of the best resources on the web to help with under-the-hood OS X action, and he's got principals I happen to dig. He also busts his ass on the site.
I bought my copy of the book to support him, period. I've got several more on order now to give as gifts to friends who are making the transition (art director and photographer types) who could use a guided tour under the hood of OS X that doesn't make them feel like morons or *cough* 'Dummies'. Let's face it -- the dummies, missing manual and like books are made for grandma. I'm trying to show these guys all the cool new stuff you can do once you peek under the hood to get them excited about the change instead of dreading it.
Just the simple fact that his site has a way to re-enable Sendmail within a day or so of a patch that cripples it is enough for me -- I've gotten my money's worth out of the osascript stuff already as well.
I'll happily spring for the Panther/Smeagol (dual personality?) version once it's released as well. It's the least I can do.
Interesting note about some tips (Score:5, Informative)
The most interesting one (one that I use myself and one that I believe is shown on the example pages on the O'Reilly site) is the entry in the com.apple.Dock.plist file that allows you to specify that hidden applications should appear as transparent icons in the dock. I find that kind of visual feedback useful and cannot image why Apple would have created such a feature and then fail to include a simple checkbox to activate it in the dock preferences pane.
Weird. And there are quite a few hints like that. Enough that programmers routinely release software to put a GUI on them. (Tinkertool and several Safari-related apps come to mind, but there are several others.)
Not that pogue (Score:2)
Re:mac problem (Score:1, Insightful)
NOT LYING: goatse dot christmas island could change your life!!!1!1!!11
Re:mac problem (Score:2, Informative)
This is because the multi-tasking architecture in System 9 is cooperative, not pre-emptive.
In other words, System 9 does not multi-task any better than Windows 3.0 did in 1990.
This has been my biggest complaint of Apple up until the release of OSX. No matter how fast the PPC chip, if System 8 or System 9 was running the system, just playing an MP3 and doing something else would skip the music. Or do something in Finder and watch
Re:mac problem (Score:2)
Re:mac problem (Score:1)
This is when you should be yelling at the providers of this software to provide at the very least a compatible version, if not a native OSX version.
I hate when software vendors pull stuff like this to users, especially considering that OSX has been out a few years now.
BTW, there are ways to dual boot for the older software (even thought it would
Re:mac problem (Score:2)
Re:mac problem (Score:2)
Sorry, can't resist:
And please donâ(TM)t post about Windows95 having a 16bit Mutext. This is not a flame war of OS relgion. We all know that when running 16bit applications, the 16bit mutext in Win95 would also be cooperative. However when running only 32bit (WIN32) applications, it was fully preemptive.
Unfortunately, the GDI was 98% the same as the GDI in Win 3.11 which meant it was a Win16 thing and needed the mutex because it was not reentrant. This means that any win16 application that locke
Re:VERBATIM! (Score:1)
Re:VERBATIM! (Score:4, Funny)
If correct English and Grammar is that important, then you should add a comma to your statement. Without it, the verb can be misconstrued.
In example: Learn how to speak English, you fuck.
*smile*
Any punk can have a web site... (Score:2)
Hey, any punk can have a web site (I've had several, including a fairly popular one) but seeing your name in blank ink on white paper in an actual book is an ego boost that has no equal.
Besides, I still find reading actual paper easier than reading web sites for long periods of time.
*blink* *blink* (Score:2)
How is it "bload" when someone tells me how to get my iBook to work with my company's highly structured active directory? That problem stumped me for weeks...