Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck Businesses Education

Computer Engineering Degree Most Valuable 818

Anonymous Squonk writes "CNN reports on the National Association of Colleges and Employers quarterly salary survey. Computer Engineering degree holders once again command the highest starting salaries at an average of $53,117, but Chemical Engineering is gaining rapidly, and Computer Science graduate's salaries are up 8.9% over the year before. Most of the other geek disciplines rank high on the list as well." While starting salaries for some degrees are up, the overall situation is not very good - indeed, your salary may be decreasing.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Computer Engineering Degree Most Valuable

Comments Filter:
  • by ChaoticChaos ( 603248 ) * <l3sr-v4cfNO@SPAMspamex.com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:32AM (#8200761)
    Wow, that starting salary must be appreciated by all 5 graduates who were able to find jobs.

    Honestly, until something is seriously done by the government and companies (determing a percentage that can be offshored, completely redoing the tariffs in the so-called "free trade" agreements, etc.), it's difficult to make a case for going to a college or university. To train for what? Everyone behind a desk is vulnerable to being offshored.

    Thankfully, Lou Dobb's program is putting the spotlight on this issue each evening! Tonight, he's going to focus on the companies who are the worst abusers of offshoring. Last night, he focused on the owner of a Tool and Die shop who is complaining that "free trade" has ruined his business and it's about to go under. His specific complaints were that tariffs on his stuff going to China is 29.9%. Stuff coming from China to the US has a tariff of 3%. In Mexico, they freely use and dump chemicals that he would go to jail for dumping. This is free trade? Our elected officials agreed to this? Holy cow! The playing field is not level or even close to being level.

    Until the tariffs are equal and labor/enviromental issues are equal with our trade partners, America is going to continue to lose jobs, companies, and wealth. Our future is slowly being flushed down the porcelin convenience. Our own beloved industry - IT - has near double-digit unemployment. Good luck to new graduates trying to enter.

  • by Short Circuit ( 52384 ) <mikemol@gmail.com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:34AM (#8200778) Homepage Journal
    I'd rather know about the money I'll be making five to ten years into the job. If the company has starting salaries too high, chances are they aren't going to be around that long.
  • Re:i call bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)

    by andih8u ( 639841 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:36AM (#8200798)
    Yeah, but she has a masters versus a regular batchelor of science, or what have you. Most psychology majors I know have very low paying jobs with social services.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:36AM (#8200805)
    You're probably right. We'll always need doctors in every town because people get sick and need to get better. But we won't always need software creators in town because the townspeople don't actually NEED them there -- the software engineering process can take place anywhere and still meet the requirements.
  • by Short Circuit ( 52384 ) <mikemol@gmail.com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:38AM (#8200836) Homepage Journal
    He's complaining that tariffs to China are much higher than tariffs from China? What's he want, import tariffs to go up?

    Depressions have been started because competing companies got into tariff wars. And political fallout (steel tariffs and the EU, anyone?) gets nasty too.

    Heinlein always talked about democracy being likely to fail when people voted themselves bread-and-circuses. I wish he would have speculated on the sequence of events that could cause it.
  • Sad (Score:5, Insightful)

    by savagedome ( 742194 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:38AM (#8200838)
    The sad(der) part is that nursing and elementary teaching are in the bottom five of the list with both of them going down.

    Nurses and Teachers are the people who should be paid better. Oh well.

  • Money... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sabrex15 ( 746201 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:39AM (#8200842)
    Lots of money is great, but what about the people who have a love for computing?... To me as long as I am happy with my work, the people I work with and I dont have to worry about where my next meal comes from then thats all the beans. If youve noticed, a lot of people are getting into the field JUST for the money, I'd like to see maybe 5-10 years down the road all the high money chasers go and the people who actually WANT to do this type of work stick.
  • by djdanlib ( 732853 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:39AM (#8200848) Homepage
    The title "Computer Engineering" can mean so many things, though.

    I know it was all about the internal computers from microwaves, stereos, etc. where I went to school. [rit.edu] CE people had a very good combination of IT, CS, and various microprocessor-related engineering skills.

    What does it mean to you?
  • Region Dependent (Score:5, Insightful)

    by j0hnfr0g ( 652153 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:39AM (#8200849)
    One thing to remember is that salaries are very region dependent, so a Computer Engineering degree may not command the highest starting salaries in your region.
  • Re:i call bullshit (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:40AM (#8200854)
    the cnn article doesnt mention it, but these types of surveys are based upon 4-year bachelor degrees, not masters.

    Next - those numbers in the survey represent the AVERAGE! You're trying to take one individual case and make it the value for all cases. Statistics dont work that way my friend. Wilt Chamberlin may have scored 100 points in a game once (a single individual case), but that doesnt mean every player scores 100 points every night.

    curious - MBA stands for "Master of Business Administration." How the hell does one get an "mba in psychology"? Did you mean MA or MS in Psych?
  • by ChaoticChaos ( 603248 ) * <l3sr-v4cfNO@SPAMspamex.com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:42AM (#8200888)
    What he wants is equality. Why would anyone in China buy his atificially inflated products? China's products are only inflated 3% coming into the US. That's great for US consumers! The 29.9% tariff is horrible for the American company.

    How about both companies having a 3% tariff???? Better yet, until China has labor/environmental laws that are enforced, THEY should have the 29.9% tariff and he should get the 3% tariff.

    Honestly, whoever agreed to these trade laws was totally asleep at the wheel.
  • Re:Sad (Score:3, Insightful)

    by lennart78 ( 515598 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:43AM (#8200903)
    Not only do they get less pay, they also have to work the longest hours (especially teachers), or the most inconvenient (nurses/medical).

    I don't think anybody who works in IT has much to complain about if you compare your situation with any of theirs...
  • Re:Money... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by sinucus ( 85222 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:45AM (#8200934)
    I agree with you on this one. The dot-bubble is the cause for all of this. People saw money in this field and ran for a job. Now that they have been laid-off they still think they can make money in this field because of their experience. That doesn't leave much room for us, the people who have been working on computers since before we could read. I worked on a computer before I watched television. People like me are the ones pining for the jobs because we deserve them. And yes, I do make shit for money so I am most definatly working for the love and NOT the money.
  • by Loundry ( 4143 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:46AM (#8200941) Journal
    "You're never going to get rich working to make someone else rich."

    This was told to me while I was working as a software engineer commanding a decent salary. But I wasn't making the real money. That job belonged to my boss, who saw it fit to pay me a skim from his profit for a job I performed.

    What was I to do? Whine? Talk about how "greedy" he was? Criticize him for his lack of technical skills (compared to mine)?

    All of that is excrement. Instead, I chose to become an entrepreneur. I found partners, made deals, and now am in the process of opening my second restaurant as well as selling things over television and Internet. I think about business all the time, and work suddenly has become very, very fun. Life itself feels like a massively multiplayer game.

    Oh, and here's another piece of advice that I learned that I wish someone had told me earlier: Anyone will loan you any some of money as long as they are convinced that it's in their best interest to do so.

    Stop working for someone else. Find partners. Find investors. Find a way that you can make a business work. It's exhilirating and fascinating. And you won't go back once you are free.
  • Re:Sad (Score:5, Insightful)

    by linderdm ( 127168 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:47AM (#8200954)
    I agree 100%! There has been so much complaining about the quality of our education system in America, and how we need better teahcers, etc. yet they continue to be paid such pitiful salaries. I was shocked to see that the average salary for teachers actually went DOWN! I can't wait until this country actually starts to respect educators the way they are in other countries. There is so much emphasis on teahcers' accountability for how well the students perform, yet they get zero support.
  • by Tassach ( 137772 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:49AM (#8200982)
    If you have a comp engineering degree, you have a whole lot of an advantage over someone with just a Comp Sci or MIS degree. Recent CompE grads are taking the lower-end programming jobs that would previously have gone to people with CS degrees, forcing the CS majors into whatever job they can find. It's a tough time to be a code slinger.

  • by jgalun ( 8930 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:52AM (#8201018) Homepage
    Honestly, until something is seriously done by the government and companies (determing a percentage that can be offshored, completely redoing the tariffs in the so-called "free trade" agreements, etc.), it's difficult to make a case for going to a college or university. To train for what? Everyone behind a desk is vulnerable to being offshored.

    Yes, white collar jobs are now vulnerable to off-shoring - but far more blue collar jobs have already been off-shored. There's a reason why factory payrolls just declined for the 42nd straight month, even as total payrolls in the US increased.

    Besides, off-shoring isn't the only factor in the job market. Over all, it pays to get a college degree. According to surveys (see article [salary.com]) the average college graduate makes $17,000 more per year than the average high school graduate. Even if you go to an expensive private college at $35,000 per year, you still more than make back that cost over the course of your career.
  • Re:Why? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:53AM (#8201020)
    What are you doing about it though? Are you writing your congressman? The whitehouse? The Press? Or are you doing nothing? We (American Programmers) who are working and aren't working need to become more involved in politics, and not just the EFF either.
  • by ChaoticChaos ( 603248 ) * <l3sr-v4cfNO@SPAMspamex.com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:55AM (#8201048)
    While the college degree disparity may have held true historically, we're about to see if it will continue to hold true in the age of the Internet where doing a job can be done without boundaries.
  • by Mycroft_514 ( 701676 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:59AM (#8201084) Journal
    the shortage is that there are not enough jobs for all the certificate and nothing else holders. Are they really IT/DP/CS professionals?

    The company I work for has hired a few people in the last year. First requirement on every position BS in something, usually BSCS (CSEE doesn't exist much around here, so they only cover it under "related fields").

    So, the job market is recovering slowly, and we are in no danger of outsourcing even job 1 here.
  • by Mr. Underbridge ( 666784 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @10:59AM (#8201095)
    Wow, that starting salary must be appreciated by all 5 graduates who were able to find jobs.

    Wow, that's amazing, because I recently returned from a career fair here at Caltech, and nearly every job needed a heavy programming background. The problem (for you) is, that they want other skills too.

    Your REAL problem is that an increasing number of students majoring in physics, chemistry, math, etc have learned to program pretty damned well. That gives us a huge advantage - we can take a job that uses either our science knowledge, programming skills, or more likely both. Companies get somebody with a wider range of skills.

    As such, I think the best idea is a major in the physical sciences or better yet, EE, with a CS minor (or double major).

    I guarantee you this - if you had an EE/CS double major, or even EE major/CS minor, you'd be beating companies away with a stick. Particularly here in California.

  • by duffbeer703 ( 177751 ) * on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:00AM (#8201106)
    US Steel was able to reorganize itself from a state of near bankruptcy to modest profitability due to the steel tariff.

    The guy that the parent poster would like to export stuff to China, which is growing at hyper-speed and has plenty of tool and die customers.

    But the Chinese gov't slaps a 30% tariff to encourage local industry.

    The US is utterly dependent on the Chinese government and Industrialists buying US Government debt that we accept that situation.

    Heck, the "free" market people have even convinced people like you that the destruction of our nation is a good thing!
  • Re:Money... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:02AM (#8201123)
    Lots of love is great, but what about the people who have a need for money for computing?... To me as long as I am happy with my pay, the people I get paid from, and I dont have to worry about where my next car comes from then thats all the beans. If youve noticed, a lot of people are getting into the field JUST for the love of it, I'd like to see maybe 5-10 years down the road all the high love chasers go and the people who actually WANT money to do this type of work stick.

    You do it for love, I desire money. How do you know I won't do a good job. Often times people doing it for "love" neglect other boring aspects and turn out something of no use/reduced use to people. Havent you seen this too?? Be real, don't discriminate on motivation.

  • Re:Sad (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dillon_rinker ( 17944 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:02AM (#8201125) Homepage
    Regarding elementary teaching - get real!

    ANYBODY with an high-school education can teach children to read and count. Quite frankly, any adult who feels academically unqualified to teach elementary school should sue their high school for educational malpractice. The only bit that makes the job difficult is managing large groups of small children. That's something that can be gained only be experience, and would best be learned in a one-year apprenticeship.

    Why am I qualified to make this statement? Because of what I do for a living.
  • Finally (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Cyclone66 ( 217347 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:06AM (#8201178) Homepage Journal
    Finally some good news about my education (Computer Engineering). I graduate in a few months, and for the past four years it has been nothing but doom and gloom (No jobs, and now outsourcing).
  • by will_die ( 586523 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:08AM (#8201206) Homepage
    From HR people they said it generally works out like this.
    If you have a big name recognition school, such as Harvard, MIT, Caltech,etc. You are going to probably be offered more just for the name and the preceived additional skill level of the person who graduates from one of them.
    Then you have the local big name school, such as Texas A&M being worth more in texas then in California. Again because of preceived values and a far better chance that the person hiring is from or knows someone from.
    Then you have everything else, and thier they just check the books to see if the place is accredited.

    Then after a few years of actual work unless you have one of thoses huge top-tier ones it really does not matter.
  • by duffbeer703 ( 177751 ) * on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:09AM (#8201219)
    You started college in the middle of the dotcom boom. Salarys were inflated.

    No college grad is worth $60k. Period.

    We pay grads $35k. Good workers make it up to $50k in two years, mediocre ones go nowhere and shitty ones get fired.
  • by phaze3000 ( 204500 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:12AM (#8201241) Homepage
    I find it quite strange how quickly many American's love of capitalism and free trade is forgotten as soon as they are the ones loosing out.

    Isn't the sort of protectionism you are suggesting akin to a socialist command-economy?

    I whole-heartedly agree with you on the the unfairness with regards to environmental damage, which is why I believe you government shouldn't have torn up the Kyoto treaty. I don't see how this directly relates with regards to programming jobs moving to India though.

  • Re:Sad (Score:3, Insightful)

    by duffbeer703 ( 177751 ) * on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:13AM (#8201263)
    Please.

    Teachers work 9 months out of the year and are guaranteed employment for life. They teach a state mandated curiculum and have no performance standards to adhere to once they earn tenure.

    Salarys for nurses vary widely. The nurse in a family doctor's office does not make alot of money, but doesn't need alot of skills either. Specialized nurses make signifigantly larger sums of money and need to maintain multiple certifications and take continuing education.

    If you want to get rich, take a high stress, high risk job. If you want to take it easy, don't expect a huge check.
  • by SlamMan ( 221834 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:14AM (#8201267)
    That's why you don't go to a school that will cost you $150,000. If you can't afford to go to an ivy league, go to something cheaper. You're education won't be much different as an undergrad.

    Coming from somebody who couldn't afford MIT, and happily went to Maryland.
  • by EnderWiggnz ( 39214 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:17AM (#8201301)
    a companies best interest is to pay you the absolute bare minimum that it takes to keep you around, and not a dime more.

    you need to negotiatie up front for the best compensation possible. all future raises will be based on that going forward.
  • by AnonymousNoMore ( 721510 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:18AM (#8201316)
    Me first. Company second. Anyone who believes otherwise is delusional.

    Putting yourself first isn't always about salary. Young engineers should be more concerned with the technology that they are learning and less about salary. Ultimately, engineering skills are a commodity. If you take the opportunity to develop unique and desirable skills, you will make more money over the long haul than someone with more common skills that chose projects on the basis of salary. You will also be more employable in difficult times. That's how you get rewarded down the road.

    I can honestly say that I've always chosen the job that was more technically exciting or seemed like a big long term payoff because it was a risky challenge instead of short term financial gain. I've gotten screwed a few times when companies failed and the sure thing at a better salary would have netted more. But I look back without any regrets because I was always enjoying what I did.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:29AM (#8201471)
    - I can think of a few reasons.

    1) Not minority (dis)advantaged.
    2) Not gender (dis)advantaged.
    3) Weak handshake.
    4) Bad people skills.
    5) No networking skills.

    The first 2 may sound like flamebait, but I was a recruiter. I had several excellent candidates that I remembered, they had excellent GPAs and great people skills... but the gentleman I had to send the resume's to wasn't interested because they were not a minority.

    Thats a fact of life now in business- you'll see companies being rewarded for hiring minorities, with the assumption that that automatically generates the best potential.

    In this particular case, ours hired a minority with a 3.2 GPA over a 4.0 GPA.

    Oddly enough, I've not been asked back to the recruiting team after I objected to this.
  • Looking backwards (Score:4, Insightful)

    by AB3A ( 192265 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:31AM (#8201489) Homepage Journal
    At best, this statistic only tells us where the US economy was, not where it is. I don't put much stock in tallies like this because it's like answering 42 to life the universe and everything.

    Let's take a longer perspective, shall we? The computer industry has been white hot for many years now. Those of you who were working in it were riding that wave for a long time. Good work!

    It couldn't last forever. Those wonderful salaries were not reflected in other parts of the industry. For the experience and training most Computer Science graduates have, an appropriate salary ought to be much closer to what most other engineers earn. That's why so many jobs are evaporating. We'll get them back eventually, at salaries more in line with what the rest of the engineering world is earning.

    That's the way business works. The demand was white hot for nearly a decade. Now it's only red hot. It was a good wave while it lasted. Business Revolutions like that come along maybe once or twice per century. Be thankful you had the chance to ride this one.
  • Re:Sad (Score:4, Insightful)

    by planetmn ( 724378 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:31AM (#8201494)
    Except that a teacher will spend around 50-60 hours/week either teaching or developing coursework/grading, etc. (if they are good and commited) plus will have to spend time in the summer training and obtaining more "continueing education credits."

    Add to this the fact that not only do they make less money, they tend to have to spend a certain amount on the classroom, buying books, tools, etc. that the school can't/won't pay for. Ever fill out a 1040? You'll see that educators get to deduct up to $250 in expenses, why, because they generally spend much more than that in a year.

    Furthermore, the teachers have to deal with the kids of people like you who don't have respect for what they have to do and only think "gee, it must be easy to only work 9 months a year."

    My fiancee has a bachelors and masters degree in education, I have a bachelors in EE/CompE (a real engineering degree, not this bullshit lets rename CS as CE crap) and am working on my MSEE currently, and she earns 1/4th my salary.

    It isn't right, but it won't be. Teachers salaries won't be increased much in our lifetimes (we have wacky priorities) and it doesn't matter. A good teacher teaches because that's what she loves to do. My fiancee wouldn't change professions for anything.

    All I ask is that you please have more respect for people like teachers instead of ragging on them because you are ignorant of how hard they really work.

    -dave
  • by stevesliva ( 648202 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:33AM (#8201517) Journal
    What's he want, import tariffs to go up?
    What he should want is China to let their currency (the yuan, I think) float, rather than fixing its value to the US dollar. Goods from the rest of the world have gotten more expensive in the US and US prices and wages relatively more competitive in foreign markets, except in China, because the value of the yuan is artificially pegged to the value of the dollar.

    That's hurting more than any existing tariffs. While China's taking advantage of free markets, they're not playing by the rules. I'm all for free trade and I hate protectionism, but China's currency policy needs to go.

  • Value of degree (Score:2, Insightful)

    by NixLuver ( 693391 ) <stwhite&kcheretic,com> on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:37AM (#8201568) Homepage Journal
    There are a couple of real problems; one is the recursive relationship between campaign funding and legislative favors to corporations. The second is the fact that most schools simply can't stay current in their computer programs. I know quite a few CE and CS grads who are basically clueless as to IT in the real world, with the exception of a very few schools.

    Linux/BSD/etc are rapidly addressing this, but not fast enough.

  • Re:Organization (Score:4, Insightful)

    by iamsure ( 66666 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:38AM (#8201570) Homepage
    There is a huge difference between professional organizations and unions, and you do a disservice to both by lumping them together.

    Unions exist - as you said - to assist with collective bargaining, to work for better wages and working conditions, and most importantly (imho), to reduce layoffs without cause.

    Professional organizations on the other hand can have a variety of functions. Most are focused on knowledge sharing. The AMA, for example, publishes magazines and gives doctors strong recommended guidelines based on thousands of doctors feedback.

    There would definitely be a benefit to both types of organizations for computer scientists/engineers. However, try not to lump them together, as you'll get the arguments against both, and few of the pro's for either.

    My two cents on unions are that they need to get a foothold in the one place that can make a huge difference - tech support centers. Places like "CallTech" and other minimum wage, low-benefit, high-stress environments are the perfect foothold.

    They get the numbers needed to show that people gain benefit from being under collective bargaining, and they build a groundswell of support.

    When you then leverage that to move into call/support for say, Sprint or Microsoft, you can see that it would be a trivial extension to break into the server rooms, the switch closets, and the rest of the company.

    I don't think for a second that I need to give the Unions ideas though.. they've thought of it, they are working on it, and it will happen in time.

    I really like the idea of a professional organization though.. add some strong credibility, and knowledge sharing.
  • by bluGill ( 862 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:38AM (#8201572)

    Sure, if you can run a bsuiness. I'm terribal at some of the things needed to run a buisness. Selling for instance, I can't sell product. I couldn't sell a cure for cancer to someone dieing of cancer, not even for a penny.

    I have in fact found partners to go into buiseness with. I'm a terribal judge of people though. My partners, while excited at first, soon realized this was real work and left me with a buisness that I couldn't make work alone. (It could have made some money if they had done their part...)

    I like working 9-5 and not worrying after that. Sure I'll never be rich as far as money goes, but I'm richer than even Bill Gates because I don't tie my life to money. Sure I can't have a lot of things I want, but I can decide what I want to do, and there are plenty of cheap things to do.

    I think you need to get your life in focus. Money isn't everything.

  • by NDPTAL85 ( 260093 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:45AM (#8201646)
    You know, your words are so true and so right yet so hard to take seriously from one of the less than 3 individuals in the western world who believes the HIV virus does not cause AIDS.
  • Re:Sad (Score:3, Insightful)

    by RedX ( 71326 ) <redx@wideopenw[ ].com ['est' in gap]> on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:50AM (#8201693)
    I certainly do respect the work that teachers do, especially for the comparatively low amount of money that they make. However, for someone to come to this site, where I'd bet the majority of us can't remember the last 40 hour week we worked, and claim that teachers work the longest amount of time is just ridiculous. Many of my co-workers work 45+ hours per week, are on-call around the clock, and do technical reading at home afterhours. Yes, teaching is a tough job, and there typically is more afterhours work to do than your typical 9-5'er.
  • by The Spoonman ( 634311 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:53AM (#8201720) Homepage
    Well, I hate to say it here, 'cause I know I'll get flamed more for who originally said it rather than what was said...Rush Limbaugh once made the statement that the fairest and simplest trade agreement with any country is simply, "We'll charge you what you charge us." If China's adding 29.9% to the cost of our goods, we do it to theirs. It's fair, it's equitible and anyone who complains is just told, "Fine, lower your tariffs, ours go down automatically."
  • by Killswitch1968 ( 735908 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:55AM (#8201745)
    Argh, seems everytime outsourcing rolls around...
    Steel tarrifs were a HORRIBLE thing. You are only looking at one side of the issue: Steel worker jobs. Think of all the companies in the US, cars, construction workers, machines, that rely on steel. They all had to pay this insane rates because the steel workers couldn't adapt. The end result? Hidden jobloss in these sectors from companies that can't compete well, not to mention inflated prices on the goods these companies produce.

    Make no mistake, tariffs are ALWAYS a bad thing, regardless of which side institutes them
  • by delphin42 ( 556929 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:55AM (#8201752) Homepage
    I graduated from GT as a CompE in Dec 2001 and got a job in Austin, TX starting at more than the $53k average. Every one of my friends got a job paying close to the average. There were a lot of higher paying jobs, but they were in cities with a much high cost of living. It doesn't surprise me that $53k is the average, but take it with a grain of salt because $60k in Northern California is more like $35-40k in other parts of the country.
  • Re:Help Me! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by MetalShard ( 633009 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @11:57AM (#8201772) Homepage
    I have been involved in hiring at the last three companies (all software related) that I worked for. Your resume would not have made the cut. Get someone professional to go over your resume. It needs to be cleaner, clearer, and it needs more content.

    A lot of people don't realize that its not what they know or dont know that is keeping them from getting a job. Its the fact that they have really bad resumes.
  • *the* IT industry (Score:2, Insightful)

    by hellraizr ( 694242 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:00PM (#8201807)
    I'm beginning to notice a pattern here. slashdotters seem to think that IT == programmer. which is WRONG! sure programming is part of IT but a very small part. Those computer science degrees could be used very well to obtain an entry level job in help desk ot junior sysadmin at a large company. getting a job as a programmer with no real world experience is like a convicted child molester applying at the FBI. get your ass in the door first, fine tune your skill for a couple years _THEN_ go look for a programming job. you need portfolio's and verifiable experience under your belt.

    I personally have been in IT for around 8-9 years, well before the dotcom boom. and I've never been out of work for more than 4 months at a stretch especially now that I've moved over to networking and process automation. I have yet to see a qualified network technician stay out of work for very long. the market is there, stop trying to skate your way in @ $50,000 a year coding web pages. get your asses in the trench and do it like the rest of us did. work your way up. a couple years of hard work won't kill ya, and it always pays off in the end. there is an IT market out there and plenty of jobs but without experience you might as well compare it to an etheopian child looking at pictures of a royal feast, i.e. you ain't ever gonna get it.
  • Re:Sad (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:11PM (#8201958)
    Why not just let the market figure out teaching value instead of imploring people to value a certain job a certain way. If something is worthwhile, then it will be valued. It may sound cold... but thats the way things work best :(
  • Re:Sad (Score:2, Insightful)

    by grammaticaster ( 657410 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:13PM (#8201972)
    It's true -- many mediocre teachers do "slip through the cracks" for years and years. That's one of the real problems with the public education system; excellent teachers are rarely rewarded and teachers who merely manage not to offend anybody really can keep their jobs forever.

    I'm not anti-union, but I would bet that there are more bad public teachers in the places where the unions are strongest, and I know NY has a very strong union.

    Overall, though, working for a public school is like any state job -- the pay sucks, and you have to deal with tons of dead weight and paperwork.
  • Labor Unions (Score:3, Insightful)

    by donutello ( 88309 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:24PM (#8202128) Homepage
    You can thank the teachers unions who make sure that starting teachers get paid squat while teachers who've been there a while, regardless of performance, make well above the industry median for someone with their education and experience - at least that's true in the state of Washington. Your state may vary.

    If starting teachers salaries went up, the teachers wouldn't have anything to back up those extra taxes they keep asking for.
  • by A Bugg ( 115871 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:25PM (#8202136)
    Liar, liar, pants on fire. I go to Wash U and the school is a god awful money pit, and the professors just aren't that great(they are smart yes, but many are lazy as shit). I will be shit struck surprised if I get a great job coming out of here.

    I am a senior ME major HOPING to get 40-45k as a starting salary. I figure set my sights low and anything above that I get will be gravy.

    And you do sound like one of the drone admissions people that work here, I can't fathom why they get paid a salary from my tuition money to bullshit all day.
  • by strike2867 ( 658030 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:34PM (#8202263)
    Its an average not a minimum wage. Its only 48k because some are paying 35k and some are paying 60k. If everyone was only accepting 48k as starting, the average would be higher, since ofcourse some people deserve more.
  • by macsuibhne ( 307779 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:41PM (#8202335)
    Your post betrays a poor understanding of psychology, game theory and human nature. In a trade where your productivity is a direct function of the number of hours on the job, such as flipping burgers and slinging lattes, it's approximately true, expecially as you can at least hope to make some of it up in tips for having a good attitude. In a trade where productivity varies wildly, such as computer programming, and is a direct function of ability and motivation, it's vital to keep people motivated. Which is why good employers tend to pay 20% over the going rate, and issue share options. 20% is a small price to pay for 50% extra productivity.

    Tony.
  • Uhhh, dude (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @12:43PM (#8202357)
    Averages are just that, the average, not the minimum. Also, the min and max vary a whole lot when you take a national average. Why? Because cost of living varies a whole lot. There are plenty of places where 35k is fine. I live in one of them, Tucson Arizona. On 35k you could easily afford to own a 1500+ square foot house, a deceant car, and have enough left over for some goodies.

    Now of course in the bay area, 35k is practally poverty, you'd be sharing an apartment, maybe even a room, with someone just to make ends meet. So, all things being equal, the same job will pay more there.

    Basic economics dude.
  • by ncc74656 ( 45571 ) * <scott@alfter.us> on Friday February 06, 2004 @01:09PM (#8202677) Homepage Journal
    "Good point. I recommend not going to college so you don't have to pay for food and rent."

    You see, if I'm not at school I can get a thing called a "JOB".

    I had a job while I was finishing my degree. At times, I even had two jobs (one full-time, one part-time). It might mean you only have time for one or two courses per semester, but it is doable. (Even a job that takes you out of town occasionally doesn't have to be an impediment...there was a discrete-math course where I ended up faxing in most of my homework for a month or two, and I still managed to get an A.)

  • by meta-monkey ( 321000 ) * on Friday February 06, 2004 @01:39PM (#8203021) Journal
    Your post is spot on. I, too, got out of the tech industry and opened my own business (I'm a photographer). Best decision I ever made. I'm my own boss, make my own hours, and make more money than I could have with my engineering degrees.

    The response to your post has been truly sad, but very typical for Slashdot. Essentially, you told people, "well, if you're having this problem, here's a solution that works very well!" But your (our) solution is hard, and scary, and not what people want to hear at all, so they attack and insult you.

    This topic comes up about once a week on Slashdot. Outsourcing, lack of jobs, low pay, soulless corporate masters, etc. Every time, somewhere in the discussion is a post from someone who says, "yes, I noticed this problem, too, so I opened my own business, and now things are great!" and immediately the geeks go on the defensive, citing hundreds of excuses why they have absolutely no other option in life but to sit around waiting for SOMEBODY ELSE to provide them with the means to make a living. It's very sad. They seem to take this advice to be some kind of personal insult. Perhaps they feel it exposes the failings in their own lives, and they would rather spit vile back at you than look inward, and reevaluate the choices they have made in their own lives.

    I also find it so interesting how it juxtaposes with the typical Slashdot libertarian bent. There are dozens of people with the "people who trade liberty for security deserve neither" quote in their sigs, or who smugly insist that every business has to "adapt or die!" followed by analogies about the buggy-whip manufacturing industry. However, when it's time to apply those same principles to their own lives, they expect someone else to take care of them. "A company has to give me a job!" "The government has to make these companies give me a job!" They refuse to understand that their own "business model" of

    1. Get CS degree
    2. Get job in tech industry
    3. Profit!

    no longer applies. However, "adapt or die!" is only good for the RIAA, not for themselves.

    Yes, there are a hundred reasons why going into business for yourself is hard. Yes sometimes you have to work 100 hours a week. Yes you have to pay for your own health insurance. Yes, you may have to retrain in another field. No, you might not be a fantastic salesman right now, never having really tried it or had any sales training in your entire life. No you don't get two weeks paid vacation. No, you don't get a paycheck for the exact same amount every two weeks. Yes, it is harder when you already have kids and a mortgage. Working for yourself is hard, and anybody who says otherwise is a filthy liar. But so is anybody who says it's impossible.
  • by unother ( 712929 ) <myself@kreiRASPg.me minus berry> on Friday February 06, 2004 @01:53PM (#8203236) Homepage

    "Programming is easy! Programming is easy!"

    If I had a dollar for every time I've heard that from someone who then proceeds to create the most atrocious mass of spaghetti-code...

    Here's an article [apa.org] for you. You may want to remember that there's a large degree of difference between mere competence and mastery.

  • by Dasein ( 6110 ) * <tedc@codebig. c o m> on Friday February 06, 2004 @02:35PM (#8203816) Homepage Journal
    So lets look at this from a logic point of view. I'm going to try to validate your argument through use of formal logic. As a refresher, an argument is valid when, if all the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

    So let's translate the first premise:

    To think if I only made $53k out of college, I'd be taking a 50% paycut. (O, P)

    That's:
    O > P (this notation means if O then P)

    Now the conclusion:

    Good thing I didn't waste my time and energy on a useless college education. (W, C)

    C > W Conclusion (If I go to college, I was time)

    Now, there's an implied premise: If I went to college, I'd be making straight out of school money. (C, O)

    C > 0

    Okay, now let's look at the truth table:

    O P W C O > P C > O C > W
    1) F F F F
    2) F F F T F F
    3) F F T F
    4) F F T T
    5) F T F F
    6) F T F T F F
    7) F T T F
    8) F T T T
    9) T F F F
    10) T F F T F T F
    11) T F T F
    12) T F T T
    13) T T F F
    14) T T F T T T F
    15) T T T F
    16) T T T T

    Oops! It appears that line 14 has a false conclusion but has all true premises. This means the logic is invalid. Roughly translated, this say that you can go to college, make out of school money, *AND* have it not be a waste. Gee, who would have thunk it.

    Now, if you had added the premise that the only reason to go to school is not make more money then you'd have a technically valid argument. However, I would you and I would still disagree that the only reason to go to school is to make more money. In other words, having a valid argument doesn't mean the premises are true, just that the line of reasoning beginning with the premises is good.

    Now, I might suggest that going to school might help you either articulate your arguments better or realize that money is not the only reason why you'd want to learn. Maybe that's a set of life-skills that would be useful for you.
  • by WheatWilton ( 663942 ) on Friday February 06, 2004 @02:35PM (#8203821)
    Don't listen to this moron.

    HR departments are filled with idiots, sleazeballs, and the vile progeny of high ranking executives who are too incompetent to hold real positions, but can't be fired for political or financial reasons. So what do you do with them? Put them in the place where they can do the least amount of damage to the organization... HR!

    And, as an aside, suggesting that WU students are better than those from CMU, Caltech, MIT, Stanford or ANY of the Ivy League schools is complete and utter bullshit. Grads from these school dominate the high-powered executive positions. These are the facts of the case, and they are indisputable.

  • by meta-monkey ( 321000 ) * on Saturday February 07, 2004 @10:17AM (#8211249) Journal
    You seem to "get it," at least partly. You understand that, through no fault of your own, the job market for your coding skills is quickly vanishing. Tech jobs are being outsourced. Companies are not paying coders and engineers near what they paid before. There is a glut of people with such skills on the market. That part you "get."

    Yet, you still cling to the hope that "bean counters" (as you casually relegate them to a status beneath your exalted place in life, as a techie) will wake up, realize how horribly wrong they were and give you a great job with fantastic benefits and high pay. Because you're soooooo good, and sooooo much better than Indian coders are now, or will be soon. Don't hold your breath.

    I think your problem is arrogance. You want the world to adapt to your way of thinking. You want that great job, the benefits, job security, high pay, respect, etc. You see the world as a place where you deserve all of those things; you are entitled to them. The economy revolves around you, and your job. I love this quote:

    BTW, nobody's going to pay you to take their picture because nobody's going to have a job

    It's tech jobs getting exported. Not doctors, not lawyers, not auto mechanics, not office managers, not landscape architects and restaurateurs. You equate "techies aren't going to have jobs" with "nobody's going to have a job." Again, notice the arrogance. "The economy revolves around tech jobs. If I don't have a job, then nobody has a job!"

    Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been hired by an engineer in the first place. Techies generally don't value art much to begin with, and certainly don't want to pay for it. Somehow, I think the doctors and lawyers and small business owners and all the non-techies in my community will still hire me.

    The world is changed. I suggest you change with it.

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...